This is video from today's confirmation hearing for Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson. U.S. Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) questions her about her record in child porn cases among other topics
@@amoskowitz0103 because the most patriotic American thing you can do is stand against unjust laws…. Your logic claims that the nazis were just “following the law” just because it’s a law, it doesn’t make the law just….
@@MIXTAB1 I happen to agree with you about the nonsensical nature of prohibition laws. #1, they don't work. #2, they choke prisons with people who are not dangerous. HOWEVER, a judge or a prosecutor ignoring existing laws in order to push forward his/her own agenda is not the way to rectify that situation.
@@amoskowitz0103 its legal to abuse a pill a doctor prescribes in order to get a kickback... The only "good" drugs just happen to be taxed drugs. Pretty trivial indeed.
@@inconspicuous99 a friend of mine is a psychologist who says that these leopards do not change their spots. The only way to permanently change them is with a bit of lead poisoning. I am all for that.
@@alanc6781 I am in no way defending the actions of pedophiles, and I must say I am against capital punishment as a whole, but I do hold onto the belief that there are pedophiles who are ashamed of it, have never hurt a child, and would benefit from help learning how to cope without it. I completely understand where you’re coming from with the main priority being justice for victimized children and saving potential future victims. I don’t necessarily know the solution with how we run prison systems right now - I just know rehabilitation leads to lower recidivism and I’m okay with every human getting the opportunity. thanks for the chat!
To be fair soon as they made it to prison they wouldn't last long ... one thing about jail woman & kids are not to be played with so they wouldn't last
You need to look into the case. And there is enough information out there that would explain that low sentence. You just cannot believe these unscrupulous GOP assholes. You have to do your fact checking yourself on reputable media.
Did you ACTUALLY LISTEN to what the Judge said. It is CONGRESS who sets the sentences and the rule that have to be followed, PEOPLE LIKE CANCUN TED MAKE THE RULES. The judge just FOLLOWS THE RULES. As Judge Brown tried to tell Cruz, SENATOR YOU MAKE THE RULES IF YOU WANT A STRONGER SENTENCE THEN PASS A BILL TO MAKE IT SO. For pity sake LISTEN to what was said, she FOLLOWED the rules AS SET DOWN BY CONGRESS, she used her discretion and if CRUZ is not satisfied THEN HE CAN CHANGE THE RULES. Judge Brown gave those criminals a jail sentence that was in complete compliance with the rules set down and approved by CRUZ HIMSELF.
@@oldedwardian1778 Did YOU actually listen to what the Senator asked? CONGRESS recommends NOT SETS sentencing guidelines ,NOT RULES “ThAt HaVe tO bE FoLLeWeD”. The whole point was that in 100% of child pornography cases, that didn’t carry a mandatory sentence, she didn’t follow the guidelines but instead gave markedly lower sentencing.
@jaybonybisquit Gaming Well we all know who you are. As has been explained many times, she followed the LAW AS SET DOWN BY CONGRESS, CANCUN TED HIMSELF HELPED WRITE THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES. If CANCUN Ted wanted stronger sentences THEN HE SHOULD HAVE MADE SURE THAT THE LAW ALLOWED THAT. How the bloody hell can you blame Judge Brown for SIMPLY FOLLOWING THE LAW AS SET DOWN BY CONGRESS. And according to her record, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT JUDGE BROWN GAVE LIGHTER SENTENCES TO ANY PARTICULAR ETHNIC GROUP. LICE like you are the problem here, you simply twist the truth to suit your own twisted beliefs. Kedge Brown is FAR FAR BETTER QUALIFIED TO SIT ON THE SUPREME COURT THAN THE LAST FEW JUSTICES APPOINTED BY DUMP. And CLOWN THOMAS RECEIVED AN “UNQUALIFIED” rating from the AMERICAN Bar Association when he was appointed. In contrast Judge Brown was judged to be EMINENTLY QUALIFIED by the ABA. So shut your lying mouth. By the way I am a very WHITE ANGLO SAXON from an Anglo Saxon family going back to at least the 15th Century.
That's what I feel is a real wrong. 5_10 years should be enough. That one law that should be changed. Especially if you are set in arriving on a decision on your own conclusion and not following the law or the constitution.
