Тёмный

Solving the Gaussian Integral the cool way 

Dr. Trefor Bazett
Подписаться 411 тыс.
Просмотров 39 тыс.
50% 1

Check out MAPLE LEARN ►www.maplesoft.com/products/le.... Try out the limited trial version of Maple Learn
(for free) and start solving! My thanks to ‪@maplesoft‬ for sponsoring today's video.
My video on the "normal" way to solve the Gaussian Integral using a double integral in polar coordinates ► • The Gaussian Integral ...
In this video we're going to see a different trick to be able to solve the Gaussian Integral utilizing Feynman's trick of introducing a parameter.
Check out my MATH MERCH line in collaboration with Beautiful Equations
►beautifulequations.net/pages/...
COURSE PLAYLISTS:
►DISCRETE MATH: • Discrete Math (Full Co...
►LINEAR ALGEBRA: • Linear Algebra (Full C...
►CALCULUS I: • Calculus I (Limits, De...
► CALCULUS II: • Calculus II (Integrati...
►MULTIVARIABLE CALCULUS (Calc III): • Calculus III: Multivar...
►VECTOR CALCULUS (Calc IV) • Calculus IV: Vector Ca...
►DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS: • Ordinary Differential ...
►LAPLACE TRANSFORM: • Laplace Transforms and...
►GAME THEORY: • Game Theory
OTHER PLAYLISTS:
► Learning Math Series
• 5 Tips To Make Math Pr...
►Cool Math Series:
• Cool Math Series
BECOME A MEMBER:
►Join: / @drtrefor
MATH BOOKS I LOVE (affilliate link):
► www.amazon.com/shop/treforbazett
SOCIALS:
►Twitter (math based): / treforbazett
►Instagram (photography based): / treforphotography

Опубликовано:

 

