Scientists Discovered A Lost Civilization In The Jungle More Ancient Than You Think | Series 

Eventually the nukes will make an end of life on earth..

Yep. And they will think the nukes led to human mutations when they find men with tits and chick's with dicks having no clue the worst for humanity happened way before the worst for humanity actually showed up...

Yep!! And they will think that the nukes caused mutations that gave men tits and chick's with dicks. Not knowing it was way before the nukes..

It would not be the first mass nuclear war

Plastic

Hmmm. Maybe they idolized their sport heros. Plausible. Good question.

Where did you hear that the Maya and the were head hunters? The Aztecs didn't kill the enemy on the battlefield. The enemy that they captured was how they proved their battle skills. They were given a chance to live through a ball game. If they won, they lived. If they lost, they were sacrificed. At least they were given purpose. The European put their prisoners in arenas with beasts. Lil Daniel in the Bible got an old sick lion, or he would've been ripped apart with the sound of applause! Hypocrites!

@@Teresa-y7tthe Europeans lied about “mass human sacrifice” in order to justify killing, stealing and destroying Central America. This was pointed out by historians.

​@@Teresa-y7t the mochica he said

Catch up with recent science. The Aboriginals of Australia, the Negritos from the Philippines, the Natives of Papua New Guinea and others, are from Asia with ancient Asian DNA, not African DNA. The world knows that tight curly hair and dark skin don't always equal black African. The world knows that diet and exercise can dictate your physical appearance including hair texture and skin color. Catch up with it science. The ancient DNA studies have been done and verified. There are several ancient human fossils of the Americas first inhabitants. None have African DNA. NONE! The African came with the European on ships of horror and it's very well documented on paper and DNA trail.

@mystery2038 There are several ancient human fossils of the Americas' first inhabitants. None have African DNA, NONE! The African came with the European on ships of horror, and it's very well documented on paper and DNA trail. In fact, there are a lot more whites that carry Indigenous DNA, and they don't do this! Get over it and catch up with recent science. New sophisticated genetic studies and dating techniques have given up lots of shocking surprises. With more to come. Catch up with recent science. With the new science and dating techniques, every newfound ancient human fossil, tool, and site strengthens the position of the REAL Indigenous of the Americas and makes bigger fools of the wannabes. Catch up with recent science.

A great story... But in great error about the Magi at the birth of the Messiah. First, following the Biblical narrative, the Magi were indeed astronomers, but they came from the "East," of Israel. More to the point, they came from the kingdom of Babylon, of Mesopotamia. They followed a celestial sign... The "Star of Bethlehem," being a celestial conjunction of a planet and a constellation of stars. This conjunction happened 3 times, and the Mgi, "who were descendants of the Israelites from the Babylonian captivity, set forth towards Jerusalem, not 3 men with valuable gifts... But 3 Israelites who's ancestors remained in Babylon, after the king ordered them to return to Jerusalem and rebuild their temple. They were in a large, well protected caravan of horses and camels and many soldiers. They followed the sign, and came to Jerusalem, and then went to Bethlehem. 500 years before the birth of the King of Israel, the promised Messiah, Daniel, the prophet, was also Belshazzar, the head Magi of all the kings Magi, soothsayers, and 'wisemen,' had served under 3 Babylonian kings in his lifetime. Yet, he was also a Hebrew and was faithful to the Creator, Yehovah. He was blessed, to see the time of the Messiah. He knew the sign that would be given and so it was Daniel, who set apart a portion of his own wealth, that 500 years later, was taken to a newborn babe in Bethlehem. And the Magi, were descendants of those days of Daniel. For 500 years, the prophecy was looked forward to, the gifts made ready. And the sign of the star, the conjunction of planet and stars, that marked the exact time, when they should go to the holy land and offer the gift.

@johnlord8337 did the tribe of Dan settle in Ireland? You seem knowledgeable in the subject.

Bro there are three original Israelites, Jews, European Jews and the Japanese. Israelites had absolutely no connection to the societies of mesoamerica, as a Mexican I am both offended and appalled at what you believe. You have to either be a troll or a misinformation spreader, my people the Native Indians and African Americans, will never catch a break in this lifetime it seems. Our groups will always be targeted by the Israelites because, we are Gentiles alongside the other 70% of humans, Israelites have something in their DNA that pure Gentiles don't have, something that's not human. The Israelites originally and still call themselves Israelites to separately categorize themselves from Gentiles, the Zionist Elite always perceived themselves as superior to gentiles because, they think they are distended to rule the world as God's children, with Gentiles as their slaves. The Israelites have always had the darkest agenda, I mean what further proof do you need other than knowing the fact that, God is just a 5000 something year old Israelite SOCIAL CONSTRUCT and, Christianity is just a program made to manipulate and control the weak minded, the poor and the kids. Christianity uses fear to scare kids and adults into it's religion, The seven sins are just rules that can all be summed up as stupidity. Seven stupid things you can do that rational people don't do.