Do you expect Judge Jackson to engage in sentencing norms beyond the average at the time, while simultaneously prognosticating a minority of Senators who think that Kavanaugh was "treated poorly", and giving a reasonable explanation years later?
She probably already sold her daughter off to someone, which is why she's being put in charge, just In time for Epstein/Maxwell case, with high profile people like Gates, Clinton, and Biden being investigated...what a coincidence 🤔
remember that these sentencings are for possession, not creation of the material. frequently lower sentencing will be imposed as part of a plea deal for the possessor to cooperate in helping to prosecute the creator.
Then you need to look at the facts of the particular case and read the justifications made in text. Culpability to a crime matters and that's exactly what she took into account. Giving a maximum sentence for every single wrong is not reasonable and not something our society wants. Our correctional system needs to focus on actual correction of behavior instead of thoughts on revenge.
@@waltergray5872 That still doesn’t explain sentencing LESS then the guidelines. Maybe the low level of the guidelines but NOT less then. It’s call a “Minimum sentence” for a reason
Deeply sorry! I've been thru it .. and ppl will only look at the colour and think she's being attacked. But these sentences are awful to think toddlers and young ones have been thru this horrendous events in their lives yet the perpetrators get the min. of the minimum 🤨
She is told, by congress how to evaluate based on evidence and information supplied by various court and penal officials. If she makes up her own sentence outside of the guidelines, her case will be appealed and oftentimes overturned.
@@lukerabin5079 You are right congress made that minimum and maximum meaning this crime if found guilty comes with certain amount of time. Not to exciede beyond the min/max. So why is she giving less then even congress required? Why does any judge do this?
@@Machia52612 More so than Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh and Clarence Thomas combined, for the love of God this is what everyone should want if they don't want to eventually succumb to political greed
@@Machia52612 Ironic you say that when Cruz and Hawley are traitors to our democracy .Is Cruz your idea of a good leader that is someone who is a coward who couldn't stand up to Trump.
perhaps your experience is significantly different from those that went before this court? Did you physically make illegal contact with your victims or did you look at pictures of them on your computer while sitting in your basement? there's a huge difference.
SO SHE IS THE BLAME FOR THE LAWS CONGRESS 🤔 PUT IN PLACE THAT SHE IS FOLLOWING Laws passed by Congress and by state legislatures make up most of criminal law. City councils also pass ordinances that compose part of criminal law. Each state has a statutory criminal code, as does the federal government.
Bring the parents of the toddlers who were being abused by adults and ask them about the sentencing handed out. That child is forever screwed and if that child ends up being a criminal they’ll just say you should’ve sought help. As an adult your influence on a child is massive but yet that doesn’t seem to play a factor in these child porn cases.
The real problem with this hearing is that a Judge should NEVER be a politician or even politician like in their answers. The two jobs can NOT coexist in the same individual.
@@gravediggass I watch them all, but you don’t. Which is why you dodged the question. That is the MAIN problem with progressive voters. They are either misinformed or half informed about everything political.
@@jessebarnett4205 🤣🤣 Now I've caught you in a lie. If you watched Amy. Then you'd know she was notorious for answering little to no questions during her hearings. Go do your research before insulting others. I know you're sad that Trump isn't in office and that there's a QUALIFIED black woman being placed as a Supreme Court Judge but let's not get too out of hand here
I’m all for term limits, but 4 year term limits doesn’t make sense. Congressional seats are elected for 2 year terms and Senators for 6 year I believe. There should be a limit of like 3 or 4 terms.
What about an age limit? Or even better totally restructure the composition of the House and senate so that representation is proportional to the population. This is especially true in the senate as teeny tiny States like Wyoming have the same influence there as humongous states such as texas, california, and new york.
Any time a person in office can’t or won’t answer a question of this magnitude they should immediately be disqualified for what ever the position they are seeking.
Including these nitwit Senators, A black woman is view like she doesn't belongs ,meanwhile a person that can barely Read was elected to the highest Office
@@verawallace9055 Just because you are black and a woman does not qualify you for scouts. In this case she is too ignorant to answer simple questions. A man has a penis, a woman has a vagina, simple.
@@verawallace9055 you can barely put a sentence together so top trying. And that sad little boy Ted wouldn’t even let her breathe… nevertheless explain her answer and clearly that’s what was shown in the video… idiotic
When it came to Kavanaugh the Dems said you have to believe all women. When it came to Amy Barrett the Dems said you have to believe "some women", now this Dem nominee says "what's a woman" ?
