Solutions to the IQ test made by Mensa Norway - animated 

the ways shown in the video are absurdly complicated compared to how you would solve these items normally

An interesting thought I often think about with these Raven matrices. Non-verbal method of defining intelligence but what is it truly measuring? Is the time fair? If someone trains for these as the questions themselves have a clear pattern to them that you can practice looking out for (with the exception of the last few questions) then how does that get accounted for? What about different methods of pattern recognition that arrive at the same answer but with a more sophisticated method vs a simpler one? Having multiple choice can also be a problem since you can arrive at the correct answer without completely seeing all aspects of the pattern compared to someone who thought of a complete picture. You can also get the right answer for the wrong reasons and faulty logic. There is too much these tests don’t actually measure so putting faith in them, in my opinion, is ironically a low IQ move lol. If anyone says that’s me being insecure though I actually got a super high result on this test but to avoid coming across as bragging I will not disclose the exact number.

I got 142 😮

@@pineapplejuice1156 It is not a reliable test. Real IQ tests are longer and professionally done with a psychologist

the proliferation of simultaneous guesses working in realtime is tantamount to (one kind of an) intelligence yes - to web, network, systematize them

So if i got a few of those questions right does it mean something?

i got to Q.30 with like 17 min left

​@@kevinchou249 me too 😭🙂💔

@@damianferreira7893 What actually has value in life are our moral characteristics such as humility, kindness, helpfulness, etc. Avoid bragging and that would be something very special. Would mean a lot more than some IQ test online

@@damianferreira7893 Bragging is the worst

Yea I solved these tests before making this video, this video just summarises my thought process by showing 1 answer for each test, leaving the failed attempts out, would make too long of a video otherwise. In 11 I just removed the left from the centre and moved what remained to the right. And you are damn right this opens a lot of new worlds, I already use this for language teaching, - demonstrating how I understand languages, mathematics, anything, this is just the beginning. Has taken me years to figure all of this out, but it's hard to be taken seriously because all of this is basically new. Thanks for the comment, have a nice one!

I am test in I.Q. just by training my brain.

Точь в точь так же, чувак. Кстати, откуда ты?

​@@Alexus457 I am from Greece!

@@stephmod7434 Great. What do you think about a special military operation?

@@stephmod7434 and how old are you?

@@Alexus457 15

Fully right with u, friend

Thanks, Neijen!

I am definitely an exception. 🤓

My thought process was to follow the position of the unsquared dot and i got the right answer. 1st row right down right down right up; second left down left down left up; right up right up right down, and the only answer was A with that position. I looked at the squares as a distraction, not a pattern. Hope I helped you.

its saying they “combine” like they do in some of the previous questions, and “flip” across the line

It's jus copyright free crap, I used to make my own soundtracks, but let's say I made a simple 5 min track, youtube would mute big sections of the song from random places due to copyright stuff, just got tired of it, lol

@@universalfinnish4800 ahaha that straing

I scored 107, but I didn't even complete question 29. I wasn't so focused, so maybe I could have had a result above 110, which is just a bit above average.

i gave it just for fun and submitted i like 10 minutes, got 121, im so smart

I have got 135

i answered the first 15 right but my time was over lol. for this test my iq is only 90 or something.

35s honestly not so bad, it’s basically like some of the triangle square circle stuff from earlier(question 23) where they each need to appear in the row(except now the shapes are the “up arrow”, “down arrow”, “vertical parallel lines”, “horizontal parallel lines”, and “horizontal line” there can be some confusion in the bottom left box as to whether it had the “horizontal line” and the “vertical parallel lines” or just the parallel line, however that can be easily deduced by looking at the columns and seeing that the third already has the “horizontal line”

Sucks

@@universalfinnish4800 I turned off so Fine I like your video

no, even 29th

Same. It reminds me of the riddle of the scorpion, sheep, and hay where it's difficult to figure out unless you are told you can exchange items on shore to bring one back in order to do multiple trips. I tried to solve each horizontally and got stuck once they changed to vertical and the instructions on the test don't indicate you can switch up like that. I guess the higher IQs know to switch in order to find patterns. I wonder if more people would have slightly higher IQ simply if they knew they could look for patterns in either direciton.

No ofc not, IQ can’t determine intelligence as well as popular belief might have you believe. It’s mostly used to determine if you have some mental disability, as long as you score within 85-135 you can’t really tell if someone is very intelligent or not. It’s only if you score below 80 or 85 it should be a concern and likely you have some disability. If you score over 145 then you are ’’probably’’ gifted or just VERY good at puzzles. Either way, IQ is not a great measure of human intelligence, it's only used as a tool in some areas of psychology. The reason mathematicians, physicists, and chess players usually score higher than lawyers, philosophers, writers, etc on an IQ test (on average) not because they are smarter, but because they have been more exposed to puzzle and matrix-like activities in their everyday life, not because they are more ’’intelligent’’ than the rest. I’m a life long chess player and have scored 135-140 on every iq test I have done in my life (both irl and mensa internet) and the reason I could score so high is because I do both puzzles in my free time and because chess is pattern recognition. This does not make me more intelligent than ’’99.9%’’ of the population as some people like to claim. I wouldn't say I’m dumb, but I’m definitely not near the ‘’genius’’ level as IQ tests would like to claim.

