Traditionally Hollywood had distain for writers. Now writers who have some technical skills and acumen will be able to cut out the entire film industry and take their visions directly to the public. Talk about the ultimate revenge!
Very true - though your words "writers who have some technical skills and acumen" is everything. Accordingly I don't think it will effect many of them in a positive way. Also, don't forget screenwriters are treated with even more disdain by the literary world.
I'm just starting college, all career paths I've explored and considered are art - film. Animation. I'm simply screwed. My dreams since I was a kid are effectively suddenly no longer existent in reality, so what the heck am I supposed to do now
You're screwed? How about already having a degree, being deep into a career and then this shows up. You are fortunate, switch majors, don't whine, good luck.
There's always going to be demand for real art. No matter how good and photo-realistic Ai gets, it still feels fake. It has no imagination or emotion like that of a real person. Sure it can make amazing stuff and it's gonna affect artists yes, but there will be customers out there who will still will want the real thing, in a sea of AI generated repetitive fakeness. The challenge will be to find these type of customers and target your services to them, but they will be out there. Alternatively, work on finding another career or thing that you enjoy as much as you do art. Something that's not dominated by the world of computers and graphics. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
So by 2030, I think there will be 2 film industries: the AI users and the Analog ones. The AI users will be the Studios (natch) and reeeeeeeeally broke-ass indie filmmakers who can't even afford actors. The Analog ones will be filmmakers who use real people on real locations (or close to that). We'll have separate terms to describe each one (the way we have "snail mail" or "meatspace" or "dead tree" to describe things from digital counterparts) and people will go into them based on the cost-goal-integrity ratio. Also, people will probably try to get a hold and a lock on earlier versions of this before more guardrails go up. Guaranteed that Sora v.6 won't let you make AI porn with Jenna Ortega and Riley Keough, but v. 1 or v.2.1 might. And then those earlier versions will be extremely valuable and people will learn coding just to figure out how to copy that and distribute it to willing buyers for greytrade currencies. But there is no way in fuck this doesn't eliminate at least 80% of all creative media jobs.
indie filmmakers will not need any actors, they need only great ideas to f... up Hollywood. Neural networks in 2030 will be able to simulate any analog effect with perfect quality
Oh they said the same about records and live music PA's, and EDM, and AI music.. Now the power of sight and perception has changed. Creativity is freedom, and joy is the purpose, and this has led to an AI inevitable expansion, which are the results of our work. It's the universal life-force that flows in our veins, it's the air we live and breathe.. In the hands of artists these new tools will create new meta art and societies that are beyond our most futuristic hopes and dreams. This moment now is completely beyond what our previous imaginations could even conceive....
Interesting video - thanks. (by the way, we DO know what woolly mammoths looked like. We've found specimens preserved frozen in permafrost, complete with fur. We've found human art depicting them. So just saying) :)
Hey, this is your cousin :) I really need this to be regulated. I think it’s really important that legislation is made to protect artists, film makers, and PROTECT PRIVACY OF PEOPLE!! Your mention of 🌽 is absolutely an issue; there was a huge debacle on Twitch where a man generated AI 🌽 of his friends!!!! That’s so screwed up!! As an artist, it’s really upsetting that many ai programs are being trained on artists without compensating any of them. I don’t like the fear mongering going around because it just bums me out, but I also want to be aware of the dangers here. I’m glad they’re willing to force users to tag their content as AI.
@@yekim008 AI involves a direct pull of an artists’ image, to then mesh it up and combine it with other art also directly pulled from artists to create a mirage. That mirage is then used by other people in their videos, usually for profit. You do not know the difference between a direct copy of an image through AI versus an artist learning anatomy or color theory from each other.
Basically in the future the "Scriptwriter" will also be the producer, cameraman etc. just that their script will look more like prompts in terms of storytelling.
Pay attention to the glasses at 2:42 , crazy how it’s able to remember to have the car on the glasses lens when the lady turns her head, this going to be lit 🔥🔥
14:19 - Eerie, she looks so real and it feels as if the AI knows it's scary to look at through her face expressions, as if it says "I'm innocent, I promise, look, my hands are empty hah I'm just going to use a spoon to mix the mash." - and she does that scary face impression that you can see on her eyes, it's scary how spot on the micro movements of whatever it generates are, makes you wonder how smart their AI model is to be able to do it that well (feels like it's an AI model capable of acting like AGI, which is what they strive to achieve)
With all the advancements in technology over the last 30 years movies have not got any better but I applaud anything that kills the bloated budgets of big corporate studios. And this may ... though it will probably only effect extras, location shooting and film sets. Leads will still get $10 million, $20 million, $30 million plus per film. It wont help all writers, only the good ones who will direct their own films and become the auteur on the project.. But who knows how it will play out. After Polar Express they said actors would not be needed (as much) anymore ...it didn't transpire. Video games will continue to kill film and once humans are fully integrated into the storylines that will be the end of it. No great loss as there there will still be a niche market for films (and no doubt there will be a lot more cable TV) Maybe people will rediscover the past? You know a film from 1939 is a new film if you haven't seen it before.
2:22 The lady is switching her feet in a spooky way while walking ;-) A typical AI thing ;-) But most examples are very good - and just cut out this scene and we would have thought it was perfect ;-)
I simply cannot belive that this tech soon would let me turn my ideas of movies I had in the past into real looking legit movies (as if some well known Hollywood producer of films cooperate with me to create it), we truly live in crazy advanced times, we live in the futue in which ideas can turn into realities via simply texting.
@@mikesmithzI kind of agree. In ten years will people ask if you watched a new movie or will they know you didn’t because you’re watching your own, custom generated content only?