Meanwhile Cruz's wife is a head for Goldman Sachs which has admitted to causing the 08 financial crisis. Cruz's is owned by a corrupt financial corporation that has hurt an entire country.
It's worse than WWE. Imagine having a Constitution, only to have it blown off because the POTUS could give a sh!t about anything other than 1)gender & 2)color (which is what I use as criteria for my 1)couch, and 2)pets...). Liberals prove they're idiots on an hourly basis, like clockwork. A sh!tshow is more like it... Cruz makes a perfect argument... which is why she was hogtied...
White people in real is this the type of leader you really want. Put all a side an look at this white man try to be just like his Pimp Trump. If this was your son on national TV how would you feel with the world watching your son. Wow I know
@@donaldfurlow1931 I see that you are a straight up racists. You going to regret one day putting down African Americans. God will punished those who mistreat people of non white. God will bring down arrogant white races one day.
I've seen a 20yr old get 6months for 2nd offense of csc on his younger siblings of 10 n younger. Got 3 months his first offense while I got 12month on misnomer retail fraud. Go figure
Well I guess you knw all then. We're you the one that was charged and locked up on it. Also whoever is an adult and your molestesting your younger siblings then you deserve to die
@@bloodborn8287 Of course, you're just being irate at the idea of the worst of what those crimes may entail going unpunished. Not that that is actually happening. Because it hasn’t. There's like 10 or 12 sentencing guidelines that go I to a judges considerations along with the facts of a case are taken into account for the sentences handed down in each case individually. No judge is just letting baby f%$&ers just roam free, not a one. The opposition is using the questioning time to make it appear as if that is what is the case here. Just consult your common sense for a moment and tell me if you think people make it through law school and 25 years of practicing law at every level of the judicial system as a mother and is elected a judge and then just starts letting child predators off easy so they can go prowl the streets to get little kids? It's looney when you step back and look at the thing while dispassionately, from a level headed and moral standpoint. The whole idea is loco, esè.
What baffles me the most is that Jackson is a mother. I don't have kids but if someone did that to my sisters or even to a child in my baby brothers 1st grade class let alone children the age of toddlers I'd hope and fight for for death sentence. It's just Aggregous for me to hear her call herself a mother and then hear her try to justify her leniency to her sentencing. She shouldn't have been nominated.
It leads me to believe she is a perverse and evil person herself and possibly engaged in these type offenses herself. But merely pretends to be righteous by her verbiage but is exposed as as evil. And the chair also trying to prevent her from being exposed. They are all perverse and trying to prevent senator Cruz from exposing them. The video of Biden himself sexually squirming in his chair while a male trans in his cheer leading outfit sexually entices Biden. This president and his goonies are dangerous people. They are trying to corrupt our young children and youths . They feel we are here for their enjoyment of oppressing us.
Stick to words you can spell. The correct spelling is “egregious.” And stick to concepts you have the range to discuss. She’s not a mother when she’s in the court. She’s a judge. And her job is not to be biased. Her job is to be objective and to impose a sentence that is commiserate with the crime. And if you think any of the cases they discussed warrant the death penalty, then you shouldn’t have been nominated either. Oh, that’s right. You weren’t!
@@kennedihill4155 What a deliciously ironic self-own…. You should take your own advice: the correct spelling is “commensurate”. Rather than trying to sound intelligent by correcting the spelling and grammatical errors of others, perhaps you should stay out of discussions concerning topics above your grade level. And yes, these criminals deserve the death penalty; but the law does not provide that as an option. However, the alternative is to impose the maximum sentence, and that is what these monsters should have received. Ketanji Jackson is a “diversity hire”. She is NOT qualified to serve as a Justice of SCOTUS, and everyone knows it. Her answers to these, and other questions, make that very clear.
He's whole demeanor was judgmental from the beginning. His tone, his poise. The manner in which he spoke to this woman. Sometimes you can tell a lot about a person in the first 10 seconds of them talking. I don't like this man.
I don't like mothers that sentence predators of children (including toddlers) of violent crimes of such rediculously low sentences. Says a lot about you.
Why are they refusing to release the 48,000 pages of her time serving on the US Sentencing Board so the American public can understand her judicial philosophy and her influences on the recommendations for the criminal sentencing guidelines. We deserve transparency. What are they hiding?????
