I think $12k is right where it belongs. Harley is never going to price match with their European or Japanese competition, but comparing it to Honda's rebel at $10k, the Nightster now makes a bit more sense.
If I had $42k to spend on a bike, I'd buy an M1K. I just bought a brand new S1K last week and that's half the price of the Harleys. I realize that's comparing apples to oranges, but still. Harleys are so overpriced its ridiculous.
Harley is the iPhone of the motorcycle world... no normal person is taking a 43k bike to the track where insurance isn't a thing.... nobody is using an 800lb bike as their track bike....
Harley is a shining example of what a lot of companies are doing these days. They're just focusing on premium, high profit margin products. They don't really care about the affordable products anymore. Entry level products aren't profitable enough for them. New Harleys have always cost a little more than the competition, but the current Harley lineup is just completely out of reach for most people. But they'll sell enough to stay afloat for a while. I still think turning their backs on the affordable bike market will bite Harley in the ass some day.
It will, not bringing anyone to the brand and thus not building any loyalty with newer riders while their current base ages/dies out of riding. They’re also making a mistake not bringing the Indian made small displacement bikes to the US to attract those newer riders. They phoned in the street series bikes and are now too scared to go after the beginner market because those bikes failed (due to being aweful bikes).
as the middle class dries up, they're all trying to chase the Boomer money into the sunset. Even the CEO of Mazda said they're trying to turn into more of a luxury brand.
@@k9m42 younger riders arent wanting top of the line. they want something affordable and good quality. It doesn't matter if it's the best quality of nobody can afford to buy it or if it's not so much better quality that it's worth the massive price gap.
@@SummitCoyote i am not referring to the current Buell brand, Harley missed the opportunity to get younger clients when they decided to end Buell production. And now they are missing it again with the Bronx bike....which if they ever put in production will probably be way too overpriced for a younger market.
A few thoughts to consider: 1) Harley sells 62% of the motorcycles it makes in the US market 2) In the US, motorcycles are more likely to be leasure vehicles and therefore not likely to be purchased on merits of commuter economy or utility. 3) leisure items are generally purchased with surplus income 4) Some people have more surplus income than others, in the US especially. 5) Harley is well equipped and versed on how to drain a very specific customer base of their surplus income. 6) Manufacturing a premium brand in the US is particularly expensive, more now than ever. 7) What makes a brand premium and high value is almost entirely on the part of the buyer 8) There are no universal standards for why a person will or will not burn their disposable income on such a thing as a 40k Harley 9) Inflation sucks 10) Spite needs a Harley
Or.... buy a Challenger, which Harley is trying (not so subtly anymore) to match in looks and performance. I put EVERYTHING shy of going stage 2 and cams into my build and it was under 37k total. It runs like a scalded cat, handles like a bike half it's weight, and is super comfortable with heated grips and seat (cooling too, which works and is insane in a bike) and an adjustable wind screen. My 108 crushes 131s all day long at near stock for performance parts when guys are dumping all kinds of dough into their HD without equitable return on that dollar. But.. it's their dollar I guess. To me, Harley is just an expensive shampoo: wash, rinse, repeat. I honestly wonder how long they continue to ride the legacy (which is obviously valid worldwide) without adding something of consequence.
You touched on some things ive been thinking about harley for a while, namely attainability. My big problem is that everything Harley does, someone else does cheaper with more power and less weight. I keep hearing its supposed to be an aspirational brand. I dont see what im supposed to aspire to when it gets out punched in every area it tries to compete in. A lower priced entry bike is critical, because when im shopping in the $20k range there are SO many options that hit SO much harder
The 975 is actually just an underbored 1250. Was super disappointed to find this out talking to someone that works in Harley. I was saying they could totally make a KTM 890adv/Ducati Desert X competitor and they were like "yeah no the engine is just as heavy as the 1250 so that wouldn't make any sense.
@@MrMann-gt1ehSay you know nothing about motorcycles without saying… if Honda is one thing, it’s boring. That 1250 HD motor is something else. Might try experiencing something before judging it.
My harley friends are considering the 42k bike and it blows my mind. I'm upper 30s (all sport bikes) and they joke about me having 3 but i joke back my 3 bikes are less than their one.
If you want to talk about money ; Harley are expensive but they depriciate slower then any other brand. In other words, you lose less money per year on the value of your bike. If you have three 15k bikes for example or one 45k Harley. The 3 bikes will be worth 30k in a few years and the Harley 36k. Just an example, not real numbers.
