What I've learnt in my 5 decades is that we are terrible at predicting the future because a new change that we cannot imagine causes a major paradigm shift.
When I told people that some day you will be able to pass notes to people without the note they laughed at me. Boom texting. When I told peopl that video chat will be on our phones and it will be the most efficient way hold business meetings. They laughed at me said it would be too cost per user. Boom FaceTime.
I agree and I think we will never know the future at all! It's amazing how after over 2000 years we still linger to that feeling of knowing... when the answer has been given to us since the beginning.
AI is a hot topic for now. It has been around and will be around for a long time. Just like Metaverse, AR/VR, drones delivering packages, flying cars, jet packs, etc.
He literally said that jobs will be eliminated and the rich will get richer. Then he said that we will all get government hand outs of 1/8 billion per person. He perfectly described a dystopian dictatorship. He literally just described how his company will destroy our world
once AI is further developed, and adapts to become smarter than Humans (which is within the next 5-6 years), government contracts will start coming in for National Defense implementations in the form of partnerships for Companies like OpenAI, and we'll all hav to accept it as the perceived safeguard against international threats and other Nations like Russia and China doing the exact same thing. Hmm...where does this sound familiar ?? We are living in the age where Companies like OpenAI will soon become like Skynet.
@@sandhuaditya4855We declaring that it's hopeless, will only embolden the billionaire sociopaths, like what how oil/fossil fuel industry benefits when people feel it's hopeless to fight for climate change.
I'm ready for ai to take over. Working sucks. Well all have ubi. Progress is good. If we had social credit that would probably help me so much. I made the conscious decision to stop littering and shit 20 years ago. I liked masks for several reasons. I liked the anonymity. I don't enjoy being in crowds and the masks is just a little comfort shield. And plus if you get the n95 mask it filters all the dust and other stuff besides viruses. You're an idiot and you're holding human civilization back. There are always reasons to be kind of skeptical of scientist. But real science has self regulation. If one person makes a discovery then anyone else can verify the discovery themselves. If it's wrong it comes out eventually. You know eventually we will have to leave the planet if we want to survive as a species. Intelligence is cool. It's amazing to think of what could happen if people live and think properly. We need to preserve and grow our knowledge and pass it down through the generations just like it's always been.
he’s just telling the truth on the nature of progress. of course it won’t all be good. but if it goes well, the quality of life will improve for all humans
@@benjaminb6678When you’re living in the slums, no work, no income, fighting off your neighbors with an ax for scraps while the few wealthy enough to endure this look down on you from their tower, far removed from struggle….then tell me how that quality of life worked out. You can not improve quality of life for the majority by taking away the majority of jobs in a capitalist society. It doesn’t work that way. What you want is more likely to turn all of America into skid row
@@benjaminb6678keep believing your life will get better via these corporate vampires and tech giants attempt at “improving” your life. And it will be the end of the minuscule amount of sovereignty we have.
One thing I wanted to know. It shook me first to see that AI does GREAT Artworks, even now almost replacing alot of designers. Then I saw that even music production will be replaced. Then I asked myself: Isn't that a bad thing? Like the feeling of making a drawing thats really great over hours and days, it was rare and fullfilling. Creating music and vibing to it all done by an AI in seconds with unlimited results that alot of them are really good even now. Thats depressing to me. I mean what do we live for? To relax and not do any work? To have everything we want at the touch of a button? Even with tech now we see that people notice that it doesn't really make life better. Easier, faster doesn't equal more fun or better. I think the mindset we have is going in a direction we cannot stop. Don't get me wrong I'm a developer/artist myself and these things ARE exciting but also if they will replace everything we do. Whats the point of living? Humans are designed to do things, not to have fun all the time, get drunk or relax. That sounds good in theory but is actual hell. What do we talk about with people then? There is only so much to explore in the world. The real things to explore are internal, are creative and deep. EDIT: I want to add: Even the worst case I describe here will be better than living in some time of our human history. Being tortured or living through illness is of course a lot worse. But I think we should always aim to have a better future for our children and I see a potential that it wont be as we imagine it to be. And to be honest, I dont think we have a choice anyways because its not a democratic choice we have to develop these AIs, because if WE don't do it, actors like the CCP will do it to ensure their weird reality. And even without china, its just like the atom bomb, we will discover it and use it. Bad or good will both be present and we need to be careful which I'm REALLY afraid we are not. Or does any social network face consequences for the mental issues they created? Just think about it and I'm open for anyone to discuss this topic. I love the comments that tell their opinion of the future :) Bladerunner is not so wrong after all... (not an English native speaker, please excuse my mistakes)
I think thats right, and biollogycally damaging to the human being (we are not designed/prepared for that much entertainment and flood of comfort). But when I see our internal psychology, I see that there's incredible amount of work that people must do. Maybe we can conquer the space with tech or cure cancer, but we are really infants in understanding our own minds. Perception, conciousness, emotion, the origin of thought, the sense of self or no-self, we almost know nothing. That, I would bet, is the hard work we have ahead and moreover i'd say, without that work, we will perish (as you say in the feelings of meaningless).