@@josesantana232 President Trump is a businessman and his tax information doesn't have a darn thing to do with how he ran this country which by the way was a win win for everybody. That man donated and didn't collect a dime of his presidential salary so his taxes are none of anyone's business. His taxes being withheld didnt affect anyone but him. Now this judge's history being withheld is a big deal because it will ultimately have an effect on her future rulings.
Why did russia only release the dnc hacks and not the rnc hacks? Why did paul manafort flee ukraine? Why did the fbi report on trumps ties get swept under the rug by the media?
I like how Senator Ted Cruz questioned Supreme court nominee Kentiji Brown Jackson regarding her minimum sentences she handled out to criminals guilty of child porn.
she was literally saying that the 8-9 cases or whatever 1) doesn't reflect her entire career. that's true 2) she doesn't have the case on her end. as in she is unable give a specific answer because she doesn't have the specifics of that case, we're talking about several thousand points of information, in front of her which means 3) she says "hey, I'm doing my job! let me explain how I've done so, not with just these cases, but every single one to the best of my abilities and the extent of the law" but what's happening instead? teddy boi is cherry picking and wording things in an attempt to make the judge appear as inhumane as possible. and it's working for many of ya why? cause teddy is weaponizing emotions in an attempt to bulldoze his way into being "right" you should be able to see no attempt was made on his part to understand the words coming out of the judge's mouth despite her best effort to maintain some level of professionalism throughout the interaction. she wasn't even aloud a straight answer without being interrupted several times in some weird effort to "execute" her credentials as someone who's pretty damn good at her job.
@@pricklybiscuit i call bs on this whole statement. sounds like you might be in court for what they are talking about, n you hope you go in front of her.
Trust me, she's not stupid. If she walked into the hearings with a George Foreman Grill and decide to make her lunch instead of answering any questions, she knew she would still get the 51 votes she needed. She didn't have to answer a single question.
@@ericasmith6680 by unqualified do you mean a non activist who actually follows the constitution? Yea i see how that can kind of piss leftist off. Yall like activist, a breathing document. Gtfoh
@@Mariasanchez-qb4ln no you will go to hell for demonizing other people you don’t even know. GOD SEES YOU. The devil is in your body and you don’t even care. You spew so much hatred yet you don’t even notice…or perhaps you don’t mind? I pray to God he takes you out before you hurt anymore people.
This is great. A judge is normally the King or Queen of the room. You can see how uncomfortable she is not being in charge in this hearing. The Chairman’s sucks.
Wrong. The Judge knows exactly knows what the Republicans are doing. She done a great job of avoiding the GOP question trap. She knew that most of the Republicans are not questioning her qualifications. They trying to set her up for their political gain.
she was literally saying that the 8-9 cases or whatever 1) doesn't reflect her entire career. that's true 2) she doesn't have the specific cases on her end. as in she is unable give a specific answer because she doesn't have the specifics of these cases, we're talking about several thousand points of information, in front of her, preventing her from directly addressing these questions. again out of over 100 cases which means 3) she says "hey, I'm doing my job! let me explain how I've done so, not with just these cases, but every single one to the best of my abilities and the extent of the law" but what's happening instead? teddy boi is cherry picking and wording things in an attempt to make the judge appear as inhumane as possible. and it's working for many of ya why? cause teddy is weaponizing emotions in an attempt to bulldoze his way into being "right" you should be able to see no attempt was made on his part to understand the words coming out of the judge's mouth despite her best effort to maintain some level of professionalism throughout the interaction. she wasn't even aloud a straight answer without being interrupted several times in some weird effort to "execute" her credentials as someone who's pretty damn good at her job. and btw, these cases related to the possession of cp which is legally a lighter sentence. she didn't write the rules. if you do some research on who actually wrote those laws you'd see just how backwards ya have it
Of course not. It doesn't matter what she or he says, it is already decided what is going to happen. There is no freedom in America, it's all simulated.
No, he shouted at someone for political points. This dude publicly throws his children under the bus when he's under fire, you're an idiot if you think he gives two shits about anyone, let alone babies.
@@bhmichigan8731 I'm sorry, but that's only what he tried to do. Instead, he just made the wrong impression that somehow the prosecutor's suggestion has to* obligatorily determine the sentence length. That's not how the justice system works. He just exposed how dumb he is about the role of the judiciary.
