Skyzone SkyO4X Pro! Can They Beat The HDZero Goggles? - FPV Questions 

still there, or did support eventually take you seriously?

@@ferocious_r the bug is still there, I think they will never fix it and it will.remain the way it is

Hehe me too my EV800d has been a trooper hope this new one is as well I'm keeping my ev800 and my kid is using it but it's a backup

The skyzone04x? How do you like em? I've been rocking the skyzoneo30 with a rapid-fire module and they're pretty good goggles.

@@Chillin-fpv I bought the 04x pro, but I haven't received them yet. I think they'll be here by the end of the week.

@@Chillin-fpv Welp I was wrong. They actually came in the mail today and they're awesome. It's a little windy and my mobula 7 wound up in a puddle, so my goggle test got cut short, but I got through 3 batteries and I love how light they are. I'm coming from ev800d's so they are a giant upgrade.

@@Brunoku sounds like it's time to build a waterproof quad. Darwinfpv or hglrc both have waterproof parts. Then get some worry free fpv for all the solder joint. I just finished my waterproof build.

Imo it's better to go with a hd goggle and add a analog Bay to it than the other way around

Ok. So what pair would you recommend. I’d probably only go digital now anyway. I only have a whoop drone for analog anyway.

@@thebigbilltheory4388 Wait to see some more reviews. See what the HDMI latency is. As of right now HD Zero is the best goggle in terms of capability and low latency. It can do 100fps Walksnail with a VRX through HDMI and has no added analog latency. The new walksnail x has latency added for analog and no analog DVR. These skyzone04x pro would have no added latency for analog, just need to see what HDMI can do. Watch MadsTech latency video, that is what im basing my info on. My thinking, I want analog and Walksnail but dont really like how they implemented analog into Avatar X. No DVR for analog is a deal breaker. I dont really need HDZero but the goggles are capable of everything I want. After adding a Walksnail VRX and analog receiver. These Skyzone seem like the can do what i need but they are pretty much the same price as the HDZero.... I cant decide on any of them. Definitely waiting before i decide on which HD. Them we got DJI too....🤦

I just can't see the Skyzone goggles being justified at that price. A few things to consider here. The WS and the new Skyzones just don't have any real user feedback. The WS goggles cost less... But also come from an ecosystem where there is constant development. As a pilot, once you start dipping into HD will you want to continue with analogue builds in the future? I'm certain for the vast majority that just isn't true. The WS goggles can use an analog receiver, and probably one that performs better than the Skyzone unit. To me it just makes more sense to go with the goggles X... At least on the cover, and I do really like Skyzone products.

Probably late but, if you already have analog goggles go for dedicated digital goggles (eg. DJI/Walksnail/HDZero). There are no goggles that are truly "all-in-one" (not event 2 systems in one).

about 395dollar 😀

@@aivan_fpv987 아이반님 반가워요^^

how do you know?

yes, what makes you think one screen is oled and the other isnt?

@@GK-dd5ci my goggles has backlighting. It might be a faulty item tho.

I think it's just the fact that they have 2 OLED screens, and since they're so small, it's expensive to have good resolution on them because the pixels have to be very small.

@@urubufpvthen why are digital HD goggles cheaper than analog goggles? Makes no sense to me

@@urubufpv I understand the point of the goggles. the price just doesn’t make sense. Idk at this point it makes more sense to just go digital

@@WindjumbieFPV maybe it's something similar to what happens on printers. If the printer is cheap, the ink's are expensive, and if the ink's are cheap, then the printer is expensive. Analog goggles may be more expensive (they may not, there are several options), but the vtx's are pretty cheap compared to a digital system.

@@mach389 you can go digital, it's totally worth it, but it's not really cheaper if you think about the fact that you're going to break your vtx if you're doing crazy freestyle flights. A cheap analog vtx will cost you as little as $10, and a very good one will cost you about $50, while digital ones would start at something like $120 and go up to $200. Well, if you're not really into freestyle or racing, and want to just do cinematic or cruise flights, then yeah, digital would be 100% better. Edit: analog cameras are also way cheaper, and have good low light performance if compared to digital. Again, it just depends on what you're gonna do.

But you don’t get true 1ms response even on high end monitors when playing cloud gaming for example, right? What’s the true latency of analog or digital video signal then?

On this very channel if you use the search feature you can find his livesteam clips where he has talked about them multiple times :)