Тёмный

Solidworks Tutorial - Super Easy 3D Screw External Thread Lesson Learn Simple Helix Cut 5 Minutes 

R Kopec
Подписаться 882
Просмотров 751 тыс.
50% 1

This is a tutorial to teach you the most basic/generic threading method by using a helix cut. You can modify the triangle in the sketch into any shape to create unlimited thread styles. Remember to delete or change to construction geometry the line that extends from your thread relief to triangle that I deleted at 2:48 or you may get an error. I did it naturally without thinking and didn't mention it in the video. Thanks for watching and hopefully learning some techniques.
Wallet Addresses:
Litecoin: LKoh97J8bTifg7NTPGvbKF3reJRqN1k8FB
Bitcoin Cash: 1CKBWBJVRGr8zJTkVKHFng8kE1VDLQeJ9m

Опубликовано:

 

16 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 133   
@boogerhead0
@boogerhead0 9 лет назад
Really nice step-through. Exactly what I needed to make the M10X1 section on an SFU1204 standard BK machined ball screw drawing. Thanks!!! I really appreciate that you took the time to make this video/tutorial.
@iceCOLDkillaxDLoL
@iceCOLDkillaxDLoL 6 лет назад
Thank you sir very much!!! All the time the problem was that triangle width reduction. I didn't realize that it would cut into itself.
@cst4252
@cst4252 10 лет назад
Much easier approach than piercing the helix, etc. THANKS!
@TbosStomp
@TbosStomp 10 лет назад
Like everyone else, thank you!! This helped me a lot! First time Helix and swept cut/ boss user...My machine shop requested a square thread. Easy transition from your example.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 10 лет назад
Yep, you can make any shape you want into a helix cut now :0)
@marshal7102
@marshal7102 3 года назад
Ok I got it. had to redraw my cutting tool and remove the depth line for the tool. You went by without pointing that out. you clicked it so fast I didn't notice it
@personalemail194
@personalemail194 5 лет назад
Awesome job! Worked perfectly for me.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
Thanks! Glad it worked for you!
@kiranvarghese1
@kiranvarghese1 8 лет назад
Thanks Raymond Kopec simple and easy way
@ivanuttley8371
@ivanuttley8371 9 лет назад
you saved my sanity! thanks!
@timahchimbo2185
@timahchimbo2185 8 лет назад
all i can say is thanks very much man!!!!!
@ryan49johnson
@ryan49johnson 10 лет назад
Worked perfectly! Thank you!
@anikpehmiracle4727
@anikpehmiracle4727 3 года назад
Nice one. Short and rich
@erdogancilingir
@erdogancilingir 11 лет назад
Clear and simple expression, Thanks.
@j0sefpv514
@j0sefpv514 8 лет назад
Thanks a lot for the video. It was super helpful.
@huanganda1128
@huanganda1128 8 лет назад
Thank you very much, I learned a lot of knowledge from your video, this video is very valuable, I fully recommend.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 9 лет назад
Vivek, the only thing I would guess that making yours act in such a way is that your "profile" sketch might have a tiny "extra" line dangling around somewhere. Try zooming in everywhere at all of your line ends and see if you see a tiny line hangin' around somwhere. If this is the problem, you can delete it and continue with the operation. This is the case a lot of times if it won't correctly find your "profile" and "path" automatically with the correct sketches selected.
@makismakiavelis5718
@makismakiavelis5718 8 лет назад
+Raymond Kopec That was the case for me too. I have forgotten to delete the line used to line up the triangle with the thread relief [1:22] Thanks.
@illcomeupwithanamelatter3632
@illcomeupwithanamelatter3632 7 лет назад
Thank you for topping the text book provided video...
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 7 лет назад
And thank you for keeping it alive!
@tobyhummel6569
@tobyhummel6569 9 лет назад
good video ray sure was helpful, when i program a thread on a cnc lathe i always put a chamfer before i thread, if you go from th face under the miner (or major id od ) at a greater angle then the tool then you never have a bur , im trying to figure out how to blunt start a thread in solid works anyway great video thanks m8
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 9 лет назад
I always run a chamfer also but didn't in this video. You can start the thread out past the part to avoid that little "start position" error angle I showed at the end. Glad you liked it. Thanks for watching!
@sunnyonthebeach
@sunnyonthebeach 10 лет назад
This is really cool. This helps!