I would rather live my life with the challenge of fighting boredom than by the sweat of my brow. I’m happy that in the future, there may be no need to work most of the day.
Just remember that he doesn't control AI. He just made a monopoly around a discovery in the AI/ML academic community, specifically a paper from Google, that proved the attention mechanism "is all you need" to train large scale models. This allowed us to scale and train larger and larger statistical (deep learning) models that predict the next word given a sequence of words. Previous large language models before this paper were using too complex architectures and the compute power wouldn't allow training models with datasets the size of the Internet and more. This is called generative AI today, but it's like monopolizing light bulbs after they were discovered. The math is published and it's not too complex to reproduce. Look up hugging face and the LLM leaderboard and you'll find 100s of open source language models that compete with OpenAI. This is called a bubble. It will pop. Models like these will run offline in your house in the next 5 years.
*trains generative AI using full Lovecraft library, book 4 by Crawley, all Egyptian reference materials, and every detailed report and pharmaceutical disclosure on DMT* Ask it to describe, in detail, the creation and reason for our dimension, and exact methods for communicating, interaction, and transfer between. And of course, lastly, the methods for harnessing and ascension through the designs of Solomon. 🤟 Sounds crazy right? Now imagine even it's essentially so simple it'll be a carnival ride. K fine. Maybe a cruise? Oh wait. A 3 hour tour. Lol
@@WiseWeeabo I disagree, Google's VertexAI has some models that definitely compete and some even out compete with GPT-4. OpenAI also lacks the support for common retrieval augmented generation (RAG) tools in their suite but vertex AI supports a ton of things like cloud vector stores, feature stores, and more.
@@Chickenflaavorramen If that was true, why are they not using those models for Bard? Bard fails every eval I give it that Gpt4 handles easily. I can write a RAG implementation myself so I'm more interested in a competent model.
Sam admitted he was wrong multiple times about how AI would develop. Although i appreciate his honesty, makes me suspect that the future will be radically different from what he or anyone else predicts
The soft eyes, the vocal fry, the gentle consonants - it’s all practiced. This is the performance of a man who knows exactly how you’re about to get fucked by the technology he’s unleashed on the world and would like for you to regard him as a nice person all the same. Good luck, everyone.
Honestly, he’s not so bad. In fact, his ideas for the future are quite exciting and even revolutionary. We should collectively come together and celebrate these inventive new ideas and the possibilities they offer for us all. _United States Federal Law requires this notice informing the reader that this response was generated by an Artificial Intelligence developed by OpenAI._
I actually think it's going to happen for those remaining. Even the WEF talks about this kind of stuff. The downside is that we will have to give up a lot of what we consider essential freedoms. The rich and powerful need other people to cater to them, even when robots and AI are everywhere. So, a human underclass will be somewhat taken care of so they don't rebel. That's what is already happening now in many Western countries.
He literally said that jobs will be eliminated and the rich will get richer. Then he said that we will all get government hand outs of 1/8 billion per person. He perfectly described a dystopian dictatorship. He literally just described how his company will destroy our world
It's called thinking before you speak. When this guy or Zuckerberg do it it makes them evil autistic robots but when Elon does it it proves he's great.
No, just the downfall of most of humanity. Let’s look forward to our dystopian future where the elites live in their towers far removed from the rest of us in our slums, fighting each other for survival. Imagine South side Chicago mixed with skid row but nations wide and 10 times worse
Honestly i think we are headed down the Bladerunner rabbit hole as far as AI is concerned.....Alexa is basically JOI in it's most primitive form,and we have all the tools in other areas....internet banking,GPS for your car,mobile phone for social media,your fitbit watch that monitors your vitals,your Spotify,your Cloud based media and other stuff will be collated and brought together in one entity that you can pretty much run and control your life with.Your AI will naturally be paired with any device you personally own and all of this of course will be voice interactive but it will be intelligent enough to give you ideas and suggestions to improve your life with your own personal AI
@@massivelyindie7124not intentionally.... but this dude is frighteningly out of touch with what makes mankind special. This the is ultimate example where in which just because you can do it, doesnt mean you should
The problem with AI taking creative jobs is that they are training the neural nets on living artists' work. If they limited the neural nets to learning from work that is already in the public domain it would still be amazing, and living artists would still be motivated to create new work. Instead, they took a shortcut that might destroy our creative industries in a generation.