@einherjar2545 I have a moto 2 triumph, a trident and a zero. I'm not too concerned about the depreciation. I ventured into bikes as a car guy. I got hooked due to sporty bikes with mods costing way less than modifying cars. Buying 40k Harleys doesn't really appeal
Harley needs to do what Ducati did with the OG Monster & make a parts bin special. Specifically an XR975. And do it properly, not like the old XR1200. It wouldn't be hard either. The Pan America frame & geometry is right there. Strip it back to the bare essentials & throw the 975 engine in there. Throw on the tank from the Sportster S, rework the Sportster S seat section to be longer & finish in a duck tail and make a new sub frame to fit & you're basically done. And Voilà! You have a Srambler/Flat Tracker with real off road ability that cost bugger all to develop.
@@rightwingsafetysquad9872 ha nice! Anyway, a Harley will never be a Monster. MAYBE something like a Bulldog or a MT01. The long stroke enige is just to tall (and heavy) to make a sports bike out of.
@@michielotsen6317 I see you're not familiar with the motorcycle history I was referencing. The original Ducati Monster was developed on the cheap mainly from existing components at a time when Ducati was in financial trouble. The release & sales success basically saved Ducati. The Harley-Davidson XR750 is an iconic motorcycle from Harley's back catalogue. It was both an extremely successful race bike & was used by Evel Knievel during the height of his career.
@@thierryfaquet7405 not sure I agree with that. I love mine, 37,000 miles on my 2022. A few issues, but never left me on tbe side of the road. Just wish they would’ve created something that competes with the long distance stuff from BMW and Triumph.
@@francesco1998 You still turn your head... its just extra warning. What they need is a warning when a car comes across the lane into your lane with a giant speaker aimed at the car to blare at them automatically loud enough to make their ears bleed.
I dream of an HD scrambler line using a stripped down Pan America chassis. model as well. You could do a track bike, a standard scrambler, and a full-on desert sled.
I think I just have to accept how out of touch I am with reality or the rest of the market, because I couldn’t even begin to imagine buying any HD offered. With the number is engine issues in the M8 and the way high costs to buy something largely, unreliable. They’re beautifully made, they’re nice to ride. To each their own. HD is important to the industry but the costs of them is incredible.
@@ninji5226 I like that Indian hasnt allowed its heritage and its customer base to hold it hostage on the innovation front and they developed a modern twin thats watercooled for their big touring line. They have both air and water which gives a broader appeal. I stand by HD being important to the industry as a whole and its good that people buy them. Just not my bag. Ride safe, friend.
I'm 22 years old so id consider myself a "younger rider". All I want from Harley is for them to add the technology they have from sportster s (infotainment, ride modes, etc) to their existing bikes like the softtail standard. I want the classic look of a Harley with all the new technology. Hell even throw in the 1250 rev max into that. I have a 22 sportster s and I love how it rides but the styling is nowhere even close to the other "classic" looking Harleys
YOU DONT NEED THE INFOTAINMENT SYSTEM DUDE ITS JUST A MARKETING GIMIC LIKE IPHON O BUY THIS IT WILL MAKE YOUR LIFE BETTER JUST RIDE AND ENJOY NOTHING LIKE SHUTTING YOUR PHONE OFF AND RIDING THROUGH THE DESERT WITH ANALOG GAUGES
Sellin' to the sort of dentist that buys $15,000 bicycles with $400 carbon fiber bottle holders. They'll never actually need any of that stuff, they're just buying a status symbol.
@@marathonrefrigeration9593obviously they like it or they wouldn't of brought it. If I had the money, I would buy an old Schumacher F1 car. Doesn't mean I'd ever get the full potential out of the car, and I'd probably be just as quick on track in a much cheaper car.
Millennial Harley owner here. I actually enjoyed the presentation. The CVO pan am is something I'm thinking about because price wise, if I were to buy a Pan Am special and include all the stuff on the CVO, it comes out more than the CVO. part of me wants to make the move to a touring bike, but they haven't yet made the one I want (a road king st or updated RK with the VVT). But I can "tour" with the Pan Am, and I love the bags, the crash guards, extra lights, heated grips, and the automatic ride height.
Harley Davidson: creator of bikes at status symbol prices without the status symbol looks. Ducati, MV Agusta, and Moto Guzzi: actually makes status symbol bikes.
