I was listening to a podcast a while ago where a historian was saying that Wallis Simpson should have been given an award for services to the British Empire for getting him to abdicate.
It's fortunate that Harry has never been in Edward VIII's situation because the damage to the BRF would be 20 times worse. Edward still had some power, however diminished. Harry, fortunately, doesn't. But both have been proven to be not very nice people, i.e., very selfish , self-centered, childish, narcissistic, not very bright or self-aware individuals. My opinion.
This was a very interesting documentary, but the background music spoiled it for me. Why do presenters do this? The music is too loud and distracting, and wholly unsuited to the story.
I don't think he was guilty there was something shady from the get-go something to do with Edward and his co-horts for sure. And the guy stayed overnight not to hear anything with that brutality or smell any of the burning he's full of BS This son-in-law I think was just going to wait patiently for the father-in-law to kick the bucket naturally.
Perhaps the police were bribed by the accused to bring the palpably false evidence about the fingerprint so as to undermine the prosecution case. However, apart from the burnt hairs on the accused, the evidence against him seems non-existent. He could have been burned by candles at his dinner table. If he didn’t notice it he would be able to explain it away.
