Shaykh Uthman Clarifies About Daniel Haqiqatjou | Nouman Ali Khan | Yasir Qadi 

Eating was more important to mawiyah bin hinda lanati rather than obey Allah Messenger pbuh till Allah Messenger pbuh prayed against that Maloon sahih muslim 6628 Ibn Abbas reported: I was playing with children that Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya. I returned and said: He is busy in taking food. He again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in taking food, whereupon he said: May Allah not fill his belly! Ibn Muthanna, said: I asked Umm Umayya what he meant by the word Hatani. He said: It means he patted my shoulders.

@@tmffj hello shiite head… done sujood on ur clay tablet for the day..? wat abt ur tip of nose.. both palms.. both knees.. n ur toes.. did they touch ur karbala clay tablet also..? just asking….

​@@tmffjmay the curse of Allah be on people who curse the sahaba (may Allah be pleased with them).

@@zakiahmad4024Maloon Marwan the Governor of Mawiyah bin hinda lanati announced sunnat of Allah Messenger pbuh is EXPIRED even tho the companions(ra) tried to stopped him but he didn't listen & did it anyway & this truth been hide from ummat what was the reasons behind Karbla Sahih-Bukhari 956 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: The Prophet (ﷺ) used to proceed to the Musalla on the days of Id-ul-Fitr and Id-ul-Adha; the first thing to begin with was the prayer and after that he would stand in front of the people and the people would keep sitting in their rows. Then he would preach to them, advise them and give them orders, (i.e. Khutba). And after that if he wished to send an army for an expedition, he would do so; or if he wanted to give and order, he would do so, and then depart. The people followed this tradition till I went out with Marwan, the Governor of Medina, for the prayer of Id-ul-Adha or Id-ul-Fitr. When we reached the Musalla, there was a pulpit made by Kathir bin As-Salt. Marwan wanted to get up on that pulpit before the prayer. I got hold of his clothes but he pulled them and ascended the pulpit and delivered the Khutba before the prayer. I said to him, "By Allah, you have changed (the Prophet's tradition)." He replied, "O Abu Sa`id! Gone is that which you know." I said, "By Allah! What I know is better than what I do not know." Marwan said, "People do not sit to listen to our Khutba after the prayer, so I delivered the Khutba before the prayer."

@@zakiahmad4024Mawiyah bin Hinda lanati had no respect for Omer (ra) cuz Mawiyah was sooodrunk he announced he is more worthy to be Khalifa than 2nd Khalifa Rashid (ra) by keeping quite son of omer was safe & secure exactly like nowadays in Saudia Arabia 😂 Sahih al-Bukhari 4108 Narrated `Ikrima bin Khalid: Ibn `Umar said, "I went to Hafsa while water was dribbling from her twined braids. I said, 'The condition of the people is as you see, and no authority has been given to me.' Hafsa said, (to me), 'Go to them, and as they (i.e. the people) are waiting for you, and I am afraid your absence from them will produce division amongst them.' " So Hafsa did not leave Ibn `Umar till we went to them. When the people differed. Muawiya addressed the people saying, "'If anybody wants to say anything in this matter of the Caliphate, he should show up and not conceal himself, for we are more rightful to be a Caliph than he and his father." On that, Habib bin Masalama said (to Ibn `Umar), "Why don't you reply to him (i.e. Muawiya)?" `Abdullah bin `Umar said, "I untied my garment that was going round my back and legs while I was sitting and was about to say, 'He who fought against you and against your father for the sake of Islam, is more rightful to be a Caliph,' but I was afraid that my statement might produce differences amongst the people and cause bloodshed, and my statement might be interpreted not as I intended. (So I kept quiet) remembering what Allah has prepared in the Gardens of Paradise (for those who are patient and prefer the Hereafter to this worldly life)." Habib said, "You did what kept you safe and secure (i.e. you were wise in doing so).

We encounter significant concerns that needs addressing not on minor issues. For example, I came across a RU-vid video wherein Brother Daniel provided a strong critique of Nouman Ali Khan's interpretation of a Quranic verse in which Allah SWT instructed the Prophet's wives to stay at home. Nouman Ali Khan's stance was that this verse was exclusively relevant to the Prophet's wives, while Brother Daniel argued that it applies universally to all women, given that the Prophet's wives should serve as models of virtue. Personally, I find that the evidence aligns more favorably with Nouman Ali Khan's perspective, primarily because the Quran explicitly differentiates the Prophet's wives from other women. Additionally, historical accounts from the Prophet's life (seerah) demonstrate instances where women engaged in activities outside the home, such as market visits. I acknowledge the potential strength of Daniel's arguments, i was not satisfied with the points he presented The core issue doesn't revolve around determining who is correct between Nouman and Daniel. Instead, the concern arises when we intensively scrutinize these minor issues, disregarding the fact that Islam faces more substantial challenges. The commentary on the video was distressing, witnessing individuals pronouncing takfeer (excommunication) on Brother Nouman based on this matter. The predicament arises when scholars are publicly criticized, particularly if their opinions are so divergent that they could lead one to be considered outside the fold of Islam. While it is important for muslims to seek perfection in the deen, it's crucial to recognize that practicing the religion flawlessly is unattainable. This acknowledgment holds significance when we decide to address the actions or viewpoints of scholars.