@iangeis3966
@iangeis3966 10 лет назад
Great and concise instructions. Thank you very much!
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 9 лет назад
Very Welcome!
@iceman5234
@iceman5234 8 лет назад
thanks, forgot to subtract the small bit from the edge of the triangle, so the tool was running into itself. of course, solidworks wouldn't just come out and tell me this.
@CorneliusWiens
@CorneliusWiens 9 лет назад
Awesome tutorial, thanks!!
@3dsolidworks978
@3dsolidworks978 6 лет назад
Good job, Bro!!!
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
Thanks! Sorry for the late reply, as I've not messed with my RU-vid in some time. I have more simple techniques that I'd like to make a new video for but need the time. It's for a more correct, complex thread but is still simple to create.
@tom9604
@tom9604 7 лет назад
Great video. Thanks!
@ronniefish7174
@ronniefish7174 6 лет назад
epic! thank you so much that was so simple
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
Welcome! Sorry for the late reply, as I've not messed with my RU-vid in some time. I have more simple techniques that I'd like to make a new video for but need the time. It's for a more correct, complex thread but is still simple to create.
@DGArtzz
@DGArtzz 8 лет назад
awesome video, thanks
@kakumanupattabi8697
@kakumanupattabi8697 5 лет назад
Hello, I am impressed by your command manager bar can you please make a video on how to change the traditional Command manger Thanks in advance.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
Kakumanu, I would love to make a video showing how I set up my UI (my buttons may be in different locations now but the concept is still the same) but it would probably take me hours of explaining and showing minor details of setting it up correctly so you don't get errors and everything loads as you want it. It is something I've thought about doing many times but will take me quite a long time to do. I may, and hope to, do it in the future so others can get away from the command manager (something I dislike very much) because every button you need is 1 click away versus 2-3. I like to work on as few clicks as possible and using a lot of swipe gestures. If I finally get to do it, I will send you a message. Thanks!
@TwoGirlsOneMUP
@TwoGirlsOneMUP 11 лет назад
This was very helpful, thanks for posting!
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 12 лет назад
The hole wizard is actually a great tool for calling out threads in drawing files but it lacks the ability of detail in the drawings. I didn't like it until I started doing solids with lots of tapped holes. If you use the hole callout command in a drawing and select the hole it will automatically tell the drill size needed and the depth of the drill and tap according to the parameters you set. It also has the correct depths preset unless you change them.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 11 лет назад
Just want to thank everyone for watching that helped me get over 5,000 views on my first video. It's inspired me to make some more and i'll try to continue and do so in the future.
@ckmok8784
@ckmok8784 10 лет назад
Very helpful!!
@andrewgeiman4358
@andrewgeiman4358 9 лет назад
A little monotone but the video is great! Short, Sweet and to the point, covering a few in depth tricks as well.
@wolfmanjacksaid
@wolfmanjacksaid 10 лет назад
Hi, great video but I am unclear on the triangle or cutting tool. I don't know where to draw it or where to place it exactly. I understand making the helix to the desired pitch, but I just don't get the "cutting tool". Can you help me out?
@wolfmanjacksaid
@wolfmanjacksaid 10 лет назад
Nevermind, I re-watched several times and saw that you make the middle line a construction line and then mirror it. I am using a different version of solidworks so it was slightly different.
@johnrambo7367
@johnrambo7367 9 лет назад
that was cool thanks
@markgallagher3065
@markgallagher3065 5 лет назад
Brilliant video, thanks for sharing
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
Thanks Mark! Even though the video is so old (I have different methods now, but this is still great for learning), I'm happy it's functionality is still viable.
@Nabz1635
@Nabz1635 7 лет назад
Helpful Video thanks
@rayannsun1553
@rayannsun1553 10 лет назад
very helpful. Thank you!
@supersonic060
@supersonic060 9 лет назад
hello, thank you for teaching me.
@Spaggy
@Spaggy 9 лет назад
i did learn something! thank you
@miketripp9375
@miketripp9375 10 лет назад
really clear and helpful, thank you!
@MichaelChismToday
@MichaelChismToday 9 лет назад
Awesome thanks!
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 9 лет назад
Thanks for watching!
