Serral's ULTIMATE ZERG LATEGAME vs. Harstem - StarCraft 2 

Third caster sounds like HeroMarine

If anything, Harstem has become an even better player because of his content, where he tries different and unusual tactics and he learns a lot of new things. It’s clearly visible by how his cheese account is now better than his main

to be fair cheese usually inflates your mmr (not to say that cheesing is inherently easy) @@magnusbjarni

nah he was completely floored by serral. like this is what you'd expect the 39th best player in the world against the top player in the world. the only fight that looked like it was going his way, the last one in game 1, only looked like that because serral recognized that it was essentially an all-in and purposely avoided fighting until he made a big enough army that could convincingly win (which is basically what you're supposed to do in an all-in anyway). i think harstem recognized this too, which was why he pushed much more aggressively than his previous engagements. regardless, he never took control of the game at any point, which kinda sucks since i feel like he definitely had potential to do better in these games.

@@dankmemester1066 Actually Serral won 1st match because of mass economy advantage he built earlier. Take a look how many resources he had to spend to stay ingame. From 15:40 onwards Serral used his savings to keep up with Harstem who was dry on money at this point.

You should watch Uthermal then. Might be your jam.

@@IamKnucks nope, he's not bad, but his videos are too long and not as action packed as the ones from sc2hl

same

It was a wtf moment to me for sure. Like how does he do it

@@knightish Its the usual Zerg moment, he lost some useless ground units and instantly remax with 30+ corruptors and overwhelms protoss key air units. All he had to do was keep the broodlords alive to clean up anything protoss have left on the ground.

@@skychaos87 Yeah, this. He had a huge bank allowing him to remax instantly with the right units, while Harstem had no bank.

I see. Thanks. 😀

I think he's improved a lot over the last 6 months.

@un3kn3own0 If this was any indicator, I agree completely. I usually think of harstem as maybe like the 17-18th best european. Insanely good, but not serral caliber. But if he keeps this up....

To be precise: The lowko maneuver makes use of a parasitic bomb to kill the interceptors.

Yea I think he shift clicked with a move command past then a moved

it was very close, tbh harstem had multiple opportunities to win on timing, but he respected serral too much to commit

@@aLeeb9 it's true; probably the closest I've seen of this type of game. I'm just sick of protoss players going late game air against good zergs since it never works

Harstem had a big bank and didnt build enough. Casters called out Harstem for not building enough stargates to support his army when he loses a big fight.

You say that as tho all of that was easy to set up. Like yeah, every zerg player just gets 4 free bases and constant injects and perfect rallies?! And complaining about how zerg can remax is like complaining how toss can proxy 4gate, or how terran can turtle. It's just a core part of the armies design.

Please, Harstem, tell me... is it IMBA or do I suck?

0? May I recommend a blocker? There are several good ones.

Idk bro I think 400 zerg limit might be still more powerful then 200 skytoss limit

imagine going up against Serral in the late game^^

So you're saying that having those 3 units should just grant you an immediate victory?

imagine lasting 20+ minutes in a match vs Serral

>keeps up with the best player in the game >'he micros so bad lmao' never change, youtube comment section