@@shuaibuabdullahi6327 I appreciate your thoughtful reflection on the contrasting interpretations of the Quranic verse presented by Brother Nouman Ali Khan and Brother Daniel. While I agree that the Muslim community faces pressing challenges that require immediate attention, the subject matter at hand should not be relegated as a "minor issue." Here's why: Clarification on Brother Nouman: First and foremost, Brother Nouman is a da'ee, not a scholar specialized in Islamic jurisprudence or tafseer. While I find his work on the miracles and literary beauty of the Quran deeply enlightening, he is stepping into nuanced matters of jurisprudence and tafseer without offering a comprehensive context, reason for revelation, or perspectives from established scholars. This approach can be problematic. Returning to Classic Scholarship: Before taking sides, one should ask, "What have our previous scholars said about this verse?" The likes of Ibn Katheer, Tabari, Ibn Abbas, and Mujahid have dissected these issues far more comprehensively. The Islamic jurisprudential schools-Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali-have offered their perspectives too. Shouldn't we consider the consensus of our rich scholarly tradition? Questions about the Verse: The Quran and Hadith are multi-layered texts that require deep understanding, not just casual opinions. What is the syntax, the Nahw, the I'rab, and the Sarf of the verse? How does this specific instruction fit within the broader context of Islamic teachings? What are the implications on the inheritance by Prophets, the duties of Ahlul Bayt, and so forth? These questions underscore the complexity that defies simple 'two cents' opinions. The Point of Contention: The real issue isn't whether women can go out for necessities-Brother Daniel himself mentions that his wife Umm Khalid goes to the market. The concern lies in Brother Nouman's suggestion that Muslim women should be at the forefront in jobs and education, which is not historically supported in the Islamic tradition. The Role of Women: While you may view this issue as minor, the role of women in Islam is foundational. A strong, virtuous Muslim woman who prioritizes raising God-fearing children can be the pillar that holds the house. The evidence supporting this far outweighs contemporary misunderstandings of women's roles in Islamic history. Questioning Brother Nouman's Intent: Given Brother Nouman's years of experience in the field, it's unsettling to see him emphasize a stance with scant evidence, especially at a time when there's a strong wave of liberalism and feminism attacking Islamic principles. Scholarly research largely supports Brother Daniel's view on this matter. Comments Section Irrelevance: While the comments section can be disturbing, it's important to remember that the internet is rife with irrational opinions and even potential bots. That shouldn't distract us from the seriousness of the subject. It's crucial for us as Muslims to engage in these discussions with the depth and nuance they deserve, rather than dismiss them as minor concerns. JazakAllah Khair for initiating this dialogue. May Allah guide us all closer to the truth.

Yea u guys are not salafi. You guys follow adul wahhab and his manhaj, so don't call urselves salafis its morally sanctimonious. In reality you guys are wahhabis and you guys demean and mock the Salaf. Thats the truth of your sect.

so is daniel wrong? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7Xyj5s61Zg4.html

*Deobandi "ulamas" & heads were pure mushriks the deobandi akabireen! MUSHRIK ASHRAF ALI TANWI, THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI, HIS FAVOURITE DREAM BRIDE QASIM NANOTWI, IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI ANOTHER MUSHRIK WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ALSO THE WRITER OF FAZAEL AMAL ZIKRIYA KHANDELWI CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ANOTHER MUSHRIK!*

*_5 PILLARS OF ISLAM1⃣SHAHADAH2⃣SALAH3⃣ZAKAH4⃣SAWM5⃣HAJJ_* *_6 PILLARS OF EMAN1⃣AMANTU BILLAHI2⃣WAMALAIKATIH3⃣WAKUTUBIH4⃣WARUSULIH5⃣WALYAWMILAKHIR6⃣WALQADRI KHAYRIHI WASHARRIHI MINALLAH_* *THERE ARE 17 FARD/COMPULSORY RAKATS OF 5 DAILY PRAYERS✅OF WHICH 11 ARE BATINI/QUIET RAKATS & 6 ARE JAHRI/LOUD RAKATS✅SURAH FATIHA MUST BE RECITED IN EVERY RAKAH AS PROVEN IN MANY SAHIH HADITHS & SURAH FATIHA IS NOT FORGIVEN OR EXCUSED FOR ANYONE WHETHER ITS THE IMAM OR CONGREGANTS/THE ONES PRAYING BEHIND AN IMAM✅ALL THE SAHABA RECITED SURAH FATIHA EVEN IN THE LOUD RAKATS WHERE THE IMAM FINISHES HIS FATIHA AS PROVEN FROM ALL THE SAHIH HADITHS ABOVE* 1⃣4⃣ *PILLARS OF SALAH1⃣STANDING2⃣OPENING TAKBIR3⃣SURAH FATIHA 4 BOTH IMAM & CONGREGANTS4⃣RUKU/BOWING5⃣STAND FROM RUKU6⃣SUJOOD/PROSTRATING7⃣RISING FROM SUJOOD8⃣JALSA/SITTING BETWEEN 2 SUJOODS9⃣CALMNESS IN ALL ACTIONS OF SALAH🔟PERFORMING ALL PILLARS IN ORDER1⃣1⃣FINAL TASHAHHUD1⃣2⃣SITTING DOWN 4 IT1⃣3⃣SENDING SALAT ON MUHAMMADﷺ1⃣4⃣2 TASLEEMS* ☑ 8⃣ *WAJIBAT OF SALAH1⃣ALL TAKBIRS EXCEPT OPENING TAKBIR (SINCE ITS A PILLAR)2⃣SAY SAMIALLAHU LIMAN HAMIDAH 4 BOTH IMAM & CONGREGANTS3⃣SAY RABBANA WALAKAL HAMD4⃣DURING RUKU SAY SUBHANA RABBIYAL AZEEM5⃣DURING SUJOOD SAY SUBHANA RABBIYAL A'LA6⃣BETWEEN 2 SUJOODS SAY RABBIGHFIRLEE7⃣1ST TASHAHHUD8⃣SITTING DOWN 4 IT* ☑ Hadith *حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو كُرَيْبٍ، مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ الْعَلاَءِ حَدَّثَنَا زَيْدُ بْنُ الْحُبَابِ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ بَشَّارٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَامِرٍ الْعَقَدِيُّ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ مَنِيعٍ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو أَحْمَدَ الزُّبَيْرِيُّ، قَالُوا حَدَّثَنَا كَثِيرُ بْنُ زَيْدٍ، عَنْ رُبَيْحِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ، عَنْ أَبِي سَعِيدٍ، أَنَّ النَّبِيَّ ـ صلى الله عليه وسلم ـ قَالَ* ‏ *لاَ وُضُوءَ لِمَنْ لَمْ يَذْكُرِ اسْمَ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِ* ‏ ‏‏ *It was narrated from AbuSaeed that:The Messenger of Allah said: "There is no ablution for one who does not mention the Name of Allah (before doing it)✅Hasan✅Darussalam💧Vol. 1 Hadith 397 Book 1 Hadith 429 Ibn Majah* 💧 *WUDU MUST BE MADE WITH CORRECT STEP BY STEP PROCEDURE EVEN IF A PERSON DIPS IN A POOL OR TAKES A FULL SHOWER💧BCUZ 1 OF THE CONDITIONS OF WUDU IS IT MUST BE DONE IN CORRECT ORDER💧YOU CAN MAKE WUDU ANYTIME💧WITH OR WITHOUT CLOTHES WUDU IS VALID💧REMOVING CLOTHES DOES NOT BREAK OR SPOIL WUDU IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM* ✅ *1 Wash hands starting from the fingers to the wrist 3 times* *2 Rinse & gargle ur mouth thoroughly & spit out 3 times* *3 Hold water with right hand close to nose & inhale & sniff some water slowly inside & clean the nostrils & blow out the water from the nose itself 3 times* *4 Wash entire face 3 times with both hands cupped with water & it must reach ear to ear door as well as from forehead hair line to neck* *5 Wash right hand starting again from the fingertips to elbows 3 times* *6 Wash left hand likewise* *7 Take little water with both your wet hands & wipe your entire head from forehead to the back of your neck & WIPE BACK TO THE FOREHEAD IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION ONLY ONCE!* *8 Use wet index fingers to clean the inside of ears & thumbs to clean the outside ONCE* *9 Finally wash right foot upto the ankle thrice* *10 Wash left ankle likewise* ⛔☝🏻💡 *CORRECT YOUR MISTAKES IN WUDU💧ESPECIALLY ISTINSHAAQ=CLEANING THE NOSTRILS☝🏻I ESPECIALLY ALERTED ABOUT ISTINSHAAQ BCUZ MOST people just sprinkle water into their noses without even INHALING & sniffing it inside AND EXHALING & BOWING IT OUT BY THE NOSE ITSELF!👃💧THIS IS THE ONLY VALID METHOD❗✔IF YOUR WUDU ABLUTION IS INVALID, ALL YOUR PRAYERS ARE ALSO INVALID🔥FEAR ALLAH SHARE THE KHAIR WITH EVERYONE JazakAllahukhairaa🗣Tag any1 who is unaware of the dangers of NOT following the proper procedure like the Prophet Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم ﷺ* 🌴