@Ramkumar-oy7fh
@Ramkumar-oy7fh 9 лет назад
thanx a ton
@ajawam
@ajawam 10 лет назад
Don't want to sound like the ol' geezer I am but... you send this to a machine shop they'll ignore that, and either delete that feature (if they use the same native CAD program) or just export and edit a STEP to eliminate it They'll then cut the stock for the proper thread major diameter for the thread tolerance.. Then they'll either cut a single point on a manual lathe, use a canned CNC routine in their toolpath generation program for a CNC lathe/screw machine, or use a die with the proper thread tolerance. Same thing happens to an internal hole, You'll do a second operation with something like a tapping head on a drill press (Tapmatic, Procunier, etc...) or run a tapping cycle on a CNC machine for the proper thread type (H1,H2, H3, depth, etc...) as called out. This is why Solidworks has (since I've been using it from 1995), cosmetic thread displays and and added a Hole Wizard - I think around version 2004-2006 - some CAM programs for CNC can read that data from the native file - tho most machine shops can't even use that. The Hole Wizard allows a CAD guy to make a Solidworks Drawing with a Hole Table callout for actual fabrication of machined threads. For instance - one of the larger on-line rapid machining houses, Firstcut - has a guide - just google them (they're part of the group that owns Protomold). Check it out for yourself on the page. Go to Protolabs - Firstcut - you'll see a pull down menu for Resources, then go to the menu item "Machining Design Guidelines", then the picture titled Machining Design Guidelines (I know redundant) - then you'll see a picture called "Threaded Holes" They even state there "Do not model internal threads..." later it states: "You must model the pilot hole for a threaded hole. Firstcut finds candidate threaded holes by looking at your model. It looks for holes that fall in a specific diameter range and that are in an allowable orientation." This is why Hole Wizard works that way it does when you ask it to do a threaded hole. Now there are times when you need to do an actual modeled thread - say for an injection or blow molded part for say a shampoo bottle or for some thing that's to be cast threads . But that's a whole other furball - read "Mold Making Tips" in the book Machine Shop Trade Secrets - the first sentence is something like "Mothers don't let you kids grow up to be mold makers..." As to threading - check out some of the suggested videos on this RU-vid sidebar to see how most treading is actually done. Search RU-vid for: NC PROGRAMMING - "How to make any hole with NX CAM" Threadmilling in Mastercam Part 1 Note in the mastercam vid - it shows how they use Solidworks files in a production environment. Even check out the Tormach vid on threading... they use the routines in their CAM program... Similar thing happens when we get SW files with what the customer wants for the silkscreen as a cut or extruded feature. First, it makes more work for the toolpath guy since he has to delete all that so something like Visual Mill or Mastercam doesn't see at as a machinable feature. Then, the actual guy int he back (usually with a purple mohawk that does screens T-shirts for local metal bands) has to re do it all in either Corel or Illustrator. Screeners really prefer "camera-ready" art with any seps (pantones or builds) if it's color. I know all the threads and J1, J2, company logo's, etc look great in SW and Edrawings, but it's not really how it's done. The best thing to do is to take make a SLDDRW file 1:1 scale of your face/surface that you want to have screened, then either add the Fonts you want or else take that 1:1 view - export to Illustrator or some other format - bring it in to a vector based graphics program and send them that file You'll need to know the basics of doing vector-based graphics files tho... I've had so many clients that do stuff and I tell them - "Uh no you can't do things like drill a hole much more that 5 times the drill diameter and have straight. Takes special tooling and machines for that" They say - "But Solidworks let me do it..." I really feel that more people should have to at least once go to a machine shop and fab and build what they do in these packages... they'd learn a lot. Adding a ton of extra faces that the program has to render every time you rotate a view - especially since it is not used for fab - can really slow down your designing.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 10 лет назад
Since making this a long time ago, I actually do things a little different now because I actually have to program the rod ends and stuff i make for cnc machining. Doing a helical cut in solidworks is just for physical representation more than anything. I save the helical cut thread as a different configuration so I can take it out for the machining process.
@JohnDoe-nv2il
@JohnDoe-nv2il 10 лет назад
Raymond Kopec , ajawam I am doing some 2D-to-3D modeling of parts with standard NTP and Tapered NPT and my question is how important is the threading on the 3D model? I have hundreds of parts to do all with NPT threads and I am curious if it is unprofessional to leave off the threads? The drawings will be used in the future for sand-casting and 3D printing. I would truly appreciate your wisdom.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 10 лет назад
If you want to do it an easy way and it still look good you can just draw a line through the center, then draw some triangles and revolve cut them to make it look like a thread. As long as it is called out correctly in the drawing, exact dimensions are not required. A true tapered pipe would be harder to helical cut anyway so you're probably better off doing it the way I explained. It's really easy to do a helical cut in the video like I explain too. The more you do it, the better you get and it gets quick. You can thread something in less than a minute after you get good at it. It also helps to understand the relationships in swept bosses.
