Smuta (Russian Witcher) vs The Witcher 3 - Details and Physics Comparison 

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

It's not funny or surprising. Any government-sponsored entertainment is dogshit. Government-sponsored memes are not funny, government-sponsored games are not fun. it is what it is.

@@CaptainFynx Every single Witcher game received government funding. Same with Dying Light and Frostpunk.

​@@kamilszadkowski8864Polish Government is good at using potential of developers

@@kamilszadkowski8864 Cyberpunk too

Лучше бы сделали бы законченную инди-игру ! (Translated)

I agree with you, The Witcher series are a masterpiece

I don’t understand the hype around Russians vs Lizards !

@@GameLight I guess it’s just very absurd as a concept, that’s all

It's was born from a Russian meme, that mostly have grown out of goofy neo-pagan mythology "Lizzards" are basically "reptiloids" from the classical period of ufology

They officially released the unfinished game. I think the developers are tired of making the game.

A handful of whackos announced that they would make a AAA pseudo-historical game that would show a historical narrative according to Putin regarding a historical period that propaganda calls great sorrow (Time of Troubles). Putin was very happy and lavishly subsidized the creators. The creators were also pleased and decided to plow on with further production of the game. The problem was that the Russian public really wanted to see a Russian game about how Russians bravely fought the Polish occupiers, and they didn't let the creators get away with the money. So they finished the game just enough so that someone couldn't say they took money for nothing. P.S.. For those who wonder why I called the game pseudo-historical I already explain. According to Putin's propaganda, after the death of Grand Duke Ivan the Terrible (the founder of Russian imperialism), an interregnum prevailed in the Principality of Moscow, leading to many years of civil war. This was taken advantage of by the evil Poles, who first wanted to install the usurper on the throne, and when that failed, they seized Moscow themselves. However, the Muscovites fought valiantly against the occupiers and eventually exiled the Poles regaining their independence. In fact, the Russian Civil War was exploited by Ukrainian magnate Adam Korybut Wisniowiecki, after one of his servants tried to lie to him that he was the miraculously surviving son of Ivan the Terrible. Adam decided to show his servant to his acquaintances at the Moscow court, who personally knew Ivan the Terrible and his son. They confirmed that he was not Ivan's son, but actually resembled him and imitated him perfectly. So together they hatched a conspiracy to install the servant on the throne, in return the servant would enable his patrons to expand their political and economic influence. However, a handful of Ukrainian and Russian nobles were too few to carry out such a plan. So they went to the court of Poland before King Sigismund III Vasa himself. Sigismund was not Polish, but Swedish, and refused to help in the plot, as did the rest of the Polish and Lithuanian nobility. The exception was one minor Polish nobleman, who was willing to marry his daughter to the usurper for his assistance. The conspiracy was also supported by the Franciscan Order, who wanted the right to spread Catholicism within the Muscovite state in exchange for financial assistance. The usurper (Dimirta) was supported by many Russian nobles, and they seated the usurper on the throne in Moscow. Everyone knew about it was usurpator. However, it did not matter. In the history of Russia and Russia, many times the throne was taken by people born of the treachery of the ruler's wife, as genetic studies confirmed a few years ago. Dimirta was liked by everyone because he refused to fulfill his obligations to his patrons in the west. He turned out to be a patriot and looked after the interests of his people. However, the problem arose when he began to reform the court (and later wanted to reform the state). Western behavior, such as wearing velvet clothes, shaving the beard, taking daily baths, eating with cutlery, and liberalizing the law, proved too subversive for the Russians and they decided to get rid of the ruler who “introduces Polish customs.” After this, another civil war began, and several attempts were made to settle more “surviving sons of Ivan the Terrible.” This time the Russians and Ukrainians were joined by Belarusians (Lithuanians). The Russian civil war turned into a great war between the Ruthenian nobility from three different kingdoms (four if you count the Novgorod Republic, which was conquered by Moscow). At the time, Ukraine (Ruthenia) and Belarus (the Grand Duchy of Lithuania) formed a union with the Kingdom of Poland and the Kingdom of Sweden, so the King of Poland, who was Sigismund III Vasa, finally had to intervene, since the war was reducing the state's income. He assembled an army consisting of, starting with the most numerous nationalities: Ukrainians (Ruthenians) Lithuanians (Belorussians), Poles, Cossacks, Swedes, Russians, Germans and Lithuanians (Samogitians). His troops reached Moscow, which was all made of wood, so it burned down (Sigismund's army claimed that the Muscovites themselves set the city on fire intentionally, or unintentionally. Muscovites to this day believe that it was done by the aggressor's troops. We will never know the truth again). Only the brick castle (Kremlin) survived. This one was besieged for 2 weeks, after which.....Russians themselves let the aggressor's troops in, because they made a deal with Sigismund III Vasa. The capture of Moscow and the castle never happened. How did they get along with Sigismund? Sigismund said he was a Swede just like Ruryk (founder of the state of Rus). In addition, he was King of the Polish-Lithuanian-Swedish Union ruling a huge state covering almost the entire Baltic Sea. He agreed that he would still accept the Duchy of Moscow into the Union, creating the most powerful state in Europe. Moscow would become the capital, and the immediate ruler of Moscow would be his son, who would adopt Orthodoxy. It later turned out that Sigismund wanted to take the Moscow throne himself and rule the entire Union from Krakow. He also did not want to change his religion. One of the Russian nobles who helped besiege Moscow gathered the commoners and together they blockaded the Moscow castle, blocking food supplies. Sigismund's governors in office there, along with a small army, eventually agreed to leave Moscow. A new Romanov dynasty took power in the country, forcibly introducing Western reforms that the first usurper had been unable to introduce. The Romanovs brought Russia out of the Middle Ages, introducing first the Polish pattern of civilization and then the German, which was more developed than the Polish. It was the Romans who transformed the Grand Duchy of Moscow into the Russian Empire. They gained huge colonies in Europe, Asia and even North America. What Putin believes, for the greatest tragedy in the history of Russia (just after the disintegration of the USSR) in fact was the beginning of the Russian Empire and its power. It's a great story, but in Putin's Russia hardly anyone knows the truth and instead of celebrating the great reforms of the Russian state, they celebrate that 500 years ago they were trampled by the Poles.... which never happened, ,but thanks to this Putin's propaganda can show Russians who is their historical third enemy right after Ukraine and the USA. :)

