Sorry, Evolutionists: Bees DESTROY Your Entire Worldview 

How lovely - it always irritates me when people teach their kids to be afraid of bees.

​@allysondoerfler2435 one problem, at least in my region, is that the yellow jacket wasp is often referred to as a bee. Of course the yellow jacket wasp is a highly aggressive insect that will repeatedly sting even with a slight threat.

I did the same thing with a bumble bee, I picked a few dandelions and sit the bee by them, he went to them, and in about 15 minutes he was able to fly away, truth be, he actually circled me before he flew off 👍🐝🐝🐝🐝

I had a mother mouse come back to thank me once when I saved her nest.

e

Truth? That is actually amazing- im not a bee keeper but i like bees they always land on me when im outdoors someone always screams a bee ! Kill it before it stings you! But they never sting me just sit awhile then fly away fascinating creatures

Ditto here@@dyingforpie6879 I do believe that bees can smell fear like dogs, and other animals can!

@@dyingforpie6879 When I was a mailman working in the summer heat, I had to stop someone who wanted to try to kill a honey bee that had landed on my back to take a drink of the sweat that was soaking my shirt. Leave them alone and they will leave you alone.

Were those bees African Africanized bees?

No. This was in the late 1950s early 1960s.@@bruceparker6142

None of this flows naturally.

So true! Honeybees are incredible!!!

I'll bet you think that God made bees so that we humans can have honey....right? The problem is, there were bees on the Earth 300 million years before the first human. 200 million years before the 1st animal that ate honey. Some plan. Time to grow up, sbunn7678.

bees were created on the fifth day of creation..time to grow up timmy@@timhallas4275

@@timhallas4275 Bees were made on the fifth day of creation..time to grow up Timmy

The god of the gaps argument was good enough for you? I'm sitting here wondering where the proof for god is lol

I'm a backyard beekeeper too, l don't know what a god has to do with it .....any of them.

What gaps? Gods awesomeness is displayed in literally every aspect of these amazing creatures. He literally explains that our best and brightest minds cannot recreate what these small, seemingly simple creatures can do. If you guys don’t see God our Creator in this, then I say it’s because you don’t want to. Romans 1:19-20

@@davidgillis3807The minds may not create the creatures but do they create the gods.?

@@iveseen1 design implies designer 100 out of 100 times brother.

e

Their behavior as well as their biology is "hardwired" in their DNA. In the computer world, some hardware comes with the program already installed, such as in a BIOS or some kind of ROM. This functioning complexity of the bee is beyond accidental incremental genetic changes over vast time periods.

Evolution is wonderful, isn’t it?

Evolution is a fun idea, but unfortunately, there is no evidence to support it. It is not supported by the fossil evidence, it is not supported by genetic research, it is in contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics.

@@betsieswartz Yes. Thank God that He created the processes.

So you've always been wrong...

@@Firedrake1313 🤡🤡🤡🤡this clown face seemed fitting for you

and the wasp proves theres a devil

Bees are truly evidence of..........the existence of bees!

​@@Firedrake1313yeah like nothing creating everything. That is really wrong.

I dd not know that. Thanks for posting.

@@rockyhill9965 we have all the information and that what makes us a KNOWER . Dig deep and your world view will be changed forever . Even as far as flat earth . Open your eyes and trust your senses . Just like bees do . Everything is all by design . Dont believe anything i say . Check it out for yourself . Its all connected from the macro to the micro . Peace to you for your reply .

Nothing succeeds like success

Wow! That IS amazing. Thank goodness they’re not any bigger 🫣

Except it is only the Japanese honeybee that does this.

And Israel was the land of milk and honey! The Lord's creation is astonishing!

So very true, the bees contribution to the vast ecosystem is incredibly important and yet again the evolutionists attribute it to an act of blind chance, its amazing how many of these symbiotic relationships in the living world evolved at the exact same time, anyone with sense would realize the magnificent design God has implemented throughout his creation.

I am trying to figure out how evolution explains the synergy between the plants and the bees.

​@@spamm0145 Symbiotic relationships and homeostatic control have both been shown to be evolved processes through trial and error. I believe in God, too, but I think that God has developed the world through naturalistic processes, such as cosmic microwave background radiation, entropy, and evolution. Surely, an omniscient god would be capable of creating the universe through both random chance and purposeful driving forces? The evidence points us towards naturalistic processes like evolution: an undeniable fact.

​@@MastaE2288 We call such relations symbiotic relationships, and evolution actually explains them very well! For instance, the endosymbiotic cell theory displays how prokaryotic cells engulfed by larger ones evolved to become mitochondria and chloroplasts, allowing multicellular life to evolve! Many such relationships are also based on interactions between organisms in a specific environment. As such, the ancestors of bees interacted with the first angiosperms in such a way that they were able to transfer pollen from anthers and stigma, reducing the tendency of angiosperms to pollinate one another via the wind. This is why we see two different types of pollination, wind and insect, today, as the latter developed a symbiosis with the ancestors of bees and other pollinators today. Evolution certainly provides an answer for the entirety of the development of life!