*_It is FARD/obligatory upon The True Muslim to affirm the Asma/Names & Sifat/Attributes of Allah, without committing:1️⃣Tahreef:To attach figurative & metaphorical meanings to the attributes of Allah, while denying the apparent meaning of the attribute2️⃣Ta'teel:Leaving & vacating🔥Negation/Denial of His Attributes & denial of His Self & Being. Denial of the real meaning proved by the Quran & Sunnah🔥Tahreef includes Tateel but Ta'teel does not include Tahreef🔥There are 2 types of Tateel:❌️1)Absolute Tateel: Which the Jahamiyyah committed:Denying all attributes of Allah❌️2)Partial Tateel:Which the Ash’ariyya & maturidiyya commit:Denying all attributes of Allah by Tahreef & affirming only 7 (Ashariyah) & 8 (Maturidiyah) attributes of Allah3️⃣Takyeef:To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are such & such or to put questions as to the state of His Attributes. The term "beghair Takyeef' means that the AhlusSunnah deny having knowledge of Allah's condition as Allah alone knows the state of His Self & His Attributes4️⃣Tamtheel: To have faith that the Attributes of Allah are like the Attributes of His creatures5️⃣Tafweed: To have faith that it’s not the apparent meaning which is meant but only Allah alone knows the meanings of the attributes6️⃣Tajseem:To have faith that Allah has a body. (We as AhlusSunnah neither affirm nor negate the attribute of body, since nothing has come in Quran & Sunnah concerning it & Aqeeda is a matter purely based on Revelation/Wahi as mentioned by Shaykh IbnUthaymeen RAHIMAHULLAH & Shaykhul Islam IbnTaymiyyah RAHIMAHULLAH✅So we do NOT affirm that He has a body while affirming his attributes). The Salaf understood the meanings of the passages of the Quran & the Sunnah & proved these meanings in the favour of Allah. However they would submit the knowledge of the reality (how of the attribute) To Allah. Imam Malik RAHIMAHULLAH was asked about the state of Istawa (Rising Above) of Allah on the Throne, he said Istawa is known but ‘how’ He ascended is unknown. The code of conduct of the AhlusSunnah wal Jamah is as the clear Quran’s verse:“There is nothing like Him.”-Quran (112:4)✔️The correct Aqeeda therefore, is NOT that the Attributes are completely denied as is the way of the Mutazila🔥(A Deviant sect), NOR is it to try to prove them completely as is the way of the Mumathila🔥(Another deviant sect✏Rather the true Aqeeda is to make an affirmation of the Attributes without similitudes/likeness✅SALAFIYYAH✅️_* *Breaking down DEVIANT AQEEDAH OF SUFI/deobandis/asharis/matureedis🛐❌1️⃣They claim to follow imam AbuHanifa infact they follow him only in fiqhi issues, so they can fight with us that fold hands below navel or dont do Raful-Yadayen2️⃣The aqeedah of sufi/ashari/maturidi/deobandi is of sufi🔥WAllahu Alam from where they got this Shirk belief🔥Their aqeedah is of Mohammad bin Mohammad matrudi🔥If you know that matrudi is the fiqh who are wrong in the tawheed asma-wa-siffat of Allah.. They don't believe in every names of Allah, holding on only 7-8🔥They were wrong before & they're still wrong❌3️⃣Whilst in performing deeds they follow Sufi's 4 sub categories qadiri→chishti→naqshabandi→suharwardi👎🏻They're undercover Sufi🛐❌4️⃣SUFI/ASHARI/MATUREEDI/Deobandi claim that they follow 4 imams, but they follow imam matrudi in aqeedah & in fiqh they follow imam AbuHanifa, they leave 3 Imams as if they never existed!*_ *_WHERE IS ALLAH⁉️ImamAbuHanifah☝🏻AbuMutiAlBalkhi reported:I asked Imam AbuHanifah about a person who says:I do NOT know whether my Rab (Allah) is above the heavens or on earth⁉️AbuHanifah said:A person who makes such a statement becomes an apostate because Allah, the Exalted says:The Merciful has ascended above THE ARSH & THE ARSH OF ALLAH IS ABOVE HIS HEAVENS🔥I ALSO ASKED ABUHANIFAH🔥What if such a person admits, Allah is above His Arsh BUT EXCLAIMS:I do not know whether His Arsh is above the heavens or on earth‼️AbuHanifah responded🗣If he denies that the Arsh is above the heavens, he is an apostate‼️If the person apostatizes by saying that he did not know where is the ARSH of Allah, then by right a person who denies the Loftiness of Allah altogether is definitely worse than an apostate🔥ImamMalik🔥Abdullah binNafi reported:MalikBinAnas said:ALLAH IS ABOVE THE HEAVENS BUT HIS KNOWLEDGE encompasses everything. NOTHING ESCAPES HIS KNOWLEDGE🔥ImamShafi said:THE CREED which I hold is the same creed the MUSLIMS BEFORE me were holding, namely, the Testimony of Faith:There is no god worthy of being worshipped except Allah, that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah & that Allah is ABOVE HIS ARSH, above the heavens. He descends to the lowest heaven whenever He wishes📚ImamBinKhuzaimah a SHAFI himself said:Whoever DOES NOT BELIEVE that Allah is above His ARSH☝🏻Above His 7 HEAVENS & THAT HE IS SEPARATE from His creatures, is a KAFIR🔥Such person must be ordered to repent & disavow his belief or else he must be beheaded and thrown on a garbage dump so that neither Ahlul-Qiblah nor Ahludth-dthimmah be annoyed by the foul odour of his carcass🔥AbuBakr MuhammadatTamimi, a Shafi'ite imam of Naisabur said:"I do not pray behind a person who denies the attributes of Allah & does not recognise that Allah is above His Arsh🔥ImamAhmad🔥He was asked: Is Allah above His Arsh, above the 7th heaven, separate from His creatures, & is His knowledge & power encompassing everything everywhere⁉️He replied:'Certainly, He is above His Arsh & NOTHING escapes His knowledge. All of the above show that the entire Muslim ummah, in the past & present, is in unison regarding the belief in the Loftiness & SUPREMACY OF ALLAH THE EXALTED_*

