Spinning Levers - How A Transmission Works (1936) 

@Jhon Krasnovskiy good point

Different times too. But you couldn't always rely on someone fixing a problem. Home repair books from the same era were similar, complex items or repairs broken down into simple to understand process. My kids help around the farm and struggled with the stuff they drone out now, but if I give them old farming material from the 1920s to 1940s they get it.

@@elilla331 Whoah! That's very interesting. Goes to show that nothing beats simplicity of explanation.

These guys should have made modern DIY car repairs videos

That's because they only have 3 fukin gears Now we have 6 and its harder to explain as the engines are wayyy more complex

Nah buddy, it’s just you.

Well it should be, the science has made many advancements over the years

@@imperialguardsman135 The principle doesn't change. It just modern education system and style are shit.

Anybody know how a "flappy pedal gearbox shifter" works ? I driven a few cars with these new gearboxes.

This is more close to an advertisement

you feeling stupid is a choice of your own

Then you wouldn't need to wait a month and pay 3 grand for one of their technicians to change a fuse

YES IK WYM BUT COMPANIES ARE MONEY HUNGRY SO THEY HAVE TO MAKE THERE PRODUCT OVERLY COMPLICATED SO SMALL BUSINESS CANT REPRODUCE IT AT A CHEAPER PRICE

@@AntiKiwieCS I feel your a waist of oxygen

They won't because then you could figure out how to fix them and not pay them absurd amounts of money for a new product because capitalism

We deserve more moments like this, where you realise how something works. This feel better than sex

This literally blew my mind. And the quarter of the distance, but more force lever? BOOM

@AlexanderChristopher-qg4kl no thanks, i better belive in myself

Same

did you understand anything else

At least in Spain, while studying to be a qualified mechanic, you have to dismantle and put together manual transmisions and carburators, and make sure they work after the process. I hope that knowledge is not forgotten.

Most people understand manuals when you explain it. Autos though? Forget it

manual is easy boomer

@@dracofenix3860 La hostia, ahora quiero dejar la informática y ser mecánico xD.

@@aleaallee pues mira, yo siempre odié la informática. Y en los coches de hoy en día... Quizás puedas trabajar de mecánico sabiendo solo informática.

YOU ARE SO RIGHT ! I watched like 5 videos about gearbox bc from today ,but i found this and i understand now !

These educational videos are a lost artform, clear, detailed and concise BUT easy to understand. Old workshop manuals are the same too, manual writing is another lost art.

i found a video on how the semi auto and auto mechanisms on guns work and they like build it from the ground up in a way a normal person would be able to figure out

ye im dumb as fuck but this makes it easy to understand even then

I think it's because companies now are trying to engage with kids but back then Kids had to engage with companies

let me start you off with a set of Lincoln Logs . > Then maybe a set of leggo's > or packet of seeds , some dirt and some water >>

It's a cinch by the inch, but hard by the yard ... ;)

Exactly this.

you dont learn alot, you learn everything that was presented.

That’s what Feynman said about Quantum Physics; “…. but it is NOT complicated - there’s just a lot of it.”

@@jasonbender2459 Finding one explanation more clear than another has nothing to do with ability to understand things in general. You'd know that if you weren't a simpleton.

@@jasonbender2459 Yea okay, Megamind. Ever heard learning to walk before you run? They’re easier to understand because this video explains the whole process step by step. Whereas other videos start off with the assumption that you have a basic understanding of mechanical and engineering concepts.

@@jasonbender2459 Besides.. If it was so easy for you to comprehend such advanced concepts, then why can’t you comprehend the basic concept of sentence structure?