sure but Artists today are neural nets that train themselves on other Artists work and always have done, we have entire schools of art that do nothing but ape other artists work that are them selves a conglomeration of previous artists works to form a recognizable style, we like to think humans have some divine spark that's capable of inspiration drawn from the void, but thats really not the case, we build on the works of other in a never ending cycle of iteration. Built from the bones of what came before.
fax. AI is terrifying though when you think about humans attempting to compete with that. We eventually won't be able to let's be real. @@johntowers1213
i’m an artist and i have no fear of ai. used it to make cool stuff and get ideas. It can steal my art style maybe but i just keep making new better stuff it’s never gonna replace me
Who’s gonna “redistribute the money into society”?? No shot any of these greedy companies actually do that when all they care about is profits and the shareholders. Times are getting dark
Joe talked most of the time in this podcast. Conversations that the avg joe likes to hear. I wish we heard more from Sam's high IQ. Also, to hear more about his other projects.
Who cares? Cars put all the horse businesses out of work too. Would you rather have those jobs kept and no cars? AI will take people's jobs... SO WHAT?!
@@Lithenius Depends on the scale and scope. If AI truly is going to take out 80% of all jobs that are currently available, who is going to consume? This entire economy is built on consumption fueled by cheap debt.
@@LitheniusAre you mentally handicapped? Horse businesses were a tiny minority of businesses compared to all the businesses that will be impacted by AI
Man you just hatin to hate. He said that, so you know that his intuition is most likey wrong but Joe was still interested in his perspective. Setting up predictions and seeing how they differed from the actual things happening is super interesting as well. For example his point, where his intuition was turned upside down and the creative work was gone first.
Ian Malcolm summed it up perfectly in Jurassic Park "I'll tell you the problem with the scientific power that you're using here, it didn't require any discipline to attain it. You read what others had done and you took the next step...you wield it like a kid that's found his dad's handgun"
This is a common misconception. AI's progress has been the result of years of hard work and discipline. Unfortunately, public understanding is often influenced by dramatic portrayals. This quote highlights the gap in public perception of this technology, that has been around for decades.
@@Eric_Kabucha_ That wasn't the point. The point is that this is what the future holds. AI will do the work, and a few rich and powerful people will be in control. They'll have everything handed to them without the discipline that comes from working for it.
Completely authoritarian and totalitarian where the ruling One knows what's best for you and you're going to like it! It wouldn't be subject to redress of grievances. With it's constant "improvements" on itself, in time, it simply realizes how messy and unmanageable people are. We are marked as parasites to the planet. Then starts the elimination of the problem or forced lobotomies for perfect harmony
He talks about AI bringing “abundance “ to our lives. My fear is that, as social media has degraded society in so many ways, it will fast track that degradation. It certainly will reduce human interaction which creates disregard for each other. Abundance yes. But what kind of abundance?
AI is already doing the degradation. The number of bots spreading negative replies and people wasting their time replying to them already. The purpose is engagement to game the algorithms
This generation of kids already hate thinking for more than 30 seconds at a time. AI will effectively turn them into functioning vegetables. They’ll be able to walk around and talk but they will have zero ability to critically think about things without asking AI how to think first.
i had a plenty of ideas on a regulated AI system as executive branch while legislature (programmers) regule the executive branch and a panel of judges (Third party civil rights advocates) deciding what is constitutional for efficiency and worth perfection
I said this after having dealing with family court. Just plug the info into a machine and let it decide and then a judge can just sign a bunch of orders made by machine because that's sort of how family court works anyways.
Yes that's because instead of being a keyboard warrior on internet he actually decided to build something and learn from his own mistakes. That's basically how anyone else in the history has learned things, maybe try going back to school again?
