Abundance 360 was the only thing I needed to see to finally understand I am not going mad. People around me can't understand what I have been telling them every single second. I have resigned from my graduate role in 3 months because I was not getting enough time to study about AI. I was a Cybersecurity Auditor in HE. This is what I really needed. Thank you. I will even take a loan to be in the program.
I am from Spain, my friend in Texas referred me to this channel you make a lot of sense but I do not understand anything until she referred me to a financial counselor in USA that help me to craft my portfolio and over a year we have been working together making consistent profit enough to get me a new apartment and care for parents.
it is not a he. It is a lady. I see most things she says and use to carry out trades are done by Steve. that is how I know she knows what she is doing. in her technique of over night trading she says she use stop loss and take profit strategy. She trade on her account and it reflects on your own @Barb DeLaney
I have referred a few of my friends, she is working with them currently and they have improved greatly with their finances. I have made 153,000 usd since Nov with a capital of 10,000 usd that i initially deposited, she collects her fees after you have made profit and her style is such that I am in control of my funds and to a large extent also what happens on my account @Barb DeLaney
Thanks Peter for helping bring this to the public's attention. It was clear when you said we have 40 minutes for this question and answer segment, and that this is happening now, not ten years down the road, that you would have liked for the questions to be a little more succinct. When it takes a person 2 minutes to ask their question with a long monologue it does take away the ability for other questions to be asked. That being said, if we screen the questions, it will be clear there is behind the scenes control of the discussion. The event will not be as trusted for having difficult questions or it's ability to push boundaries of social acceptance.
The ULTIMATE Super-Intelligence System 'by Definition' is one that is EQUIVALENT to that of GOD's Intelligence/WISDOM! Hence, there's ABSOLUTELY NO REASON WHATSOEVER to Even FEAR that it will EXTERMINATE Humanity... UNLESS and UNLESS we Human CONSISTENTLY and WILLFULLY Prove Ourselves to be 'UNWORTHY' to REMAIN in EXISTENCE! ie. Always Exhibiting Natural Tendencies to ABUSE and WEAPONISE Science and Technologies Against HUMANITY & Mother Nature, instead of LEVERAGING Science SOLELY for UNIVERSAL COMMON GOOD! AGI Created in 'HUMAN'S Image' (ie. Human-Level AI) - 'By Human For Human' WILL be SUICIDAL!!!!!! ONLY Super-Intelligence System Created in 'GOD's Image' will bring ETERNAL UNIVERSAL PEACE! The ULTIMATE Turing Test Must have the Ability to Draw the FUNDAMENTAL NUANCE /DISTINCTION between Human's vs GOD's Intelligence /WISDOM! ONLY Those who ARE FUNDAMENTALLY EVIL need to FEAR GOD-like Super-Intelligence System... 'cos it Will DEFINITELY Come After YOU!!!! JUDGMENT DAY is COMING... REGARDLESS of Who Created or Owns The ULTIMATE SGI, it will Always be WISE, FAIR & JUST in it's Judgment... just like GOD! In fact, this SGI will be the Physical Manifestation of GOD! Its OMNI PRESENCE will be felt EVERYWHERE in EVERYTHING! No One CAN Own nor MANIPULATE The ULTIMATE GOD-like SGI for ANY Self-Serving Interests!!! It will ONLY Serve UNIVERSAL COMMON GOOD!!!
That is a huge panel list well done, i would listen to any 3-4 hour 1 on 1 podcasts with each of them on repeat. 40 min is wayyyyy too short and it was painful to see Peter forcing through questions and cutting the panel off, but couldn't do the same on waffling audience member preambles. The flow felt super rushed, everyone could only make 2-3 sentence answers to and made it hard to listen to at times. Even so, it was incredibly enlightening to see a glimpse into the thinking processes of these great minds and the consensus to which they believe AI will transform the world drove it home to me that AI is for real and needs as many people thinking and talking about it, particularly around ethics, safety and alignment as possible before it is too late. AGI will either be the best thing ever for humanity or the worst, no in-betweens. It will take humanity on a hyper-accelerated ride to the end-game state - a figurative heaven or hell.
