All the uploaded videos are very promising and I have learnt allot from the current and previous videos on Cuk, sepic, buck and boost converters. I appreciate for uploading the working for the same. Thank you Sir🙏
hello sir! great video! i do have a question to ask. i have a pv module simulation in simulink and uses P&O and Incremental conductance to execute it. But the outcomes of both methods are the same (Ppv, Vpv and Ipv). Is there any explanation why they have the same output? I'm using interleaved flyback and dc-dc converter and full h-bridge as dc-ac inverter.
Kindly reply.. If my pv input is 98 volt dc (open circuit voltage) max voltages on load 80 vdc, max current on load 11 amp.. how much max current can i get on 24 volt system with incremental conductive mppt?
Sir the error is showing tha The variable step discrete solver cannot be used to simulink block diagram untitled because it contain continuous state How to resolve this problem
Hi Pushpendra. Did you simulate the exact circuit that was demonstrated in the video. Because if you did then you will definitely get the output. Can you please elaborate the issue that you are facing in detail?
@@ElectronicsMaddy sir i did exactly same only problem coming is with unit delay i took it from discrete the error is "the block unit delay is discrete, yet is inheriting a continuous sample time; consider changing the sample time to discrete, using fixed step solver or replacing it with a memory block." I'm making model once again from scratch to see if I missed something before.
@@ElectronicsMaddy sir I'm choosing the same block as u did I re verified it also as soon as I add unit delay block and run the model without connecting delay block then also it's giving the same error ps: I'll mail u, plz check it u'll know what I'm trying to say
Hi Sindhuja selvam good morning. Please refer to my boost converter design with simulation video where I have explained the design procedure in detail.
i don't understand how the mppt is happening?! you are setting d=0.58 again giving it from outside..how the D may retain the last simulation data?! every time should not it start from d=0.58 ??
You will have to change the parameters of irradiance. How do you expect mppt without changing anything? In practical environment sun's radiation keep changing isn't it?
@@ElectronicsMaddy but still the D is struck at .53 after one cycle. an if I give 0.78 as inut it's struck at 0.53 for the same conditions. error in program??