@randomuser5237 We are building the worlds most powerful machine that can kill all of us, and the creator can't predict or control what it will do. Instead of seeing that threat, people like you only want to insult someone who points it out. I don't expect you, those that sit behind a computer all day, not interacting with people, to understand what a grave threat this is. Get outside and connect with people instead of making love to your computer screen before bedtime. Find a human being to care about and connect with. Maybe then you'll see the threat.
i was just talking about this to my in law and was telling him what i think will happen and for me it’ll take over these mass jobs and we’ll have universal basic income. and they’ll use ubi against us and put us in our place which is pretty scary
I don't trust a person who promises the world a "World Coin" that is "personalized for one's own security" and then performs an iris-scan with his test subjects and consequently obtains all the biometric data of millions of people.
Not to mention he's the guy behind one of the ai art generators that steals data from actual artists to function. He's not the person who should be in charge of something like openAI, he's sketcy at best, malicious to further his own ends at worst
@@pookimkutsel Im an artist myself, I overwhelmingly agree with your sentiment, but I would push back on the issue of "AI stealing data from artists" as artists themselves have been "stealing" concepts, techniques and even completed works from other artists for literally centuries. That is how art works.
An AI governing us, with no bias, no greed, no ulterior motives sounds like Utopia, a beautiful Utopia. But also the premise of the TV Series - Travellers: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Travelers_(TV_series)
Sam is modern day Oppenheimer He is the man who has given us the power to destroy ourselves and the world is not prepared. Now that he is fired, it's his time to deal with the consequences of his achievements.
@@DanyPell Isn't he the guy who cheated Elon Musk(and many others) out of 50 million $ when he broke his promise of keeping his company non profit open source and went private? I wouldn't call a traitor and liar the best leader.
Abundance for CEO's, managers, corrupted polticians... Yes, he's right. What about the majority of people deciding if they want a law to limit AI, and not a few guys in Silicon Valley that have gone mental and sociopathic deciding for all humanity?
I agree. I know this is not really the same, but I've played Simulation games since the 90's and it's just as Sam talks about in the first few minutes.
Thanks Sam!!! As I truck driver I appreciate you helping me out by replacing me with automated systems so I can go off and be homeless and destitute!!! The way you explain it is so whimsical I think I can manage my first year of unemployment with alcohol and drugs and completely avoid self deletion!!! Love my country and the leaders of innovation and appreciate everything they do for me!!!
I don't want no part of your shitty future...was being facetious but honestly I can't wait for this to happen so I have a legit reason to escape into the wilderness and avoid contact with people all together.@@elsosa7863
The issue with AI assuming creative roles lies in the fact that the neural networks are being trained using the work of contemporary artists. If the training was restricted to works in the public domain, the results would still be impressive, while also encouraging living artists to continue producing new work.
Very interesting discussion! Although it always worries me how little sci-fi these tech people have read or know about. PK Dick and Asimov should have been mentionefmd
This guy gives me Zuckerberg vibes in every worst way possible. Some young smart guy representing an advancement in big tech who knows how to sell ideas but feels like everything he says has been practiced a thousand times in front of a mirror.
I think the most shocking thing in this interview is how Sam is speaking in definitive terms. He knows things that have given him enough data points to say that things WILL happen.
He's holding back alot, he knows some of the plans they have for AI both positive and negative. I think he's been coached by his handlers on what not to divulge
What he meant to say predicting 50 yrs out is "the current wage gap btwn ceo and line worker is like a grand canyon today. With AI it will be wider than the pacific ocean. If the lower workers even have a job. Poverty and squalor will surpass the gravest times in human history. But a lot of ppl will get stinking rich, so its going to happen."
This has to be the absolute worst time for this to come along. With the amount of corruption and Traitors in charge this will be used against the people
Newsflash: the entire history of humanity is filled with those in power using the best weapon at the time to keep the people they rule over down. AI isn’t any different than when towers were used to keep the peasants out of the castle.
Humanity's obsession with having others do everything for us, to the point of seeking slavery as a solution, threatens our very existence. Will we choose this path to destruction, or will we find a better way?
@@hyponomeonedont mind the piles of millions of dead bodies that history used and then discarded. Nothing to see here. We'll get it right next time bc man begets man and is therefore god. Yay!
We don’t even take care of the troops who put their lives on the line when they come back and this dipshit thinks the govt will give a single fuck about truckers, etc losing their jobs. Just more foreclosed real estate for blackrock and friends to gobble up.
To me, it sounds like this means those who control AI will get to do whatever they want, while the rest of us end up having to do blue collar work and simply accept AI forms of entertainment and "do the thinking for us". To me, that sounds like the catalyst of warfare.
