Sea level rise - fact & fiction: John Englander at TEDxBocaRaton 

Agreed, the Maldives and other micro nations in the Pacific were predicting catastrophe years ago. I think ‘WE’ as a collective can only go with the flow, roll with the punches. This thing we live on is much more “dynamic” than we give credit for. The Earth has gone through more at Geo-historic times (admittedly with out Human life) than we as inhabitants could imagine or endure. The cyclic behaviour of the planet’s climate has been and always will be extreme judging by the graphs etc I have seen. IMO the ‘war’ that is “climate science” I see going on at present is destructive in its self as the two factions duke it out with what I see from the ‘left’ with propaganda with data that is debunked by what I see as impartial fact by the so called ‘skeptics’. At times I’m not sure who to believe! I think “things” will happen irrespective of what is done.

Sea level is rising globally 1.1 mm per year since decades inspite of increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, as measured by thousands of precise and proven tide gauges. With the satellite measurements beginning in 1992 the sea level rise went up within one year to 3.3 mm/ year AND accelerating! The gap between real measurements and the IPCC speculations is increasing every year ina an absurd way until the house of cards will fall down. This IPCC and NOAA data manipulation will possibly be proven as a gigantic scientific fraud, which helped to scare our kids and drive some of them to suicide with IMMENSE social cost and suffering. All completely unncesseray. By the way in the Indian Ocean the sea level rise is not even 1.1 mm/ year and stays completely flat inspite of constantly growing CO2 concentration and billions spent in the toys of the so called "experts"as are Satellites and measurement installations. Our tax money is spent only to convince us that we have to stay true belivers of the IPCC dogma and destroy our perfect energy base, like complete idiots.The beneficial side of CO2, like the "greening of the planet" by CO2 fertilization is much higher than the speculated and not measurable problems of these live spending molecules.

@@matthauslill4577 I completely agree. Over the past year I've changed my mind considerably and now believe that "climate alarmists" are among the most dangerous lunatics on the planet.

Look at the island of Kiribati, their sea level has increased an average length of 3.2mm/year

@@seyamrahman1002 a fluid will always be level. You will not have it stay level in one place and rise another (with the exception of barometric pressure ). You can have a land mass rise and fall based on tectonic movement

Should quit trying to stop it, and start preparing for it

😂😂😂

i was in the Canadian Arctic when the first ship Since Roald Amundsen passed - that was in 2007 For anyone that has lived in the area, the changes are obvious and accelerating.

Thank you. Exactly right.

You obviously are not very observant

@@cliffordnelson8454 obviously you are gullible!

Remember the ever elusive acid rain? Oh how I miss you acid rain. Now I hear we'll be done in by a massive release of iceberg farts. What's next? Meteor vomit? If anyone wants A REAL CRISIS, implement the GREEN NEW DEAL. That'll certainly destroy enough of the population to slow down "man-made" climate change

I wonder what Robert Peary and Matthew Henson would say? Their expedition to the North pole would have been a lot easier if they could have just sailed up there instead struggle with dogs and a sled over blocks of broken up blocks of ice and pressure ridges..

Paul Starr qa

Agree with most of what you say, except that islands do get pushed up and they do disappear. Depends on where the islands are, near tectonic faults or converging, diverging or subduction zones or over hotspots or at the seaward margins of big river deltas. The situation is very complex. It takes a lot of training and study to know which factors dominate.

Yes. It means the CO2 going up caused temp rise & temp rise caused CO2 to go up, as you said. It's a well-known thing called a "positive feedback loop" and it appears to be starting now. The warming ocean surface waters are just now starting to absorb less CO2, so the coal global warming is starting to add some natural ocean CO2 global warming. +ve feedbacks are fun.

Yes exactly, it's a good question but I read a similar explanation in a book or video on global warming.

@Patz13 It is a false dichotomy. Yes higher temperatures increase CO2 but also higher CO2 increases temperatures. As grindupBaker points out - it is a positive feedback loop. This is absolutely mainstream science.

@Patz13 thats the way i view it. Even Scotland had grape growing, and it's usually bloody freezing here. It all seems pretty much the opposite of the hysteria. Bring on the heat.