@JohnDoe-nv2il
@JohnDoe-nv2il 10 лет назад
Raymond Kopec I have closely watched your video multiple times for reference, and it has been a great help. Thank you for the video and quick response. I have much to consider. Cheers!
@ipissed
@ipissed 10 лет назад
Some of us will be 3D printing our models you ol' geezer.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 11 лет назад
What version are you using? I believe in 2013 the error was fixed to where it wouldn't come up. This example I'm going to give is the best way to think about this error and hopefully the best way to understand it: If your "cutting tool" (Triangle Sketech) width is greater than your pitch, solidworks will see the sketch as though it has ran into itself after a revolution and the tiny trailing corner is trying to cut something that is not technically there because it has already been cut.
@manuellando2060
@manuellando2060 7 лет назад
Thanks!
@usarmy87
@usarmy87 10 лет назад
That little triangle that create the sweep around the stock came to a sharp point at 60 degrees, How easy is to put a crest of .0069 or flat and align it perfectly. In this tutorial you used 12 TPI 1/12=.0833 pitch then pitch/12TPI=crest. (.08333/12=.0069) Flat. Not that is critical. But just wondering.
@songeunie
@songeunie 9 лет назад
had to change thread relief line to 'centerline' and use 'swept cut'. was using swept boss/base and it was not working. good tutorial, would be better if there was some text to indicate which functions/buttons you were using but hindsight is always 20/20.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 9 лет назад
Yes, I updated the note in the description for viewers to delete or change to construction geometry (centerline) the line from the relief to the triangle. I naturally deleted it at 2:48 without thinking and didn't mention it on accident.
@hch321
@hch321 2 года назад
thanks a lot!
@2112user
@2112user 9 лет назад
Thank you for the help. I've been able to do almost all the threading I needed, what I am still having problems with is metric.... primarily .5 pitch. Any suggestions?
@sonofravok
@sonofravok 7 лет назад
Thanks buddy
@razawaheed9412
@razawaheed9412 11 лет назад
thanks
@tobyhummel6569
@tobyhummel6569 9 лет назад
o and ajam it depends on what your doing if its a standard thread geo then yea its easy as puting a g72 g92 or g32 to do the thread easy but if you fluting drills or have a bastard thread like the bones screws im doing it is good to pull the geo from the sketch so you can edm a insert , just food for thought but you did say typical machine shop
@vivekk2473
@vivekk2473 9 лет назад
Whenever I give the swept cut command, this is the message that is being displayed,"A profile and path must be provided to define the sweep.The profile may have more than one contour profile.To make a solid sweep all the contours must be closed and non-intersecting.The same is true for surface sweeps,except that the profiles need not have to be closed". I tried the whole thing 5 or 6 times but its the same message over and over again .What do I have to do?? And I even deleted the line from thread relief.
@vivekk2473
@vivekk2473 8 лет назад
Oh ok......Thanks a bunch !!!!
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 9 лет назад
David, I'm not sure what kind of problem you are having with metric, please explain. I can tell you, however, that you can just change from IPS to Metric within solidworks and input your dimensions as you would in inches.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 11 лет назад
You may need to zoom real close to your sketch lines and make sure there isn't a tiny line connected at one of the ends that you need to delete. If it doesn't see it as a closed shape it won't let it complete. Also, make sure all of your lines except the shape you are using to cut in the sketch are changed to construction (dashed) lines. Hope this helps, if not let me know and i'll try to help. Thanks.
@MAC1072
@MAC1072 7 лет назад
Getting an odd result where it only carves out the section between the tool and the start of the helix. No idea why, I did nothing different aside from use metric (And those shouldn't effect it anyway).