How many groups under the Sunni banner claim they don't follow the Quran and Sunnah .......very few moments in our history we've had unity .

*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable* *_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*

*Deobandi "ulamas" & heads were pure mushriks the deobandi akabireen! MUSHRIK ASHRAF ALI TANWI, THE HOMOSEXUAL RASHEED AHMAD GANGOHI, HIS FAVOURITE DREAM BRIDE QASIM NANOTWI, IMDADULLAH MUHAJIR MAKKI ANOTHER MUSHRIK WHO CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ALSO THE WRITER OF FAZAEL AMAL ZIKRIYA KHANDELWI CLAIMED TO BE ALLAH! ANOTHER MUSHRIK!*

*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_* *DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!* *ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!* *FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS* *_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_* *_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_* *_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*

​@@muhammadsalafiahlulhadithignore this guy

*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable* *_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*

Eating was more important to mawiyah bin hinda lanati rather than obey Allah Messenger pbuh till Allah Messenger pbuh prayed against that Maloon sahih muslim 6628 Ibn Abbas reported: I was playing with children that Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya. I returned and said: He is busy in taking food. He again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in taking food, whereupon he said: May Allah not fill his belly! Ibn Muthanna, said: I asked Umm Umayya what he meant by the word Hatani. He said: It means he patted my shoulders.

@@tmffj your point?

@@mwadoodsarwar9561 Maloon Marwan the Governor of Mawiyah bin hinda lanati announced sunnat of Allah Messenger pbuh is EXPIRED even tho the companions(ra) tried to stopped him but he didn't listen & did it anyway & this truth been hide from ummat what was the reasons behind Karbla Sahih-Bukhari 956 Narrated Abu Sa`id Al-Khudri: The Prophet (ﷺ) used to proceed to the Musalla on the days of Id-ul-Fitr and Id-ul-Adha; the first thing to begin with was the prayer and after that he would stand in front of the people and the people would keep sitting in their rows. Then he would preach to them, advise them and give them orders, (i.e. Khutba). And after that if he wished to send an army for an expedition, he would do so; or if he wanted to give and order, he would do so, and then depart. The people followed this tradition till I went out with Marwan, the Governor of Medina, for the prayer of Id-ul-Adha or Id-ul-Fitr. When we reached the Musalla, there was a pulpit made by Kathir bin As-Salt. Marwan wanted to get up on that pulpit before the prayer. I got hold of his clothes but he pulled them and ascended the pulpit and delivered the Khutba before the prayer. I said to him, "By Allah, you have changed (the Prophet's tradition)." He replied, "O Abu Sa`id! Gone is that which you know." I said, "By Allah! What I know is better than what I do not know." Marwan said, "People do not sit to listen to our Khutba after the prayer, so I delivered the Khutba before the prayer."

@@mwadoodsarwar9561 1st Kharaji/Shia/Rafdi Mawiyah bin sufiyan in Muslim ummat who abused Khalifa Rashid & Mandatory to abuse Maula Ali (as) in religious & political gathering in His Fironic era sahih Muslim 6229 Sahl b. Sa`d reported that a person from the offspring of Marwan was appointed as the governor of Medina. He called Sahl b. Sa`d and ordered him to abuse `Ali. Sahl refused to do that. He (the governor) said to him: If you do not agree to it (at least) say: May Allah curse Abu Turab. Sahl said: There was no name dearer to `Ali than Abu Turab (for it was given to him by the Prophet himself) and he felt delighted when he was called by this name. He (the governor) said to him: Narrate to us the story of his being named as Abu Turab. He said: Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) came to the house of Fatima and he did not find `Ali in the house; whereupon he said: Where is your uncle's son? She said: (There cropped up something) between me and him which had annoyed him with me. He went out and did not rest here. Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) asked a person to find out where he was. He came and said: Allah's Messenger, he is sleeping in the mosque. Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) came to him and found him lying in the mosque and saw that his mantle had slipped from his back and his back was covered with dust and Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) began to wipe it away from him (from the body of Hadrat `Ali) saying: Get up, covered with dust (Abu Turab); get up, covered with dust.

Uthman ibn Farooq needs to either provide proof of the accusations PUBLICLY made against deobandis. Amongst the absurd allegations are that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) is walking around, meeting people and having dinner with them. PROVIDE THE PROOF, or be a man and RETRACT THE STATEMENT.

