We are comparing the lap times of Schumachers around the Hungaroring circuit to see who had the faster lap. Mick Schumacher - 2022 Haas Michael Schumacher 2004 Ferrari Subscribe! @formulaaddict
How about if the 2022 car was 250 ish kilos lighter, had traction control and engines that aren’t rev limited, forced onto one engine setting and were built to last one race instead of multiple.
Imagine if the 2004 cars weren't allowed to refuel and somehow needed to find a way of carrying 200kg/300L of fuel that it needed to finish a race. Imagine if the 2022 car were allowed to use as much fuel as the V10's. it would develop 1600hp with ease.
@@Anon24052 2022 cars are heavier because they are using batteries and are just bigger which also have more downforce with bigger wings and floors. Strip those away and it wont be faster than an f2
The German and Italian national anthems are forever ingrained in my mind because of Michael, Ferrari, and Valentino Rossi, even though I'm not from these countries.
@joro7304 same for me, that is so strange as I am Russian but all my childhood I was living from weekend to weekend just to watch racing. Shumi was a mythical hero walking among us for me that day
Another thing to add is that the F2004 had advanced traction control which would make the corner exits faster than any human could, especially low speed like turn 1. TC was banned after 2007. Lower weight also makes a big difference as stated.
@@drevinashcraft2485, it was banned from 1994 but they brought it back in the beginning of 2001. It was necessary to bring it back because TC was easy to hide in a software. I guess it was reasonable to avoid conspiracy theories and accusations.
I'd love to see the 2022 car use twice as much fuel as it's allowed to use. I'd love to see how much slower the 2004 car is if it had to carry nearly 200kg of the fuel needed to finish a race
Where Michael pics up speed with unorthodox lines is magic. Mick is following a classic speed line that would be considered ideal. Michaels using less of the track and picking up a lot of speed, very interesting.
0:25 says T2 "can be taken tighter due to lower weight" but it's probably more about T3 and the long straight, which you want to optimise for as it's overall better for lap time. Only cars with high enough downforce can go fast and deep through T2 (ending up rightward) and still take T3 flat, whereas lower downforce cars have to compromise T2 a little to go flat onto the straight from further on the left.
It was only a fully-matured elephant's pen!s-length ahead of one of the slowest cars of the current grid.. Pretty crazy. Yes, I know 2004 cars had grooved tires but it also had over 400lbs. less weight, much less drag, far greater visibility and much easier/forgiving to drive.
@@ballaking10002004 cars were not easier to drive, and the only reason it was that close is literally because of the tire technology gap in modern vs old
@@oblied 2004 cars were most certainly easier to drive. Sure, they bounced around slightly more around the same corners with less downforce/weight but it's those same attributes that make the car easier to save when the car disagree's with the load being placed on it. Also, what makes your argument completely moot is the fact that the 2004 cars had driver aids; traction control being one of them. To be fair, traction control does increase lap time, but since we're talking about the level of difficulty driving here, I mean.. Come on.. Then again, in your mind, the ONLY thing that LITERALLY matters is the tires.. Tires are extremely important and is what the whole car operates from is those small contact patches with the road, I know. But it's so far from true to think it's all that matters and I think you know this, you can't be that dumb. You were just trying to be more dramatic in place of anything with substance as a way to put weight in your comment..
@@ballaking1000 F2004 had more power was lighter and had a much more unhappy rev range, the car was also smaller making it more uncontrollable. thats why onboards of older cars are always more action packed because theres more required to control.
What's there to test? Grooved tyres were literally introduced to slow down cars. Of course they'll, uh, slow them down seeing as that's what they were there for.
Giving it slicks will at most be as fast as with their groove tires. The suspension is not meant to handle the Pirelli slicks of today, because Bridgestone specifically built those grooved tires to suit the F2004's chassis. While Pirelli specifically built theirs to suit the heavy & stressing, but fast HAAS. It really can't be a comparison.
You can literally see it in this video where Michael's car is lacking the mechanical grip in lower speed corners and accelerates later than the modern cars because of the lack of grip.
The electric side of the V6 gives recent cars a better acceleration but I'm pretty sure the F2004 V10 would annihilate it round Monza for exemple considering cars struggle to even reach 340/5kph with DRS open nowadays. And what I'd give to see the F2004 on slicks and going for push laps.....could definitely challenge or surpass the W11
Michael’s fastest lap in 2004 Hungary was 1.5 seconds faster than max this year. The qual laps in 2004 were done on race fuel and set up so not comparable to now. Also grooved Tyres too. That 2004 was lighting.