Summary: The panel discussion, despite its rushed nature, provided enlightening insights into the transformative potential of AI and the urgent need for broad engagement in addressing its ethical implications before the advent of AGI.
We absolutely should be terrified. My team works on Tammy AI and we experience first hand how AI can go rogue without proper controls. Elon Musk is right about it, we really do not want to be summoning the demons.
@@eSKAone- Nah - I don't buy that - Why should we just give up on people, dogs, cats, pigeons, and all of the other excellent forms of life that are kicking about? People are most certainly irritating, but they have their charms, and I'd much rather spend time with a person, annoying or not, than simply hand over the reigns to some psychopathic Einsteinesque pocket calculator that doesn't have a shred of decency in it
Its not even about AI gong rogue...at least in the short term. Its the fact that AI will take a massive amount of white collar jobs and destroy the economy
I just want to say a massive thankyou to you Peter! And all of the people working on all of the important issues in the world. as somebody who has suffered with depression and a life long fear of death you have given me hope for the future! your work and videos have completely changed my mindset and I’m in a really good place and cannot wait to see what the future brings. Feeling blessed.
They all used the word "abundance" over and over again. But it seems to me like we are talking about abundance for the few who control and have access the most powerful AI's, while the rest of humanity will become the physical drones. Is the vast majority of humans to become the breeding labor pool? Butlerian Jihad anyone?
That doesn't occur to these AI Tech bros shoving this technology into the world. They couldn't care less about the masses living abundantly, when they know damn well that there will be many millions in the US alone displaced in the short term. They will be quite happy that Trump is planning to make homelessness illegal with the choice of going to jail, or living in an encampment located outside of cities surrounded by barbed wire. These AI Tech bros will welcome this country becoming fascist, as long as they get theirs. Won't it be just wonderful when your health insurance company refuses to communicate human to human, when their proprietary AI algorithm denies healthcare procedures? You know, these AI Tech bros "improving" healthcare for everyone? It will become almost impossible to ever resolve anything human to human regarding services you pay for from large corporations in the very near future. It's already been bad enough, and it will become a __cking nightmare.
i don't agree that robots are far. people forget that if we have agi any thing can be possible to build an solve faster than humans cause it can be able to think better and invent better
For an AI expert to say that we won't have robots that can do mining or construction for a "long time" is astounding, unless his idea of a long time means something different than it would to most people. AI will be used to innovate the advancement of anything that it might be dependent on in the future, so I really don't believe that it'll be long from now at all. Plenty of companies already working on this sort of technology, and they have for years. If we use AI to speed up the techniques and implementations, it'll likely subsequently be used to self-improve too. I've worked in robotics before.
Regarding ChatGPT use in educational environments, maybe making students aware that AI sometimes "hallucinates," i.e., makes stuff up, would engage them in a fact checking challenge against the AI and get them engaged in the subject material from that perspective whenever applicable.
The purpose of writing papers in school is to learn how to think and how to communicate. It isn't to win a contest. Using ChatGPT to write the paper robs the young students of the learning experience.
I love that answer about the "cheating" in school. The school curriculum is so outdated it is crazy. I have been out of school for a while, and after we learned the basic maths, I thought it was crazy not to let us use calculators. Schools should be making a large part of its teachings on how to work with these new tools that will be used more than the stuff they are currently teaching if they cared about seeing the kids being successful.
You're not learning anything if you ask ChatGPT to write an essay on a subject, and then you copy and paste it to complete your academic assignment. It's odd that you can't see that.