I bought a 24 CVO Road Glide ST. raven metallic. I am just a cable guy nothing fancy. But I know how to make good financial decisions. I owed 3k on my 2020 street glide special, I owned a 09 dyna street bob. So I had a ton of equity and if they hadn’t given me what I wanted I would have walked. My payment isn’t awful at all and it’s from my 401k loan so I get the interest and I’m paying me back.
I'm just glad i have people like you to slog through the manufacturer promo vids and give us the breakdown. As far as new models, i think you're still in wishful thinking mode. But as long as we're wishful thinking, how about an XR975? Use the Nightster frame and engine, give it a set of 17s, more rear ride height, and a set of upside down forks. Honestly..... I'd sell a couple bikes and choke down a bike payment for that.
People are hating on Harley but the Panam is a great example of Harley as a company. Nobody expected them to succeed in a already very competitive segment of the market . All japanese manufacturer have MULTIPLE models already established in the adventure bike segment and look what happened? The panam as been a great success. As for Harley, I personally think their marketing team is amazing!.
We should be talking about the 1250 super hooligan that they've been racing. Essentially, the naked pan am. I have a feeling we are more likely to see a street version of that.
HD would be the king of bikes for literally everyone if the would just take the CVO top of the top bike and set it at $30k fully optioned out. That's about the value of the bike not $48k. THEN set pricing for everything else below it. What do you get? Bikes that match their value, a nightster at 10.5 - 11k where it should be, baggers around $20k where they should be. We've all seen the leaked cost sheets of what it is to manufacture a RG ST CVO for '24 and when you're talking 50% margin that's the main issue. I still stand with HD on their bikes being good, however the pricing doesn't line up with any of the models actual value. Am I still going to ride my RG of course, will I ride other brand bikes of course.
I don't know where you're getting 50% margin, dealers buy these for roughly 36k and as long as they are priced at MSRP only make 7K. If you're like my dealer we start discussion at MSRP and depending on how easily we can sell it to someone else we will take more off. We still have a 2023 CVO on the floor and offered to someone at 40K out the door just to try to get rid of it.... that was 6K+ off MSRP and we were throwing in accessories on top of it. He still ended up buying our only 24 CVO ST over the heavily discounted 23.
Your Harley Davidson criticism is pretty good content. You only point out where they could do better because you feel some type of way about the Motor Company.
Fun fact: IIRC the exterior dimensions of the 975 and 1250 Revmax engines are identical. You could literally take a PanAm engine and bolt it into a Nightster S (plus transferring the electronics).
I hear you man, but Harley is not interested in anything but selling high priced bikes. Used market is the new entry level Harley. That's why they keep adding tech and increasing prices so that you will aspire to that more sophisticated model after riding a used HD. We know that Harley knows, Harley knows that we know, Harley knows that we know that Harley knows, yet they still do it as if no one noticed 😂
I agree with the sportster platform if they're trying to get new people in the door. I'm a noob to HD and that's one of the bike that's always looked 🤤 to me as a person coming from a sportbike mindset
Harley has made a lot of improvements over the last four years - revmax engine, pan America, updated 121 engine, updated everything on CVOs, sportster S, Nightster. People who say they haven’t been changing are clueless.
I think they're just looking for bigger changes and not just more baggers. I tend to agree that they're making some big improvements, but I see where someone is coming from when they say it's not enough
Here's my thing: 150 horsepower in the Pan-Am, all it needs is a different windscreen and its a sportbike. Look up your favorite bolt-on custom Evo Sporty of any style, Cafe Flat Track or whatever else, and understand that a LOT of those parts fit on the Nightster 975 the same way they fit on the Evo Sportster. I'm pretty sure you could just swap them directly... Hey, That would be a neat video, HINT HINT HINT
I have a feeling we may see a new Fat Bob later this year. $42000 for their CVO ST, I don't care how many racing pig logos are on it, the fact that it does not come with but the fact that they don't come with the SE Ohlins as standard is outrageous. Do you really think they would build a Sporty 1250, or would they consider that hurting Sportster S?
Im 30 years old. I just bought a 2019 indian chieftain a week b4 Christmas. I wish i would have waited. The new street glides look awesome. This is my 1st bagger.
The fairings are a shock at first because they are such a change and I too think that they will grow on me. However, the one thing that I don't understand and don't think I I can get past is the windshield or lack there of on the Street Glide. It is basically nonexistent.