@@mikesmithz Honestly I won't make it for the views, it would be to just get to see how cool and succesful it would look as a real looking movie (besides I think I would still get some bit of views, maybe not much but enough to justify giving it a try and seeing a bit of reactions to it and comments maybe)
@@mikesmithz I get what your'e saying, it has some truth to it I guess but I still think having a world that has AI boosting it's capabilities and accelerating technology research on all fronts is better than a world that is AI-less in which it has more time for the people to watch these movies. I think that the only AI movies that would get more views (maybe much more) are those that would really have a good storyline and something that would cought the potential audience attention, also those that would put decent amount of money to advertise their AI movie would have more exposure still which would still gain them some views. I kinda finding it hard to think that just bcs AI would be able to generate AI movies that then all of humanity or most of it would keep generating AI movies nonstop to the point of literally not having anymore time left for seeing other people's AI movies, there is maybe gonna be a super hype of the tech at the beginning but then people would decrease the rate of their AI movie creation pace and at some point might even stop and then those other smaller percentage of people that would still be (long term) dedicated to what they actually love doing - creating movies with AI - they would be having more people having more time to watch their AI movies. Oh and BTW the future won't be so boring, in fact the opposite, it would be the most interesting era to live in much more than it is currently since AI would create new sciences/new cultures/new discoveries/new ways to experience realities and what not, as we progress with tech and new inventions and breakthroughs more options open up which means the present becomes less and less boring because of it, I think it might even be too much in the future in terms of sensory overload maybe and things to do or experience.
I’m not sure everyone will be creating their own art. Once Sora becomes available to the public, realistically it’s probably going to have a pretty hefty monthly subscription fee. For creators and video creators who do this for a living then it’s probably worth investing in. However, for the average Joe I really doubt they’re going to be paying for it monthly just so that they can create their own movies. Most people just aren’t interested in that kind of thing.
@@elliotforemanfilms It's what I came to realization with today, I think unfortunately that their tech is too pricey for the average person and they are going to ask for a rather expensive subscription fee per month so then sadly it will be catering for only the small percentage of high quality serious professionals of video film making and actual producers of movies since it would be worth it for them even if it would cost $50 or more per month to use it since they would earn back the money from their production and movie they would create with it, so it means most people would have to wait for it to become cheap enough to be able to afford it and then it would only go mainstream in like 3-4 years? I don't know, again, if it's not too pricey I might still want to buy it since it's that impressive and revolutionary to overlook it and to hold back from it due to its relatively high price, as long as it's basic subscription tier won't cost like $100 per month then it's gonna be fine, I'd be willing to pay for basic tier about not more than $40 per month ( depends of how many videos per month I would be able to create as well and if it's worthy enough)
Is there even a point in trying to be a freelance filmmaker anymore? Like if you aren’t already established and have people wanting to work with you, now I have to compete against ✨this✨ 😔 I mean I guess you could say it can’t tell a story…..but how long until it can do that too?
AI will come up with the Stories and entertainment will become 100% personalized. I'll open up my Netflix and RU-vid and it will be AI content generated purely for me and my preferences
I understand the existential crisis people are having but let's ground things a little: 1) The value of "real" will go way up and people will care - "It looks like AI will not be a compliment." 2) I was using insane AI tools back in 2016 and in a strange way have it has only made my work more sophisticated. 3) Producer says, "Well AI can do your job." Writer responds, "If AI can do my job, it definitely can do yours, see you in the unemployment line." 4) Look at this as another tool in your belt and learn to use it.
i agree. authenticity will be something humans crave and seek out. also i wonder if the academy will have rules in place to protect artists too. maybe to have a film submitted to be worthy of an oscar you can’t have any AI generated work
You won't, but we have yet to see the laws that are going to be put in place. You think lawyers want to lose their jobs to AI? Wait until the AI legal software comes out and can scan text and image for plagiarism. An actor who was in the original Top Gun is suing the producers of Top Gun: Maverick because they used a picture in the film that he was in. This is very small potatoes. Chris Pratt, if he so desired, could sue for shares of "Sora" because they used his likeness in the spaceman with a knitted cap. @@deaddycruel
Revolutionized? Destroyed would be more accurate. Imagine all the jobs impacted and the loss of value of skills that unsed to take time and work to acquire. They are gone in an instant. We should pull the plug.
I anticipated this with the advent of Pixar and others like it... Where actors are not really necessary and where you can create action sequences that would turn stunt people into bloody hamburger.
Still looks like animation. Also, in the wide shots, you'll notice a little pixelating and blurriness around the hands of most of the models.. So, whilst pretty good, I'm still not convinced that this is going to replace stock footage. Looks like this was all made with DAZ 3D and unreal Engine.
Hi to you & your followers, just an interesting progress in the AI evolution or revolution that's unfolding very quickly saddly for humans artists. Two questions: Where did AI amalgamate, fetch or steal these videos from the WWB or from human artist that created it before, originally and in the past. Will AI generate the same exact video visual output for the same exact prompt, if many prompted the exact and same requested sentence ?
It all depends upon what kind of content will be allowed. For instance, will you be allowed to produce a Tarantino-styled film? I doubt it. You have to work hard to get these models to produce Pixar levels of violence. Censorship. Silicon Valley won't allow truly violent or sexual content to be produced. Are you going to make a film like Halloween? Nope. They won't allow it.
You have no what is required for cinematic story telling of long form video, a few short clips of AI generated content is nonsense. The level of control required to make accurate backgrounds and character interactions is years away and way more details too many to list. Will this speed productions, yes will it lower costs eventually, yes. Will it change story telling yes in time, but tools are only as good as the story teller that uses them and most people barely know how to walk and chew bubble gum.
Its just an stupid AI video formation why are we so surprised that this technology even exists we should have all excepted this but yknow if you arent used to science and the internet than this is a cool way to see this.