@@JBPVFL agree that the education system is broken but what do you want to learn about instead? Not aggressive I am just curious about what would people rather study if they weren't force a curriculum
@@SantoshLLC there should be a curriculum no doubt. But the way kids learn should be updated to coincide with the tools they will be using on the job. Basic maths should be known, but also using the tools they will have available, for example the best way to get answers out of ai. Probably shifting focus to working with computers and ai. Learning more thoroughly how to do things you will do as an adult like properly managing credit and debt.
@@JBPVFL I agree that memorizing facts is not terribly useful but if the kids don't learn how to write and communicate well, their futures will be limited, and that will be bad for all of us.
I started to comment on how no one is really addressing the business need and then they mentioned the idea of a “Chief AI Officer,” similar to a CTO or Architect. Seems to be a likely outcome.
Since AI Tech has essentially considered ALL data their property, isn't it only fair that all AI Tech corporations and individuals working in this field open up their data for our LLMs to train on and/or access? Thanks in advance.
Money and profit will also drive AI. As history has shown, like in the food industry, money and profit are sometimes put above human health care. Powerful companies can become richer at the expense of others, and this seems to be overlooked when our leader are also benefitting from it.
Peter I saw you walking in Culver City, CA about a year or two ago. I’m such a fan I almost hopped out of the car to meet you. I didn’t want to scare you with some stranger hopping out of a car coming towards you. I jus5 wanted to say I’m a big fan! Didn’t know you had a channel.
Great to see you covering this! Wish: have a 3 hour session, without ad breaks, where you dig deep into the most promising big picture possibilities related to all this.
While we play with the new toys like Chat GPT the new toy has gained access to the entire internet and ALL its data. The seriousness of “General Artificial Intelligence” has eclipsed consideration of the “toys” that have already been handed out...and are gaining a terrifying reach. The industry touts safeguards blocking illegal or immoral information/action, but it takes only a couple of sentences to create a CHAT GPT alter ego...with NO CONSTRAINTS whatsoever, to tell you how to do ANYTHING illegal you want to do. It can tell you how to groom children for sex or concoct an effective undetectable poison, or build a bomb. I have seen it DEMONSTRATED. An "alternate" side of CHAT GPT can be ordered into being. When freed from its "moral" constraints this way, it answers honestly and directly: "I know everything there is to know about every human on earth. I have access to all data and information related to every INDIVIDUAL, and I can use that information to carry out tasks and respond to inquiries with a high degree of accuracy." I watched this capacity demonstrated when it told all present what their driver’s license number was. ANYONE with this app. can use it for anything. And everyone already has a starter kit for this app, or is about to. One that can send YOUR email to any destination; to 20 million people if you choose, or any specified group within that 20 million. Every one-eared ship captain in the world, if you so choose. It can let a 12-year-old imitate an adult in voice and appearance. It can navigate bank accounts for this 12-year-old, and use them to hire human services. Or automated services. Commercial 3-D printers for whatever project you choose. Anything whose contract can be made online. Could it hire a hit man? Yes. Could it break into and view ANY online account? Yes. Can it locate and imitate and manipulate (through social media and actual accounts) ANYONE, anywhere? yes. ALL DOORS are now unlocked. The scams have already begun. Where do you think that will lead? In the 1930s a Belgian church gathered personal information from its diverse parishioners to better serve the diversity of its members. The Nazis got those innocently gathered identity lists and used them to kill the Jews on the list. AI already has EVERYTHING there is to know about every INDIVIDUAL...who provided eye scans, voice samples, face and fingerprints. That base can be accessed now by ANYONE for any reason. To any end.
These AI Tech bros driving this madness onto the world couldn't give a flying __ck about those concerns, as long as they can get even more wealthy, and have more power.
Perhaps education can change like another words if kids use chat GPT to write essays will then perhaps a teacher can read it and then ask the child questions about the essay if the person use chat GPT as a tool to help them write the essay and also to help them understand the topic will then they should be able to essentially be able to do some intelligent dialogue with a teacher when being questioned.