I bought my first Harley a couple of years ago. Bought it used from a dude in Dallas, flew up from Houston, purchased and rode it home. It is a 2018 Heritage Classic, only had 1498 miles on the odometer. Of course I bought it used and that give all the HD shops a case of the ass. One of the local shops called the bike “entry level” and a “starter Harley” eluding to its “affordability”. Dealer MSRP is almost $23k for this bike, I wouldn’t call that starter. Buying used I paid $16k. In my book, still not a starter bike. I agree with comments, if HD want to attract new riders, the need to make something in the $10k or under category and it needs the same level of tech as any bike in that range. If they can’t do that, I feel like their days are numbered.
@@radianman fr lightweight open sportcars starts at 1100 lbs or so A motorcycle being 63% of that weight is insane That's even besides the price that is bigger than boutique italian sport's/naked's most special versions. Which would be 40% lighter, 80% more powerful and have an actual high-end electronic suspension and state of the art chassis and brakes. Even more, you could buy boutique american naked/sportbike for half the price 185 hp for 415 lbs ...
This year, Harley has played their hand. I do think the Fat Bob is going to come back. My thinking is it will be the first softail bike that gets the liquid cooled heads and they’ll do an ST version with another fairing. The low rider st has been so popular, I feel like it makes sense to do a second bike.
I love the new Road Glide fairing. It has me almost wanting to upgrade my 2022. As a first gen Pan America owner, I can’t understand the CVO Pan America. Sure some new paint but you are going to scratch it.
I own a 21k Harley, I’m about to put another 8 into it and I BADLY want one of the new Street Glides or Road Glides. I’m 33 and I have no use for a sport bike. I don’t do felonious speeds and wreckless driving so therefore I want something comfortable with look, sound and feel. I LOVE my Harley-Davidsons. I may make a career change to afford another one, honestly.
The new fairings on the Street Glide are cool, but just look like those off a 2013 Victory Magnum. Victory was making "performance cruisers" before Harley even thought about it, and for that matter, the Japanese were doing it before them. Polaris definitely made a mistake in dropping Victory in favor of Indian, they were ahead of their time, and would probably own this market now. Instead we got more slow heavy nostalgic baggers from Indian that looked like rolling birthday cakes with all those tassels, flared fenders, pastel colors and chrome curb feelers - *sigh*.
Didn't realize the Fat Bob was miss till your video, the target market for the hot rod Road Glide ST is me, but I'm not interested in a 800 pound race bike
They'll launch a 975 Pan Am at the same time they launch the 1250 nightster. This will most assuredly 'upend' the motorcycling community with their novel idea of releasing two models.
I agree with you on the fat bob. That was going to be my second cruiser in case the Buell Super Cruiser never sees the light of day. If not, it’s s1k single r.
Who buys CVO ST’s? Same guys who buy $35k Ducati Multistrada’s. I think they figured out they aren’t going to survive on just trying to win over the younger demographics. So they have to embrace winning over the older Uber rich. I’m sure all the 2024 CVO ST’s are already sold out.
The Fat Bob was a poor seller despite it being the most fun to ride Softail. It was too expensive and ugly. 95% of buyers went for the Low Ride S instead. Especially when they included the 117 motor.
Hmm. I still can't handle Harley prices. I could buy a new Busa and an FJ 1300, or a CRF 300, DR 650, and a GS 1250. I like having lots of bikes. I'll take a 20 year old metric cruiser with low miles over a Harley instantly.
The 2021 roadking was 19.5k (somewhat reasonable) 2022 was 23k 2023 msrp 23,999 2024 24,999 WHAT THE HELL nothing new AT ALL And roadking is 24,999 put that into perspective I'm a strong harley supporter. But I can't anymore with a bare bones touring bike has risen thousands of dollars for not a single change is absurd
I have said this for two years now since I got my Sportster S. I would trade it in within a second for a SportGlide with the Rev Max 1250. It is a bike out of the gate capable of light touring and still light enough to commute. It is a great introductory platform to the RoadGlide and StreetGlide but still stripped back enough to be fun in a city. For most it would be their first "foot-forward" bike which makes people feel less planted but with the high seat back and comfort when used to it, beats the hell out of mids and rears. The Rev-Max 1250T is just tailor made for that bike.