Its not the engine as the v10s were about 200 HP weaker than todays engines its the increased weight and aero which bogs the modern cars in straight lines, they can carry more speed in the corners but the old cars destroy them on the straights
@@Smzxe the official figures are 825hp and 865hp in qualy mode, now sure some manufacturers got their engines to upwards of 900hp, that is not the official regulation. Meanwhile other v10s only produced about 700 ish horse. The v6s with their hybrid system produce 1000hp. Im not defending the v6s and I do miss the v10s but the v6s perform better. Like i mentioned before, the cars back then were far lighter but had less grip
@@burgir9985 cry hard because V10s were much much faster on straights 370 km/h on Monza and 345 km/h on every straight of Monza No V6 Hybrid F1 car can keep up 2004 F1 car was faster than 2019 Ferrari on Monza straight also in acceleration V10 F1 car was much faster than 2019 Ferrari V6 Hybrids cannot even touch 350 km/h without slipstream V10 F1 cars were fastest F1 cars ever existed
A comparison around track with loads of high speed vorners would be interesting imo, I would guess modern cars produce more downforce which would come handy through high speed corners
Can't believe that Michael's son Mick got his seat taken he was gonna be future world champion and would be great as his dad I think he deserves a championship winning car and he would be a future driver for Ferrari and win championships like Michael and even match his records
@@bipolarminddroppingsmick in possibly the worst car on the grid against one of the best cars on the grid plus racing experience mick only done it for 2 years schumacher was doing it along time before 2004
Mick have different approach on his driving style... Maybe like more smooth and soft around corner. His dad more aggressive on mid corner and floor it on exist.
2004 cars held many records and were considered the fastest until 2020, so no surprise there. No DRS, no charging batteries and no slick and wider tyres too.
Just like Porsche developed the 919 Evo imagine the F2004 with slicks modern Aero principles applied to the chassis and aero along with the modern manufacturing and materials used to make the car more slippery, and lighter. That would be insane. If DAS and Active Suspension can be added without bulking lot's good weight you'd probably end up with a crazy car that'd rip up the record book
Would love to see a simulation, which equalizes the car differences. Not to replace this one, but in addition. I assume, that's not possible as driver and car must be considered as one when comparing them
Smaller and lighter is why they look so much more agile. There's a good video showing the evolution of F1 cars through the turn 13-14 chicane from 2002 to 2021. As the cars evolved they looked less agile as they slowly grew in size and weight
The 2004 F1 cars are significantly 5-10s faster than the cars from the 1990s. But by 2022? What a joke. If the F2004 were built using modern materials and with new tire, it wouldn't be slower than today's Red Bull. Deviating from lightweight and slim designs while demanding fuel efficiency... This isn't the racing should be about.🙃🙃
I it would be difficult because tracks have changed so much over the decades but a Formula 1 car from 1997 vs a current F2 car Or a comparrison of a Champ Car from 2006 vs a F1 car from 2006 around Montreal
It also has about 50% more torque and 30% more horsepower, slick tyres, more efficient aero, DRS, etc. etc... It's more impressive that a car from 20 years ago gave it a run for its money. 🤷♂️
@@deerlord2363 but the power to weight ratio of the car really makes those power difference huge, in a negative way for the current car. Which makes the current car pretty impressive. You gotta remember that those old grooved tyre has very different chemical to nowadays slicks. They are probably more sticky than nowadays slick.
Had Daddy Schumi not had an accident, I think we may have actually seen this happen in 2022. Also pour one out for Michael, wish he was around still, what happened sucks.
@@mohammedaneeskhan790 Similar in that Max likes a pointy car like Michael. With modern cars your steering input has to be smoother and the fastest line often approaches the geometric line. In contrast with older F1-cars you had to drive to the limit and correct your steering angle mid-corner with lots of fast movements. If you were to drive a modern F1 car like this you'd go off. Driver61 has a great video on the topic.
@iSkyline1 Drivers have to adapt to the cars. However, the basic style of Max is similar to Schumacher, he drives a shallow line, greater mid corner adjustment, and on the power earlier. Schumacher was more extreme in his style, similar to Jim Clark.
It's mind boggling to see the all conquering f2004 would be a back marker in the current era despite its weight advantage, there are factors for and against it but time flies
It's down by ~50% torque and ~30% hp, among all the other things that it's lacking in comparison to the current specs. Of course it's going to be slower...
2004 f1 cars were >1000hp/600kg monsters with tailored tires if we talk about brigestones used by ferrari. Clearly in slow cornerns may handle better than nowadays f1 that have a way more advanced aero but limited by their huge >800kg weight.
It is still unbelievable how a 2004 f1 champion can actually be faster than the correct standard f1 car although it's close enough so why are we not getting a V10 ?
Headline from some media outlet after seeing this….. Mick in the haas was only 18 hundredths slower than Michael in a Ferrari. Will Mic replace Checo after the summer break?