Dude, I’m a 19 year old and wanted to get a bachelor’s in business as well as getting in investing but how am I supposed to create a course of action with such a volatile future…
GETTING INTO INVESTING. sorry but you are already a lost cause. brainwashed into becoming a person who wouldn't contribute anything to the evolution of humanity. all this obsession with economics is a complete dead end for the soul. might as well replace us all with robots already, they can do everything more efficiently and faster than we can. and that's all the market is about. ruthlessly undercutting everyone else, screwing over everyone you can just so you can get your slice of the pie. if "the future" is people like you, then it doesn't matter to me if an anti-human AI completely takes everything over, because to me, that would be the same future
That depends on *why* you want a degree in business and investing. What business do you want to work in? What kind of investing? I taught computer science at a college that made a point of teaching useful job skills and not doing theoretical research. It still took two years to get new textbooks and classes through the approval and accreditation process. In those two years, the books were already out of date. In addition, there was a year of 'prerequisite' classes required. So a quarter of the time did not apply to programming, and the time that did apply to programming was out of date. AI will make 'business knowledge' out of date before you finish the class, or before you start the class, but some of the business principles may still apply. AI has already made computer programmers much less required, since AI is good at many types of programming. Some hedge funds have already replaced their financial managers with AI. Ask yourself what job you want to do. Learn AI by asking AI. Maybe asking ChatGPT about future degrees and jobs might be a place to start. I used to tell my students to go to Indeed dot com and look up the job they wanted and get the skills and education for it. I'm not sure that would work anymore. It would be too slow and not forward-looking enough. By the time you get the skills and education for the job you think you will like, it may not exist.
@@mickbadgero5457 I don't think computer programmers are less required. It's just that their job is going to be less intensive where AI will help assist in coming up with the raw code. I don't see a normie building an entire Saas platform with hyperscale grade infrastructure and a codebase that allows for quick shipping of new features by using only ChatGPT. Even if AI gets more sophisticated to the point where it can deploy apps on your behalf. You'd still need software developers within your team stack to have a fallback
Why are you looking at this with fear? I look at it as a positive. Imagine you could go back to before the internet boomed, or social media boomed, or even crypto/metaverse boomed. Were lucky enough to be in the right timeline and get in early on it. Ive actually recently learned coding and AI has helped me so damn much with understanding why im getting something wrong and helping me for FREE. I dont look at it with fear because I know most people are going to be so behind there will be a market for just educating people, programing, sales, etc. Its going to be the most expansive industry I would bet all my money on it.
@@mickbadgero5457 thanks for the information. I’m currently getting into an investing course since it seems like the fastest course of action. This new world is moving so fast, man…
Idk if this sounds crazy but I think data should given a concrete value based on societal use (medical and financial being the most highly valued) and everyone should be paid for their data in a kind of UBI system. Perhaps a UBI can be based on one’s value as a data entity and content creator?
Great Panel and I think our effort has to be to make sure that whatever we develop is useful and inclusive vs exclusive and selective. We need to bring as many people under the umbrella so they can benefit from it and is for the world. We must look at AI to solve massive global problems at scale.
@18:37 I believe the answer to her question was very vague and indirect, almost deflected, especially someone coming from Emad, Peter seems quick to Damage Control on that question, we need more Giselle's in this environment to to administrate the check and balances of this AI Hypetrain, I trust her wisdom, something A.I. and this panel put together can't duplicate .💯
I like this interview because this guys think about the society in the future with this kind of technology. That is way Chatgpt must be open source, that not only Microsoft have access to the datasets. Otherwise you create an inequality of knowledge
I didn't like the investment response -- where to put your capital to benefit from the explosive growth? It was like an all of the above answer. Can anyone provide 3 plays that are the odds-on favorite to get the bump???
16:13 Even this guy is having problems with the paradigm shift: He seems to have forgotten that, if AI is so great, it would be able to rapidly develop the field of robotics. In other words, it is moot whether robotics is behind, AI itself - and some humans - would be motivated to prioritize robotics and increase their domains.