@@aktcdclooks you have never left your hometown. Go to Pakistan, India, Turkey, some part of Russia, Central Asia, proofs and evidences in every 2-3 mosques

Saud cheer leaders =uthman and the wierdo abu taymiyah

@user-sq5zf4nr7l I dont got time to answer most of these but female circumcision isn't a thing is islam gang

They’ve literally advised Daniel for a long time “behind the scenes” if you don’t know what’s going on akhi don’t make theories based on a certain person’s words. Saajid and Sh Uthman’s team have advised him.

The actual answer is very simple because syaithaan's whispers, every human is targeted 24/7 may Allah makes it easier for us to always remain steadfast

"Tell My ˹believing˺ servants to say only what is best. Satan certainly seeks to sow discord among them. Satan is indeed a sworn enemy to humankind."

@@tacom0nsta658 asslamu alaikum brother what verse is that and what Surah. Very powerful

@@jbo1092 Seems to be from Al-Isra verse 53

*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable* *_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*

Exactly.

100%

Eating was more important to mawiyah bin hinda lanati rather than obey Allah Messenger pbuh till Allah Messenger pbuh prayed against that Maloon sahih muslim 6628 Ibn Abbas reported: I was playing with children that Allah's Messenger ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ ) happened to pass by (us). I hid myself behind the door. He (the Prophet) came and patted my shoulders and said: Go and call Mu'awiya. I returned and said: He is busy in taking food. He again asked me to go and call Mu'awiya to him. I went (and came back) and said that he was busy in taking food, whereupon he said: May Allah not fill his belly! Ibn Muthanna, said: I asked Umm Umayya what he meant by the word Hatani. He said: It means he patted my shoulders.

Best way possible

@@tmffj *_Tawassul by virtue of the Prophets & the righteous🔥Seeking Rescue from the Living & Dead & Making Tawassul Through Them🔥Excerpt:Quote:As for seeking rescue from the dead, from the Prophets & other than them, it is not permissible & it is from the Major Shirk. As for seeking rescue from the one who is alive and present (in the vicinity) & seeking rescue from him in that which he is capable of, then there is no harm in that, due to the saying of Allah, the Sublime, "The man of his (own) party asked him (fastaghathahu) for help against his foe✅️QURAN 28:15✅️As for Tawassul through the living or the dead, from the Prophets or other than them, by way of their physical essences, or their honour, or their right, then it is not permissible. It is from the innovations & the means that lead towards Shirk🔥Tawassul to Allah by virtue & honor of His Awliya is of several kinds:1️⃣When a person asks a living Wali to supplicate to Allah for them that Allah may extend their provision, cure their diseases, or guide them to the right path. This is HALAL & some of the Sahabah asked the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to supplicate to Allah for rainfall & the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم invoked his Lord who responded to his Dua & subsequently rain fell heavily. The Sahabah themselves asked AlAbbas ibnAbd AlMuttalib to invoke Allah for rain during the caliphate of Umarرضي الله عنه✅️They called upon him to make Dua to Allah for rain. AlAbbas made Dua to his Lord and they all said Amin after him✅️There were other similar incidents that took place during the lifetime of the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم & after. Muslims used to ask others to supplicate to Allah for them to bring benefit or ward off harm2️⃣Asking Allah through the love of His Prophet & following his Sunnah & also through loving His Awliya by saying:O Allah I ask you by my love for Your Prophet & my following his Sunnah & by my love for Your Awliya to grant me such-and-such.” This is HALAL because it is a Tawassul from a servant to his Lord through his own good deeds he has done. It is authentically narrated in a Hadith that the people who were trapped in the cave asked Allah to save them by virtue of their righteous deeds3️⃣Asking Allah through the virtue & honor of His Prophets or one of His Awliya’ by saying, “O Allah I ask You by virtue of Your Prophet or by the honor of Al-Husayn…” & this kind of Tawassul is NOT ALLOWED‼️& HARAM MAJOR SIN🔥Though the honor of the Awliya is great, especially that of Prophet Muhammadصلى الله عليه وسلم it cannot be relied on as a means of answering the Dua🔥That is why when the Sahabah suffered from drought, they did not make Tawassul to Allah for rain by virtue of the Prophet’s honor🔥They asked the Prophet’s uncle AlAbbas to supplicate to Allah although the Prophet’s honor is the greatest✅️Moreover it has never been narrated on the authority of any of the Sahabah رضوان الله عليهم that they made Tawassul through the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم after his death, while they are the best of Muslim generations, who knew well his esteem and were the most loving of him4️⃣A servant asking His Lord for their need swearing by one of His Awliya or Prophets, or by their virtue saying:O Allah‼️I ask You to grant me such-&-such thing by virtue of so-&-so or by the right of Your Prophet so-&-so.” This again is NOT ALLOWED & HARAM‼️🔥because just adjuring a person by the life or virtue of another is prohibited & is even more prohibited when it comes to Allah🔥Furthermore no servant of Allah no matter how pious & obedient they are, is entitled to such status that makes others adjure Allah or beseech Him by their virtue🔥This opinion is supported by legal proofs & on the basis of which the Islamic creed is protected & is regarded a means to block the ways leading to Shirk_* www.salafitalk.net/st/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=16&Topic=9807

It will cause a _fitna_ among the Muslim _ummah._ That's why it should be done in private. This is not speaker's corner, this is about preventing a _fitna_ from happening.

If i have less followers than you and I publicly mock you and ask you to argue with me, will you accept? Do you think Zakir Naik cares if small dogs bark at him??

Daniel Haqiqatjou is drifting away Muslim women from Islam. Those women just need to study Sahabas and Sahabiyats for themselves.

It’s the Saudi puppets that does that, Daniel is a real one.

you have lost your mind@@egoiisticprince7977

Yes brother , You said it rightly

Uthman ibn Farooq needs to either provide proof of the accusations PUBLICLY made against deobandis. Amongst the absurd allegations are that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) is walking around, meeting people and having dinner with them. PROVIDE THE PROOF, or be a man and RETRACT THE STATEMENT.

@@aktcdc plz. can you share the link where he said such things about Deobandi School

@@abdullahalrai Nontheless , such beliefs are'nt uncommon in books of their past scholars..

Some might also view sleeping with premenstral minors as evil...except for Mohammad and Allah Surah 65:4 As for those of your women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their term shall be three months-and also for those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED.

@@mattpowell6291 find a job

He didn’t make a video about them. So cope harder

@@enamulhaquejoy6962 this is literally a video with name dropping. Good bye troll.