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 7 лет назад
Sorry for the delay, I don't get on my google much. I have a feeling I know what your problem is but I'm not positive. In 2016, the feature was added for threads (terrible in my opinion) but I'd rather do it manually because there's more geometry control. When you are trying to do your swept cut operation do you see the 3 little boxes under your path selection that look like little cylinders with a circle around them? They added this when they added the threading feature. It controls the direction that your cut is going to go and seems a little finicky to me. Try adjusting it to the center or left one and see if it clears it up. For some reason, they made it default to the cut that, I would think, people would use the least. Hope this helps.
@alexred6312
@alexred6312 10 лет назад
like a boss!!!!! tnks
@vqtv4921
@vqtv4921 8 лет назад
Thank you , very helpfull
@EmporerNapoleon
@EmporerNapoleon 11 лет назад
I'm receiving the following rebuild error. A profile and a path must be provided to define the sweep. The profile may have more than one contour profile. To make a solid sweep, all the countours must be closed and non-intersecting. The same is true for surface sweeps except that the profiles do not have to be closed. Any advice? I replicated the procedure to the Tee.
@oogiesmuncher
@oogiesmuncher 10 лет назад
How would I do this without a thread relief? I can get it to cut, but it ends in a "hard" stop. I want to taper the thread near the ends but a variable pitch helix wont let me sweep cut it for whatever reason. Also, how do i prevent the cutting tool from cutting into the bolt head when it nears the top of the screw? I obviously just want the shaft to be swept cut
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 10 лет назад
You will be left with your "hard" triangle after the sweep. Simply select the triangle and create a sketch. Next, clink on the convert entities tool and it will automatically turn that triangle you have selected into a sketch. Now, Create a construction line directly down the center of the bolt and revolve cut that triangle. This will be like a lathe running a thread down and at the last thread staying in position until the triangle cut all the way around the shaft. I never thought at the time I made the video to do that but I do it all the time now. To keep it from hitting the head of a bolt just keep your helix back an extra turn or so, however much it takes to keep it out of it.
@oogiesmuncher
@oogiesmuncher 10 лет назад
Raymond Kopec awesome, thanks! Is that a common/realistic method of screw production though?
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 10 лет назад
We do a lot of it on cylinder rods and such with lathes. Where they are any possible combination of diameter and pitch. I don't ever recommend drawing a bolt in solidworks unless it's an absolute must. It doesn't take me long to make one but it's not worth it to me for how many different sizes are out there. Using toolbox and creating your own bolts out of there is fine with me for assemblies. Here is a video on mass produced bolts and nuts. It is not ideological to to produce them on a lathe but is possible for higher accuracy than factory mass production methods. How nuts and bolts are made
@oogiesmuncher
@oogiesmuncher 10 лет назад
Thank you so much for the info!
@Theterry383
@Theterry383 5 лет назад
I'm a newbie and when I do this on my sketch the spirals stay so I still have those blue lines spinning around the bolt. And if I delete them, the swept cut goes with it.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
Right-click the helix and click 'hide'
@Theterry383
@Theterry383 5 лет назад
@@RaymondKopec Thank you for the response, I'll try that tomorrow !
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 11 лет назад
One more thing I've noticed while watching my video that I'd like to make a note of is that the line I drew at 1:20 to reference the bottom of the thread needs to be either deleted or changed to construction geometry. You'll notice I deleted it in the video real quick without thinking at about 2:50. If you leave this line in without changing it to construction geometry it will not let it complete.
@toddkaempfer9904
@toddkaempfer9904 10 лет назад
yup works Great!!!!
@Iscariot18
@Iscariot18 11 лет назад
What happens with SW2013 is that if the triangle width is greater than the pitch the swept cut works but proceeds to cut off more reducing the outside diameter of the solid. If you make the triangle width the *exact* length of the pitch (not subracting the .005) you get the error. I think this is a problem with the software.
@marshal7102
@marshal7102 3 года назад
All I get is "Sweep operation failed to complete" followed it to a tee and tried three times or more but it will not sweep the cut. ????
@nusrethasic5132
@nusrethasic5132 8 лет назад
Hello,i need a trapeze screw,hot to make that ? Thanks
@bmcsue7973
@bmcsue7973 8 лет назад
Do you do repairs on stripped threading .
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 8 лет назад
+B McSue Yes, I have the abilitiy to repair threads depending on what it is. We've repaired many threads on hydraulic cylinder parts. I made a channel for my work if you want to check it out. It shows a little of the machining we've done. I just started taking and uploading some videos. Check out K&E Technical on youtube. If you're interested, you can send info and we'll quote.
