Scientists Reveal That Jupiter Is Not What We're Beeing Told 

Except no, because science is always changing. In the 70s, we learned that the estimated pressure "on" Jupiter would be 8+G.

@@troydepauw5117 So in summary, Jupiter is exactly what we've been told...

indeed except the astroid belt on that, this docu is wrong for the rest its the same story jada jada if i haven't seen it with my eye's i don't believe stuff so xD

@@palupl lol Yeah always take things with a pinch of salt as they say

I’m not even going to bother watching the video now.

I suppose it wouldn’t be too difficult to see if they correspond in some way.

Sun's 11 year cycle is shaped by the gravitational pull of Venus, Earth, and Jupiter. I just pulled it from Google, so take it with a grain of salt probably

Well there's a possibility that Jupiter was supposed to become a star and make a binary star system with the sun.. it wasn't quite big enough so it never fully developed into a star. On another note, the moon is a quarter of the size of earth and it creates tides.. it's not hard to jump to the thought that it may be the same with Jupiter and the other planets

it's rather 12 years orbit

@@sethbieber5127 Agree, both Jupiter and the Sun would exert tidal forces upon each other. There is some theory and belief that tidal forces are partially responsible for being the final feather in the stacking of various tectonic plate forces that can set off earthquakes and the releasing of tension in the Earth's crusts as it flexes the earth's crust & either causes increase or decrease of the compressive forces between the tectonic plates. Keep in mind that it is not just the moon that causes tidal forces on Earth, but the Sun & Jupiter will have smaller tidal contributions, but larger when an alignment of planets, sun, & the moon happen in various adding & subtracting configurations to net together their individual contributions to the total tidal effect. Understanding this, and since most planetary orbits around the sun are not perfectly circular, but more elliptical with a point of closest approach once per orbit, it is not a far stretch to believe that Jupiter could have some partial contribution to the Sun's cycles.

So I can go ahead and dislike it without watching?

well she is still big even though small compared to the sun and thus she still has immense gravity due to that mass make's you wonder how much mass she is missing to become a small star from the commencement of fusion processes like the sun has that would be fun to find out if we could fire asteroids and comets at her till it started to occur we could learn a lot from doing that one to Jupiter since she is the largest gas giant in the system

@@raven4k998 or we would die from a star so close......ever though of that

@@raven4k998 Wouldn't Jupiter become a brown dwarf before a star?

@@bladerj I think Jupiter is like 2/3rds of the solar systems mass. (edit: not including the sun ofc) so we could only increase it's mass by about 50% if we there everything including earth into it. To become a brown dwarf Jupiter would need 75 times it's current mass. (per google search, but regardless, I'm sure that a 50% increase wouldn't do it.)

Yes it is

Lol lots of time to get all the hissy fits out of the way! A few billion years ago this bish was a shooting gallery!

And yet not as stable as we thought

​@@drewmadenew3000good point 👉

Well, it has had Billions of years to become stable. Eventually with enough time things tend to stabilise and even out. All energy moves towards a state of decay, the more energy that is "Lost" or more accurately dispersed outwards the more stable things become.

Whats crazy to think about as well with the beginning of the solar solar system, Had saturn been ejected or not existed where it was , Jupiter would most likely be where venus is and us, who knows. Crazy how saturn was enough to pull it back out and is technically the hidden MVP of all life.

They don't focus enough on Earth or Space in school they want you to know more about dead guys which is why i took last semester so i could take Astronomy at the planetarium Those dead guys in history arn't really of help to us now days XD I did mostly Art and Science in Highschool and JA Government and ecnomics. more important to me then history I can learn that in free time if i want.

@@okidokidraws I like the way you think!

​@@okidokidraws a bunch of dead guys who were rarely brought anything, but death & oppression. Then the curriculum makes it seem like they were greater than they actually were.

@@okidokidraws Students are too innocent to be taught about politics

Everything they say about planets outside our solar system are extreme extrapolations from very little data. Like details in the spectra from the little light they can catch that move from their sun through their atmosphere. Wild guesses basically.

Don't know anything? Watch the video again.

​@@LordTalaxoof

​@@LordTalax No.* *for more information reread this message

Yeah, as a kid, I never understood that either. It wasn't until early college I realized what you just said.

What? Whatd you say?