@@MarkFrankUK ~ "Yes higher temperatures increase CO2 but also higher CO2 increases temperatures." Then why didn't the Earth already spiral up to extremely high temps? That's what must happen if temps boost CO2, and CO2 boosts temps, right? It simply can't be so simple, and if true, there absolutely must be some other factors which act against the mutual feedback looping . . Or, the Earth already did spiral up, and we are living in that "extreme" state of climate ; )

i noticed that too. he is saying things that slip by unless you stop and replay. "only a 25 foot rise in water in the past obliterated half of Florida". come on. talking 25 feet when todays models predict a 2 ft rise by 2100. maybe this oceanographer has not been told that when glaciers melt that weight is taken way and the land rises. that would be consistent with the observation that the shorelines haven't changed much in the past 6000 years.

George Hong about that bridge I think you might be interested in ‼️‼️🙄

@@rogerspaugh212 You are selling a bridge you think might be inundated? Better hurry you have only a thousand years.

@@rogerspaugh212 do you have bad viewing comprehension? The presenter said something paradoxical and you let it slide. How can the coastlines be pretty much the same after the sea has risen for centuries except for Florida?

Also, just a few decades of increased warmth, at a fraction of a degree, has heated the oceans so much that it will take hundreds of years to cool. What? And has caused a run away melting of all ice on the planet.

He mentioned in the month of September it will be ice free. Not for a whole year. Which hasn't happened anyways ...

Where are these, I am interested in where the evidence of sea level rise is.

Very true, in some areas erosion causes "sea levels" to rise in others sedimentation causes "sea levels" to recede.

he only had whatever the time was on that monitor screen. It would probably have taken half a day to go through the stats. After all, as a rule you never bore your audience.

Actual analysis by glaciologists & oceanographers is available on Utube. There are several. There are pictorials. There are pie charts. There is mass of information for all not-coal/oil-shill-fuckwits with a science education (that is, almost nobody).

let me guess: SLR is but one part of the scam?

To this day, not one inhabited spot on this planet, has gone beneath the ocean.

I've lived on the coast for 32 years. Sea level hasn't changed! The only islands disappearing are due to erosion

@@waynemoss8145 Not ENTIRELY true. Watched a documentary on SLR from an alarmist group. Among all the south pacific islands that COULD fall prey to AGW, they showed one that is actually now below sea level. Thing is, the now exposed roots show the sea level to be right where it was. This "island" is actually little more than a large sand bar in a relatively shallow section of the ocean. The sea level didn't rise, the sand washed away.

Unbelievable what mental gymnastics people will perform to avoid accountability. Keep burying your heads in the sand guys! You'll be first to go when the sea levels rise and drown you.

Yes, I saw the gentleman who works there, {white hair, long white beard}, presenting graphs of their measurements, going back to 1880. Just as you would expect, with any nstural, global phenomenon of such a magnitude, {the level of the sea, as it registers at one point, on the Pacific Ocean}, there is s gradual fluctuation over time. There was noticable, gently undulating sine wave, that seemed to have a period of about 15-20 years, who's last entries included 2018, which was slightly lower, by a few centimeters, than when they first started keeping records there, way back in 1880. KOut

Take a look at the records for Fremantle Western Australia. There are tectonic movements as well as seal level rising.