6 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 72   
@bryangough6424
@bryangough6424 Год назад
Hello Dr. Trefor! I am an undergraduate student who loves your videos a lot. I have been struggling in my current major and really not felt confident in my studies. I think your videos have helped convince me that my passion lies in mathematics instead of the subjects I have pursued so far. Thank you so much for your content!
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
That's so kind of you to say, good luck!
@grahaml6072
@grahaml6072 Год назад
Wish I had RU-vid and channels like this when I was an undergraduate student. Unfortunately that was 30 years ago.
@ShanBojack
@ShanBojack Год назад
man i have a similar story
@agutilinus2828
@agutilinus2828 11 месяцев назад
​@@DrTreforhi
@fordtimelord8673
@fordtimelord8673 11 месяцев назад
@@grahaml6072 Same here. These RU-vid professors that share their knowledge, intuition and joy of a subject or problem are an incalculable blessing to mankind.
@caryfitz
@caryfitz Год назад
I really liked this. Feynman's technique has always been obscure to me. Your description was revelatory! Thank you very much!
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
Thank you! Isn't it cool?
@212ntruesdale
@212ntruesdale 11 месяцев назад
Who in the world is brilliant enough to come up with this?! I feel really smart just being able to understand what’s happening! There’s clever, and then there’s CLEVER. Know your station!
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor 11 месяцев назад
so clever!
@ajb16384
@ajb16384 4 месяца назад
I have an extreme love for math and I just discovered this channel. This is an absolute goldmine. Thank you Dr. Trefor
@slavinojunepri7648
@slavinojunepri7648 11 месяцев назад
Wonderful proof. Thanks for sharing.
@johnchessant3012
@johnchessant3012 Год назад
Wow, up until today I only knew the polar coordinates way of solving the Gaussian integral!
@Valori_4
@Valori_4 9 месяцев назад
Hello! I'm currently 12 year's old studying in 6th grade but I'm a very curious person in learning mathematics and physics so I chose you to teach to solve this infamous Gaussian Integral Hope when I get older I'll find a new invention like any other scientist's ❤ Thanks to you for your video's You got a new sub❤
@ryemiranda6800
@ryemiranda6800 9 месяцев назад
Same im 13 and in algebra 1
@Valori_4
@Valori_4 9 месяцев назад
​@@ryemiranda6800❤
@kasg8427
@kasg8427 Месяц назад
I am 9 year old
@umairbutt1355
@umairbutt1355 7 месяцев назад
This was my first proof of the gaussian that I came across and it blew my mind (I didn't study multi-variate calculus yet). Does anyone know the original author of this proof?
@user-cg7gd5pw5b
@user-cg7gd5pw5b 3 месяца назад
Thanks, I've done multiple exercises where they give the developed derivative and you have to climb back to the Gaussian integral, and was always wondering how people found this kind of expressions in the first place.
@foysalsahriar5608
@foysalsahriar5608 11 месяцев назад
Hi, Really nice video! I was wondering if I can help you edit your videos and also make highly engaging shorts out of them.
@aweebthatlovesmath4220
@aweebthatlovesmath4220 Год назад
Nice video! it's always good to solve a problem in more then two ways. i mean all and all it's not the answers that make math interesting it's the way we do math!
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
Absolutely, and we often get stuck only knowing the "normal" way things are done
@monsterhunter8595
@monsterhunter8595 Год назад
Nice
@monke9865
@monke9865 Год назад
Interestingly there is another way to compute this integral using single variable calculus, with strong geometric flavor. Consider F(r)= int _{x^2+y^2
@AssemblyWizard
@AssemblyWizard Год назад
This is multivariable..
@marylinebentzinger7378
@marylinebentzinger7378 Год назад
Can somebody explain why we introduced y and why when we introduced the new variable y, we set the top border to one?
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
It's just a change of variables y=x/t. Specifically when x=t for the upper bound, in the new variable y=t/t=1. The point of this change of variables was to get the parameter t out of the limits of integration and into the integrand.
@marylinebentzinger7378
@marylinebentzinger7378 Год назад
@@DrTrefor thank you so much, it seems so easy right now, you must have a gift for maths
@MurshidIslam
@MurshidIslam Год назад
Shouldn't it be −arctan 1 + arctan 0 + C at 7:26?
@balubaluhehe2002
@balubaluhehe2002 Год назад
It should've been, because there was a negative sign at the front, but -0 or +0 didn't change the final result at all.
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
Oops, good catch. Yes irrelevant for the end result:)
@josafajunior5425
@josafajunior5425 Год назад
7:25 That signal it's wrong? Don't changed because is zero, but should be +arctan(0)?
@EdoardoDAurelio
@EdoardoDAurelio Год назад
That Englishal it's wrong too lol
@tg0406
@tg0406 4 месяца назад
I remember solving this using power series and differential equations
@strikerstone
@strikerstone 8 месяцев назад
Really fun if you understand imo