Cruz questions on the child porn was totally legit. I am for history being made but this chair is important. She should answer the question. Children offenses and 28 months sentence on a 78 month minimum Wow....
What did you fall for? We shouldn't need a federal, state, local, nor backyard rule to know you don't sentence predators that go after children more so of this magnitude to slap on the wrist time in jail/prison. Get real.... You keep letting man made rules be what guide your way of thinking but I won't. Man/ government change rules more than a baby changes pampers
@@elevatorgoup3483 These were cases regarding possession of illicit materials, not of child predators. As reprehensible as it is to even have that kind of vile material, it's not the same crime as being a predator.
She declined to answer anything clearly!...What th is slightly respond? She should be ready to answer all questions in a concise manner without fail...it's what the job is about.
@@tenesamccaskill-gainey1485 She was using evasive words and NOT answering what she was asked. It's called subterfuge! Aka..baffle with BS. Cruz rephrased his questions continually to stop her from her avoidance tactics. She answered nothing. Pretty dismal responses from her if you think she was sharp enough to even be in her position. Bit Kamala!
so now you women find excuses, for her giving less time to child molester if this was a man you women would be shouting from the rooftop. what happens to a child molester in Islamic, most, countries?
I think he was trying to highlight him self on a case that has many conditions for her to sentence, he is missing the whole fact and brought a case with out backing up what the law says.
What? There was zero fact checking or context and it's just Ted Cruz wanking on the mic. This is a video of yelled questions, nothing more. Definitely not news.
@@darrene.vonbraun4421 coverage as it happened, is news and is the fact. No need for media opinions, or opinionated fact checkers that turn out to be biased and lied 6 months later.
@@darrene.vonbraun4421 you are free to fact check it yourself or did you completely forget how to think for yourself? What exactly are u questioning here anyway?
Clearly she knows what a woman is, but is more progressive and believes that gender is a spectrum and new situations have changed the basic gender roles. I’m not saying I agree with this, but you sound so stupid saying , how does she not know what a woman is. You have to be able to acknowledge the other side if you want to sound educated.
You clearly don’t have a legal background. What is standing? What is the current Federal legal holding regarding who a woman is ? As an attorney I’m telling you she answers in line with the law. They know there are yet undecided issues and they purposely ask those because they KNOw conservative laypersons like yourself won’t really fully understand and don’t even realize what they do or don’t know. You fall for semantics games. They’re dishonest in the questioning.
@@kongmlee92 and you feel that's more worthy of a concern than the current commander in thief. You have some serious issues my friend. I know you're a leftist but can I call you friend since we're both Americans?
BASICALLY SHE SAID Serious crime and as A mother I gave the offender A Lower sentence and rewarded them with freedom earlier to protect their feelings. What I didn't do is protect the children and give society a peace of mind that these people are still in jail.
I feel like she took into account the reality of prison. She seems like she knows prison isn’t a place for change, it makes people worse. She seems like she advocates more than change than punishment. Because that’s what prison and jail are supposed to be. Recreational centers. Sending a dude to jail for extraordinary time only drags that jail mentality into the real world after they’re released. In other words, higher sentences make it so that the offender is only worse when he’s released. However, giving someone a taste of prison is far more likely to ensure that they no longer have the intention to even commit those same crimes.
@@henzyperez5487 She also spoke at length about how sentencing guidelines are wrong when it comes to these cases because they focus on the quantity of the content, and not the number of sources or time used to gather them. 1 download could net you terabytes of illegal content and put your sentence guideline into the decades, but that hardly seems fair when people spending years trading in this content and gathering it over time get less of a sentence. At the end of the day the guidelines don't take into account the internet and the ability to get massive amounts of illegal content very quickly.
All your ideas are crap Sentencing is too long? Good. No easy pass for child predators, as a judge she isn't to be on the side of the criminal she should be on the side of the victims. You people are the problems. Defending child predators. Must have been raised in a Democrat led school. Indoctrinated since kindergarten on Homosexuality, communism, and child sexualization. You are not a free thinker, just think what they told you too. Do better!
@@gadgetdan2111Really do you aporve for these people to do things to your children or grandchildren if you have any ?? I don't!!! It's a sickness that can't be FIXED!