@@jasonbender2459 man, do you realize, that this shows how gearbox works? Not shifting. It shows why you can change gears and what exactly changes in the gearbox. Plus, if you watched carefully, you could've seen that they showed changing gears without clutch... Stop trying to insult everyone, when you're dumb too. 🙃

@@jasonbender2459 but the video isn’t about flywheels, clutch pads, clutch joints, universal joints, ect. It’s about the basic inner workings of a transmission and the principles it uses. Also keep in mind this was recorded around the 1930s, transmissions will have changed a lot since then. Yet the video still does an excellent job explaining how it works 90 years later. (Also for the record, it DID talk about the reverse gear)

So true

In other words, ground-up explanations

This is what I've always done. Also, understand what each part does, so you can have the bigger picture.

Yeah like finite elements method

Exactly

me neither! crazy, right?

Not a new thing...but it is interesting

Yeah my mind is blown and I feel boosted by 1936 knowledge which makes me feel kinda dumb but is hella cool to me too. Like a concept I’ve struggled with I now understand from a 1936 lesson with 1936 technology and now I know how their shit worked. Pretty nice for being lit at 1am lmao 😂

Not really infinite. They’re bound to wear and break at some point

I study engineering for 5 years now and nobody ever told me this explanation about levers :D

Because it's a good design that stands the test of time. Same reason why the US Military still uses the M2 .50 machine gun despite the design being nearly 100 years old.

Just refinement, material, helical cut gears and more gears.

don't fix it if it ain't broken.

nowadays there are synchros introduced

@@marguskiis7711 wasn’t that what the cork and bottle thing was about?

Yes but sadly his videos stopped a while ago...

Bill Hammack wasn't even born for another 25 years when this video was made.

I love his videos. His passion comes through on every video.

I had him as a professor and he was a solid instructor. Used some funny analogies to help us understand more abstract concepts

Its just the olden days

No, but they all had the same microphone which favored guys with this voice. So basically every narrator sounds the same.

The standards of qualification to be a narrator for films and television back then was the same as radio presenter which was clear and articulate voice delivery with certain mannerism and styles which was accustomed with radio listeners. That's why people was horrified with sheer terror when Orson Welles published "War of the World" on air as the quality of the broadcast was similar except of course for the few which listened from the start where they told about the fictional parts...

well also they wanted a radio voice or tv voice. the fake accent known as trans atlantic english

Randy Robinson Was just about to bring up the Transatlantic voice. Happy to see you already did and someone else knows their s***.

It was all one person lol

I can’t imagine how they did it. Animation through drawing? It looks too perfect!

I wish corridor crew can spot this and give us their opinion.

It's a stop motion technique @@Kelson01

I was thinking a similar thing. I’m not an animator so maybe it’s obvious but that really stood out to me because I’m curious how they had managed to do that

​@@Kelson01stop motion animation through series of Photographs is way older methods than this movie release date

I wanted to upvote, but downvoted instead to keep this beauty at 666 likes. This is just to inform everyone that the downvote is really just an upvote on the Left Hand path. Edit: Nevermind, upvoted. Nobody else respected the 666.

What is the beauty of 666?

Could you please explain how it’s being applied? I didn’t fully understand it.

@@tto4646 So the "cork" makes contact, and frictional forces carry over the rotational movement, which allows the two components to reach the same speed before physically engaging/mating them.

@@ZandrichMynhardt the reason it's confusing is because they only showed the actual synchronizer in a gearbox rather than showing a visible demonstration of the actual mechanism. so he can understand how the cork works but can't see how the synchronizer is analogous because it's not even visible in their demonstration. the properties and shape of the synchronizer are unclear in the video so you can't really see how it would operate similarly to a cork. the rest of the video is great but they really just glossed over this detail imo

The culture was way more certain of its self back then. They didn’t need to dance around issues and sell this new scientific morality.

@@commissary4196 what the fuck does these even mean?

@@commissary4196 Please give me the name of whoever sold you what you're on, I want it!

@@chrismcpherson7582 this*

@@jasonbender2459 Proof read what you wrote. Your grammar is all over the shop. Take the first paragraph for instance. That being said I get the gist of what you are saying. You are definitely wrong. Transmissions are complex things, they’ve really just put a basic or stupid model (as you so eloquently put it) so you can grasp the idea. Same thing could be done with any technology we have now. Stop being petty.