I have a nightster 975, love it. I'm really hoping for a bigger Revmax bike. Give us a 1250 Cruiser that revs to 9500! Sportster S is cool, but not what I'm after
Did they ever work out the electrical/software issues on the Pan Am’s? Came very close multiple times to getting one and the issues at those times were not resolved. I gave up hoping and after six HD’s got a Suzuki and saved myself a lot of money. Miss being a Harley owner but don’t miss the cost of procurement and maintenance.
@@JelloThatsMellow I got a GSX-S1000Gt+. So far easiest ownership experience I’ve had on a new bike purchase and ownership. Really only negative has been having to do chain maintenance again after so long of forgetting all about that. It’s been a long time since I had a in-line four and I forgot how much I really enjoy that layout and power curve.
I need to try a Solar. I finally got to check one out locally and was pretty impressed with the build quality. I want the 29” baritone pretty bad. $42,000 is nuts. Definitely a sick bike but not worth it at all. I’d rather buy 3-4 bikes and mod them for that price or 2 really nice ones.
I used to own a Livewire when they first came out. Fantastic bike for riding around town and trips where charging was available. I sold it when Harley was wishy washy on its future (by removing the Harley brand from the bike). What are the odds that the Livewire comes back under Harley Davidson?
I saw you wear their tee in another of your videos and I made them aware them about it, cause it was such a cool clash of worlds for me. Motorcycles that I love and live and music and colleagues that I've worked with. Rock out in Austin!
Well, technically, it's in 3. The PanAm, Sporster 1250, and the Nightster. I'm patiently waiting till they (or someone else) put the 1250 into a Softail frame.
@@Vee_231 I'm afraid that you might be waiting a long, long time. Like, until they get a CEO who wouldn't be afraid to sell it at cost, or at a slight loss. Because I can't see regular Harley buyers going after them, and I don't think spec wise it will be that much better than anything on the market now. So that rules out other buyers. I think the killed it because either 1) the specs were way worse than others or 2) the price was considered not to be competitive or 3) a combination of the two.
The 2024's, particularly the street glide, look pretty good with the updated fairing. That being said, so do Indians and one could argue they just look better. The prices on all new bikes are silly to me but $30k+ out the door for an hd is just insanity. Just give us the Bronx at a competitive price and they will sell like crazy.
I really want a 975 PAM AM. I tried the 1250 and it’s just too big. Something in the 900cc range. Although, if BMW made a R90GS, that would be the finisher bike for me.
I’d like to see them make a inline4 with the same technology they have in the sportster s or an inline 3 engine for a bit more torque but a lot more top end . The sportster s was a great bike when I had one if they could make their softails as peppy they’d do much better
Honestly the Fat Bob needs a major change. They were cool at first and the people who wanted them bought them, but then they just sat on the dealer floors. Harley would be smart to get more into the hooligan style bike, but I don't think anyone wants it into a sportster frame for softail prices. Stick a new bike into the softail lineup where the fat bob was and go from there
I still think that if they wanted to effectively expand their lineup and still have a bike for all, they should have kept and upgraded the traditional Sportster and made the Bronx like the plan had seemed to be to begin with.
I'm still on my 2010 street glide.. it now has a 107 kit, with heads and cams, exhaust, ect.. Along with Ohlins shocks.. There is no reason for me to upgrade any time soon.. Honestly I have rode many newer m8 bikes, they are only slightly better.. I like the analog gauges and no screen much better than the 14+ bikes.. Guess at 42, I'm already old school.. lol
I'm surprised to see the Pan America in the lineup again for 2024. Harley has a history of cancelling anything that wasn't a cruiser, bagger, chopper or touring bike. Those didn't sell. I guess the Pan American is the first exception. Also, Harley is creeping into the Cadillac Escalade market. Some people will pay $42K for a motorcycle just because it isn't cheap.
I’m 24. I bought a brand new 22 fxlrst on pre order, love it so much I’m probably going to add the cvo panam to the garage. Stop hating cause it’s trendy.
$42k is nuts for a "performance" bagger. Sport touring is always going to be on a sliding scale with various models falling closer to the sport or touring side depending on which. I just think this one falls too far to the "touring" side of the scale to sway folks with that kind of money away from the truly sporty options in the segment. We will see I guess.
It always bums me out how much Harleys cost. My brother always loved Harley and always wanted one, but could just never afford it. I think a lot about getting one in his memory, but they’re still so damn expensive for what you get.