@@jeneendove906 Making assumptions about people who collect child p0rn is like making assumptions about murderers being sick and therefore incurable, except murderers actually kill people and we oftentimes give them second chances. It's dismissive to do that because they're not all the same and don't all do it for the same reasons. I get that children could be at risk but you also have to think about the people you're incarcerating. If "we can't take the risk" doesn't apply to most cases, then it shouldn't apply here, especially if no physical harm was done to the "victim" by the "perpetrator" (in this case, the image collector). Putting them in jail for the rest of their life for that would be like putting someone in jail for collecting images of murder scenes and saying they're a danger to society. Not all CP collectors would physically do anything themselves so that has to be considered before you label them a serious threat. I get that you don't like it but we're talking about what's fair to everyone, not just the people you care about. Also, if it truly is a sickness, why not hospitalize them? A lot of people call them sick but at the same time argue that they're evil as well and therefore should be either jailed indefinitely or killed, which doesn't make sense to me.
@@bink Based on that type of thinking you replied to on the above just think how many on the Right we could put in Jail for life for having pics of Hitler/Goebbel and other scum showing harm to Jews.
They treat these cases like a numbers game. He said that the prosecutors had a certain number to reach. What a shame. I would like to think that every case should be judged based on the law and facts and not to meet a quota.
Absolutely friend. And the basis of the law, for first time child pornography offenders, is 5 years (minimum) to 40 years (maximum.) Not 3 months. Nowhere even close.
@@nikkicroucher9226 I am pretty sure judge 👩⚖️ Jackson fellowed the law, not sure what she has to gain by letting child pornographers off “the hook”? ! And most likely most of those people looked like senator Cruz!!! 🤷🏾♂️👩⚖️
She's not the only one sentencing these people other judges do it too and why they speaking at it now why didn't they take care of that a long time ago and they can still go now to the other judges and do the same what they're doing to her
... Those judges are not being nominated for the highest court in our land. Imagine 8 more justices like her. That would probably be no punishment for these people at all. SCOTUS has the power to set the tone and the laws for sentencing for these animals, and every other court would have to follow.
I've seen Ted Cruz interview people before. That man is a beast ketanji Brown had better be careful when she's being interviewed by him because he will dismantle her.
As a black man, he was asking legit questions to a Supreme Court judge nominee. What does that have to do with her color? Y’all just find a way to make it about race.
Ted was presenting a fact 100% of these cases were given the minimum sentence He asked why Her answer was "one of these doesn't represent my career" Now think for a second is 100% the same as 1? No She is dodging the question for no reason outside of what's expected
@@ChristochatBTW You have no idea what evidence or deals were made during their trials. Some people get 8 years for killing two people and others kill one and get life without parole. It's all in the evidence and we don't know what it was here. Stop thinking so simplistically.
This is a ledgit question that Cruz is asking, why is she giving pedos soft sentencing? I think before being put on the highest court in the land it wouldn't be too much to ask to have her explain why she went light on all of these pedo cases, and she's trying to say "well, that's just one case", when in reality it's all of the cases involving this despicable crime that she ruled on.
No this is all the usual republican hypocrisy. The subtext for this is as follows: be very scared! The criminals are coming after you! Of course they hope the yokels that follow these goons will take a huge dump in their pants and then run to the polls and vote republican in full panic mode. Another example of the republicans playing the fear card masterfully. Unfortunately, the democrats have no cards to play because they're terrified of these bucolic bards and their bumpkin followers.
Supreme Courts do not sentence, youre right, but it does open up a judge's track record while being in the bench. Her refusal to give what the prosecutors asked for in those horrific child porn cases has no justification.
I don't understand why the chair doesn't hold the switch to mute the child, when rules aren't being abided. Keep everyone's mic on. Make it public record. But turn off their volume when their time is up.
You're very correct the rules need to be abided and that goes for everyone that is sitting in that room. It is very disturbing that she would not directly explain or answer the question. I don't care where you're political affiliate lies these are serious questions that deserve a serious answer.
Hmmm sounds like you didn’t want her to answer the question either. Sexually abused and photographed children is not political position. It is our job as HUMANS to protect and to want the highest level of punishment. What kind of person puts their political views above the well being of our babies? Only democrats. That’s who. Disgusting.