When he said half way in “ or you’ll get a monitory equivalent “ I thought that sounds more like it, once AI runs everything you’ll have your tokens to go online and buy grocery’s ( as long as your within your allowance) and maybe some Amazon pocket money to buy a rationed amount of miscellaneous. Gosh I can’t wait 😢
Like he said, he evolve along with the tech that we've evolved. Since gps became common, people can't read maps, can't find their way amywhere on their own or repeat the trip without the gps. People also don't learn street names etc. With calculators some complex math became available to more people but significantly less people can now do basic math in their head. Spellcheck, grammar check... people's vocabularies have shrunk, the can't use language properly and are ignorant of why it's important. We're about to enter the other side of the bell curve where from our tech advancements.. in fact I think we're already on the downward trajectory. We don't know how to fix the broken corrupted systems we already have. We'll be absolutely reliant on out tech being able to fix our mess for us. We are arrogant and the tendency is to think we are smarter now than people were in the past. I think it is the other way around. We have more collective knowledge at our fingertips but we're dumbing ourselves down. Becoming weaker and more sickly. Lowering mental fortitude. We are our biggest threat.
An interesting Quote: HUMAN ACTIVITY DEVOLVES TOWARD COMPLEXITY (K.L. Jamison, 2019)..... Orwell's "1984" occured in 1964..... "You Will Be Assimilated, Resistance Is Futile" (Borg quote).....
We either redistribute money or close the eye and the people with less technological/scientific skills will die out as they literally have no way to make enough money to survive. Sick to think about the second scenario. Sad to think that this is how it has worked over long periods of time. What is different now is that it is happening in front of our eyes in the span of a century. I don't worry so much about myself but even as someone in software I'm planning to go back to school to learn another, more human-focused, skill to add to my arsenal. Some jobs which I don't see disappearing during this century: kindergarten/primary-secondary-school teachers, nurses, plumbers/builders/welders, movie directors, actors, tailors, ..., and anyone with very deep specialization in any field.
@@irenleorr5539 We still need workers to manage the printers (and you can't use printers for everything when I said builders I mean everything to do with construction aka construction workers, welders, plumbers, painters, electricians, etc.). I also do not believe that AI will become better at making an entire 2-hour movie than professional team of movie directors/editors/cgi artists/actors/designers. To repeat: this century. What happens in thousand years is impossible predict and does not affect any of the humans alive today.
I’m not sure if everyone will get this but you know there is that one moment where you have a breakthrough on a problem and something clicks. You finally get it, but in a real way. That’s one of my concerns with AI is that it could steal that opportunity from some individuals who are overly reliant on the technology. Those moments are critical to grow as an individual and you can’t get it back after it has passed.
I don’t think that the interviewee understands what genuine creativity is. He uses the word in the “commercial nakedly” sense. For myself, creativity comes from a random singular place that accesses that part of the mind that we don’t yet understand.
I get your point, but at some point you really get fractions and regular math equations through repetition, calculators didn't kill math, it just made it more complex. Same logic, we'll be dealing with harder questions in the future.
@@user-vw8tl2wp9oExactly, he’s just the CEO and people seem to think he’s invented the damn thing. Musk was similarly involved in Open AI at the start. Frontman to get investment
This guy is really good at saying a lot while also saying nothing. His answers are very surface level and he obviously doesn't think too much about what will happen to the millions of people that will lose their work. All he cares about is the race to develop a dominant AI before someone else.
Has man ever created anything that has made ourselves obsolete? Of course not otherwise we still wouldn't have to work. We just get to solve different and hopefully better problems. (I'd rather be discussing the merits of AI development than arguing over why our well shouldn't be next to the poop pit) That being said, "AI" is a great marketing term for "computers" and all "AI" does is the same thing a calculator does. Its only as perfect as those who designed it, which is to say, it will never be perfect. But, people are treating it like a deity and human history has plenty of examples of how this gets stupid fast. Those of us who "hate AI" aren't afraid of loosing our jobs, we're seeing that this mirrors all the times in human history where a bunch of people needlessly suffer and die because some idiot "in charge" decides "AI" is unquestionable. AI can change my tires and even tell me it is time, but I'll never allow it to force me to do so.
It is the nature of the beast. Progress does not care, for better or worse. It IS going to happen and i don't blame innovators for wanting to be the pioneer, to be the first. Electricity has killed thousands of people so have vehicles but the pros far out weigh the cons. AI is unstoppable, you need guys that are on the cutting edge to have a defense against those that will inevitably use it for bad.