@@anEyePhil + So Phil, what you're saying is ... other unproven scientific theories need to be created ... even when NO evidence exists to support these novel suppositions. These dubious theories are contrived to protect the MOTHER of ALL DUBIOUS THEORIES: ANTHROPOMORPHIC CO2, IS CAUSING CLIMATE CHANGE| Global Warming is now used less frequently, as temperature increases stalled roughly 20 years ago. The latest NOAH report shows US temperatures DECLINING by nearly 3°F, over the past 5 yrs, alone. Australia has always been considered a tectonically stable land mass, with almost little, ir no vulcanism, dating back BILLIONS of years. Geologically it is best known for sedimentary, & erosional features. Compared to near by Indonesia, it's not suffering from tectonic uplifting, friction, subduction, & the resulting seismic activity, or vulcanism. Yours, is yet another dubious theory that never existed on it's own. It was not developed independently, on it's own merits. It came on the scientific scene, only recently, to explain away HARD DATA that invalidates, or is otherwise problematic for Anthropomorphic Climate Change. There are DOZENS of these specious insta-theories, created on the fly, with little or no academic acceptance, data, or the required evidence to support such claims. The Medieval & Warming periods, well documented periods of warmer temperatures, {confirmed by ice core samples}, extending for centuries at a time, with NO CORRESPONDING elevated man-made atmospheric C02. In these sections, climate change devote's will offer these ridiculous insta-theories, quite often during exchanges in here. It's clear almost instantly, when these replies are read; that these newly imagineered ideas, DO NOT come from the academic literature, or any scientific avenue, or realm. I've had one of these deceitful debaters try to claim the Medevil Warming Period should be dismissed, & all the problems it poses for AGW theory, is meaningless, because that lengthy period of significantly warmer CLIMATIC CONDITIONS, was only a regional phenomenon. I won't go into detail about why this is laughable on it's face, not the least of which is the Gulf Stream out of the Gulf of Mexico, & the Atlantic conveyor, that dictate weather, & the climate of Europe, & the North Atlantic, or written accounts from China during this period, that describe the effects of the warmer temperatures, for the same centuries affecting Europe. No scientific papers have ever claimed the Medieval, or Roman Warming Periods were regional events, & global tree ring records directly contradict this contrived response. BEWARE THE BS INSTA-THEORY, THESE ZEALOTS WILL TROT OUT, or SIMPLY MAKE UP on the FLY, to PROTECT, DEFEND, & DEFLECT ANY SCRUTINY, OR SKEPTICISM of the MOTHER OF ALL, SPECULATIVE SCIENTIFIC THEORIES !! Note: What follows are details about the specious "Regional Warming" fantasy, & their feeble attempt to obscure Earth's warmer climate, that allowed Viking settlements, & villages on GREENLAND, to thrive, expand, & export grain CROPS surpluses grown there. Products from their herds of imported, European grazing animals, entered the extensive Nordic trade network. These marine-based trade routes reached their zenith, during the same period that saw bountiful harvests, surpluses, & agricultural abundance throughout continental Europe, over the centuries of the Medevil Warming Period. I have yet to hear the fairy tale theory to explain the 1/2°F decrease in Global temperatures, over the 3 decades of the CO2 intensive "Post War Economic Boom" from 1945-1975 when man produced more atmospheric CO2, than in the previous 100,000 years of modern man's existence as a novel destinct species ... COMBINED!!! I have heard this BS about a 30-40 delayed action theory, but these excuses for AGW theory are as mythical as the Bible stories, these same fraudsters would ridicule out of spite, & religious bigotry. When we want to talk about the science, & climate forecasts that have yet to resemble the events they fail to predict, we are met with nonsense, & Grim fairy tales in response to any inquiries ABOUT THE SCIENCE. KOut or GLOBAL WARMING DUE PRIMARILY TO MAN-MADE CO2. in

Sea level is rising globally 1.1 mm per year since decades inspite of increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, as measured by thousands of precise and proven tide gauges. With the satellite measurements beginning in 1992 the sea level rise went up within one year to 3.3 mm/ year AND accelerating! The gap between real measurements and the IPCC speculations is increasing every year ina an absurd way until the house of cards will fall down. This IPCC and NOAA data manipulation will possibly be proven as a gigantic scientific fraud, which helped to scare our kids and drive some of them to suicide with IMMENSE social cost and suffering. All completely unncesseray. By the way in the Indian Ocean the sea level rise is not even 1.1 mm/ year and stays completely flat inspite of constantly growing CO2 concentration and billions spent in the toys of the so called "experts"as are Satellites and measurement installations. Our tax money is spent only to convince us that we have to stay true belivers of the IPCC dogma and destroy our perfect energy base, like complete idiots.The beneficial side of CO2, like the "greening of the planet" by CO2 fertilization is much higher than the speculated and not measurable problems of these live spending molecules.

None do, unless they're talking to American laymen. You know, measurement in celsius is linearly convertible to temperature in fahrenheit.

@ The UK went Celcius on 15th October 1962. Nobody uses Fahrenheit any more.

@@fivish , this American is envious. We tried starting in the 1970's, but then a moronic dinosaur was elected president and pulled the plug on the effort. So now we still have hospitals and clinics that still mix classical English and metric measurements, but they're slowly, slowly, slowly moving toward metric.

Water is different temperatures in different parts of the world. Water's density is related to its temperature, so I'm afraid your common sense has failed.

Just like the picture of the polar bear. Polar bear populations are at an all time high! They are thriving! They move to the ice flows to catch seals. This propaganda does science an injustice.

there is also evidence of shorelines retracting also as there has been civilizations found inland that appear to be sea cultures.

adapting to changes, any changes, is perhaps the only true statement this man made. Dishonesty about shorelines changing through human history should discredit and make skeptical of his intentions as he is obviously intelligent so why would he make such blatant false statements.

