I haven't listened too closely to any other Galaxy drives, but Tonka2 does pretty much the same thing. So does the Quantum Fireball Plus LM, oddly enough.
I also got this hard drive and ran with RAID 0, Dualboots Windows XP and Windows Vista, and test with Victoria, the hard drive seeked too much but fortunately it survive. But the hard drive model name and the the capacity is 50gb high, its a 300gb hdd and the model name is ST3300820SCE. Its the same hard drive. And it's not a barracuda hard drive, it's actually a DB35.3 hard drive and it's a SCE means it's a DB35 hard drive
I might have had 2 7200.10s back in the day in a RAID 0. In a windows XP machine. 2 120gb drives. I assume these are the same just the enterprise level. They ran great until my PSU decided both of them in a RAID was too much and started dropping its rails making them park and spin down. At least these arent the 7200.11s. Those had issues.
This drive is odd for the position it is in, and to my surprise it has the exact same capacity as my ST3250620NS? The only difference I found was that this model has 8MB of cache as compared to the 16MB on the ST3250620NS I own, but otherwise the platter and head count appears to be the same. Really weird, I didn't even know models like this existed with just less cache. I wonder what the reasoning Seagate had for doing that, since the model number is strange too since the one with a higher number in the model like this one has less cache, what the heck Seagate XD.
This is one of the same hard drive I got also, but in a different model and 300gb from it , it's a ST3300820SCE or DB35.3 300GB. The capacity is different and model also again. But was manufactured on the same date