Listening to the podcast. I get this eerie feeling. Sam seems to be having an Oppenheimer moment. Where he continues to have intuition moments of regret as AI evolves. Where we don’t know where we’re going with this but let’s continue. Knowing that something tragic might happen. Risk to reward maybe? I don’t know. It’s just a thought about this podcast.
I love the idea of reducing the 'cost' (not referring to the narrow and profoundly lacking capitalist concept but the true human value term) of intelligence to 0. This achievement is actually close IMO, and the smooth exponential curve that Sam talks about, again IMO, is not really 'intelligence' per se, but the fundamentally important aspects of progress he talked about, namely science and technology, and since we inhabit this physical world, this exponential is actually a sigmoid. Reducing intelligence and energy 'close to zero' is necessary but not sufficient. The work needed to actually make things real may become extremely efficient but it still needs to be done. And in a true world of true abundance, hey, if you want to be a truck driver or a factory worker still, pretty sure such society could perfectly accomodate your preference. Negentropy for the masses! Go OpenAI! I'm David E Long live ultra (utopian) transhumanism!
The first thing Joe says to sam when the podcast starts is “what have you done?” and laughs referring to the groundbreaking AI advancements Sam have done . Sam replies: what have I done in my life like ever? Joe tries to explain it was a joke but he didn’t get it lol that’s a tech leader as usual lol can’t get a simple joke but then they are the ones deciding what is a joke and what is offensive in every social media platform
What nobody seems to touch upon, is that by far not every job will disappear due to shortage of microchips. Even if a job is replaceable by AI, it will simply be expensive as the hardware possibilities are limited (see prices of microchips and hardware in general for the past 3 years). AI runs on chips, people will have to prioritize for what they are using an AI. For example, a driver will be simply cheaper than an AI driven car in the future.
When I was a kid I was excited about technology and the future. Now it seems like mixed in with all the promises and benefits of technology comes the reality that we are losing what makes us human due to convenience and progress. We are being absorbed by the machine.
The eventual and unavoidable outcome if humans want to keep existing involves our biological body assimilating and merging with the machines we create enabling us to abandon the earth and the solar system. That or we can go down with the ship that enabled our existence in the first place
it sure changed his bank account when he took 1 billion in investments as a non profit company and turned it into a for profit company raising even more money on top
Can't tell if you're surprised about it, or just stating facts for no reason. Because the system we live in is called capitalism If he did something wrong or didn't use the correct loopholes - he'd be in prison. Since he isn't locked up - he's doing it right
I recently worked for a trucking company that added very simple technology to the trucks and fuel pumps. It caused a great deal of frustration. These are not people who will go from driving trucks to driving ai to fulfill creative ambition. Tech folks forget that these leaps in computational advancement will leave a lot of the blue color labor force behind.
Once this is out of the bottle you can’t stuff it back in. Hold on for a crazy ride. I miss the days of the 1980’s growing up. So simple and enjoyable.
They will look at the comments here and see people like myself raising the alarm and ask why they didn't listen to us. These people will bring the end of humanity.
@@cptn_chromo3189You are not raising an alarm. You are writing a comment, you are doing nothing to help regulate AI or to understand it better. If you are actually afraid, do something, if not, then stop writing youtube comments to help boost your ego. Sorry if I was too harsh
@@karlomolnar2780 This is an open forum for discussion, one of the few left. People voicing concerns over potentially harmful and not fully understood reliance on automation is perfectly acceptable discourse. Let the voices be heard, stop gatekeeping. Especially if they have a valid and justifiable aversion to trusting a future fully dependent on machines and electricity to function society...
"The future is already here - it's just not very evenly distributed." - William Gibson Mark my words, AI is not going to help people by automating jobs they dislike because the benefit of that automation will not be spread to them. There will just be a different shitty job for them to roll into with no monetary gain from the automated one they left.
Not as many jobs though. Fewer jobs overall, and the pragmatic value of an individual human will be reduced. Accountants and Engineers being in charge of policy will then seek to create a more 'efficient' human race through population control.
As long as we can keep our freedom to pursue our own interests, I think we’d all be a lot happier if we didn’t have to worry about going to work at a place we hate.
People doing menial jobs: I HATE MY JOB SLAVING AWAY FOR A LARGE CORPORATION Also people doing menial jobs: WHAT?! YOU’RE GONNA PAY ME THE SAME AMOUNT WITHOUT ME HAVING TO DO THE JOB I HATE?! YOU COMMUNISTS!!!