@@karlbyrne6021 There are statements, and some myth-history legends talking about the Tuatha de Danaan, and the British-Israelite movement, has (some potential) word play making them the Tribe of Dan. The best book on the subject is E Raymond Capt's (now passed) Missing Links discovered in the Assyrian Tablets. Google or Amazon up the books. What happened with the northern Kingdom of Israel under the Assyrian conquest, is that they were moved into concentration camps along the border regions between Assyria and Babylon, under the Caucausus mountains. When the Babylonians conquested Assyria, they still remained in these encampments, as Babylon conquested the southern Kingdom of Judah. It is the Medo-Persian conquest of Babylon that allowed the Jewry to return to Judah and rebuild the nation of Judah-II, while all these concentration camps were evacuated with some tribes moving east (and now down into the regions of Southeast Asia, which still practice their said legendary genetic descent from the Tribes of Israel, and keeping the Torah etc. Others came over the Caucausus mountains as ... the Caucasians, and moved west in those 517 BCE period. As shown in other commentary, the Zara-ite branch of the Tribe of Judah, left Goshen and the Nile Delta after living there for ~20ish years, leaving the majority of Israelites to become the enslaved people of 1295, 1292 - 1207/1206 BCE of the Mosaic Exodus (and mixed peoples) into northern Saudi, Midian, and the Jordan region of Petra. However, the Zara-ites went back into the previously destroyed civilizations around the Mediterranean (and into greater Europe) (devastation and destruction caused by the 1620 Santorini/Thera volcanic island explosion and 45+ foot tsuanami that wiped out shoreline and island populated civilizations. They founded Troy, Greece, Rome, that of Gaul in western Europe, Germany, and Scandinavia - another portion sailed over to Central Americas and became what we would call the Mayans under Chalchol the Great (Kulkil Khan) in these 1300s BCE. These Caucasian northern Israelites would wander west and come into contact with these Judaic Zara-ites and settle, or continue crossing, until they came to the shorelines and settled, or sailed over to the British Isles and even further to Ireland in these 500s BCE. The rise of the Macedonians of Eastern Europe (Greeks) under King Phillip II and his son Alexander the Great of the 300s BCE would see all these portions unified under conquest or submission, to the greater family and relatives of this clan. It is known that the Alexander the Great's lineage is quickly traceable back into the Judaic lineage, thusly these Macedonian Greeks (and other immigrant Caucasian groups) would go on to conquest the biggest (secular Judaic) empire, second only to the Mongols, and bigger than the Roman Empire at its greatest extent. The (said) gods of Zeus, and the Roman god Jupiter are one and the same, and historians and theologians can't understand who they are talking about. These Zara-ite Judaics ... and those of the Pharez-ites coming out of the Exodus, all descend from Judah. In effect, these Greeks and Romans were idolizing their patriarch Judah with their version of the name. Zeus, Jupiter, and Judah are all the same ancestral patriarch. So to answer up the question, are the Irish and Tuatha de Danaan associated. Entirely possible. It is known that the Trojan refugee Brutus, and the establishing of the new Trojan civlization of Rome under Romulus and Remus, would see him and a group of colonists continue sailing the Mediterranean west for a suitable colony site. They diverted over to Ireland, wrestled with giants, and eventually came back to Britain, of which it is said, that the name Britain comes from Brutus establishing the ancient Roman colony there of these Zara-ites Judaics, and they were British, as in a religious word Berith-ish, or covenant makers and covenant followers. All of this is centuries before Alexander the Great, and of the Mosaic Exodus 1207/1206 BCE, the 40 years living at Petra in the wilderness, and then Joshua conqueting Canaan in 1167/1166 BCE and establishing the Commonwealth Tribes of Israel as a nation, fulfilling the 400 year prophecy given by God to Abraham, when he was 100 years old, in 1567/1566 BCE, that they would be a wandering non-nation of peoples, until they came into their own land and became a nation. This then is prophetic, biblical, and historical confirmation of those events. As to all of the many northern Israelites, ... also that historians and theologians have vastly confused, and abused their origins, ... these northern Israelites were known by their association with their last King Yehu. There are "2" groups of Jewry that are constantly to this day, conflated together and then character and religious persecution have constantly attacked the Jewry as being. The (said) apostate northern Israelites as "Yehu-di" of which modern Israelites, and the modern nation of Israel consider themselves, traces this jewish name back to the tribes of the Kingdom of Israel. The southern tribes and Kingdom of Judah (the original name of the patriarch Judah is "Yehi-dah." Yehudi and Yehidah. Yehidah means a spiritual worshipper. The Torah-keeping southern Kingdom of Judah (Yehidah) are those of the Old Testament. It is those portions of other tribes, who remain in the many Hittie (Hebrew), Assyrian (Hebrew), Babylonian (Hebrew), Medo-Persian (Hebrew), Macedonian Greek (Judaic), and the days of Jesus with the Roman (Judaics), that you get the Pharisees (Persian socialist Jewry), who were Yehudi. Jesus and the population in Judah-II were Yehidah. Jesus was the Crown Prince and King of the Yehidah as written on his cross. One needs to differentiate these 2 groups. Other groups of the many centuries of Judah-II (and these other Yehudi groups of Caucasians), other expat (or banished groups) migrated out and settled in the region of Gaul, with the centuries-known area of Lyons France. This was a Jewish (Yehidah) and Yehudi population center ... even up into Roman times when the Macedonian Greek Seleucid empire Herods were banished to there by the Romans. These Pharisees, as Yehudi, NOT YEHIDAH, were the real killers of Jesus. As such, all blood libel and millennia of attacking Jewry as they were these Pharisees is wrong and totally heretical. As these migrating tribes of Caucasians, as E Raymond Capt shows their migration trails came into these regions of Europe, they moved into those Zara-ite colonies. And this comes to those 5 sons of Zara, and what I found as the ancient links of the Bible with history. 5 sons - Ethan, Dara, Heman, Gymry, and Chalchol. Ethan is Odin of Scandinavia. Dara is Thor/Darius of Germany. Heman is Amenhotep, otherwise known as the new Minoan civilization at Knossos at Crete, with Linear B language, as King Minos. Chalchol sails to the Americas and sets up the Mayan empire as Kulkul Khan, Chalchol the Great, as a Zara-ite Judaic empire of the Americas. Gymry becomes the Cimmerians, and others migrate into the British Isles as the Welsh Cymry. 800 years later with the Medo-Persian empire, were the Yehudi and the Yehidah freed from conquest, and allowed to migrate out, back to Judah-II, or via the Caucausus into Eastern and Western Europe, Scandinavia, etc. So any Tribe of Dan, with (said) British-Israleite mentions that when they planted towns, they would name them some form of Dan, remains mute. But the Tribe of Dan (if it exists), could/would be any part of such tribes migrating east into China and Southeast Asia, or over into Europe and then into the British Isles. There are also legends of the Spanish sub-continents of Spain and Portugal that also trace back into Israelite origins as well. There is also a greater and vast history of events happening in the 400s-600s CE that I have re-discovered that totally spins your mind as to who we consider ourselves. In effect, it is strongly suspected that up to 90+% of the whole world population is descended from 1 person (!) in the 0 CE era. This has vast political, international, theological, and religious implications for world peace.