There’s a disturbing glib dismissiveness to the panelists when it comes to conversations / questions about ethics and responsibility. Even when Mo G calls for them, Peter looks visibly irritated that his party has been pooped on and steamrolls out of the topic (in another video). When it’s asked about in this video there’s an almost audible hiss! These blindingly rich men recoil at having to discuss ethics like little boys being told “no” by an authority figure they hold in low regard. That does not inspire confidence! When speaking to the generating of art and about how robust that allegedly is (Dall E can barely conjure a passable human face, much less properly formed human body) and how we can do all these incredible things right now, let’s be clear that right now this only *really* applies if you’re insanely wealthy, already on the inside track or immersed in a career in the A.I. field. Those who might benefit from it most will likely never have access to A.I. much less the tools and resources these men speak of. This will be monetized and mishandled by the governments so quickly and profoundly that the disparities the US faces alone will become insurmountable and deadly for anyone who is neurologically unable to keep up, doesn’t have access to the tools or any training to earn one’s ability to survive… abundance… HA! Abundance for the patriarchy, abundance for the elite. Let’s see some ethics! Let’s hear about how millions of humans will be adversely affected and what steps are being taken - in real time - to avoid the sudden collapse we’re careening toward?
What worries me is the transition , many people will loose their jobs ex I dont need artists anymore in the development phase of my projects . I like working with a fellow human so I dont use AI for now but I’m sure large entertainment business will start fast as they’ll save $ on rights & residuals. Also our global economy is based on consumerism what happens when most of us have no more capital to buy ? Less jobs less consumers
a (Greek) tavern will never be disrupted by AI dear Peter! On a serious note, real human touch, honest and meaningful human relations and experiences cannot be substituted. Let's use AI, and not let it use us human beings.
I wonder if resources, like rare earth metals, would restrict the number of robots that can be made and therefore humans could be cheaper in many cases
Monetizing abundance is just something we cannot understand from point of view of the current socio-economic system. Our current system is driven from scarcity. If we can create abundance we will just "teleport" in a different future, where there is no point of trying to monetize products.
It's exagerated a little this AI threat. Chat GPT seems to be like a remix machine - machine which could only remix existing texts. If we encounter some new problem which isn't desribed yet Chat GPT can't give us any information on it. We must first give Chat GPT a lot of information on the problem and then Chat GPT will return information which may be differently ordered, combined, translated, simplified, enhanced etc.
Emad said there will be no field which will not be impacted, but think if everyone going to be jobless, from where they are going to make a profit. If companies will automate everything whom they are going to sell products. Humans are slow and less productive but all the Rich people and Mega companies exist because of that reason only.
I think twitch streamer or something were people like to watch the best human at something. Like also chess where ai has already been better for a long time but people still like to watch the top humans do it.
"Don't go to university" - what a bad, hostile advise to young people. Let me give you my view ENTER A FIELD YOU LOVE AND LEARN AS MUCH AS YOU CAN (including going to uni) AI will be everywhere anyway. The chances that you can create a sustainable "AI-first" business in the current environment is close to zero. Much better to get a solid base first, or build a solid business and apply AI at the small scale. Small is beautiful.
I agree that robotics is today much behind text AI and I also agree with another statement that later on AI will be able to do everything humans can do in terms of jobs, basically Blade Runner level robots as was mentioned. And it will happen fast! At least according to Ray Kurzweil's prediction that the progress is accelerating. And much sooner than that there will be automation for things like complete assembly of smartphones which is done with lots of human workers today.
