@@spacescatatford The whole left-wing climate change agenda is nothing but politically driven! How about you state what she said was incorrect!? I'm sure you won't!👍
63 yrs old here. In my lifetime the US population has doubled. My hometown now has 9 interchanges instead of 5. It is easily twice as big of sprawl. So when a tornado touches down it is more likely to take out something instead of bending over corn stalks. Coupled with your data, the distortion of the media hype is evident
Well said. This is called the bullseye effect. There is simply vastly more for nature to destroy and media, unlike decades ago is 24/7 and happy to source out every single disaster on every square acre of land to shove down our throats.
Thx Linnea, simple facts our neighbors no very little or nothing about, and will likely never hear from the legacy media. Stay well and keep'em coming!
You sound like a relative. If so, I don't t blame you. She is part of a groundswell of young people who are thinking for themselves. Good for all of us.
Data clearly shows that death tolls from every natural disaster *including every single climate related disaster* has been in precipitous decline for a hundred years. This is important to understand, because it's the modern world that keeps us safe, and the modern world was created by inexpensive reliable energy. Impoverished societies don't fair very well when tornados hit.
@@anthonymorris5084 impoverished people won’t do well without cheap fossil fuels. They don’t give a crap about climate change. They are hoping for a next meal.
Correct. There is no real evidence that tornadoes are happening more often. More are being recorded now than in 1950, but a closer look at the data shows the increase is only in the weakest category, EF0. There's been no increase in stronger twisters and a slight decrease in EF4s and EF5s. Luken failed to state that tornadoes are moving out of Kansas wheat fields where they do little harm, into neighboring eastern states where there are far more people and expensive property. If you tell half the story, you get half the answer which is considered lying.
A tornado is still a tornado, no matter where it forms. The damage from tornados is definitely more in denser population centers, but the damage from tornados is a different collection of facts than the formation of tornados. Can't you see the difference?
Making a false claim so you can discredit it is a very Republican thing to do, Ms. Lueken. When did you first discover that you liked money more than integrity? Edit: "The 2023 tornado count was above the annual 1991-2020 annual average across the contiguous U.S. with 1,197 confirmed tornadoes reported, with an additional 97 preliminary tornadoes still under verification during the October 1 to December 31 period." Assessing the U.S. Climate in 2023, National Centers for Environmental Information, NOAA.
@@sirifail4499 I have quite a bit of education, fail, and since we're farmers a lot of that education has focused on weather and climate. Her initial claim is a lie. Did she manage to slip that lie past your lack of education?
@@jasminelindros8923 You're ranting. You have no idea what my education is. This is just more desperate invalidation and slander. You used invalidation again to call her a liar without explaining the lie. Citing propaganda is also what people use to deflect when they have no argument. You've got nothing except "Hey everybody she's wrong and I'm right"
