I am feeling very enlightened, positive and Hopeful after going through your Lecture Videos. Please Stay Boost Up always.... Your Teachings are Blessinga for us students.... Keep Showering Your Blessings.
Good afternoon SIR. TODAY i have completed my evidence notes and concepts and its your teachings that i now have conceptual clarity. Thank you Sir. May you be blessed always. thank you..
I consider you not only the best teacher I have ever had, but also the best mentor I have ever had. I learned a lot in your lecture because you took the extra time to explain things clearly. You gave me the extra help I needed. 🙏
I felt same thing while listening to lectures that the way sir teaching is much better then other vedios avaibale on youtube and even the demo classes by expensive caoching centers.thanks to god and many many thanks to harpreet sir who did such excellent work with full of dedication🙏
Thank you so much sir..jis subject to sb to wadh drr lgda c oh easily clear ho gya only bcoz of u..u r great..thankyou so much..kindly ipc and crpc de remaining section complete krdo g ..they are most important section for practicing advocates..may god bless you sir
Sir I have been watching your lectures since January or February. I have watched 80% of your cpc videos and 50% of your crpc videos and tomorrow am going to complete all IEA videos. Sir now I am conceptually very clear. Thank you sir. After completing integrated law now I am preparing for Odisha judicial service. Sir I would tell you my final result if I was selected though notification is yet to be released 🙏
Dear Sir, I am feeling very enlightened, positive and Hopeful after going through your Lecture Videos. Please Stay Boost Up always.... Your Teachings are Blessinga for us students.... Keep Showering Your Blessings. God Bless You With Very Good Health and Happiness Dear Sir ji.. 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Superb lectures👌👌 I am from m. P. And many law students here are following your lectures who belongs to small town and villages and cannot afford coachng classes.. Good job sir.. We appreciate you sir.. Love from all students..
Wonderfully explained , plz keep uploading.and a request whenever you take any subject ,never skip any section of it. Those which are not important mention them in two lines but plz don't leave them.
Sir, in section 148, is it talking about only the clause (3) ie., Shaking his credit by injuring his character, or is it talking about the first two clauses also ie., Testing his veracity and to discover who he is. What I mean to ask is that, if the question relates to 146(1), to test his veracity and in section 146(2), to discover who he is, then also the court shall decide that the witness can be compelled or not or is section 148 only applicable to clause (3) of section 146?
It covers all the clauses, and the Court has a ryt to compel the witness for a answer of the question asked by council, moreover if he don't give the answer then presumption is against him
Thankuu so much sir for ur lectures ...ur way of teaching is just amazing...my college is providing onln classes......I don't understand their lectures 😕 but ur lectures are just amazing nd ur teaching instantly reaches my mind .....that's why I follow ur lectures 🤭 Thanku so much sir 🙏🏻 lots of respect 🙏🏻
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir punjab pcs ch polity da topic mention aa basic concept freedom equality nd social justice plzz guide it talk abt fundamental right
Sir agar rape case m jab do ladkiya ho aur ak k shath rape kiya gaya ho aur baad m vo ladki apne bayan m yeah kaha ho ki ushki consent thi to kya yeag relivent hogi aur is bases pr accused bach sakta h ???
Sir could you please explain the statement given below. The court cannot suo moto make use of statements to police not proved and ask questions with reference to them which are inconsistent with the testimony of the witness in the court Krishan chander versus state of Delhi. PC Act case
In this case prosecution failed to put question to witness as per his statement under section 161crpc. So it was held that court can't sue moto make use of that statement regarding which no question was asked or proved by prosecution.
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 sir i have a little doubt. I humbly request you to correct me if I am wrong. Is it like that prosecution tried to contradict his witness and finally failed to contradict the witness. ?
It's not like contradiction but being as a prosecutor I have to put the whole story before the court and if I partially put the statement then benifit goes to accused, so the court sue moto can't fill the gap by putting questions on the remaining portion of that statement
Sir mujhe ek confusion hai ki witness ke related to yeh sec samajh a gye lekin cross examination to plantiff ka bhi hota hai to uspar yeh sec ni lagu hoge
Hello Sir, nice explanation Sir, in point 4 of section 148, question is unfavourable to witness in what sense? It will expose him to an offence or any personal issue based discomfort and unfavourable? I couldn’t get it and how would it effect the decision of the court, will it bind the witness to answer or won’t ask him that question. Please clear me on this.
guru Ji.🙏 statement written by witness is not consider the statement of sec 161 than how it will be contradicted although it's expressly provided in sec 145 given in written or reduced in written
Sec 145 not only deal with criminal law but civil law too, so any statement although written by witness himself may be used against him with intend to contradict him. So it's not only about the statement under sec 161 of crpc but includes every statement
Sir if in cross-examination by public prosecutor the accused forgets his statement because of old age .. whether he can refer any document to refresh his memory like F.IR ( As in practical court any issue takes time for decision ..same in case is going from 4-5 years ..now accused is became old age and forgets about incident again nd again whether he can refer any document) Because it's became always a golden chance for public prosecutor to cross him
Husband ne according to sec 122 of iea kuch btaya tha when they live together, or phir divorce ho gya unka or jo fact btaya tha uska case ab bhi chl ra h in court, after divorce wife btta sakti h court ko wo information?