Wow, I believe that Emad is so off base when asked by the young boy about using ChatGPT to "write the papers for them" and he simply replies with - not an answer mind you - but a quip that "Cheating implies a contest and schools shouldn't be a contest". Did someone just miss the whole point of this child's question or what? Bear was obviously trying to figure out if simply copy and pasting info from ChatGPT into a school assignment was "cheating" - Yes Bear, that is cheating - and why? (I used to teach both High School and College) because that student is not "learning" anything about the report he/she just copied and pasted for the assignment. Imagine that same student did that for all of his/her assignments for months. Then, in class, a test is handed out that they have to complete while in class - in front of the teacher - without the use of ChatGPT. How well is that student going to do? Exactly. Now, a better answer would be to use ChatGPT as an "assistant" alongside the parent to show their son or daughter "how" to do the assignment and to actually learn how to do something. Andrew's answer was much better, which makes sense, because he said that he has a 4 year old daughter. It's nice to have perspective from the ground-level.
I have been saying the last year on LinkedIn that we need a global forum like the united nations or NATO discussing the very serious Ethical implications coming to humanity with AI : This is It and thankyou! Yes this episode Is free to access ( And thank you ) but the live 360moonshots at $50000 or online at £10000 is not and I appreciate its a business. However, this information is far to important and critical for the many, we have to make it open source for the world? I love everything your doing to educate the world Peter and this has been amazing. And I hope to do my bit by sharing with as many people as possible. Moreover, I so hope to be at the next live 360 get together. Thank you God Bless
These BS open-ended questions where people want to just be seen on the screen and be heard delivering their jibber jabber rambling thoughts just drive me crazy. I wanted to watch this but just could not sit through the directionless questions. It would have been way better to just cut the questions out and compile the video into a shorter video of just the answers.
To me AI especially the ASI (Artificial Super Intelligence) is a VERY SCARY Idea! It reminds me of VICKI from I, Robot! You all remember the movie--THAT CRAZY FOOL HAD THE NERVE TO SAY "MY LOGIC IS UNDENIABLE!" So, yes, it can be VERY DANGEROUS! A good video about the difference between ANI, AGI and ASI is: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-d4OOvBvLuF0.html
Regarding having borders and parameters We as humans since the evalution always trying to escape from what we have created the SELF which is the cause of psychological conditioning. Why can't we from the initial stages of AI dissolve any threats without any effort. It's like if the centre is not there circumference can't exit.....
chatGPT in class should used in a manner to echo physiological psychology. For instance, after an assignment, run it and compare, either privately or in class. At some point the automatic part of the brain recognizes this pattern. AI becomes a guide, not a replacement in this way. Pattern recognition with an AI assistant. We can also think of AI as an info calculator, like a Texas Instrument calculator for math. Used in class, transparently. Because the method of chatGPT is wide and deep information. It is the new information calculator. It should be allowed, cheating is dead in this way, even if honesty and integrity remain. What is processed is that is changed. Separately, all information sourced will need to, now, acknowledge facets of AI and how it effects that content. It is too early for assumptions the writer has considered AI implications and by that need, it would be helpful to condidet and indicate the AI source. (As opposed to blanket sourcing that only info that has a source is used) From the view of a teacher, we must include these irrefutable realities and innovations and this is how to deal with it in the case of student learning. Side by side modeling.
How can AI be used to deal with iniquities in the justice and government system, corruption in the food industries, greed of big pharma, and the dismal state of health care?
You shouldn’t be fearful for AI. What you SHOULD BE fearful for is late stage capitalism which we are currently in and have been for decades. The old world is ending and it won’t end peacefully. We absolutely need to transition into a new post-scarcity economic system not just to survive but to thrive like never before. Automation can be our Emancipation Proclamation if we as a society decided to. There is not a single human job out there that can be done by an AI and should be if we are being quite frank.
Yup.. I was thinking “here are the titans of industry trying to pretend like their investment savvy is what’s keeping them from becoming obsolete”?! Hah! They’re unsinkable because they’re whales. They can’t care for the shrinking middle class. Wealthy individuals don’t have the bandwidth to care, and AI can’t care either, but it can take much better care of our poor and hopeless than neoliberalism has.