Missy West You forget we have 7.3 billion people on the planet. The effects are going to be worse than earlier civilizations with populations in the 100s of millions at most.

Missy West well pointed out

I listened a second time. He said either recorded human history or reported human history. I don't think he meant to imply all of human history.

At current, there's more ice, now, in the Arctic ice shield than there was at the time of the filming of this video.

@@rhymeswithteeth I'd be curious to see your source on that.

@@tomtimelord7876 - tide gauges.

@@paneofrealitychannel8204 Tide gauges measure ice in the arctic? Can you send me a link?

@@tomtimelord7876 - no, tide guages measure sea level rise, the rate of which has not changed in 150 years.

the snow is melting on the mount due to the clear cutting in the area that now allows warm winds to hit the snow and melting it.

How so?

I just love how badly your comment has aged. Sea level is still rising and levels of Co2 are also rising. We haven't done anything to mitigate the issues we face that will alter the current course of human history.

@@justthetruth870 The sea level will keep rising till the next glaciation period. We will be better off preparing for a sea level rise than thinking we can stop it.

Yeah, uhm, the anecdotal evidence of *millions* of people is just denial. I've watched the weather and temps where I've lived now for 18 years, and where I lived 30 years before that. Both places are objectively cooler than when I moved to them. So they say "That's weather, not climate".

If the annual rate is 1.1 mm, you wouldn't notice that. That said, I don't think the sea level is anything to worry about.

Hahaha, the USA couldn't barley adapt their economy to a small house crisis in 2008. Image what happens giving up parts of the west coast and east coast. How do Sandy Hooks victims move inland when they are bankrupt?

They walk.

Think of this......if sea levels were rising, wouldnt real estate on the coastline plummet in price? Wouldnt coastline residents notice the rise? Hmmmm I'm sure sea levels rise n fall all the time. Solar cycles control everything on our planet. Period

@ragusajr100 you never heard of nature changing? There are a million species on Earth. 500 went extinct. Were some of them species of birds and bees? If yes was there a farming crisis?

Does anyone know the story of ancient Egypt? Long ago every year the Nile river would overflow and flood everything. Eventually a pharaoh decided every citizen would put to work on a big project digging channels and building barriers to take care of the rising water problem. Pharaoh commanded and it was done.

The numbers sound bigger. Just as 400 parts per million sounds bigger than 0.04%. Pre-industrial CO2 was, apparently around 280 parts per million (0.028%). The difference is 0.012%.

Ted Talks should be busTed Talks

Or more briefly "The tides"

I also thought as you do, but think about it this way... Glaciers and other ice which exists on top of a land mass, when melted, will add to the volume of water in the sea. Also, ice is less dense than water, hence it floats. Icebergs are partly above the water, even if they are mostly below. Therefore, if an iceberg were to melt, although it takes up less "space", it also becomes totally part of the water. For an experiment, put some water in a glass, with a couple of ice cubes. Mark a line where the water level is and leave for an hour so that the ice melts. Then see if there is a change in water level. I'm not arguing that sea level rise and/or global warming is taking place, just trying to ensure that we have solid arguments to discuss with the alarmists.

Ian McNaney - It doesn't just power ac. It brings people out of poverty, allows advancements in medicine, increases life expectancy. Your view on this is typical of someone like us who lives in the top richest countries.

hrthrhs Electrification brings people out of poverty, regardless of the source. In remote areas fuel delivery is expensive and unreliable, so I think you just made my point for me.

we still need to refine and make everything work so it will be commercially available so unless you can somehow get a lot of funding, you can't actually do it.

No AC for an hour! Are you a commie or something????

We have ressources to burn for thousand of year if we use it efficiency btw you forgot the thorium and uranium. Gaz And petroleum come from the dead body of the living so renewable. We ADAPT! Everything you see and can't see is made of energy,don't forget that! We will find our way without returning to a 1800 way of life!

Yeah hilarious, are you Lex Luther!