If Harley could do a modernized XR1200 with new Revmax 1250 and updated components/electronics/suspension for sub $17k I think that would be a hot seller. Needs at least a 4.5+ gallon tank though........
I believe HDs major problem is their static customer base: 60+ years old cruiser riders, that only wants air cooled big noisy v-twins that sounds fast and impressive. Every attempt to launch something different, like the v-rod, the smaller more sporty bikes, the awesome Livewire (which actually is really fast) and the awesome Pan America it flops and production terminates after a few years. The strong brand of Harley Davidson is also its weakness, as younger bikers in other countries (in Europe, Asia) does not appreciate the hard Harley Davidson association with the confederate flag, american patriotism, guns and outlaws. So they stick to Japanese and European bikes. The other way around, no other Motorcycle manufacturer is able to challenge the HD grip on the cruiser segment. So it doesent matter if the Pan America were better than a BMW GS or if Honda was able to make a better cruiser than Harley: adventure bike riders will buy the GS or a KTM or a Honda etc, and the cruiser riders will buy the Harley Davidson that feels and looks like it was made just after world war 2. But of course in the colour scheme of 2024. Had any other manufacturer than Harley launched the Pan America, it would have been a huge success. I still regret I did not buy the LiveWire, but I dont regret selling my Harley cruisers/choppers.
I’ve been saying it sense I first started riding a few years ago, HD doesn’t care about their customers, that’s why I sold my sportster and bought a FZ09 instead, they make the motors bigger every year and change 1-2 things about the bike and say it’s better than ever, the CVO ST does look really nice, buy you could buy a R1 and an MT09 and still have money left over, i appreciate the fact HD is trying, but they need to completely rethink things for the next generation, the years of dudes wearing leather with wolf tattoos blaring deff leppard on there 110ci screamin seagull are over, people like the boys from eastcoastin and Krusei Originals make dope dynas and road glides that shred, that’s what HD needs to start doing, we want bikes that can hold their own against the naked bikes and sport bikes in today market not an updated street glide or road glide
I think harley will release a regular road glide st in a year with the same engine as the cvo but with less luxury/customization from the factory and sell it in the low 30s
Well we all know what Clint Eastwood says about opinions! I am with you on the scrambler look though as long as it is genuinely off road capable and without sitting too tall. Let them make a bike suitable for shorter riders that you can put a taller seat on for the lanky people 🤣
Came for the moto video, liked for the Orbit Culture shirt. Harley Davidson, year after year, they launch "new" stuff at price points that nobody besides a fanboy is interested in, featuring "new tech" that other companies have had for decades. They are re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
Knowing now that my CFMOTO CL-X 700 Heritage is equipped with a detuned KTM LC8c, I'd LOVE to see your take on the bike. Literally every influencer who has reviewed the bike has missed where the engine's actually from. Certain others actually made a video claiming it was a Kawasaki engine just because it looked like a Kawasaki parallel twin... 😉
I think I’ve said it in the comments before but I was considering a 975 Nightster about this time last year. 14k msrp, dealer wanted 18k out the door. If it was 12-13 out the door, I would have bought it then. What I would love to see is basically a revmax Softail with mids which might lead to a revmax low rider s and that couldn’t be a bad thing, right?
I'm 45 years old I've been a Harley guy for years, honestly I'm not into the new bikes and I'm starting to drift towards yamaha. (Better price and reliability) I have an MT09, WR250R and I'm looking at getting the T700. I still have a 2005 softtail but it just sits and collects dust.....
I'm convinced the only reason they cost that much is because they have a guaranteed consumer base that will never not buy Harley, so they can jack the price up. They cost that much because people will still buy them. The Pan America would've probably been 35k if not for the fact that same consumer base wouldn't buy it.
The fat bob was my first Harley. I wanted to trade in my current bike for a new fat bob. Its one of the very few bikes they make that I like. I had the dyna but traded it for a Ninja 1000. Totally wish I didn't but its too late now! Now I have a '23 street bob. I also have a Honda VTX 1800C and a CF Moto 700 CLX Heritage. I can't believe they killed the fat bob. I'm thinking it will be back though. It was the ugly step child the weirdos (me) loved.
I'm not a harley guy but the sportster s got me excited to see harley bring out the bronx or something like that despite them canceling it......yes I was disappointed and have sided with Indian