@@marianandrade38 nobody is jealous of that stupid judge.. she doesn’t answer questions she mixes up words to cover up that she will not answer because it does sound really bad if she answers…THE TRUTH She is light on pedophiles we don’t need that judge…
These sickos should be in prison for life or given death sentences our government will send you to jail for life for not paying taxes but the sickos get off with less time that’s disturbing
I respect his questions, but he does not know how to let someone speak. It's like he's wanting a certain response when it's only hers to give. This is so annoying to listen to.
That's it, exactly, Ms. Solarchik! He wants a specific answer - an answer that will provide a soundbite that can be manipulated against her. Questions aside, it is extremely frustrating that he can't even veil his true purpose. He can't even pretend to want to hear her out
@@dougmiller7592 Totally agree that two things can be true: some of his questioning guided towards a particular answer (and kept interrupting) and she didn't give direct answers to certain questions
@@dougmiller7592 because she know he being a asshole he coming from a place of racist hate and trying trap her she a smart lady y’all white people hate a smart blk person
@dredgen malice you got it yet again, nothing gets past you huh,the intelligence now days is mind blowing,you should be working cnn,or Tesla, NASA,in a lab for the government,u can give Elon a run for his money,the perfect mind is never wrong and u my perfect brother,are on fire not once wrong u must have a divine intelligence unknown to man..please teach me I want to be just like you when I grow up ,you are now on my list of heroes under trump and Elon ..I love you
I hate watching her dance around the questions, it's almost like she's embarrassed about what she did, why would she do it if shes embarrassed about it
You really think someone about to be appointed a lifelong position on the court is going to jeopardize that by a few misrepresented or construed words twisted by corrupt congressmen in confirmation hearings over a few weeks? Did you watch the Brett and Amy confirmations lol?
@@witchplease9695 Prove he's racist. Oh, and you are just going to ignore the fact that she has a bias in favor of child abusers? Nice try on the red herring, but you fail.
I do not think until 15 minutes ago it was necessary..do you? Two year olds run around explaining to anyone who will listen “he has a penis” and “she has a vagina,” in a very loud voice. There is no trouble. And if you need help women have an XX chromosome and men have an XY chromosome. One from each parent. No trouble. Try to remember say back to 2018. Did you worry incessantly about people who wanted to lop off parts of the body.. There are people who have all kinds of problems and we have it within our country to help those in need. These people need serious help. Their suicide rate is close to 50-50 no matter they transition or not. That is a horrible to life with that much confusion about their own body. They need counseling and support not competition with other women. Does anybody honestly think Lia is proud of what she did here. I don’t believe her throwing her last swims a sign of pride in her choice. I would rather see people live a live of freedom not slavery to their own mind. It is sad.
@@LynnRPerry I don't hear people now talking about running around chopping parts off. You hear conservative commentators using that language a lot, maybe you hear about it a lot from them? Also, are you a Christian?
@@bloodyrose1995 maybe you should also and not just the things you want to hear both sides. If you really think a majority of people who make this drastic change don't have a motive or some traumatic event to want them to be as far opposite of who they were your just closes minded. If you think a child who is literally a moldable being isn't being influenced in today's culture you are just not a deep thinker. Every action has an equal an opposite reaction that is a law of our universe. We have to be careful on both sides otherwise civilization can come crumbling down. The more we fight about silly stuff like this the more internal turmoil we create to bring our country down. People are usually ashamed of the truth are afraid to open up about real reasons behind actions.
@@LynnRPerry I stand behind you people don't like facts that's why they call it the Ugly Truth. You can't have an honest conversation without the risk of being offensive.
Asking questions about organs. I hope these corrupt losers all go to jail. It's a circus. They have no shame. A bunch of fascist ready to give up Democracy to please a dictator. Guess what? if Trump and Republicans are elected, that's what we are going to get. Did you not hear Trump say when he becomes president in 2024, he will be a dictator for life. It's not a joke, or a lie, it's a Fact. If you want a dictator and a Fascists vote Republicans. Remember me, I warned you.
A rule needs to be implemented for time. I think when the senator is not speaking, their time shpuld be paused. It would eliminate the filibustering answers where they just talk to kill time without answering the question.
@@Remember_when what does that have to do with anything? He is questioning her character and obviously she doesn't think child porn is serious which is disgusting and par for the course with democrats.
