Slightly better specs for Xperia 1 III, yes. However, weaker battery life is a hard sell. Nothing more frustrating than wondering whether your battery life is going to last.
I've had this phone (Xperia 1 III) for about 4 months now and the battery life is especially good. But that all depends if you use 120hz vs 60hz. I usually use 60hz because I don't really need 120 hz unless watching movies or social media but even that is all preference.
I've been waiting for this.😄 I don't mind the additional $300 for the 1 III. 5 III compromised too much for me from the resolution, refresh rate, audio, and even the camera (I felt dizzy with 5 III's video. Stabilization?). And their difference in size isn't that big. I can live with a slightly bigger 1 III with more features. Now Xperia 1 or Google 6 Pro? 🧐
Xperia 1 III or Pixel 6 Pro? That's a tough one. Currently I'm using the Pixel 6 Pro as my daily and I think it's the best Android for the price. The Xperia 1 III is a better phone (more features overall), but $400 extra is a stretch. It really comes down to how important the headphone jack and microSD card support are for you.
They have the same refresh rate and resolution. Every tech yt didn't notice it doesn't run at 4k which proves that you don't need 4k on that screen size.
They're both 120hz. 4k on a small screen is a con. There is not much significance and yet it would consume too much battery. The Xperia 1 iii's only noticeable advantage is the qi wireless charging capability since it can be a deal breaker for others. the increase in RAM too but I think 8gb in Xperia 5iii is more than enough
@@shirinsultana1271 going well! No heating issues after the updates and I can film in 4k for long periods without heat warnings especially during the filming of the Sony Press Conference at CES 👍💪ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tbie3G0d0aE.htmlsi=pGREsgXqTc6sAERC
You can really hear the difference in the audio through this video! Both seem excellent, and the biggest advantage for both over other brands is obviously the memory extension slot and the 3.5 audio jack. Between the two, the larger screen size and the better audio are worth the price difference for me, so I want to buy the 1iii.
Not the same Android version. XPERIA 5 III Android 12 and XPERIA 1 III Android 11 but I don't see if this is important because my XPERIA 1 III is even faster on Android 12.
yeah, unfortunately Android 12 isn't available for 1 III here in the US yet, and I didn't want to wait another few weeks or whatever to make this comparison. generally OS updates don't impact speed at all for app opening.
I am really on the fence about the 1 iii but why oh WHY did they have to put a V12 in a Nissan Micra!? That ruins the battery in no time and for a phone that is built to last, it is just a mismatch. Such a shame.
You did this test with prereleased software, waste of time there's a reason your not aloud to run benchmarks , softwares not optimized. Wasted video. You should have waited for the consumer version.
Had to look it up since your comment made me chuckle. Sony's first mobile phone was the P800. Now brace yourself, that was 20 years ago. Sony Ericsson were a thing together with Nokia.
Sony is dead in world smartphones high price less features Samsung series same price more features best camera Xiaomi less price more features nice camera Sony in mobile is a failure and it does fix those failures
Sony has features those don't have. It's not as simple as less or more either direction. Cheaper price, but at what cost ethically? It is not only economies of scale that make them cheaper. Failure can be defined many ways, so that's debatable.
have been reading that since 2015... but i guess zombie phones are great, that is why i bought an xz2 compact and 1 ii, no regrets... using them as personal phone, and work phone respectively... never thought how great zombie phones are compared to the living ones...