I get it. If you don't understand something, then nobody does.....right?

@@timhallas4275 form and function dictates order. Order is derived from intelligence.

@@StiffAftermath Rocks tumble down a hill, piling up in a river. Eventually a dam is formed and behind it a lake. One million years later, someone notices the thoughtfulness of God to have graced this land with this beautiful lake, just for us. Yes, I know the story.

When King Tut's tomb was discovered, the honey placed in it 3000 years earlier was edible!

@@karsenhummel9341 The energy of the early universe was in the motion of the particles. Linear at first, the particles were attracted to each other, and formed what is the nucleus of atoms, the negative electrons then became trapped in permanent orbit around the positive nucleus. It's what energy does. Now you explain where the "designer" came from.

The facts still point towards evolution. In fact, evolution elegantly explains the trail-and-error process through which bees have behaviourly adapted to ensure safe landings and communication between themselves.

you should wright comnodey @@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440

​@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440what if you are wrong?

@@dustinstanley9134 This sounds suspiciously similar to the question asked by a woman to Dawkins, who had an extremely witty response that you should check out! But I'll answer in my own way. There is no certainty of me being wrong because the evidence points towards evolution, which has been studied and evaluated in order to use its effects to save lives. Of course, this could all be a fabrication of the mind and we could be wrong, but there's no guarantee that you are correct, either. This is not a dichotomy. But anyways, what's the point of dealing with strawman arguments when evolution has been proven true beyond doubt? Why do you think God and evolution are mutually exclusive, anyways?

@@weltschmerzistofthaufig2440 God and evolution are mutually exclusive because of one thing, death. Evolution requires millions of years of death. God's word tells us that death came after creation, not before. Evolution also requires complex information to evolve and change by accident billions of times when we know for a fact that it's virtually impossible for it to evolve even one time. Information is ALWAYS written by a coder.

I've heard they communicate through vibrational frequency

Only once

Cap

This is one reason I had to retire. Look into mast cell disorder. Hard to detect and diagnose but very good to know about. If you have any other disorders, you likely have it as well. Sorry

@@isahunnybee - I think you are right. I just found out I have histamine intolerance or MCAS and so do two of my relatives.

​@meagiesmuse2334 how difficult was it to get a diagnosis? I had a geneticist who dx'd me and he did it thru symptoms. Getting a diagnosis any other way is very difficult. ❤

@@justachick3114 - I hear ya! I did it partly by testing myself with treatment after doctors told me they'd never heard of it and my GI doctor refused to do a biopsy while scoping my stomach. I understand that gut biopsy would've been definitive for DAO deficiency. I bought DAO and took a high dose of it with every meal, seeing an immediate and dramatic improvement in symptoms. I researched the drugs I take and found out one of my heart drugs will cut DAO in half for weeks after just one dose! Then I contacted my only 2 remaining relatives and found out both of them were diagnosed with Histamine Intolerance by doctors. That is enough for me. I am not sure if I have MCAS or Histamine Intolerance. Taking Benadryl at night and DAO with meals has been enough to calm my symptoms, so I don't think I need to know that for sure, and I don't want to waste time and money to see any more specialists who don't know anything and don't care either. I also had blood tests done by a Naturopathic M.D. that show I have 2 of the possible 4 MTHFR genetic mutations, and that also makes it more likely.

If humans truly wanted to try communism, they'd spend years studying bees but would still find a way to fk it up 😂

@@J040PL7 you just won the dumbest comment award

complexity does not imply intelligence.

@@mrosskne 🤔🤔😂 yep, I believe you

@@2990rick Good.

The soul-less ones are satan's minions - bad, bad Bloodlines. They hate ALL things our Father, YAH created.

What's so unbelievable about bees being related to wasps?

@@ohhi-zy6uv they are related just not evolved from. Two completely different insects, designed in such a way as to what they need to do. Wasps/bees same, same but very very different. The symbiotic relationship between all things is impossible on an evolutionary level. Everything needs something else to survive 🙏

yes, everything needs something else to survive, which is why evolution is always occuring- change is constant because everything else is changing, forcing everyone else to do the same. also, note that You claim that I said one evolved from the other, when I actually said that they are cousins, each being related in some way to a common ancestor. If you're going to argue with about a topic, know the basics of the topic before doing so. that being said, have a good day. @@Beekeeping4Hope

@@ohhi-zy6uvwhy the anger. Evolution is impossible. So many different species depends on so many different things to survive. So everything evolved at the same time? How does a worm survive without soil from dead leaves? Yet a tree needs nutrient rich soil from the worm to grow. So what came first the leaves or the worm? Also how did so many seeds all form differently at the same time, like oak. So many examples. Evolution is only a theory. If you really study just one animal species you’ll find evolution impossible. Adaptation to environments yes that’s real but everything evolving in sync is impossible. It’s a clever deception

the first creatures relied on non biological nutrition from the environment, such as the substances constantly being spewed from deep sea vents. Also, what is the difference between microevolution and microevolution? there is an example I like to use- we know that creatures can change the size of body parts or the entire body with microevolution, get less or more hair through microevolution, and mammoths and elephants are different species. so what if the world got colder, and only individuals with bigger bodies and thus higher body temperatures could survive? they would change size. now, the same thing would happen to the next generation, and the next, and so on and so forth. toc stay even warmer, they developed thicker and thicker hair. after millions of years, the earth warms up again, and because of this they get smaller and lose their hair to not die from overheating. the size change and more hair were from microevolution, yet multiple stacked together over millions of years became macroevolution.@@Beekeeping4Hope

Your god-fella doesn't exist, outside of mythology.