I can't speak for everyone, but I find it very difficult to respect the way in which these questions were formed and the inability to allow Judge Brown-Jackson to articulate a response. I think it's important to realize that Senator Cruz came prepared in a very specific way - he wanted to portray a particular narrative by using a group of examples that all point to the same assumed conclusion. The judge's experience is very extensive and she is unable to prepare a straightforward response to his rapid-firing technique of questioning in regards to less than 9% of the cases she's ever convicted. Understandably, she must answer these micro-specific questions with a broad answer in order the lay the foundation so that the America public (who are not educated or well-versed on what is even being discussed) can understand. She was not allowed to do that. What is sad is those who do not realize this are the very ones who needed to hear what she would say. To those who may not take the initiative to understand things on which they speak about, it may be tempting to fall into the anxiety the senator was attempting to create. The truth is that the judge's sentences are on par with the what majority of government/federal judges find appropriate for similar charges. Within-guidelines sentences are often seen as overly harsh and not considerate of humanity and rehabilitation... especially for first time offenders. Unfortunately, the U.S. is nearly the only western country left that forgets the point of prison is rehabilitation and not a holding place for the grave. Additionally, conviction time does not include time on parole, probation and/or other legal obligations and restrictions. It is possible that the defense argued for more time served overall, for a lesser time behind literal bars. For example, instead of a 10 year sentence in prison... a convict can be sentenced to 5 years in prison with an additional 15 years of probation after that - that's surveillance for 2x the amount of time. Out of all crimes, childhood predators are some of the most likely to reoffend. If this covict serves 10 years, they are out of prison with no supervision and are free to do whatever they would like. If this convict is monitored for 20 years, it is much more difficult for them to offend. Those of you who have put in enough effort to watch this video and comment on it, I beg that you also place some time and resources into understanding the judicial system the best you can... especially if you are going to echo statements that you may not have a full understanding of. Whatever perspective you come to, let it be a fair and educated one. These days, with social media, it's amazing the non-sense that people believe out of fear and/or ego. Everything has turned into a conspiracy theory and people with the most to say are the least knowledgeable. I don't believe there is a single logical adult who would accept that type of questioning as respectable, professional, fair or reasonable. Any intellectual person knows that value of a true debate, this was childish cross-fire and really served no purpose other than to rally up America's most impressionable people into following a false narrative that they don't even understand.
Thank you Dani for your response because you said everything I needed to therefore, I don't need to repeat it and they are treating her completely different than they treated their most recent male judge they forced through and he disrespected all of them and spoke back but if she does she will be considered an angry black woman. This is actually an attack and makes me despise Ted Cruz with a passion.
I disagree. In few words one could rebut Cruz’s argument with an array of other rulings that may be similar, logical reasoning of each cases specifics that warranted leniency, or a strong stand for principle that child pornography is a possession of material charge, however inhuman, that should not end someone’s life for pixels on computers. She does neither and chooses to argue that because the swimming pool is only 9 percent pee that one could safely swim in it.
Counter argument: crimes involving children should almost never get less than the maximum allowable punishment. If her decisions are "in line" with other federal judges that's all the more reason she perhaps shouldn't be a Supreme Court Justice.
Is there anything you wouldn’t want your young child assigned to read study learn and remember? If the answer is Yes you’ve found your thumbs down level~
@@debbiedace557 CRT? You believe white babies are naturally born with racist bones and little black babies want to Hate? Or is it you believe this questioning is just and fair?
Sounds like you still don't really know the full details of her cases. Maybe look into the disagreements of how sentencing guidelines are outdated for these types of crimes.
These elites could care less about law and order! It is not mind boggling as to why they don't want to take this line of questioning seriously. They are obviously not morally opposed to these egregious actions!
Why do we need to even consider this person who in super light on crime especially child crimes. Just because she's a woman and of color is why that's not a good reason.
He’s not asking questions he’s making a speech. It’s weird bc he’s not giving full context, listening to her, so we know he’s pandering to the his base and he’s playing on their low intelligence.
@@scarletbegonias767 lol the fact that you think bringing up joe Biden will somehow excuse other foolishness is hilarious, carry on with that simple rhetoric, amuse me on this Friday 😂😂
The main issue is not only is she biased but she is now appointed for LIFE to the highest court in the country. Term limits could possibly help us out.