Yep

yeah.. crazy

yup. a (larger) wheel/gear driven by a smaller one is a (continuous) rotary Lever !!! the larger the radius of the driven wheel THE BETTER. because the result is MA that is Inherent, in a 'larger-radius' wheel. MA is mechanical advantage; lever arm. (these are some of the reasons why the radii of wind turbine rotors Never get smaller.) it can be SEEN that it is Simple/easy to convert reduction-MA to Inherent MA. this is the WELL-understood principle of converting 'high rotation rate to torque'. thanks to some ancient dude, humans have developed a GIANT blindspot, regarding the existence of a transient/intermediate, potential energy GAIN in the transform. if interested, see my research. cheers googletranslate

I studied automotive engineering and only just really thought of them that way.

Same i never looked at it from this perspective

There is only one thing better than this .. being able to play with such models yourself. I'm an electronics engineer and even today, over 10 years after getting my first degree in it, I always understand new concepts best if I try them out. Especially if I apply them to a real-world problem, even if I had to make one up by myself. But I have to physically do it. I still know a lab engineer from my former university, and he always sees students struggling with things like heterodyne mixing .. until he shows it to them at the lab equipment or his ham radio stuff. Then it clicks into gear ;)

Depends though. When the mechanisms get complex an animation gets much better since you can make parts partially transparent, to focus on an important part without losing the big picture.

you can also 3D print alot of stuff nowadays

@@VintageTechFan But why do you Hoard Nitro Engines, bro?

@@SLUGTHUG I know thats basically a joke about my user/channel name, but I will explain anyway: I just like them, and they are getting rarer and rarer since almost everyone is moving to electric. There are only a few manufactures left out of the dozens there once where. "Large" scale I can only think of OS and Saito being left, both of them continually reducing their "nitro" portfolio and moving to petrol engines. Enya and Laser are still doing limited production runs for enthusiasts. Also there is Yamada with the high performance four-strokes. The whole complex of Magnum, ASP, SC and all the manufactures "house brands", which were all made by Sanye in China, is gone. But it's nowhere near the volume they once where, and I like them. So I grab them as long as I still can. The old ones from the 70s-90s tend to be of better manufacturing quality, too.

and at the same time realize how much shittier all content has gotten in the last 80 years

Thank goodness we can still refer to the old vids. Free of all the useless bullshit

I’m sure many people saw it then as well. It was a big company

Yeah they're boomers

No, because people also had telrviond back than and this was like a documentary, big chance millions already saw it

It made me rethink of life tbh.

aynısını düşündüm izlerken...

This is so critical, but today people will just say "transmissions work because of gear ratios." Ok, but what are gear ratios? Why is it easier for a smaller gear to spin a larger gear with more force (but slower) and harder for a larger gear to spin a smaller gear (but faster)? Because of leverage. Of course, nobody actually knows what leverage really is, but this is much closer to an actual explanation of how gears work than today's.

Clear as water!!?!! 👌🏿😎

It's the simple things

Ahead of their times? ya cuz we're all geniuses now.

Actually the things are quite complicated in engineering so they can't be understood if you don't have some basic knowledge beforehand but almost everyone is familiar how car works so it's easy for them to know what's going on in these videos.

I think it's just that these things are so normal and part of our lives now that almost all of us take them for granted and don't think about how they work

lol no? Even Archimedes had this stuff figured out.

No they weren't, gears like this are thousands of years old. The ancient greeks made complex gears out of hand filed brass, it's just maths

I know right

Maybe it’s because every aspect of the communication is foreign to a modern viewer and so it’s strange enough to keep your attention.

@@davidswanson5669 I understand the words used in this video better than I can of the slang throwing retards of today's world.

