@@adilali5517 shoaib not in 96-97...against india formidable but vs sri lanka,only bowling pak was stronger, fielding,unity and gameplan ,captaincy,batting -sri lanka was top in subcontinent...so it was upset if ind,pak won them
@@ellikutty You need to check the meaning of the word " upset " in cricketing language. SL was no Australia and even beating Australia was never an upset for India or Pakistan
@@ellikutty India won a test series in India against Australia in 2001 and Pakistan won an ODI series against Australia in Australia in 2002. Your definition of word upset is wrong, please check the meaning and then be a cricket expert
Afridi should've always opened in subcontinent conditions. He was much more dangerous there. In the lower order, he was often useless and dint have the temperament to finish games.
Or maybe replace Afridi with a better opener? Afridi is overrated as a batsmen. Guys like Saeed Anwar, Ijaz Ahman, Amir Sohail, Misbah Ul Haq, Abdul Razzak and even Kamran Akmal were much better then him. I sometimes wish Afridi never scored his then fastest century, because of which he ensured his place as an opening batsmen, taking place of someone more deserving and hampering our batting performance for years!
