T is right. The joke is super funny, but it’s the opposite of wise-it’s a fun example of a logical fallacy. “Mom thinks that if you can’t beat this level (Q), then you’re a loser (P)” does NOT also mean/imply “Mom thinks that if you’re a loser (P), then you can’t beat this level (Q)”. Assuming that those two statements are interchangeable / have the same meaning is a logical fallacy called “assuming the consequent”. Here’s another example of that same fallacy where it’s more obvious: “Mom thinks that whenever it rains, the grass gets watered.” versus “Mom thinks that whenever the grass gets watered, it rains.”
"So when my mom challenges me to a level and I beat it, I put something on my wall. But this time the wall challenged me to beat the level, so I put something on my mom instead."
1500 attempts is batshit insane tho. Can't believe no one is saying that. And he's like casually going, oh this level is so short so I'm putting in another short, hard level in this vid too.
@@Charles.Wright It's mainstream side of view. Nothing brave about siding with US cryptocolony while being a US citizen. You just riding the militarism proposed by your rulers and send money to kill more Ukrainians. Not to save the lives, to save the state of your colony, hostile to one of your prime enemies :)
I was really hoping he would say “whenever I beat these levels, I like to put something on my wall to symbolize my achievements. So since my mom sent me the second level, I put my mom on the wall”
Does he actually do these challenges or is this a TAS? I don’t know anything about this game except that it looks like the Wii Mario Bro game, and I got recommended this video prob because I’ve been watching random speedrun videos from summoning salt, so forgive my ignorance.
In my whole life I´ve known some fantastic people, but like you and your skills for playing is not possible man, you are impossible, you´re the more awasome man I´ve ever seen. aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa give me a baby.
Epic math moment Your score isn't bad, if there is 1 in 3 chances of making hard jump and there was 7 hard jumps in total, you had 1 in 2187 chance to make it to the end. And You needed just over 1500, so you made it ~1.33 times faster (or in easier words made it in 75% of expected time)
Chance math is much more complicated, but even if we assume that the distribution is perfect (every possible combination exactly once), the median amount of tries needed would be 1094. In your math, you assumed that the desired outcome would normally happen on the very last possible attempt, but the odds of it being the very last one would be, well... 1 in 2187 (again, assuming perfect distribution).
@@SimpleAmadeus, well, yes, our outcome is perfect. didn't you heard words of our mario god? :D Also Because of it being random event if we stick to our perfect math he could never achieve that, being just veeeery unlucky. My number just said his expected chances of getting it every single time (based on his wise words) and it was 1/2187 (1/3 to the power of 7). If he was incredibly lucky he could get it in first try, but we now know how it went. Also, isn’t 1094 just half of 2187? :Ꭰ I’m not sure if median applies here. At 1094 (according to my calculations) he had ~38.45% chance of already succeeding at least once Quick Edit, yea, maybe I said things in confusing way in first comment. It should be ~50% of success at 1500, but time thing should still be correct
@@Adi0Adi_Music 1094 is indeed half of 2187. ;) If there were perfect distribution (every possible combination exactly once, very unlikely), then there will be exactly 1 success in 2187 attempts. This can be the first attempt, the second attempt, or anything inbetween. If you had to guess which of these attempts would be the one, the most reasonable guess would be the middle attempts, not the very last one.
@@SimpleAmadeus, I can't disagree ONLY if we are guaranteed we will get lucky try in those 2187 attempts. If we don't (and in this example we aren't guaranteed win) it shouldn't be perfectly in middle (as I said chances of getting it in the middle of 2187 attempts are ~38.45%) But at least I can agree without "but" that we have bigger chances before our magic number, in this case it is ~63,22% chance of achieving victory at least once in 2187 attempts.
Hahaha nice! I still love the ending of you putting garbage on your wall and your mom asks what you're doing and you just casually tell her, "I'm celebrating" 🤣
The 8 year old in who was so proud when he finally beat super Mario bothers decades ago can't even mentally process how exponentially harder these levels have got.
The fact that either of these levels, (or other levels like these, even), are possible, terrifies me when I really sit down to consider what it means the human species is capable of if they practice a task enough.
Bit of a logical fallacy there...his mom said if he couldn't beat the level, he was a loser, but not the inverse: if he could beat the level, he wasn't a loser. Based on what she said, he could still be a loser either way.
I can hear his dad asking what he is doing in his life, pointing that his friend's children have already discovered 5 exoplanets with life and invented a revolutionary banana oppener, and when he plan to start behaving like an adult. Oh wait i really hear it and it's my dad !
Your mom is in fact not wrong. Just because you would be a loser if you didn’t beat the level does not necessarily mean that you would not be a loser if you did beat it.
Not gonna lie, I thought you were gonna end with "so I put my mom on my wall," and then slowly and carefully hang a lovely picture up. That would have been heartwarming. But what you did was fine too, I guess.
“If you can’t beat this level, you’re a loser.” Logically, that just means that you attain losership by not beating the level. It says nothing about whether you were already a loser or if there are other paths to losership.