​@@MattL-dl2suBee -ing 😂

The source coder(s) of the current construct we're in would like a word with the first sim who knows everything about it. ;)

Yup, almost like they have been to these planets and the sun and have dug to the cores to have this knowledge they teach like it is factual.

Everything in the universe? We don't even know everything about our planet or our solar system, let alone our galaxy. There are parts of the universe expanding away from us faster than the speed of light, which we'll never be able to observe. We can try to find out as much as possible but if you want to know everything, you're in for a big disappointment

@@jakesusnik5038 however, the calculations still keep planes in the air and can send spaceships into precise orbits. Meanwhile your people teach that there is a god who sacrificed himself to himself to create a loophole for the rules that he had created even though you have never drilled to the core of this god or taken any measurements

@@Vaidelotelis Bernoulli's principle is testable, which is why we can engineer airplanes that are able to fly. None of this hypothetical nonsense is remotely testable. The fact that you conflate observational science with theoretical and historical science to enforce your atheistic worldview would be comical if it weren't so tragic. Enjoy your life, little puppet. What comes after will be something else. Science is no friend of the atheist world-view. All testable, observational science suggests the existence of governing intelligence. Search on youtube for "Mandelbrot Set".

yeah Jupiter is still a mystery they say they know everything about it but they really don't she has many secrets that baffle scientists to this day even

a sine wave is literally defined by putting an object in circular motion tracking its X or Y position, einstein...y'all really should take a physics class instead of watching random RU-vid videos, you might learn something

Yeah, what the fish bowl guy said !

That’s wild.

So are we living in a simulation or not??

My mind is so blown right now....I feel like such a tiny dust particle!!!!!

Will this pay my rent?

And Pluto is a planet!!!

😂😂

Up close and personal ?

@@dimensionexo. Very up-close and personal.

@@Oshaoxin - 😹

One of those moons may have life in them.

Nothing stays still. The universe itself is in motion

Wut. The milky way isn’t orbiting anything.

@@robappleby583 Nobody said it is.

It would also be the last thing you ever saw as the immense gravitational pull would rip the Earth apart.

it didn't workout for the dinasaurs did it?

​@@majkul512 Ayy, even the best of heros make mistakes.

We know less of our oceans than the universe. Or so I heard.

@@kubel83that’s not true mate

Oceans are just the planets dumpster

@@shaunoboyle238 As of December 15 2022, humans have only explored 5% of the earths oceans yet we discover 2000 new species of aquatic life every year. The majority of lifeforms on the planet resides in the earths oceans. Just a little bit of clarification for you.

@@davidtrottier8963 I was not speaking to you, I’m saying we know less about our universe than our oceans.

If you're ready, Welcome to your Electric Universe.

exactly they deserves an appreciation

their presentation always made me satisfied

Bro they copied the content

@hemant_films If the initial source has better quality, I'm always ready to subscribe to them as well :)

Bro there are hundreds of these channels uploading content every 12 hours and be real, its ai spitting out random content

Wait a month after release to buy. Probably gonna need a patch n see what the missions are like for all the plants. Hopefully not generic and copy pasta

Elite Dangerous has been out for years. Although you gotta earn the right to enter the SOL system (but if you know how, it's just a couple hours of grinding)

Non existent.

@@user-co6lt6nc3i Just like your imagination.

Maybe in the clouds!

Uranus was explored once. Never again.

@@user-co6lt6nc3i you know nothing, Jon Snow. it could be so different from life on our planet, based on other components

All that pressure Probably a fusion reaction at centre God help us when it goes nova

There's not really a surface to send it to, and if you materialised there the immense gravity would immediately flatten you into a pool of goo about the thickness of a human hair.

😅 Thank you, fellow logical thinker.

​@@inthem-a-kingScientists actually explore the ocean way more than outer universe, but the universe is incredibly vast and way more interesting

Earth is more complex than these, and we still dont know everything about Earth. Thats not to say they know everything about the planets in our solar system either though.

Good point

Agree, it is so refreshing to find a channel like this one.

😂😂😂 Good One!

Does anyone remember a Star Trek episode called "Tin Man" That one mini moon.

@@mariemelansongundy-vx4ox Which Star Trek? There's many lol

@@AugustDreamScape "Tin Man"

It's my first time here. Question, if it's so dumb, why do you keep watching it?

There's another theory of cosmology, that the standard model supporters would rather ignore...

Yarth Middederp created it all by itself, and It's why we all celebrate Middlederp Day every 10 billion years - we blew up 3 worlds, and I got so drunk I didn't wake up for 3 thousand years!