I think you're wrong. Although in some there may be some logical workarounds. The hardest one was 33 for me. I don't even find logic even after seeing the answer

29 you just make them drop and eliminate the ones in different sides that are equal! 33 I have no idea! lol

​@@MagiadosLivrinhos ​ but on the second row of the third column, the black boxes are not standing equally to each other to subtract them..

138 for me, I don't think it is 100% accurate

Yo pensé que era el patrón basado en la del centro, si te fijas desde abajo a la izquierda y llegas arriba la derecha vas a ver como se añaden triángulos oscuros. Pero en realidad no funciona así, sucede el triángulo sombreado de arriba a la izquierda se fusiona con el triángulo de abajo que se ve en la casilla de la izquierda en el medio y luego vuelve a salir en la casilla de arriba, la que está encima de la casilla del centro, abajo el patrón es el mismo, solo que aplicas descarte con las opciones, y la única que permite la fusion es la última opción

I believe you

Same for me!

maybe you have high iq but low conscientiousness, maybe even adhd or something idk, could be a slow learner because you find it hard to focus, just an idea.

this test is mostly logic, id say the purest type of intelligence, but its not the only one and its not necessarily the most valuable in society, one that i lack is working/sequential memory (ability to have complex thoughts without losing track)

@user-ir7qs3oe9e i share the same thing. I can have a line of thoughts that end up with a conclusion. I can know the conclusion but i will lose the process. I then have to go all over again or go backwards from my conclusion. The issue is that sometimes it takes me a lot of "wandering" to get there so i dont know if i can get there again. Or sometimes i have these key moments but the fade away.... anyway. Thanks for the insight, makes sense

@@lovelaugh7299 yep, nothing/drawing things down while thinking them helps a bit :))

Imagine the problem like 1.1-2.1-3.1 2.2-3.2-1.2 3.3-1.3-2.3 Now imagine it again like 3.1-3.2-3.3 1.1-1.2-1.3 2.1-2.2-2.3 And voilá you can easily see the answer. It is always amazing how many different logic can lead to the same correct answer even in such a simple problems

think about it this way: if theres only 1 triangle in one row, its always in the same position. (top row always right, middle row always middle) And the triangles that are alone per row are always different colour. So the triangle in the last has to be left and it has to be black, so its gotta be the last answer

This puzzle reminded me of Sudoku, where you have to look at the frequency of items and their combinations in a scope of a row\column\single square. Here, for instance, we clearly see that each square has to contain a black circle (BC). And in a scope of a single column of 3 squares BC-s are placed differently - it's left, middle or right, therefore we need to place BC in the middle. Then we look at the frequency of another item - black triangle (BT), and find out that BT should appear only once in each row or column. Therefore we need to place a BT in the last square, but where exactly - left, middle or right? Here we should look not at the three columns, but at 9 columns (3 square columns consisting of 3 item columns each), and compare the collections of items in these 9 columns. With the placement of the BC we've got 3 item combinations of 2WhiteTriangles+1BC, each in its own square column. Our BT?Actually our BT is a part of BT-WT-BC collection, so it's safe to place it at the left. The last collection is BC-BS-WS, and WS goes to the right => BT-BC-WS combination is the answer.

Tbh nothing to add really, in the red are a striped/white triangle isn't found, when you copy that rule to the other side, it applies, meaning the answer doesn't contain that shape in that area, leaving only one option in the end out of the possible options.. It works completely, but it's kind of a strange solution.

on #33 it's about the diagonals. You understand 33 better after having solved #34. When two of the flaps are open, the striped covers the other, with right upwards covering right downwards first. If none of the flaps are open, the white triangle will switch line. After this, the striped triangle will switch line. The pattern that connects to the bottom right is 1 top middle picture, 2 middle left picture (3 is of course bottom right picture). So going from 1-2 striped top right triangle covers bottom right which then when going from 2-3 the white triangle will switch. This is the pattern you will see much more clearly after having done #34.

I got it by adding them(white and black separately) if they are on the same side of the bar, and subtracting if they are on opposite sides

I made it with ableton, originally the all of the audio was by me, but the copyright system is just simply broken and it flagged like 10-30 sec portions throughout the video and that's what we ended up with.

You’re telling me pineapple juice got 142 and I got 115

@@jeovs1 yes lol. I mean I technically redid the test 3 times. My original iq is 135, but when I did it quicker it upped to 142

@@pineapplejuice1156If you redo an IQ test it’s not accurate. Only the first time is valid.

@@redsusas00 ok. Still beat you by 20 pointsz

@@pineapplejuice1156 no you didn’t I got 142 on my first time lol. I think you meant the other guy. Maybe learn to read before trying to ’’flex’’ your IQ.

Puanı nasıl hesaplanıyor

6 yanlışım var

​@@KafaaccmuhimZat131 almışsın benle aynı 6 yanlış benimde

One hard

тест менса это чисто тест на ассоциативное мышление, а не общий интеллект человека, так что если вы не так уж хорошо прошли этот тест, то нет смысла переживать

142 lol