@ASREnthusiast
@ASREnthusiast 3 года назад
finally an american
@TheApina21
@TheApina21 8 лет назад
when you `muricans go to metric system....
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 8 лет назад
+Apina21 I'll use either depending on what I'm designing for. The metric system is "better" for what reason? Because it wasn't originally based off a king's foot? It's based on how far light travels in a fraction of a second and who is to technically say what a second is? It's only something we figure off the frequency oscillations of something else. In the end, nothing is perfect ;)
@tonym8741
@tonym8741 8 лет назад
except most of the world is using metric
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 8 лет назад
I've got nothing against everyone going to one system, be it a measurement scale or a standardized calendar. It makes sense but getting the whole world on board is another story.
@tallswede80
@tallswede80 8 лет назад
Idiots, the metric system is better because it is base 10, which is the same base as our counting system. The imperial system is all over the place, 12 inches in a foot, 3 feet per yard. It makes no difference what the basic unit of length is as long as all the other units are powers of ten.
@GP3D_Designs
@GP3D_Designs 8 лет назад
It's not any better, unless you can't use your head to make the simple conversions of 1inch to 2,54cm. Technically, if you design on a CAD program, you are meant to use your head more than to translate from metric to imperial. Sometimes, you can't change what's already done. Take a car's speed for exemple, why use miles/hour instead of kilometer/hour? Because it would be too hard to redesign everything and make it work for metric (ratio is 1km/h for 1.61mi/h approximately). On that note, there has been wars simply because people had different ideals and thoughts in the past, wars stopped, but ideas won't change.
@joshuamendez425
@joshuamendez425 3 года назад
i followed your instructions and the top of my threads look flat :-( is that how it's supposed to be i know its just a representation of a rod but IRL the threads would have some curvature.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 3 года назад
Not sure if I'm following you correctly. 99.9% of threads are flat on the outside and the valley is the only thing with a radius.
@iggnasio
@iggnasio 5 лет назад
choose under Hole wizard a thread and it's done
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
The hole wizard for threading is terrible if you want an actual thread. It's a crude attempt at doing what I'm doing here. My method can be used to get the exact thread with the correct specifications. I just made this generic to teach the cut helix but it can go a lot in-depth.
@burzum8312
@burzum8312 8 лет назад
Why INCHES? WHY?!!
@GP3D_Designs
@GP3D_Designs 8 лет назад
+Niranjan Mahajan Because there are UNF (unified) and Metric threads and they have long ago been anchored in society
@burzum8312
@burzum8312 8 лет назад
Yes but in CAD design, it's just so frustrating to hear "a quarter inch" , "a third of an inch"! Why not just say it in mm?
@GP3D_Designs
@GP3D_Designs 8 лет назад
because some fractions in inches like 5/16" or even 3/64 are too precise to mention in millimeters.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 8 лет назад
Wow. Apparently I haven't checked the comments in a while. Society is obviously to blame for me using the Imperial System. Where I'm from, inches and feet have been used since well before my time and I don't think it'd be very easy to get the entire place to change systems. I'm not against it, I just don't know when it'd be feasible. Too many people are too dumb to even think about switching systems. Unfortunately, the location that I'm from doesn't often use metric so I'm forced to do it this way. I do design things in metric but don't see a whole lot of it.