@@GameLight Работа над Смутой ещё идёт

@@GameLight Поэтому попрошу не пиздеть лишний раз

That's where the real russianness comes in

@@WostryFerenc I downloaded the game..The amount of eurojankyness is crazy, I WANT to play it but it's only in Russian 😅

This is a completed game, with a budget of 1 billion rubles.

@@NyanJan I mean like, it seems rushed and empty, like a wedding cake with no topping.

Technically, it was half a billion ($5mln), plus around the same on PR But how much of it was spent on the actual game is another question

@@NyanJan 1 billion rubles? So like... 200$?

only pc

interesting? why

It makes you laugh because you don't know the history of vodka. Vodka was created precisely as a medicine and is still used today for health purposes. Let's start the name itself. Wódka in Polish literally means small water. This word was used in the Middle Ages to describe the rocky outlets of mineral waters . It was believed that the water from such streams has medicinal properties (it is still believed so today), so over time vodka began to be called medicinal elixirs. Among them was “booze”, which over time took the name “vodka” just for itself. Vodka came to Russia precisely during the events shown in the game, but it was only in the decades following that it was popularized in the country. P.S. You may be wondering what vodka can cure. It is an alcohol, so it has disinfecting properties. By soaking your feet in it, you can get rid of ringworm. By washing your head in it, you can get rid of dandruff. By knocking your teeth in it, you disinfect your mouth. You can clean wounds with it, and by mixing it with pepper and honey you can cure colds and sore throats.

Agree

What's the first step? This is not the first Russian game. Hastily assembled from purchased models, there is nothing different from the same as from the Russian THE Day Before

@@foxshiron5139 bro i said "Great first step" for the team of this game. Not all the Russian developers but if u want good example of a Russian game and the potential. Just go and play "Atomic Heart" and then you can talk.

Гонишь? Российских игр очень много, и давно выходят! Atomic Heart например! А эта Смута говно!