@@youteubakount4449 What is your age? Are you even qualified to visit RU-vid? Did you even understand my comment?

even classical scholars have different views that are often contradict each others. but at the very least they're all have agreed on the bare minimum. fortunate were the sahabi. they too had their own ikhtilaf. but at that time, there's always The Prophet to help them clarifying things.

The verse that says you can sleep with premenstral children is very soothing 🤦‍♂️

Send a picture of the whole page ur just taking it out of context read the quraan properly

⁠@@Daily_QuraanOh profit what’s in your heart you are hiding from us ? FYI Surah Al Tahreem. Now read what was in his heart he was hiding ? From Al Tabari it’s quite clear it was his adopted son Zaid’s wife. Hmm get lost son zaid I want your wife too as if having so many wives and slave girls are not enough. Poor zaid lost his life and his wife both. Tafheem ul Quran is now studied by everyone not just Alims anymore.

@@Daily_Quraan Surah 65:4 As for those of your women who have reached menopause, if you have any doubts, their term shall be three months-and also for those who have NOT YET MENSTRUATED.

@@DoorbeenDornazar yh u c thats the problem the Quran is interpreted by people who dnt have knowledge who don’t have the understanding who think they can just interpret the quraan by its literal meaning no wonder u have doubts no wonder ur not 100% sure go ask a moulana n then cme back to me u think u can interpret a quraan hahahahaha u must be joking unless ur knowledgeable n in ur case ur not so cme back to me wen u have asked ur local imam. They even said a time will cme wer people will think they can interpret the quraan without knowledge.

Please don’t be bias’d lie this. It’s not right.

@@AJ-oo6sv I am not a blind muqallid or follower of any personality like most Muslims. Wherever and whenever ppl from dawah work will come out and try to involve in fields they are not good at, defame Ulama e haq, I will stand against them. May Allah bless Sheikh Usman for his dawah work, incredible indeed. My respect for him doesn't mean I will go blind anywhere he goes wrong. I don't consider any scholar today as infallible. Neither do I agree with everything Brother Daniel says. But yes I do agree with 99% things of brother Daniel. So what I think and believe I share my views. Ppl can disagree.

@@MS-Hussain Daniel who is slandering scholars and lying about them ? Go and learn islam from proper teachers and not a ignorant showman like Daniel who doesnt know the ruling of khurooj nor basic arabic. You are insulting Uthman ibn farooq and then you praise him. You have no manners but you have the audacity to talk about religious topics. If you stand against people who defame the scholars, the go against Daniel. He has called various scholars bootlickers and he promotes khawarij ideology.

Bruh Daniel has been exposed so many times. He is literally two-faced and has no good manners. He is like another Bro Hajji who lie or have no understanding of hadith. Just because someone can talk better doesn't make them right. Listen to the evidence and Daniel has nothing compared to people who are more knowledgeable.

@@musfiqurkashem346 that's all I hear fancy titles like 'people of knowledge' and yet these so called people fail to deliver a concise statement because they don't have one, they are beating around the bushes fooling the masses with their titles hoping that nobody will question them using fear tactics with their status

@@SPDRM literally making fun of women in Afghanistan for wanting an education and yet when women in India wanting to go to school in India with hijab he supports it. His wife went to Harvard... come on really. He speaks against other Muslims, but when it came to his wife she is self-developing. He says he is Jahil in one debate, but acts like he knows better than others and calls them Madkhali or bootlickers for following what the Prophet said. He speaks against Saudi rulers but speaking across the Atlantic under the protection of the kafir US government which he definitely has to be pay taxes to them which funds everything the US does like supporting Israel and bombing of innocent Muslims. Tell me when he is actually helping the Muslims suffering in Yemen. I don't see him promoting anything like that. Maybe he should use his platform for that. If he calls everyone a madkhali and bootlickers, tell him to stop bootlicking the US government and stop paying taxes if he truly stands for what he believes and let's see who the real bootlicker is.

​@@musfiqurkashem346 He's like that one spoiled rich kid who gets good grades & has no discipline on how to talk & also thinks he's the main character or something sent to debunk all deviants where only his views are true

Ive seen some of his video ( daniel ) and i've always wondered does he ever study islam in a university in muslim country before ? Like saudi arabia, so many questions about this guy, i had even sent an email to him to ask his islamic degrees, no reply

Are you making your own ijtihad here? Why don’t you see what actual scholars say on the issue?

You said you want to unite but that’s the same thing Daniel said let’s unite we have small differences of opinions among Athari, maturidi, Ashari but you said let’s unite upon the Quran and sunna then mention shiekh Albani, Usaymeen, Fowzan, and Bin Baaz May Allah have mercy all of these wahhabi scholars, but all Islam proved that they weren’t even united aqeedah. So you told me that you don’t know these guys but that’s not the issue. The issue is you told Daniel bring deobandi scholars and I’ll be more then happy to debate them. When I spoke to you, you said that it was Daniel idea to bring up aqeeda at the wahhabi ishtima, but Daniel came out with a video saying that this wasn’t true. You also told brother dilly from 5 pillars that it was Daniel idea to talk about aqeeda. So if you are truthful come out of your rat hole and became a lion like you pretend to be

Send the link

Daniel is a Khariji who praises the Khawarij and insults the scholars. Madkhali is a term used by people who have no clue of the real Salafiyyah. Daniel also claims "madkhalis" are harsh towards Muslims and good towards kuffar while daniel himself is good and gives presents to enemies of Islam who curse the prophet s.a.w. This only is a proof that he is upon falsehood

Daniel isn't even graduated from Islamic university. He's just an Irani guy hating Saudi posting memes on social media. Not a scholar whatsoever. That's why he doesn't have the wiseness of a scholar. To be careful when criticizing a particular country, a specific person. I bet he's encouraging muslims to rebel against their leader.

