Тёмный
No video :(

Smoothing a Piece-wise Function | MIT 18.01SC Single Variable Calculus, Fall 2010 

MIT OpenCourseWare
Подписаться 5 млн
Просмотров 43 тыс.
50% 1

Smoothing a Piece-wise Function
Instructor: Christine Breiner
View the complete course: ocw.mit.edu/18-...
License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA
More information at ocw.mit.edu/terms
More courses at ocw.mit.edu

Опубликовано:

 

23 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 38   
@ajpurvis2251
@ajpurvis2251 7 лет назад
So this is what a good education looks like
@JamieRad12
@JamieRad12 11 лет назад
This lady is perfect. This is definitely going to help me pass my calculus exam. Thank you for posting this! I owe my life to you, haha.
@ifrazali3052
@ifrazali3052 Год назад
did you pass? what are you doing today
@georgesadler7830
@georgesadler7830 3 года назад
This is another amazing lecture on Smoothing a Piece-wise Functions by Professor Christine Breiner.
@richardgray8593
@richardgray8593 Год назад
Amazing?
@tifawine9113
@tifawine9113 8 лет назад
Wow, wow, you explain soooooooo clearly, that so easy to understand. I'm very glad to find you. Thank you
@SilverArro
@SilverArro 9 лет назад
@Simon Hoogendal: The derivatives of left and right are never going to be equal in terms of their actual function definitions. The left side of the piecewise function is a linear function with a constant slope, and the right is a parabola with a variable slope. No matter how you define the left side of the function, this will always be the case since the problem tells us that the function must be linear at x 1 of the derivative function of each must be equal. If they aren't, it means that the slope of the tangent line at x=1 is different in each function. So again, the derivative functions of each part of the piecewise function will never be equal in definition, but they must each give the same output when x=1.
@josetecnopirobo7058
@josetecnopirobo7058 10 лет назад
thanks a lot MIT, i understood everything, greetings from Colombia :D
@alexandershapiro28
@alexandershapiro28 Год назад
This is only possible line ax+b. b/c exactly at (1,2) there's a tangent line that has to coincide with the line ax+b in order to be smooth, however you can skip this step by just saying f(x) is riemann integrable. As a side note: all the solutions for ax+b, (a,b) is isomorphic to R^2.
@selmerhorns
@selmerhorns 12 лет назад
Thanks for the presentation.
@hanschan7669
@hanschan7669 10 лет назад
Thank the speaker clearly stated what's continuous and differentiate properties.
@alpistein
@alpistein Год назад
In the second part, you impose that the function be *continuously differentiable at x=1, which is technically stronger than differentiability. For some functions, f'(a) might exist even if the limit of f'(x) as x goes to a does not.
@AcornFox
@AcornFox 11 лет назад
Thank you so much.
@AcornFox
@AcornFox 11 лет назад
Gotta go to MIT to see the artwork.
@szymonpawlisz2515
@szymonpawlisz2515 11 лет назад
Why do we need a limit of left and right derivative to be equal, not the left and right derivative itself, for a function to be differentiable?
@yangpiao3071
@yangpiao3071 2 года назад
I have the same question.
@arjunchopra5203
@arjunchopra5203 2 года назад
If a=x and b = 1, so the second function was y=(x^2)+1, then wouldn't the resulting function have a derivative, because the combination would just create the function y=(x^2)+1 ?
@user-ow3zo2wz4f
@user-ow3zo2wz4f 2 месяца назад
but didn't you use a different definition for the left/right hand limit? How is that right.
@junkie2423
@junkie2423 9 лет назад
thank you...
@magicguy1988
@magicguy1988 13 лет назад
Your right except for the fact that F is differentiable at all reals greater 1. Because if x>1, I can choose h>0 small enough that [F(x+h)-F(x)]/h>0.
@annafrebel2872
@annafrebel2872 3 года назад
I get it !!! I FINALLY GET IT ! WOOOHOOO
@jakec904
@jakec904 7 лет назад
someone help me with the first part.does x^2+1 = ax+b for the function to be continuous?
@FadilAidid
@FadilAidid 7 лет назад
Jake Goykia the definition of continuous is limit of f(x) approach to 1 from left and right must be the same, hence a + b must equal to 2.
@EMISARIO000
@EMISARIO000 10 лет назад
lastima esta en ingles, podrian poner subtitulos en traduccion en español,ojala puedan sino ni ablar, gracias_Mis-Christine Breiner
@FlavioMiloni-kr3bo
@FlavioMiloni-kr3bo Год назад
Super
@Will-Ch
@Will-Ch Год назад
Ojala Christine haga cursos de calculus,, la entiendo muy bien
@vivekkumargaur6785
@vivekkumargaur6785 5 лет назад
good job
@freizagen
@freizagen 4 года назад
Genius
@bosepukur
@bosepukur 7 лет назад
but even if b not = 0 the derivative of ax + b will be 2 if a = 2 ?
@FadilAidid
@FadilAidid 7 лет назад
soumya sarkar b must be zero because the condition of a+b=0 dude.. there is two condition must be fulfil, differentiable and continuous.
@FadilAidid
@FadilAidid 7 лет назад
sorry... i mean from a+b=2 😅
@effortless35
@effortless35 12 лет назад
I was really hoping the cameraman would pan out to show the artwork at the end :( If you missed it look at 7:13
@maxwellsequation4887
@maxwellsequation4887 3 года назад
7:13
@boblee666
@boblee666 12 лет назад
1:51 SLOW MOTIONS HUE HUE HUE HUE
@lalitverma5818
@lalitverma5818 6 лет назад
Amejing platform
@whatitmeans
@whatitmeans 11 месяцев назад
too bad the function is not "smooth"
@Will-Ch
@Will-Ch Год назад
Nice
@mahela1993
@mahela1993 13 лет назад
I LOVE MIT OCW!
Далее
REFLEX CHALLENGE vs FOOTBALL MACHINE 🙈😱
00:24
Просмотров 2,6 млн
WHAT'S A CALCULUS TEST LIKE AT MIT? | by an MIT student
13:00
Chains f(g(x)) and the Chain Rule
35:21
Просмотров 92 тыс.
Big Picture: Integrals
37:22
Просмотров 303 тыс.
Piecewise Functions - Limits and Continuity | Calculus
10:06