Black Book, Atomic Heart, Escape From Tarkov, это отличные игры, они заслуживают внимание. A lot of people still play Tarkov, and Atomic was popular for a couple of months after its release. Atomics has good optimization for Russian developers, although the trophies were completely broken. I advise everyone to try these games, as well as other numerous indie projects!

Согласен бюджет у двух игр разная, но могли же сделать как Atomic Heart, доделать и выпустить, окупили бы игру с полна ! (Translated)

@@GameLight деньги там бюджетные, по этому никто не заморачивался

так то да, но в любом случае с такими деньгами можно было бы сделать игру получше. а так разрабы просто скомуниздили часть государственных денег и были таковы.

Думаю, если бы эти "разработчики" потратили на смуту больше денег, то вышло бы такое же говно, просто большее по размеру)

@@GameLight В Атомик Харт бюджет на производство не меньше 25млн

Don't forget Pathologic, it's a masterpiece. I'm guessing the russian government is trying to boost its domestic industries due to the economic decoupling from the west, so they tried to rush the development of a AAA game but failed from mismanagement.

@@ChuckPalomo Yes, Russian developers also want to make AAA games, but so far only Atomic Heart has turned out like this. But they have enough good indie games

@@snappi139 It's weird cause I remember a huge controversy over Atomic Heart and how it was probably a scam run by gangsters. It was a surprize when it not only came out but was pretty good too. I really hope Russians manage to grow their industry.

You just didn't list good Russian games , but maybe in Russia they have a cult status :) I like: Arcanum, Heroes V, Age of pirates, Age of Sail 2, Alien Shooter, I am a dragon (it was a very bad game, but it is a memory from my childhood), Crossout, War thunder, Loop hero and snow runner. You can find the full list on Wikipedia. Russians make mostly fantasy games, especially classic RPGs, si-fi with robots and aliens, racing and puzzle games. However, by far the dominant theme in Russian games is war. Usually World War II, less often modern war. Russians have created a great many games about military aviation and surprisingly many about Caribbean pirates. If I were to create an ideal game for the Russians based on this, it would be a fantasy game set in World War II, where you can fly a plane, drive a tank, or a big killer truck. There would be references to sex and to the USSR everywhere. Accompanying us would be boob women, even if they weren't human. , In a break from gutting enemies we would relax with puzzles :D I don't know yet how I would throw pirates in there, but they would also have to be in this game. P.S. If you thought of Warhummer 40,000, the games in that series the Russians also made. ;)

@@orkako That's right, I didn't mention a lot of games, because I just didn't know that they were made by Russians. If you want to make a game for Russians, then my advice to you: you shouldn’t overdo it about sex, but it’s worth adding some jokes. There is no point in mentioning the USSR if you do not want to create Atomic Heart 2, because the USSR appears there exclusively as a setting. You can make some references, for example, wood stoves in houses, people doing housework, etc. Make either a village atmosphere with Russian mythology (like the Witcher), or a dark atmosphere, in the entrances of multi-storey buildings there are dicks on the walls, like in Metro Exodus, and decorate with obscenities :D

It's a game funded by the Russian government to promote the Russian government's propaganda historical narrative. That's like saying you're not a fan of the Russian government, but you like the Russian military.

Со смутой уже ничего не сделаешь, ее надо было задушить в зародыше и никогда не вспоминать про нее!

Gothic had less bugs.

That comparison is downright insulting to Gothic.

Gothic 1 & 2 are better than most games of that kind, yea they are buggy as hell but have great story, characters, world and ideas. Its better than TES V Skyrim, especialy that Skyrim is great game only with mods, couse community achieve more than devs in term of combat, visuals, story, enemies and all other aspects. Gothic inspired such games like Witcher 3 so depicted it as some kind of trash is insulting and just stupid.

@@huberttarnowski4980 Agreed. However, Gothic 3 is also a great game.

He should rather compare it to the game "Vivat Slovakia".

Десять миллионов у Смуты, да и выше зарплаты в Европе.

@@alexbayer2365 Лол откуда ты этот бред про 10 млн взял?

@@samuraiforyou938 ВКплей написало, погугли, да и РБК тоже.

