Тёмный

Schneider's fleet of Freightliner eCascadia electric trucks (orange you glad you found this video?) 

Mike the Car Geek
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 3,4 тыс.
50% 1

Schneider National operates a growing fleet of all-electric Freightliner eCascadia tractors. This video provides an overview of their facility and trucks. Visit the Run on Less website for more information.
#schneidertrucking #freightliner #ecascadia #ev #trucking
Run on Less website:
runonless.com/roled-profiles/...
0:00 Intro
0:47 Schneider's Depot
4:17 Freightliner eCascadia

Опубликовано:

 

5 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 11   
@ricecakeFTW
@ricecakeFTW 4 месяца назад
I use to work out of that yard for Schneider intermodal. That was a water treatment plant you observed next to the yard.
@4literv6
@4literv6 11 месяцев назад
Interesting and well done video, showing the way forward for commercial use evs. 👍🏻😎
@Mentaculus42
@Mentaculus42 6 месяцев назад
Interesting article about EV vs Fuel Cell trucks being used in California ports has this to say: “IMC, the largest company in the US hauling containers from ports to warehouses, has ordered 50 Nikola fuel-cell trucks for its operations in California, Arizona and Nevada, after disappointing results from two years of testing battery-electric vehicles. The firm had purchased six Class 8 battery-electric trucks from Volvo in September 2022, as well as installing charge points capable of serving a fleet of 30, but found them wanting. The main challenge with battery [electric vehicles] is that you get significantly lower productivity per truck vs other solutions and thus requiring more trucks for this application.” This is identical to what has been found with EV transit buses!
@theepichamster1443
@theepichamster1443 Год назад
Why do the horsepower ratings seem so low?
@mikethecargeek
@mikethecargeek Год назад
Freightliner Cascadia offers 5 different Diesel engines ranging from 370-600 hp, eCascadia operates 320-424 hp, but can electrically boost to 395-470hp. They do not quote Torque numbers, I can only guess that they get the job done for most situations.
@theepichamster1443
@theepichamster1443 Год назад
@@mikethecargeek Normally electric trucks can outperform diesels climbing hills. One of the advantages. I can’t imagine that would be true with these Hp numbers.
@Pernection
@Pernection 11 месяцев назад
Torque is more important.
@Tron-Jockey
@Tron-Jockey 11 месяцев назад
Keep in mind that the need to liquid cool the charging cables (for these particular power levels), is because Freightliner is using only 400V charging. 400V requires twice the amperage as an 800V system to charge with the same level of power. The more amperage the greater the power loss (as heat), due to cable resistance. Power loss (heat), can also be seen as a loss of charging efficiency (lower charging efficiency means more expensive charging). Even though the charging cable is cooler (the heat being dissipated by the liquid coolant), the power is still being lost as heat. It becomes increasingly more expensive to charge with a lower voltage system as the charging power increases. I'm surprised Freightliner hasn't moved to at least 800V. I expect 1000V to become the standard for all electric trucks within a few years.
@emoney822
@emoney822 2 месяца назад
2 or 5 years from now trucking will be more electric
@SalvaGer-bs4zw
@SalvaGer-bs4zw 10 месяцев назад
This is how electric trucks should work... in theory :) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9eYLtPSf7PY.html The range wouldn't be important as long as you have a "petrol station" to simply change the batteries. And the guys in the vid aim for a less than 60 seconds change! After all, it's the same principle from a flashlight: when the batteries are empty you replace them with a charged set. Why is it so hard to do that at a larger scale?
@ChrisDavis333
@ChrisDavis333 8 месяцев назад
There’s no real reason why these would be abnormally expensive and there’s no reason why they couldn’t have a ton of range. Just for example the Tesla Cybertruck(not semi) has a 250 kWh battery that weighs 3,100 pounds. So why on earth does this semi which will have infinitely more capacity than a civilian vehicle have the same size battery as a civilian vehicle? You wouldn’t. If anything you’d put 2 or 3 of them. They can haul 80,000 pounds and the engine they are replacing weighs 3,500 pounds. 3,500 pounds alone is 2 of Teslas largest production batteries out right now, I mean what are we taking about? Let’s pretend you double the capacity, 500 kWh. That’s an extra 3,000 pounds, I don’t see any reason you wouldn’t be able to do that, there’s going to be a general weigh savings throughout the truck, if they just swapped engine for 250kwh that should be a net LOSS of weight. I don’t get it. Seems half assed and weak, you want to make a shift? Make something that can do 8-10 hours of driving straight and charge while the driver sleeps. Nobody gives a shit about a semi with 150 mile range, hell that’s not even enough range for a local driver.
Далее
кажется, началось
00:45
Просмотров 1,9 млн
Я НЕ ОЖИДАЛ ЭТОГО!!! #Shorts #Глент
00:19
Survive 100 Days In Nuclear Bunker, Win $500,000
32:21
Volvo Trucks - VNR Electric Product Walkaround
13:42
Просмотров 44 тыс.
USPS Oshkosh NGDV Postal Van (Ugly by Design)
13:14
Просмотров 178 тыс.
The Problem With These Headlights
17:55
Просмотров 1 млн
Why Do Some Truck Tires Don't Touch The Ground?
6:31
кажется, началось
00:45
Просмотров 1,9 млн