​@@WU-HU-XI-LIAN-DA_STRIKElol except they are

​@jinn6841 Daniel's a khariji n gives non muslims gifts !!! Dude do u mind sharing whatever ur smoking 😂

It seems like you'v smoking something, next time dont ever speak with ignorance. In the following vids you will see the evidence of Daniel being soft to the kuffaar and giving them gifts. Not to mention he praises Deobandis who are graveworshippers and praises the Khariji "Suleyman Al Ulwan" who is a known to promote suicide bombing and who is ISIS's most favorite scholar. Ahlul Sunnah is very harsh against ahlul bid'ah. barak Allahu feek ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-7MFh7K987ug.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CpdgHVTO2Ew.html @@azamkhanAK50489

I thought no sects allowed in Islam

@@SpinozicTrollAbsolutely no sect is allowed in Islam. We shouldn’t be divided and we have to unite on Haq

Sectarianism is evil

Yasin qadhi is two face

@@halalpolice23 well in the end, sects in islam exists , so what?

Muhammad Ali Mirza is a rafidi shia

Bruh 🤦🤦

@itsme4080 hahah he's literally given hundreds of lectures in the mode of engineering methods. Fact is people who love sects hate him because he is unforgiving of sectarianism as every Muslim should be and in turn some guys don't even bother watching his lectures. He literally reasons with references and logic , the very thing you mentioned here.

Engineer 💀💀

@@ZaidKhan-su3ey grave worshippers & Banu umayya apologists 💀💀💀

why u didnt you mention muhammed householders? Ahul bait? ( Ali . Fatima , hassan and hussian ) you must be an evil Nasibi

It's about the paper ....money Dawah is the new Dawah !!! We will use kafir platforms to debate Islam 😂😂😂😱😱😱😱.

Both these Ulemas don't charge even a penny from Dawah..

@@muhammadamjad2537 have you been living under a rock ?? They travel the world on first class flights , they have no job !!! How does their household survive on no money ??? They are collecting money from Dawah !!! They charge mosques for their Dawah !!! The best at this type of Dawah is Dr Naik !! He made hundreds of millions !!! . Now these Pakistanis are at it as well .

no need to do fitnah, better silent if you are not sure

@@stms6077 The Kaaba is a pagan place of worship .. why is there a moon and star above every mosque ??? The moon god hubal is the Cresent moon . The god of the quaresh tribe to which Mohamed belonged to !!! So he smashed up all the idols and kept the ones he prayed to. The black rock and the moon . Go and do some research .... Fitnah my arse .

Uthman ibn Farooq needs to either provide proof of the accusations PUBLICLY made against deobandis. Amongst the absurd allegations are that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) is walking around, meeting people and having dinner with them. PROVIDE THE PROOF, or be a man and RETRACT THE STATEMENT.

Go watch more soul train

You're right salafi's always talk about deobandi but never dare to confront them

IF YOUR PREACHER OR IMAM CLAIMS TO BE FROM A SECT THEN THIS IS NOT ISLAM IF THERE ARE CULTURAL ACTS THAT GO AGAINST THE SUNNAH THIS IS AGINST ISLAM

Oh please. Stop pushing this sufi agenda. Brother Winters is a very eloquent speaker but he’s no scholar.

"Not discussing faults in other sects" What do you mean? Keep silent the truth???? Amar makruf nahi mungkar is wajib to each Muslim

Brother what part of the initial message did you not understand. He made false statements about a group and he was challenged to discuss his false accusations, but has not desired to discuss those false accusations online. If that's the case then why make such accusations online?

Uthman ibn Farooq needs to either provide proof of the accusations PUBLICLY made against deobandis. Amongst the absurd allegations are that the Prophet (sallallahu alaihi wasallam) is walking around, meeting people and having dinner with them. PROVIDE THE PROOF, or be a man and RETRACT THE STATEMENT.

@@aktcdc True brother. This is not the teachings of Deoband. They are following pure touheed. All those he raised points are all condemned by Deoband ulemas

Why be Deobandi,it’s a group which is a sect, why align with a group that is a new iteration as a term if it wasn’t having its own interpretation it wouldn’t need a name or be separate Why not just be of the way of the sunnah even

*Backbiting is ONLY HALAL for a sound religious purpose that CANNOT be achieved except by using it1️⃣Complaint because of an injustice such as complaining to a ruler, judge or others in authority:A person may say "I was treated unjustly by so-&-so in such & such matter2️⃣Seeking help to change a Munkar (wrong deed) & to correct the wrongdoers:A person may say "A person does such & such, so stop him." His intention should be to check the Munkar. If this is not the case, then the statement is Haram3️⃣Seeking a Fatwa:A person may state to the Imam, Mufti or Shaikh "My father, brother or so-&-so has treated me unfairly. Is that act Halal? & how do I get out of this situation? How do I obtain my rights?" This way of seeking a Fatwa is Halal. However, it is safer & more preferable to say whatever would be said about a non-specific person as doing such & such as anonymously as possible4️⃣Warning Muslims against evil & advising them. This could include criticism of untrustworthy narrators or witnesses. This is HALAL by Ijma, rather it is mandatory & the benefit is very clear. Such as consulting in the matters of marriage or a business partnership. In this case the person consulted should not hide anything about the concerned person. He MUST mention the faulty qualities only with the intention of benefiting the consultant5️⃣Mentioning the person who indulges in Haram or Bid'ah openly. This would include mentioning those who openly drink Khamr or those in positions of authority doing wrong. It is permissible to mention the sin of such a person🚷However, it is prohibited to mention the person with a different sin unless there is a reason that makes it HALAL to do so for that sin6️⃣Identifying a person. If a person is known by a descriptive nickname, such as AlA'mash (squint-eyed), AlA'raj (1 who walks with a limp) or AlAsamm (deaf), then it is HALAL to use these names for identification purposes BUT it is NOT ALLOWED to use these names if the intention is to insult the person🚷If its possible to identify such person by using another descriptive name, then it is better & preferable* *_Did the salaf backbite against open sinners or innovators⁉️🔥It is NOT considered backbiting when talking about the people of desires & innovation & those who oppose the Salaf:Al-A'amash reported that Ibrahim (AnNakha'i) said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator." [1] 🚫AlHasanAlBasri said: "There is no backbiting with regard to (talking about) the innovator or the sinner who openly professes his evil." [2]& he also said: "There is no backbiting when it concerns the people of innovations." [3]AlFudayl IbnIyyad said:Whoever enters upon a person of innovation, then he has no sanctity (i.e. protection from being talked about)."[4]Sufyan IbnUyainah said:Shu'abah used to say: 'Come let us backbite for the sake of Allah Azza wa Jal‼️_*

