Shooting 400MP Photos on the $10,000 GFX100 (Fujifilm GFX100 Pixel Shift) 

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Peter lik does this all the time I'm sure

Imagine the storage requirements if they’re didn’t put caps on data size

@@minuteman259 I have a Insta mod that removes those Caps.

@@fa14bi-78 no you don't lmfao the limit isn't client-side so that's not anywhere near how that works

Tesco Virus

If you make a deal with the bacteria to sit perfectly still

Omggggggggggggggggggggg

@@esbensteen5412 agree 🤣

with the mark ii you can take pics of stuff that are in subatomic sizes.

second this

Let's hope for 5 years! I want to be alive when this gets down to 1K. Remember: we also need a lens ...

LOL

its now 2024 and they are going for 3kish on the used market lol

It’s 3k now

Not exactly. Pixel shifting doesn't increase lens resolving power, it takes multiple shots with the sensor shifted. So if this was a 400mp camera rather than a 100mp one, the results would be worse. It's all semantics though, because with any camera you can get this level of detail, it just takes more work and stitching shots.

Agreed bro.

lens generates a flow of light. it can't be sharp or not sharp. any lens that is focused on something gives a light. the main work is to absorb the most of this flow of light in a small amount of time on a surface. thats where MP counts. so its fully the work of matrix

It essentially halves the pixel pitch from 3.7 to 1.8.. you need 190lp/mm to utilize 1.8micron pixels. Its pretty much the best that current optics can possibly do. The largest noticeable effect comes from having full RGB info. In bayer sensors the megapixel ratings are misleading, a 100mp bayer sensor is only 33mp sensor in color (rest is interpolated). One pixel is actually 4 pixels on the sensor. So the bayer sensor basically has 7.4micron pixels. Pixels that big only can utilize around 50lp/mm resolving power from the lens. It does not go exactly like this, as bayers are asymmetric.. having twice as many green pixels as blue & red pixels.

@@ilyasnamozov2914 eat less acid :) its exactly the lens that can be sharp. MP only defines the image size. Its about the pixel pitch & lens resolution.

I can supposively shoot 8k on my phone but can only view upto 2k resolution. Makes no sence to me so I just do 4k and watch yt at 1440p

Me! 😂

@@ItsPinecone_911 shitphone. I like it

@@tfr lol

@@ItsPinecone_911 liar what kinda phone shoots 8k

My contact lens went slightly painful while looking at the 400MP files. I'm putting it down to sharpness.

You should’ve heard the fans on that thing, sounded like a jet!

@@zy_cheng what are you using for editing? program and machine? I use a S1H and a canon eos r5 and Premiere and 32 core threadripper

agree....two weeks for one picture edition...

He uses a Mac, not a real computer

now we have an apple silicon chip 🤪

Hasselblad H6D in her tinder: 😈

YOU DONT GET TO GET PERSONAL :

does it also do pixel shift ?

@@marknorris3769 - Yes. But you need Capture 20 software to align and merge the multiple files into a single file.

@@mattsnider5704 Imaging Edge should do it as well, right?

@richardhalo - No. Got it on sale. Capture One was $120.

@@Dr.LaserBeam - I don’t know if Imaging Edge allows for that. I think it is only available in Capture One.

Thanks for dropping by Amelie! And your course is really awesome!

that would be insaaaane. maybe you could even see the individual light sensitive corns in some high iso films like on a delta 3200 🤤🤤🤤

@@samsonkipp probably so! I use Nikon D800 to digitize film negatives, and the results are already mind blowing. I could get ~56MP for each frame after stitching.

This would be my dream lens and camera combo if this happened.

iXG with 100/150 Mpx's, 1×120mm Scheider-Kreutznach and 3-4 extensions are just enough for 6×6 w/o stitching 🤤 BTW ROI is significant in such cases, Fuji/Sony etc does not guarantee a sufficiently long mechanical shutter life (when I mean sufficiently >2-10 mio shots)

@@miroslavkhodl2665 it's all for the sake of having a 1GB scan file ;)

🤣🤣🤣

If you ever slightly have OCD that's triggering. I prolly wont stop cleaning....

The camera is dumb af

1x reproduction would mean a maximum resolving power of around 1 micron. You can see actual bacteria with this resolving power.

They already do.

@@micahroberts4481 i mean the megapixels of our eyes is 576 Megapixels

@@virt-manager Only after you've reconstructed all your fov by looking at everything ?

At work we have a phase one 100mp and a new fuji gfx 100 since a few days ago now and I work on 100mp files on a daily basis. I wouldn´t trade my private fuji apsc cameras and lenses for systems like that, because my fuji x-t3 actually IS JUST FINE in the best way. Like Yoda said: With higher resolution comes great responsibility. ;)

@@ThisIsWideAngle I would LOVE the GFX especially since it shoots 4k 30p as well AND has IBIS. But for the work I do the XT3 is such a workhorse and I love it and will keep mind for quite some time.

and a large format view camera with portra 400....

Yes

The movement might already be too much. Even 100mp are already pretty damn sensible. Wasn´t there a hardware solution which compensates earth rotation?

IMHO because people would stop buying their APSC cameras and lenses. The whole line up would lose value.

@@kikodotfilip that's likely it :( I hope to see a fullframe fuji in future

@@INSTINCT777 For what? There are way too many full frame camera makers on the market already. And the gain of FF is just not worth it, imo. Atleast not in the mirrorless line. Lenses get a lot bigger, heavier and more expensive on FF, which kinda neglects the whole idea of mirrorless in the first place. Just my 2cents tho.

I have the same issue with mine and I thought it was user error. To be fair I have to pixel peep at insane zoom levels to notice them, so unless you are goint to print a 10m print you might not notice it. I tried to combined two pixel shift images with one taken slightly offset and at an angle before averaging them in photoshop. It cleans it up but only works if you are photographing a perfectly flat subject. Otherwise you introduce perspective/parallax issues

Probably not really, you will hit the lens resolution limit and diffraction limit. I do macros and usually I push macro lenses over their limits by using macro rings. Beyond a point I don't get any more details.

A macro lens won't capture such detail, regardless of the shooting camera. That level of detail requires a microscope with lab-grade microscope objective lenses. As an engineer working in a nanotechnology company, I produced such micro images that revealed fairly distinct detail at about 1/3 micron (>350 nanometers), beyond which diffraction was a hard limit of visible light. For reference, a single pixel in a Canon EOS R5 is about 4 microns wide; so, a good microscope would achieve a slightly blurry, but legibly detailed image of a pixel.

the left image is blown up using nearest neighbour filter. that is why it seems softer. the resolution seemd to be there. i think pixelation is the same acriss the right image.

Many flagship android smartphones do pixel binning. The crazy Megapixel numbers the advertise are binned to a resolution that is more in line with the optical quality of the lenses by default. Shooting RAW binned images is not so useful since the Bayer filter makes binning non-trivial. On monochrome cameras it can be done, we have a monochrome camera at work that we often use with pixel binning.

wow Todd, look at you. Such a unique snowflake. I think you're the only person in the world who still wants to shoot film. Go you! Don't let anybody tell you you're not unique and quirky. You're not like all the other girls

@@yashwinning My camera is 900 bucks Mamiya 15 years old and I get 300megabytes files in digitiser and no way can digital get my colours or depth of Field ...you just keep chasing those upgrades and new cameras..I am not a snowflake but enjoy your mom's basement...I kind of find you rude but it's ok I am sure you regularly get that comment.