Actually an ice free arctic and antarctic are the common state for the poles. Ice being at the poles IS A SYMPTOM OF AN ICE AGE. We've been in one for the entirety of recorded human history. The reason we have sea life fossils in the mid west and such is because for immense periods of the earths history it was under water. There's also the issue that sea levels ARE NOT rising world wide. It's stable in a great many places. New York, Florida and the like have rising sea levels while Ireland, much of Europe at the same latitude are straight up stable or receding in some cases. There is a known geological pattern where the northern western part of the north American continental shelf (basically Canada and the Rockies themselves which are still being shaped by this phenomenon) is straight up getting higher and the south eastern part of the continent are straight up dropping as the continent is encountering another tectonic plate. The issue is a little more complex than just "More water is being added to the system" and its pretty disingenuous of "scientific authorities" (a frankly dangerously laughable term as the scientific method straight up demands arguments from authority be ignored) to make these claims so simple. It benefits no one to ignore half the truth.

It really "could" happen in the next 100 million years, we need to get NASA working on this "crisis" No time to lose.

this was 5 years ago...wonder what he thinks about the increase in ice in the Arctic...over the last 2 years

Troll.

Sea level is rising globally 1.1 mm per year since decades inspite of increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, as measured by thousands of precise and proven tide gauges. With the satellite measurements beginning in 1992 the sea level rise went up within one year to 3.3 mm/ year AND accelerating! The gap between real measurements and the IPCC speculations is increasing every year ina an absurd way until the house of cards will fall down. This IPCC and NOAA data manipulation will possibly be proven as a gigantic scientific fraud, which helped to scare our kids and drive some of them to suicide with IMMENSE social cost and suffering. All completely unncesseray. By the way in the Indian Ocean the sea level rise is not even 1.1 mm/ year and stays completely flat inspite of constantly growing CO2 concentration and billions spent in the toys of the so called "experts"as are Satellites and measurement installations. Our tax money is spent only to convince us that we have to stay true belivers of the IPCC dogma and destroy our perfect energy base, like complete idiots.The beneficial side of CO2, like the "greening of the planet" by CO2 fertilization is much higher than the speculated and not measurable problems of these live spending molecules.

@@matthauslill4577 Thanks for the reply! I hear you. Keep exposing the sham. There's so much false and misleading data in this video.

"stars in it"? More like "fails in it". LOL.

The guy in the video partly right but fails because he, like so many others, to paint the whole picture.

yes these commenters are quite profound. you can tell because they keep yelling about how smart they are

Thanks for posting this.

Well, we will be surprised, because the average sea level rise for more than 100 years is about 3/4" per decade. It would have to speed up a great deal to get to multiple meters. And that would indeed be kinda scary. However, they have been predicting for more than 30 years that sea level rise would begin accelerating right away. Still hasn't happened which suggests the climate models are all wrong.

Sea level is rising globally 1.1 mm per year since decades inspite of increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, as measured by thousands of precise and proven tide gauges. With the satellite measurements beginning in 1992 the sea level rise went up within one year to 3.3 mm/ year AND accelerating! The gap between real measurements and the IPCC speculations is increasing every year ina an absurd way until the house of cards will fall down. This IPCC and NOAA data manipulation will possibly be proven as a gigantic scientific fraud, which helped to scare our kids and drive some of them to suicide with IMMENSE social cost and suffering. All completely unncesseray. By the way in the Indian Ocean the sea level rise is not even 1.1 mm/ year and stays completely flat inspite of constantly growing CO2 concentration and billions spent in the toys of the so called "experts"as are Satellites and measurement installations. Our tax money is spent only to convince us that we have to stay true belivers of the IPCC dogma and destroy our perfect energy base, like complete idiots.The beneficial side of CO2, like the "greening of the planet" by CO2 fertilization is much higher than the speculated and not measurable problems of these live spending molecules.

Let me state I think AGW is a complete scam. However, your theory is flawed, as the whole planet doesn't experience winter at the same time. Winter in UK is summer in Australia. So they would cancel out any changes, what melts in the south freezes in the north etc!

Yikes, you might want to revisit geography there buddy..

@@rogerblackwood8815 In summer 500bn tonnes of ice melts of the earth due to the heat, do you see a single inche rise in sea level?

The sea level is rising at around 3 mm/ year. That's significantly higher than what we used to have and it will have significant impacts over long time periods or in combination with more extreme storms, but 3mm/year is still like the width of your thumb every decade. You aren't going to notice it with your bare eyes.