@airman122469
@airman122469 Год назад
Before the video started: “Feynman technique?” Video starts: Feynman technique.
@alebaldus9229
@alebaldus9229 11 месяцев назад
Grazie.
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor 11 месяцев назад
Thank you so much!
@user-rq6gd8yy2t
@user-rq6gd8yy2t Год назад
What A WAY😮😮😮😮
@andrewharrison8436
@andrewharrison8436 Год назад
50 years ago I felt that integration was a black art. If anything videos like this confirm it. Love the way that the annoying C that crops up in any integration turns out to be the part that carries the result from the doable integral to the unknown one. I will probably watch this again to see exactly when you hid the rabbit in the top hat.
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
Ha ya it really is tbh, so many cool tricks to learn
@ahmedyacine5661
@ahmedyacine5661 11 месяцев назад
This guy here is so nice
@egor.okhterov
@egor.okhterov Год назад
Why?
@joelchristophr3741
@joelchristophr3741 9 месяцев назад
Sir i dont understand one thing .. that is how did you assume that f(t) is a square of that integral initially?????
@umairbutt1355
@umairbutt1355 7 месяцев назад
It's not an assumption. It's a definition for f(t). Now, the question of WHY such a function f(t) was defined in order to get to the gaussian is the really interesting question 😅😅
@joelchristophr3741
@joelchristophr3741 7 месяцев назад
yeah... i understood.. thankyou :) @@umairbutt1355
@MooImABunny
@MooImABunny Год назад
Gozeean integral. Hey look, it's Dr. Chreethaw, he's gonna us Mothimautecs
@samtux762
@samtux762 2 месяца назад
Neat approach. But I wouldn't dare to repeat it and would go for the classic switch to polar coordinates. But, I am not in math (was in chemistry), so this isnot my field.
@samtux762
@samtux762 2 месяца назад
Integrals arenot my jam and are not a part of my work. But I added your channel to my watch list. This "I will just use Feinman approach and square" came out of the blue. Brain massaging. Love it.
@sandorszabo2470
@sandorszabo2470 Год назад
Tricky solution! However it is not the "Feynman's trick". This method was known earlier. Only Feynman was the person who used a lot to simplify the calculation of many complicated integral.
@Sciensistbikon
@Sciensistbikon 6 дней назад
Feynman integral !?
@ViralShorts_2323
@ViralShorts_2323 Год назад
What is the need of taking partial derivatives?
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
It's just a partial because the integrand is a function of both x and t
@ViralShorts_2323
@ViralShorts_2323 Год назад
@@DrTrefor Dear Sir, don't we concern with 't' only?
@user-xo5th3cm5k
@user-xo5th3cm5k 2 месяца назад
11 12 22 4..
@gnarlybonesful
@gnarlybonesful Год назад
disappointed you didn't prove the limit was 0 and instead justified it by looking at a graph!
@mariostelzner4530
@mariostelzner4530 Год назад
WHY BUST YOUR BRAIN TRYING TO REFIGURE OUT SOMETHING THAT'S ALREADY BEEN SOLVED. AHAHAHA AHAHAHA LOL
@Ben-rd3mg
@Ben-rd3mg 3 месяца назад
Such an evil way to solve it
@avinashyadav8314
@avinashyadav8314 Год назад
No offence but Polar coordinates were much better 🫠
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
ha, I like both!
@grahaml6072
@grahaml6072 Год назад
1st
@monsterhunter8595
@monsterhunter8595 Год назад
Haha
@grahaml6072
@grahaml6072 Год назад
@@monsterhunter8595 I don’t know why people do that and post they first but this just happened to be the only time I have ever been first so I thought what hell I will look like an idiot like all the others 😀
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
ha, nice one!
@diezelvh4133
@diezelvh4133 6 месяцев назад
So, if you're technically first, is every other comment under your first comment first also? ...
@billcook4768
@billcook4768 Год назад
No, no, no. In order to truly be “cool”, you have to use Taylor series. It’s like a law or something. Then again, for the life of me I don’t see a Taylor expansion so maybe there is no official cool method :)
@DrTrefor
@DrTrefor Год назад
Taylor series is all good, but the question becomes for definite integrals what does that series sum to? We might get that it converges but harder to know in general if there is a nice answer for the sum
@Electronics4Guitar
@Electronics4Guitar 3 месяца назад
I enjoyed this video. You might like some of mine too. Just saying.
@xl000
@xl000 Год назад
The hand movements are really distracting
@nickzadeh7082
@nickzadeh7082 24 дня назад
You like to talk.
Далее
The Bernoulli Integral is ridiculous
10:00
Просмотров 679 тыс.
Сумерки сасага🧛
11:41
Просмотров 1 млн
skibidi toilet zombie universe 34 ( New Virus)
03:35
Просмотров 2,1 млн
КОРОЧЕ ГОВОРЯ, ШКОЛА БУДУЩЕГО
10:40
The Dirichlet Integral is destroyed by Feynman's Trick
8:15
how Laplace solved the Gaussian integral
15:01
Просмотров 727 тыс.
when Feynman's integration trick doesn't work...
13:17
5 counterexamples every calculus student should know
15:51
Researchers thought this was a bug (Borwein integrals)
17:26
Feynman's Integral Trick with Math With Bad Drawings
15:35
This isn't a Circle - Why is Pi here?
10:30
Просмотров 290 тыс.
Сумерки сасага🧛
11:41
Просмотров 1 млн