А теперь открываешь Ютуб и уводишь kena bridge of spirits , игра всего за 1 миллион долларов , не пять , не возможные 10….. как со смутой , гребаный один миллион долларов . Я бы тебе посоветовал не защищать такой шлак , потому что если смута прокатит , то будут тебя кормить не хорошими играми , а шлаком собранным на асетах за пол года и вернуться великие «Шедевры» по типу Лада Рейсинг клаб , параграф 78 , Тюрячка , Ленинин против марсиан . А не отстаивать всяких бать Ферамира которые попелили бабло . И такие , ну это же 5 лямов всего . Только за 5 лямов можно собрать хорошие игры , с норм боевой системой , без невидимых стен всюду , квестами хорошими и прочим

Jak dla mnie natomiast Skyrim to zaledwie dobra gra natomiast ze świetną społecznością. Skyrim bez modów nie łapie się do 50 moich ulubionych gier, z modami to 2 lub 3 miejsce po Wiedźminie 3. Problemem Skyrima jest to że świat jest mało prawdopodobny, zapełniony dziwacznym lore i niespecjalnie próbuje nawiązywać do elementów prawdziwych wierzeń, obiektów, kultur etc. Przez co nie mogę odczuwać go bardziej na serio jak czegoś mającego głębszą i starszą warstwę. Skyrim nie potrafi "przetrawiać" przeszłości i mitologii na takim poziomie jak np. Wiedźmin. Oczywiście gdy doda się do niego mody jak Vigilan czy Reach to na pewno gra zyskuje na fabule, ale to nie dzieło twórców tylko oddanych fanów. Dodam do tego że walka w podstawowym Skyrimie to kpina, gra w takich realiach powinna mieć dobrą walkę bronią białą (oraz większy wachlarz uzbrojenia, gdzie są włócznie np.) a tutaj jest kicha, no na szczęście są moderzy. Ogólnie TESy to zawsze były gry mocno "bezpłciowe" i przez to od każdej przed Skyrimem się odbijałem, a jak już powiedziałem mody ratują tą produkcję. Patrzę na nią z perspektywy miłośnika takich klimatów zarówno w historycznym jak i fantastycznym wydaniu.

@@huberttarnowski4980 Widocznie masz inne oczekiwania od gier niż ja. Ja w grze oczekuję maksimum interaktywności-akcji z minimalistyczną fabułą. Chcę grę do grania a nie oglądania. W Skyrim grałem wiele razy, w Wiedźmina nawet nie próbowałem, zmęczyło mnie samo oglądanie na RU-vid gameplayera, za dużo w grze gadania a za mało grania.

@@walimlot Masz rację mamy różne oczekiwania od gier, dla mnie historia i klimat jest bardzo ważny (nie mogę napisać że gameplay jest nieistotny bo grę o niepodobającej mi się rozgrywce obejrzę w formie jakiegoś longplaya jeśli klimat i fabuła będą dość ciekawe). Co prawda w grach innych gatunków jak strategie czy gry skupione na walce bronią białą mechanika ma dla mnie równie ważne znaczenie, jednak w rpg-ach akcji fabuła to dla mnie podstawa.

@@huberttarnowski4980 W rpg największe znaczenie ma rozwój postaci i powiększanie przydatnych zasobów. Fabuła zawsze ma znaczenie, ale tu chodzi o nadmiernie rozdętą fabułę, która zastępuje rozgrywkę, nie lubię gier, gdzie jest więcej gadania niż grania, wysłuchiwania tych długich nudnych historii. Gry gdzie jest rozdęta fabuła, gra się tylko raz, nie dla rozgrywki a dla interaktywnej fabuły. W Skyrim tego nie ma i dzięki temu mogłem w nią grać wielokrotnie, na dodatek, miałem tam pełną swobodę decyzji. Gry o zbyt rozwiniętej fabule zmniejszają wielowątkowość gry, jest ograniczona swoboda wyborów.

@@walimlot W każdej grze znaczenia ma... co innego dla każdego. Powiększanie zasobów to raczej mało rpgowe. Nudne jest bieganie po jakiś katakumbach i walka z tymi samymi przeciwnikami non stop, zwłaszcza jeśli model walki jest słabiutki.