Nah I don’t believe l of that

Wonder if old Lemuria?

Olmec is a word given to the tribes UNDER the umbrella of the Maya and Aztec by a European archeologist. It means rubber ppl. The European didn't understand that they were a society with structure. There was NEVER an empire called the Olmecs. This is BS from the USA. Some countries like the USA and UK like to control history. The USA and UK are the worst. They change the narrative at will. Depending on the ppl they wanna marginalize at the moment. It happens frequently at the expense of the Indigenous ppl. The USA narrative about the Indigenous of the Americas is so skewed that you can hardly find any truth in it anymore. The USA world about the Indigenous is very small. Thank goodness for our elders, Mexico, South America, our relatives on the Rez. They are the truth keepers.

Almost as much as you

True

But they are all non european African heads.

Spin it all you want. There are several ancient human fossils of the Americas' first inhabitants, none have African DNA, NONE! The African came with the European on ships of horror, and it's very well documented on paper and DNA trail.

@aaronrhines1484 Catch up with recent science. The African came with the European on ships of horror, and it's very well documented on paper and DNA trail. Anyone who still thinks that tight curly hair and dark skin or looks makes you African or another race is not keeping up with recent science. The ancient DNA studies have been done and verified. The Aboriginals of Australia, the Negritos from the Philippines, the Natives of Papua New Guinea and others, are not from Africa, they are from Asia with ancient Asian DNA, not African DNA. The world knows that diet and environment can dictate your physical appearance including hair texture and skin color. Catch up with recent science.