I hear you, and I get that it's what fx3 users wanted, but buying the a7siii when it released, only to have the fx3 drop after putting money into the the a7siii, with no real internal difference or reason to upgrade, and now having to fork out money on the fx3 just to keep up, really makes no sense. I feel done in, and cant think that I'm the only one... If the fx6 was something we could actually purchase, yes, I'd consider that an upgrade, but till now, the fx3 couldnt do anything I couldnt do with my a7siii and a klm-xlr mounted to it...
I tend to agree with you. Sony should have launched the FX3 before the A7SIII with a different menu system, then there wouldn't have been this banter in the industry. Luckily the A7SIII can be setup similarly to the FX3 and guarantee the same image quality. The truth is most people don't need the FX3 or even the A7SIII and the A7 IV is good enough :). I appreciate the comment dude.