@@NSAhitLIST yeah I guess these days there’s so many inventions that are based on inventions, and science that’s based on earlier science, that there’s too many vocab words to have to know, or look up, that it’s becoming harder to keep up with every little intricate detail.

@@davidswanson5669 I so totally agree...

@@phantomcorsair8476 yea no

@@phantomcorsair8476 Sammy Hagar and I hate you for that last comment. 😂😂😂

@@phantomcorsair8476 I would never ever be an advocate for going that much over the speed limit. That is truly unsafe and reckless. However driving 20 UNDER is almost as unsafe. How can you say it's fine to max out at 55 in a 75 zone?? You're going to cause accidents and start road rage incidents doing that. If 55 is the top of your comfort zone then it's time to get off the road geezer.

@@phantomcorsair8476 you're 19 but you talk like you're 82. If your night vision is bad and you have to drive 55 then I can empathize. Otherwise please stay off the expressways and stick to surface roads, and if you must use them, stay in the right lane.

And no seat-belts in the cars back then. And the cars were twice as heavy also. All iron and steel.

Education in general, needs a COMPLETE overhaul!! :(

that's why most students would say, where the hell would I use that? because they cant visualize things anymore

sam sam hell yeah!

No - nonsense. It's the best way

yes indeed!

@@jasonbender2459 I'm a simpleton, which is why I vote democrat!

cost i think

It's because back then they wanted to teach how things worked. Nowadays how things work is a closely guarded corporate secret and all they want to teach is how to fire the parts cannon.

I guess also the mediocre old explanations aren't nearly as viewed

I think the modern stickshift is more komplex

@@natchocrazy891 They havent changed significantly for 80 or 90 years now.

Fun fact: all the smart people in the video also had to study and pass exams back in the day

one video in 1936 and you driving generalization about education in 2019, cool

Ranjith Kumar 2020: understanding the beauty of engineering. Laugh at indians that only study to pass some lame exam, for an even lamer certification from a institution that trades paper for tens and hundreds of thousands of dollars

fuck off

ya dude, i just realized im dumb as fuck

Chervtolet sounds like Chevrolet's estranged Ukrainian brother hahah

@@tarcisofilho4878 lmaoo

Lmao

Hahaha, for some reason having them explain it like that struck me as a major revelation.

@@tarcisofilho4878 Cherv is actually russian word meaning worm. Tolet kinda remins me toilet, so you're right

I not dumb dumb.🙄

Old are the best😊

Vazvaz voova, santa's got to make it to town

Seriously. These are so much more straightforward and easy to understand than old ones. And the voice and the pace makes it easy to watch. I already know how transmissions work. I just watched this for the images and the slow lamens explanation. Screw rainforest sounds, this would lull me to sleep in the best way haha

This was doe to educate dumb dumbs, so it has to be as simple as possible.

or Russia lol

This is awesome

hahahhaha

Nice

Even Jean-Michel Jarre recorded "Revolutions"! 😄

Man you learn every day even after years, that's the good side of life.

Dr Deuteron and that’s why you’re not an English professor

@Dr Deuteron Hi Doc, When I was in my undergrad Engineering College days, a few of us in one of the computer labs "got our hands on" the incoming freshmen combined Math/Reading SAT scores and we sorted them by declared major (not relevant to this comment but Journalism majors had the lowest score followed closely by Education majors) and the highest avg. score were Engineering majors, with Physics majors almost in a statistical dead heat but we did edge them (a Ph.D. Aerospace Engineer who works for a large American defense contractor's Missile Systems company and I think this video is one of the best lever/gear graphical explanations I have ever seen).

@Dr Deuteron Hi Doc, When I was in my undergrad Engineering College days, a few of us in one of the computer labs "got our hands on" the incoming freshmen combined Math/Reading SAT scores and we sorted them by declared major (not relevant to this comment but Journalism majors had the lowest score followed closely by Education majors) and the highest avg. score were Engineering majors, with Physics majors almost in a statistical dead heat but we did edge them (a Ph.D. Aerospace Engineer who works for a large American defense contractor's Missile Systems company and I think this video is one of the best lever/gear graphical explanations I have ever seen).