*_MuslimSkeptic Daniel Haqiqatjou says:“I support Deobandis, they are the real ones. Most scholars are deobandis. I’m a fanboy of deobandis. They are preserving Islam, according to the Salaf(!)” Also DanielHaqiqatjou: “I’m Athari, Hanbali” Sorry, but this man is a deceiver. Daniel is a sympathizer of Khawarij who praises innovators from Deobandi sect upon soofiyyah. Wahdat ul Wujood is one of the worst forms of shirk and this is one of the core beliefs of Deobandis and barelvis. The Ulama of Deoband propogate and defend this kufr but the majority of their public does not know this Aqeedah. Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani had the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood as well. Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama”, “Murshad”, “Syed”, “Aala Hazrat”, “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyaat-e-Imdaadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishat that:“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allaah) and this is the meaning of Fana dar Fana. Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”_* *DANIEL HAQIQATJOU PRAISED INNOVATORS LIKE SUFI SECTS OF DEOBANDI DEVIANTS WHO HAVE PANTHEISM WAHDATUL WUJOOD AQEEDAH🔥🔥BUT innovators like deobandi naqshbandi barelwi etc. don't deserve any praise no matter how much khair they do or how many huffaz they produce each year! USING THAT LOGIC WE SHOULD ALSO START PRAISING THE QURANIST APOSTATES WHO ARE HADITH REJECTORS BUT "HAVE DONE SOME KHAYR"🔥ALLAH CURSED THE INNOVATOR AS WELL AS THE 1 WHO ACCOMMODATES THE INNOVATOR‼️🔥Let alone promotes such innovators' ideologies or sect or deviated beliefs!* *ALL MY COMMENTS ARE DETAILED REFUTATIONS OF KHUROOJ AGAINST RULERS BY SPEECH OR WEAPONS! ALHUMDULILLAH JAAHIL SKEPTIC DH, ALI DAWAH, MH, BROHAJJI ETC. HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED IN ALL MY COMMENTS & VIDEOS!* *FOLLOWING QURAN AND AUTHENTIC SUNNAH ACCORDING TO ASLAAF IS WRONG ACCORDING TO IKHWANI JAAHILS* *_Deobandi sufis & Homosexual lustful relationships🔥Is there any truth in their own books and scriptures for such an accusation? Or is 'Mufti Aziz ur Rehman's scandal a one off thing⁉️‼️Lets read from works of Deoband which reads:Book: Hikayat ul Awliya, Arwah thalatha, page no. 228🔥Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad sahib, my father mentions that, once there was a gathering at khanqah (certain dedicated area) of Gangoh (name of place). All the mureeds (blind followers) & shagird (students) of Gangohi & Nanotwi (deobandi scholars) were present there🔥Gangohi said to Nanotwi with lots of love: Why don't you lie here a bit (with me)🔥At this Nanotwi, got a bit shy, but Gangohi persisted🔥So Nanotwi lay down flat as per request🔥Gangohi, got onto that same charpai (bed)🔥Then Gangohi placed his hand on to the chest of Nanotwi while lying on that bed facing him, in such a way as how an 'ashiq' (sexual lustful lover) tries to satiate their heart through it🔥Nanotwi objected:Miyan(word means husband, but can be used in a way of respect for a person as well), what are you doing!?🔥WHAT WILL THE PEOPLE SAY⁉️🔥Upon hearing this, Gangohi replied:Let them say whatever (i.e. I don't care)!_* *_Haji Imdadullah Makki is the “Shaikh ul Ulama” “Murshad” “Syed” “Aala Hazrat” “The Shuyyookh ul Shuyookh of the Mashaaikh” of Deobandis. He writes in Kulyat-e-Imdadiya Page 18 printed by Darul Ishaat that:🔥“And after this he should be engrossed in the Zikr of HOO HOO so much so that he himself becomes the Mazkoor (i.e Allah) and this is the meaning of ‘Fana dar Fana’🔥Upon achieving this state he will become a capapie of Noor”🔥Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave and inwardly (Batini) the Haqq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human"🔥🔥🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhaail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgice him & says:“O Allah forgive me🔥I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing and whatever I am, It is You. And me & you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is nothing and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well and that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani which he mentioned in one of his books🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_* *_Zakariya Kandhalwi was narrating from a letter of Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi to his Shaykh Imdadullah AlMakki🔥(All3️⃣are from the elders of deoband)🔥Ashraf Ali Thanvi confirms in Imdad ul Mushtaq page 62 that, “He (Imdadullah Makki) used to say that the human being is outwardly a slave & inwardly (Batini) the Haq (Allah).” Moulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi further elaborates, “The batin is the reality which is manifest in the human, and the batin should not be considered a part of the human…”🔥Deobandis seemed to have applied this recipe, hence in Fadhail Sadqat page 558 Published by Kutub Khaana Faizi, Molana Zakriya Kandholwi narrates a dua from Rasheed ahmed gangohi in which he is asking Allah to forgive him & says:🔥“O Allah forgive me… I am a Liar, I am nothing… What am I? I am nothing & whatever I am, It is You. And me and you are Shirk upon Shirk”🔥So he first admits that he is a liar, he is noting and then tells Allah that what ever I am, it is you as well & that me & you are shirk upon shirk🔥Astaghfirullah🔥This is Wahdat ul Wujood. Now see the same Aqeedah of Wahdat ul Wujood from Mirza Qadiani:🔥“I saw in my kashf that I am Allah Himself and I believed with certainty that I was definitely Him..”_*

@@muhammadsalafiahlulhadith Don't spread lies. Deoband Ulemas have clear cut opinion regarding Wahdatul wajood. Allah Almighty and His Makhlooq are totally different. Whoever believes that Allah reside in every Makhlooq is astray and deviated from Islam.

​@@muhammadamjad2537brother some of them have this aqeedah In deoband btw

@@muhammadamjad2537 Many deoband scholars have such belief, Tariq Masood is an exception.. His Aqeedah is more inline with Athari Aqeedah

Don’t mix religion and politics

What can you do about the situation your talking about …

Goes against the history of Islam

@@mattpowell6291 Those who cannot correct their historical mistakes are destined for doom.

@@cmrafee2177 True but it was the founders of Islam who could not unite. This is why you have the Sunnis and Shiites.

But Karim did him dirty by asking him to do sahada

The entire online dawah scene has gone mad. Stick to scholars and their students. Leave these internet celebrities alone.