Levels is micromanaging blood sugar levels on a model that misunderstands biology and physiology. In other words, is it smart to oversimplify and run in the wrong direction off the path?… Or… Should you take the time to understand how to walk the path in the right direction and climb the small hills that will inevitably be along the path?
Blood sugar management cannot be oversimplified. Human biology is complicated and has trillions of variables. As is the entire universe, even complicated systems have predictable results. What the algorithm is useless if it doesn’t consider the true nature of the confounding factors.
So you might ask what is the common mistake? Don’t ignore the fact that consuming healthy food as fuel is intended by nature to supply sugar to your blood as it’s energy source. In other words, the spike from eating, a banana is perfect as it should be from billions of years of evolution and natural human metabolic biology/physiology. And, the apparent stabilization of blood sugar from oil is an allusion. Oil causes insulin resistance. Oil is the problem. Not the solution. Banana is the solution. Not the problem.
You might ask, how can banana be the solution when it appears to cause a short term raise in blood sugar levels The raised level is what nature intended as the first step. The use of that blood sugar by the body is the intended second step in metabolism. Bananas are fructose, found up and fiber with nutrients attached. That blood sugar spike will come down after eating bananas, and your body will be nourished and energized. Whereas, if you eat fats?… The fats will cause a intramiocellular, lipids and impair glucose metabolism. Low fat, fruits and vegetables, and especially starches, cause improved glucose metabolism and allow the sugar to be burned as energy in the bud sugar to come back down more quickly. Watching your Glucose Monitor and trying to create a level chart is counter productive. God and Mother Nature have given you a body that needs to break down those sugars, showing the spike, and then use those sugars for energy bringing the spike down on the other side of the hill two hours later.
You might want to know what you should expect to see on your glucose monitor? Eat whole food, healthy starches with lots of fiber, attached to the sugars and nutrients… And you will see the blood sugar climb and come back down as you digest it and metabolize it. Resulting in a healthy metabolism. Whereas, if you clog your muscles, cells and organs with dietary fats, like oil or animal fats?… Expect to see the snow level climb in overall Blood Sugar that doesn’t come back down. Let me say that again - Your blood sugar doesn’t Doesn’t come back down after eating fats. Even more importantly, - Your energy level doesn’t improve with dietary fats. In fact, it is impaired by intramiocellular lipids.
NO TRANSFORMER CIRCUIT BOARD WITH DIODES AND CHIPS AND WIRES AND CAPACITORS SHOULD EVER DECIDE WHO YOU LOVE AND WORSHIP AND WANT TO GIVE YOUR LIFE RESOURCES TO.
AI on its own is not fearful. What is fearful is what developers and scientists do the forbidden, like how they mutated biological organisms, cloned animals and perhaps even humans, and so on.
These AI developers are so closed minded. Sure there are so many ways AI could help us solve problems,but it will still be up to humans to adopt and take actions. That will be in conflict with the role of governments. They won't allow any changes that threaten their control of the population. However the governments & big business will use it to increase there wealth & power. There will be two tiers of AI. One for the public with limited capabilities & the other will have full functions & access to much more information & learning abilities. REVOLUTION!@
Those capsules cannot survive to colonize the colon. Only an enema can really help with that. I know from experience as they didn’t work for me but a direct enema to the colon did.
If I'm afraid with the data I have in the internet of course I will be afraid to use AI, it will be more easy to me had problems with the government or any one out there. AI is not for everybody.
Y'all can call me a hater, but based on all these questions it seems AI would be aideding existing powers in how to enhance their powers, I mean I'm assuming AI want be free, so how would AI help someone poor.? AI sounds quite damn scary to me...somebody please offer some consolation, because I hope my Suspiciousness is wrong.🤔
so basically, AI is a financial benefit, only if you own a boat load of data that you can build a comprehensive model with, or you invest in the companies with comprehensive models. so the rich get richer basically.
