Thanks for the review Tom. Already played this one ca. 30 times since its' release and we love it. We played the first one to death and find this one to be a nice change. Certainly more thinky. I'd also say that according to our stats, the attackers win less often
Is it just me or does the switch to 5 suites feel like a way to make sure I can’t play Schotten Totten 1 with the same game? Or would the removal of a suite lead to more tactics cards needing to be played?
Your brute honesty is such a breath of fresh air. After watching some playthroughs, I feel exactly the same as your review of Schotten Totten 2. Some of the other reviews I've read or watched of Schotten Totten 2 seem like they're squeezing hard to try to like it because they loved the original.
Yes yes and yes .... totally agree on everything you said .... it’s a classic for a reason ... playing around with such a streamlined game just doesn’t appeal to me ... I love the original and this looks convoluted for no good reason.
I agree with you, Tom. I like Schotten Totten because it’s fast, easy to play and teach, and elegant. This? Not so much. If I desired something different, different mechanics, I would try out another game altogether.
I want Shotten Totten reprinted. I love the Scottish theme compared to the Front Line Ancients or Knights theme. I want it to gift it to my niece since she married a Scot. So many people turned off by my Battle Line Ancients box and cards at first until they play it.
Let's take the example of the attacker attacking with a red 8 and 9. Can they not prove their success simply by pointing out that only the green 10 had already been played somewhere else? Because even if the defender could potentially match the attacker color run of red 8 and 9 with a green 9 and eight, the attacker would still win, because they were first to form a formation.
I still prefer my GMT Battle Line edition. I really don’t like Iello’s cutesy caricature art. While GMT’s artwork isn’t all that great either, the graphic design of GMT’s cards is far more functional. The colors are much more obvious at a glance, and the numbers are just more readable. Iello’s edition might be more color-blind friendly though, but those symbols under the numbers are very tiny.