You are so in denial it's shame full it's because of people who think like you do that will put us on the road to catastrophe

Hypercube Jones there's a correlation between mans who wear glasses and the lost of hair too so...deduction? CO2 is the gaz of life , the food of plants NOT a pollutant at all. I'm 100% agreed with him there's a bunch of problem more important to solve than CO2

@Hypercube Jones. Really ? If you measure ocean acidity what you find is the ocean has a pH of higher than 7, that means it is basic (i.e. alkaline). Therefore if the pH is dropping the ocean is neutralizing. So the bleaching cannot be due to acidity dissolving the calcium carbonate, because the ocean is not yet acidic. The bleaching is due to the coral polyps ejecting the symbiotic algae with rising temperature, according to modern research. It should be noted that bleaching was noticed way back in the 1960s, when CO2 levels and ocean temperatures were much lower. Then they thought it was due to the Crown of Thorns Starfish or the dynamiting of the reefs for fishing. What really damages the reef is powerful typhoons which reduce it to rubble. Also coral reefs exist in warmer seas where the polyps link up with a different species of algae. Furthermore if the ocean gets warmer then CO2 will tend to be given off - that's a matter of scientific fact, not opinion.

Sea level is rising globally 1.1 mm per year since decades inspite of increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, as measured by thousands of precise and proven tide gauges. With the satellite measurements beginning in 1992 the sea level rise went up within one year to 3.3 mm/ year AND accelerating! The gap between real measurements and the IPCC speculations is increasing every year ina an absurd way until the house of cards will fall down. This IPCC and NOAA data manipulation will possibly be proven as a gigantic scientific fraud, which helped to scare our kids and drive some of them to suicide with IMMENSE social cost and suffering. All completely unncesseray. By the way in the Indian Ocean the sea level rise is not even 1.1 mm/ year and stays completely flat inspite of constantly growing CO2 concentration and billions spent in the toys of the so called "experts"as are Satellites and measurement installations. Our tax money is spent only to convince us that we have to stay true belivers of the IPCC dogma and destroy our perfect energy base, like complete idiots.The beneficial side of CO2, like the "greening of the planet" by CO2 fertilization is much higher than the speculated and not measurable problems of these live spending molecules.

It seems that we have different information regarding the sea level rise:Sea level is rising globally 1.1 mm per year since decades inspite of increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, as measured by thousands of precise and proven tide gauges. With the satellite measurements beginning in 1992 the sea level rise went up within one year to 3.3 mm/ year AND accelerating! The gap between real measurements and the IPCC speculations is increasing every year ina an absurd way until the house of cards will fall down. This IPCC and NOAA data manipulation will possibly be proven as a gigantic scientific fraud, which helped to scare our kids and drive some of them to suicide with IMMENSE social cost and suffering. All completely unncesseray. By the way in the Indian Ocean the sea level rise is not even 1.1 mm/ year and stays completely flat inspite of constantly growing CO2 concentration and billions spent in the toys of the so called "experts"as are Satellites and measurement installations. Our tax money is spent only to convince us that we have to stay true belivers of the IPCC dogma and destroy our perfect energy base, like complete idiots.The beneficial side of CO2, like the "greening of the planet" by CO2 fertilization is much higher than the speculated and not measurable problems of these live spending molecules.

It may be sad, but it's understandable. To many people's minds (I would say most) accepting responsibility equates to accepting blame. We hear _so much_ about _the evils of the fossil fuel industry_, but _so little_ about _the evils of those buying their product_. Easier to drive around in our over-sized pickup trucks, grunting and farting about how "scientists are only out to steal our tax money".

Then they will die and not know why.

"Climate change"? Why is it changing? Human hybrids control the weather not mother nature so how can us the zombie humans and us 10% of God fearing humans stop it? Try to convince 85% of zombie humans that science is fiction and the 5% of hybrids want to destroy the 95% of the rest of us

That would be an amazing thing! If the Amazon is the "lungs of the world" that Greenland basin could be "the watering hole of the world".

google pictures of miami beach and you going to see what he is talking about I live here in miami beach and he is 100% right and scary and officials already started from 5 years ago to pump millions of dollars into rising streets levels and changing the building code because the flooded streets became a common problem causing traffic stands still

tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8724580 (Key West)

People live on the slopes of an active volcano because the soil is so rich. And then they complain about rivers of lava. People!

My problem is with the use of the world "WILL" here. No one really knows what WILL happen so far into the future. But by all means, let the Bangladeshis respond to the changing climate as they feel is appropriate.

Canada is looking forward to global warming: more forests, longer growing season.