Agreed

I can definitely agree. Another tricky part though is that our own moon might actually be too big to qualify as a moon in relation to earth. It's relative size and distance are such that it's path through the solar system is ever so slightly more centered around the sun than it is Earth. Where all other moons clearly curve away from the sun at times, Earth's moon never does.

@@elliotlevy8610 Easy fix binary planet system children now days are way smatter then people give them credit for they are far more accepting of change. I believe in the Sumerians too who said the Asteroid belt was a planet before.

Agreed

Rather than getting overly complicated, the IAU should simply define "moon" and "moonlet". I think one of the primary defining points should be that a moon has enough mass to be spherical, whereas a moonlet would not.

The objects are in reality passing around the outside of Jupiter and being pulled into a new trajectory. My guess is that they used such an oversized representation of Jupiter that modelling this interaction would see the objects crashing into/passing thru their overblown picture of Jupiter, and they thought misrepresenting the trajectories instead was a preferable compromise. Or maybe the animators just had no idea about what they were supposed to be modelling.

Life evolves where it can, whether that life is around for a shorter (e.g. omeoba) or longer period of time (intelligent species). It has nothing to do with "precise occurances" which only lets the life on a planet to keep going for a longer period of time.

@@meacadwell You’ve obviously never read, heard of or understood the Drake equation or any other probabilistic arguments for life. Anyone who says life has nothing to do with “precise occurrences” is willfully ignorant. The odds of life emerging in the universe are so unbelievable that it transcends human comprehension.

@@cloud1stclass372 Lol, I was reading about the Drake equation over 30 years ago and do understand it. Let me put it in a way you will understand things: Life will show up where it can. Full stop. We find life in places on Earth experts originally didn't think could harbor life (glaciers in Antarctica, heat vents at the bottom of the ocean, lava microbes, etc.) If life develops on a planet then it could possibly evolve from a microbe to intelligent life over time. Or it could be annihilated by a violent asteroid collision at the microbial stage. Where carbon life forms aren't viable another type of life might thrive. Perhaps silicone based. If it's not silicone it would be something else. Then scientists use intelligence to piece together why life appeared at that particular location/planet/etc. It's all chance occurance. And life in the universe, per the Drake equation, there are probably between 1000 and 100,000,000 planets with civilizations in the Milky Way Galaxy....although it may not be what we would recognize as life and it may not be intelligent life. Take your willful ignorance and arrogance elsewhere.

​@@cloud1stclass372true the universe is soo vast that there's probably of every possible similar planet being in the same solar system and in different arrangements, it just happened so that in our solar system the particular arrangement was suitable for life, it's nothing but probability like you said

​​@@cloud1stclass372Wouldn't that imply that life forming naturally is near impossible without some powerful intelligence behind it?

No no no. You messed up a little. It was Galileo that got crushed 10 yrs ago. Juno is still working. Common there are 1000s of people today including me who take photos every 6months before it orbits away for 6 months.

@@Talal189 you’re right. I was thinking of Cassini & Saturn. My bad.

@@geoffoverfield37 clearly a skill issue

4:48 This animation is wrong in the exact same way. Gravity does not repel objects, ever.

Have you ever heard about the negative gravity? /s

Give it a break, this video is entirely made by ai There’s dozens of channels like these

Only one elliptical is Pluto or Saturn

And some others

None of the orbits are circular and Pluto orbit is more narrow and off plane

​@@448819earth is only planet with circular orbit

There are no inhabitants. All data is from probes and telescopes.

Jupiter is actually a beehive

🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝

I'm glad someone else noticed that, but I guess no one is going to give a serious answer as to why a science channel seemingly mispelled one of the simplest words.

I noticed that too! Figured it's just one of those breakdowns between animators and the experts providing the information.

Yup.. I was searching the comments to see if this was mentioned.....

YES! Thank you

It's a gas planet, there is no solid surface

There’s an electrical influence going on I believe, as there are storms/marks in the clouds that correspond to the orbits of its moons.

If it’s a “gas” planet, why did the pieces of the comet Shoemaker Levy 9 explode on the surface leaving marks where they hit, vs passing deep into the planet just absorbing them. Especially considering the size of the comet fragments compared to the size of Jupiter. And why did the fragments explode? If it were a gas, it would have just passed into it possibly go thru the other side. The pieces clearly blew up really close to the surface.