@RaddishBuddy, haha, me too.

And also, METAL GEAR RISING

As they said, seeing is believing

If the 3d animation is good enough to make you think its real , or if its executed good enough it will be good. But most people cant make good animations

Never underestimate the impact of 3D animation. There's just something better about 3d animation over a physical demonstration

@@rodriguepellaud No, most 3d animation these days is complete shit.

So true

not even close. youtube was full of tiktokers, this video was originally transmited in a facebook live as a response to the iphone X pro.

@@RobertSanz1 woooosh

@@RobertSanz1 r/Woooosh

@@RobertSanz1 r/woooosh

@@RobertSanz1 r/woooosh

Back when we recognized the value of knowledge.

No body ever told you to learn things from youtubers you went alone and clicked it no body forced you or told you that youtubers explain better

Way better than that annoying guy from engineering explained

Well youtubers didnt get funded specificly to explain this . This shorts were funded by hollywood to educate the people back when the technology race became a thing ..

Thank the cold war for that, military spending really dumbs us down when it gets that excessive. People speak and wrote much more intelligently back then.

conyo985 I saw a video about a camera from the 40s that could record 2 million frames per second and could like film atoms or something idk. I guess even then everything could be made with enough funds.

Between 1936 and 1990, the method of editing films changed very little. Then in the early 90s a video copy could be used to edit, but the negative still needed to be cut by hand. It is only in the last decade that digital cinema projection has been introduced and the whole editing process is carried out on video.

The Citizen Kane of how-it-works videos

stop shaming fat people. im not delusional

Most alien technology were discovered even before that time. People in the 30's make it appear they were low key and started experimenting on those technologies. Life was pretty advanced at that time.

Now consider that a screw thread is a continuous wedge.

As long as it’s made of a strong material

I had a car that had an Aisin six-speed manual box. It was a mazda Rx-8. Between the turbine-smooth engine and that glorious gearbox, one gets the impression the engine is a giant lever. It's the weirdest thing to explain, but yes. It feels like a lever. No other car does that for me. I miss it. 3rd gear went on all day, to almost 100 at 8500 rpm.

@@wakkowarner4288 Ah, the Wankel engine (that's funnier if one is British).

I was explaining gears and levers to someone who was studying engineering, but he didn't know about either, so I asked him what he was currently studying, as I thought that gears and levers would be a very basic part of what he should be covering, his answer? Project management!

**I am human intensifies** (Dr stone)

@@axellmorren347 you just posted cringe

Apparently screws are infinite wedges. Simple machines are interesting that way.

They already had animation that good back then. Disney released Snow White just a year later.

Hand drawn? You delusion, or a kid? People died 800 years ago more talented than you'll ever be. The perception lol

Cell animation rocks. Now they would have some cheezy CG cartoon with a celebrity voice. I'm wiping away a small tear as I type.

@@turdle2767 what?

@@mendonesiac frozen didnt spend half its budget on simulatimg snow for this

All the ones that can give good presentations will be dead. And I wasn’t paying attention in speech class.

We are living in a capitalized world even the information is capitalized and hold by a small fraction of people and they dont want to give it up easly

@@spookyaction In today's day and age information is as widespread and accessible as ever, given that you are in a country that doesn't restrict internet access.

From your mature voice and the amount of hair on your arms in your videos you certainly don't seem 9.