@CNCVelMart
@CNCVelMart 6 лет назад
-ENG- (I hope you understand ... google translator is not perfect ... sorry ...) Where I live, Hungary and here are "mm" units. Mostly ... But unfortunately there is "Inch" / "Coll" to name the one you want. It is possible to multiply, divide ... 25.4 ... but if you get a drawing and not a unit, but it's very small in "mm" units, those dimensions are more "coll". But such a drawing where no unit is given, I'll throw it back to the drawing artist and until it fixes the deficiency, that work is ... At the same time, for a lot of sequential drawings, where coll is the size you specify and you have to change it, there is a lot of time. :( .. I wrote a program that collects a non-popular unit of measure for me, and converts them to show the initial size, and I see it in ascending order in the list. It is not difficult to make such a small conversion program in MsExcel, although I'd rather write it in a developer environment ... Such programs make it easier to work, and if the dimensions already exist, then the converted value of the preferred unit can be written to the printed drawing, of course, if it is handed to other people, it is also appropriate to specify the unit of measure. I'm in the video about the disruption of what the non-thread profile is showing if you want to show it this way. And this will not be used as a thread in the workshop drawing. I would be interested in making a few clicks on a thread that is on the workshop drawing a production document from the model, showing it correctly in the workshop drawing and not as a twisted profile. -HUN- ( Remélem érthető...google fordító nem tökéletes... bocsi...) Ahol lakom, Magyarország és itt vannak "mm" egységek. Többnyire ... De sajnos létezik az "Inch" / "Coll" nevezze aki ahogy akarja. Lehetséges szorozni, osztani... 25.4..., de ha kap rajzot és nem írtak egységet, de nagyon picinek látható "mm" egységben, akkor az a méretek inkább "coll"-ban értendő. De az ilyen rajzot, ahol nincs megadva egység.. én dobom vissza a rajzolónak, és míg nem javítja a hiányosságot, addig az a munka áll... Ugyanakkor rengeteg egymás utáni rajzok esetében, ahol coll a megadott méret és mindet ál kell váltani, akkor az sok-sok idő. :( .. Én írtam egy programot, ami listába gyűjti az ilyen számomra nem kedvelt mértékegységet, és átváltja azokat közben mutatja a kiinduló méretet, és növekvő sorrendbe látom a listában. Nem nehéz akár MsExcelben készíteni ilyen kis átváltó programot, bár nekem inkább jobb egy fejlesztő környezetben megírni... Az ilyen programok megkönnyítik a munkát, és ha már megvannak a méretek akkor a kinyomtatott rajzra rá lehet firkantani a preferált egység átváltott értékét, persze ha más személyek kezébe is kerül, akkor illik a mértékegységet is odaírni.. Engem a videóban az zavar, hogy amit bemutat az nem menet profil, ha már így akarja megjeleníteni. És ez nem fog a műhelyrajzban menetként érzékelni használni. Engem az érdekelt volna, hogy pár kattintással, olyan menetet készít, ami a műhelyrajzon mikor gyártási dokumentum készül a modellből, az a műhelyrajzon megfelelően jelenik meg, és nem csavart profilként ábrázolja.
@muratdogan4142
@muratdogan4142 10 лет назад
adamım ya cook basıt şeyler bunlar
@engineeringalternateworlds8853
@engineeringalternateworlds8853 4 года назад
0:45 bruh you could have done all that with a single revolve.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 4 года назад
Oh, you're talking about the whole rod. Of course you can. Does everyone know that? No.
@GarretKrampe
@GarretKrampe 7 лет назад
OK it;s a cosmetic thread not a real one. Also using this method and not the "Thread" function/feature causes solidworks to think for 30 mins if you do a thread longer than 100 mm. NEVER do a thread longer than 100 mm this way unless you have a VERY powerful computer.
@oscargandara3320
@oscargandara3320 5 лет назад
You have too many shortcuts on your toolbar, explaining where the selection is originally would make this a better video.
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 5 лет назад
There are not enough shortcuts in the toolbar IMO. I use swipe gestures and a customized mouse mostly and think the Command Manager is a stupid addition. It adds extra clicks and is only good for new users that don't know what to use when IMO. The fewer clicks you have to get to an operation, the quicker the operation will be. If you were setup the same as me and knew how to use it fluently, you'd probably like it more. It takes some time setting it up per your requirements but only the highlighted commands that can be used while doing part/sketch/drawing will be active to click. This video is around 5 years old. My icons have changed some, but I still keep most that I use frequently at 1-click positions.
@pareshpatel834
@pareshpatel834 4 года назад
That’s stupid
@Nigel5uk
@Nigel5uk 9 лет назад
thanks
@RaymondKopec
@RaymondKopec 9 лет назад
Nigel Groom Your welcome! Thanks for watching.
@burninmind
@burninmind 8 лет назад
thanks for this awesome tutorial!
Далее
Internal NPT Thread in SolidWorks - TUTORIAL
18:47
Просмотров 143 тыс.
СМЕЛОЕ РЕШЕНИЕ #shorts
00:14
Просмотров 17 тыс.
Ins and Outs of Threading in SOLIDWORKS - Webinar
31:48
Was I unfair to FreeCAD?
17:31
Просмотров 139 тыс.
solidwork helix and spiral swept cut
2:45
Просмотров 13 тыс.
СМЕЛОЕ РЕШЕНИЕ #shorts
00:14
Просмотров 17 тыс.