@@helpdeskjnp it's been widely accepted over the past several decades that the outer planets are gas, except pluto (which was demoted as a planet) but I've never been there so I guess i cannot 100% confirm this. Shoemaker levy looked like it passed into the clouds, and the spots eventually cleared, never heard of exploding fragments, but again, I haven't studied it in years. But that's interesting so I'll read up on that. I do remember that the largest thing in the solar system is actually Jupiter's magnetosphere, and without that large planet we would be more regularly bombarded by larger meteors and debris, possibly negating the evolution of higher intelligence on this planet. But these are things I retained from college years ago and I could be wrong, but I personally believe they still hold true. But i'm an amateur astronomer, not a "real" one.

@@helpdeskjnp the velocities and pressure mediation involved effectively make Jupiter a solid surface. Like when comets below a certain size impact our atmosphere only and ‘explode’, happened recently in Siberia

Isnt that what science is..and does..😂

@@JasonJohnson-lh9ei science is testable and repeatable by is nature. Much of modern-day science is pseudoscience because it cannot be tested, it is theoretical but being presented as absolute fact instead of theory.

@@intotheaether9022 Are you a flat earther? Science isn’t rigid like you falsely claim.

@@wonderwall989 I don't like being grouped in with a lot of those people, I'm specifically a biblical cosmetologist. I do not believe in the mainstream globe model however, and I think a lot of mainstream science has lost its way. Too much theory is being presented as fact and that is dishonest. Present it as theory and let's do some tests!

You forgot to capitalize Knowledge.

@@jgrab1 Gimme a Break!! Ha!ha!ha!

Oof

why did no one tell me Jupiter had a huge blue spot on it

There is and it isn't and it couldn't.

I'm fascinated by it too

You have to watch out for the hollows Things happen improbable the creature Foggy Bottoms.

U better not trust those NASA data.. what is it's mass according to John Lear? or you? It must be way higher density with all alien civ inside.. just think about it, bro.

Imagine it's really just a giant petrol/gas station

@@nffclacey 👍🏻

@@nffclacey don't give the Shell's, BP's etc of this world any fancy ideas. 😅

@@nffclacey hold on ! how is a planet made of fossil fuels ?

@@martinfidel7086 Because it’s not “fossil fuel”. “Fossil fuel” is a theory! Even though they teach us it’s science fact! Based on certain biological markers found in crude… Decades ago Russian scientists concluded it’s a natural byproduct of earths cooling. A far more plausible theory but largely ignored by western scientists probably… Well because it’s Russian?

Except it promised to reveal that it's not what we've been told, yet it's exactly what we've been told.

But then you use critical thinking .... how could they possibly know this? Have we even been to the planet much less somehow got to the core to take samples so they would have some sort of factual data to make claims like this?

@@jakesusnik5038 That's not really critical thinking that's more skeptical thinking, letting go of a hammer and not seeing it hit the floor, you would use critical thinking to know that it has hit the floor, without the physical evidence that it has done so, skeptical thinking is the kind of thinking you're suggesting, I didn't see it hit the floor so how do I know it hit the floor, sure there's that one in a billion chance that someone decided to catch the hammer before it hit the ground, but unlikely, what we know about Jupiter is exactly the same thing, except with methods of much greater complexity then a rudimentary understanding of gravity.

Where's the hole from the thumbnail?

Must be a next level joke because the title and thumbnail were a complete lie. If true, i applaud you.

Is there a problem with that?

@@prodigalpriest yes, I thought it was a real person until I realized the conspiracy theory between all these channels being AI generated and not much truth at all

W-what?

Beeing? Wtf

i was like "why is no one talking about this misspelling?" haha. yours is the only comment ive found

@@LordTalax the title is misspelled. should be "Being Told"

By this video..., yes... you're absolutely right😂

This video is made by ai that's why

Of course it's random or considered by some to be fate when comets go flying towards Jupitor. Or do you mean to say that someone is purposefully throwing comets at the planet? What they are pointing out is that due to Jupitor's ridiculous size those random comets are affected by its gravity in such a way that it could be considered to be protecting the Earth.

@@thebatman07 You have any evidence? or are you just ASS-uming?

What difference does that make? No-one said that it has a conscious intent, it's just that as it lies in its orbit it intervenes in random asteroids trajectories thereby deflecting most away from the inner circle of planets.

@@arucarddimples1944 Good response