@@josephpress. in todays day everybody can work hard and be rich right it is an open economy after all.. Or is it an illusion? Look at the equations of quantum theory you need to spend a big fraction of your life to understand them is it that complex? I dont think so some math books look more like encrypted information inventing tons of redundant notation

Yeah I was wondering how they did them without any software

@@emilio.m.c3713 if this was filmed on movie rolls, maybe those arrows were physically added to the rolls, but I'm not sure

@@GabrielFranco the same way like they put together Cartoon film sheets into roll film. Just like Walt Disney studios that existed at the same era. And honestly drawing those arrows aren't as much Labor as drawing short episode of Cartoon which airing on the same era.

@@emilio.m.c3713 They were hand drawn on what amounts to a transparency overlay then run overlaid on the negatives during production of the finished film reel. That's how you get white arrows from black ink animation.

Well this was already filmed on film and these arrows were painted by hand onto the film later nothing special back then too but took a bit more work

And if you think about it, all tools come down to either a lever or an inclined plane. Screwdriver? Combination of the two. Razorblade? Inclined plane. Wrench? Lever. Hammer? Lever. Chisel? Inclined plane designed to work with a lever. It blew my mind too. I'd never thought of it that way. It's amazing what watching PBS on a random Tuesday afternoon could teach you back in the 80s.

You are right, neither did I...

@I HATE CHEESE I'm happy for you

@Saweng Would you like to explain why, or are you just being contrary?

Because its simple, now they come up with all that vocabulary BS, basically, you have to find how you like to learn things, me personally, I prefer the dummy way, then bring vocab after I get how it works, for example, this thingy works with this thing to make this other one spin, not some stupid shit like this first gear is giving an input of 3:1 gear ratio to this other gear, so this other gear outputs a greater total speed, but that's just me some people like to read a book on how it works, others like to see an example and see it work, so just figure out how you like to learn and either look for videos like that or some how translate it to your "language"

Well, to be honest, modern transmissions are far more complicated and it's difficult to follow the flow of power. I actually always find it easier to start with the earliest prototypes of machinery and follow the progression of improvement over time. We're in a good position to understand CVTs right now because they are still relatively simple. We have only gone from opposing cones to the current squeezing pulleys, so there's not much to them just yet. They will get more and more complicated over time, and those of us keeping up with the current design changes will be able to understand them much more thoroughly.

I could picture scotty kilmer saying that. I even read it in his voice

New manual transmissions are FAR better than this one. Cars back then were extremely lucky to hold together for 100k miles. Now even the cheapest economy cars can be expected to last 2 even 3 times as long...and with a lot less maintenance and repair.

@@RealityIsTheNow it's getting harder and harder to find a manual in a new car these days. Unless you're buying a sport vehicle, but the CVTs make shifting unnecessary (as long as they aren't crappy)

Well to be fair, today's shifters, clutches, and gearsets are WAY more complex than the ones shown in this video. And this video does not mention how a modern clutch works. When you push the clutch pedal in, you are entirely disconnecting the engine from the transmission, re-aligning the gears (shifting) and then re-connecting the engine with the transmission. This isn't how shifting works in the transmissions featured in this video, because the engines at the time didn't run at 3, 4, 5k+ RPM like today's engines do.

@@Dhalin Doesnt change the basic Idea of a manual transmition however. This 83 yo Clip already explained how synchromesh works. Wich is more then enough basic knowledge.

Well back then cars had 3 Speeds and a Reverse

This

@@Dhalin nope, basic idea remains the same this should be shown at tech schools at the beggining later all the newer stuff

Kyle Banks 1- BWA-HAHAHAHA!!! : ) 2- Your mom can drive a stick shift? Cool!!!

How do you know I haven't driven with your mom?

@@davidcrocker1878 Because you're still alive.

😂 People will find a way to do anything honestly

@@erikarneberg11 bruh , r u like 7 . My dad can drive stick - shift=ft

kind of a safe assumption

"Educated" doesn't necessarily mean intelligent nowadays, but too many people still believe it does.

I couldn't agree more. I had to stop watching physics videos because they kept using analogies that dumbed it down to the point that it defeated the entire point of it. I can't learn like that.

it is a bit old-hat and conceited imo but it could be worse

Your comparison really makes no sense, and I have no idea what you're saying about the video? Lol! A human explaining something to another human does not specify their intelligence levels, nor their level of education. In addition: an educated person talking to a person or group of people who are not as intelligent would have to dumb things down (so a video on this subject would have to be even easier to understand). Anyway, about your message: So you're saying this video is hard to follow and only for intelligent or educated people? Further implying that videos back then were more for average or high IQ people? The video seems really simple and easy to follow to me. A lot of people in the comment section seem to think it's very easy to understand compared to videos nowadays. ... I think you meant: 1930's: A simple and easy to follow video. Today: A needlessly complicated video on a simple subject that few understand.

I'm sure if the folks that arranged the demonstration were still around, they would be very pleased to hear your feedback lol

Yeah it annoys me how short peoples attention spans are these days. They will only be interested in things they can understand in 5 minutes or less

@Sebastian P That's the joke

ironic

​@Sebastian P i mean like nobody thought about this whole youtube stuff (liek and subscribe) 1936 in a damn how to vid ^^

A good youtube channel doesnt need to say that. Btw old videos used to be “rated”

It could have been so funny to have someone imitating that voice and saying that at the end.

I know! I paused it as I couldn't believe it wasn't CGI - fantastic editing

I'm so used to CGI, I didn't even blink at this effect, but your comment highlighted just how well done this was with practical editing in *1936*.

He perfectly saved rotating

I have rarely seen it so well executed

Its *_real gears not actors_*

I agree with this....sometimes I wonder if its all by design...

​@@kdee2882 hello sweetheart 💕 🏹 × ❤

Those old can openers left a scary state tho

I hope to preserve one of these cars in my own driveway come springtime. They regularly show up for about 20-30 k in my area. Ideally I'll get myself a Ford; I plan on daily driving the thing and the Flathead V8 can withstand having the everloving FUCK beat out of it like no other engine around. You can have those things screaming along at 3800RPM 24/7/365 for several decades before they give out. And they sound really nice besides.

first automatics (like powerglide) only had two speeds and it works just fine for the time. If you have enough torque, you dont need as many gears really.

And the way of speaking. And the cars. And the outfits. I love the driving gloves that woman is wearing.

@@AudreysKitchen Part of why this spring I am buying a car of this era to daily and am doing no more modification than absolutely necessary.

The videos is very safe

fuucking true iam student of technical engineering aswell and the way we are are studing is wrong on many levels...it seems like nowadays teachers (school system) think we know everything already and we are all 160 IQ geniuses ...

and iam not even talking about books and other study sources which are made for Einstein... everything is so hard to understand

You're absolutely right teaching sucks now.

Okay, first off, you must not be attending any legitimate engineering courses. Why? Because engineering, math and science are the only subjects where a professor cannot just BS his way through the entire class. Most engineering students are able to grasp complex concepts with ease and if you can't, I suggest you choose another major. And by the way, young kids have it way too easy these days. You have every single tutorial you could ever need at your fingertips. All of the answers you seek are online and easy to find. If you think you have it hard now, just imagine what we had to go through - using a type-writer instead of a laptop and not having the internet as a research tool. So, if you're still having a hard time understanding an engineering course, it's your fault...not the professor's. He expects you to do some research before sitting in for the next lecture.

@@Simon-wr6hb Why are you complaining? College has gotten easier for the younger generation. You now have tools and devices that we would have loved to have back when we were banging on type-writers and spending entire nights trying to solve a problem because we couldn't just jump online to find all of the answers we needed in minutes. Ya'll have it waaaaayyyyy toooo eassssyyyy. Stop whining.

LMAO

One up ya 90 French Revolutions per second

that's a LOT of severed heads.

60 French revolutions per minute without causing a reign of terror😀😀😀

Those are rookie numbers

if know the name of the show than plz can u tell me