@divinelightshine You seem to be confusing hearts with brains.

@divinelightshine I understand that the genre of popular music in which he performed was in existence before he made the switch from gospel singing.

​@@richardharris8538 So you know it wasn't God who created everything? Tell us then how everything came into existence and gain yourself the greatest noble prize ever. I'm waiting with baited breath. Atheists by their own admission are not intelligently designed so good luck with the challenge. You may discover you are one of those the Bible mentions; thinking themselves wise they became fools. Maranatha

@@richardharris8538 Hey Richard I was wondering if you had watched the complete presentation? If so what are some things that stood out to you as plausible or improbable?

How does your education in zoology resolve the contradiction between the religious and evolution? I would truly love to know. To me it is not possible to believe in a creator god and evolution.

@@walter6574 Of course that's an excellent question. One basic starting point is that even the best molecular biologists and specialists in related fields have never been able to create a living cell "from scratch". If one can't create this on purpose despite the knowledge we have, at least to me it seems unrealistic to believe it could happen by chance...and then progress from that to multicellular organisms, and eventually to humanity. I like to joke that no matter how many times I take some sheet metal, rubber and plastic and throw them up in the air, I'm never going to end up with them assembling themselves into a new car...and of course even some of the simplest organisms are more complicated than a car. I doubt there would have been enough time even for all the possible combinations of atoms and then compounds to form even one molecule of DNA if it were based on "coin tosses". I'm sure that you are aware of the concept of entropy, and that left on their own, that things tend toward randomness. Therefore, at least for me and many others, it would take more faith to believe that random chemicals could come together to form cells and then eventually evolve to humanity than to believe a Creator could intentionally make humanity and every other living thing...and in any case, where would the chemicals in space have come from? It largely boils down to a belief in a supreme being--once a person believes that much, then it's not difficult to believe that life could be created. I believe microevolution takes place, in the sense that changes occur to living species. However, no one has really seen macroevolution, and there are alternate explanations for the occurrence of fossils and where they are located. The Bible talks about the creation of distinct "kinds" which could represent genera and individual species, and it may be that one can't change into another (macroevolution). I used to believe in macroevolution, but then I realized the biblical account in Genesis doesn't really allow sufficient time for this. Some people contend that each "day" mentioned in Genesis 1 could really represent thousands or millions of years--however, for day there was "evening and morning" which suggests "days" as we know them. According to at least one website, apparently "dragons" were actually dinosaurs. I hope this is of some help. I'm still studying this subject, and have a long way to go.

@@bobjacobson858 Instead of telling me what man can't do, provide evidence that your god exists. Until you have done that, there is no reason to believe a god exists. Do you understand how skepticism works? Basically don't accept anything as true until t=sufficient evidence has been provided. I'm sorry you have been indoctrinated. Look up Dunning-Kruger

@@walter6574 there is neither fossil evidence to support evolution, nor does 60 years of genetic science support evolution, and it is in contradiction to the second law of thermodynamics; evolution is a belief system lacking in evidence. Therefore, evolution is a religion, simply one that is in contradiction to a religion they don’t like. I spent 20 years in the technical publication industry, had a love of science and technology on my life, long before I began to read the Bible. There is no conflict between science and the Bible, only scientists who are conflicted about the Bible. That’s a personal thing, not a matter of science.

@@denvan3143What do you know about the second law of thermo dynamics? I am certain you know very little about it other than paratoing what spin machines tell you. Evolution happens. That is a fact. The genome project which was led by Francis Sellers Collins a Born Again Christian, (Washington Post staffer David Brown wrote, however, that Collins' status as a "born-again Christian . . . may help him build bridges with those who view some gene-based research as a potential threat to religious values.) Collins points to theistic evolution as an explanation that reconciles faith and science. It is a view espoused by most serious scientists of all faith traditions and includes among its adherents Asa Gray, Darwin's chief advocate in the USA, and Pope John Paul II. As far as fossils showing evolution requires two fossils to show it not one., the before and the one after. Let me help you out. There is no fossil record of babies turning into adults. There are no human remains showing the change from human baby to adult. Think about that. There is no Theory that is more supported than evolution. The Theory of Gravity, Music Theory, etc have less supporting data than Evolution. Just because yo have blinders on does not mean it does not exist because the tons data is there.

Do you ever consider anything beyond goddidit?

@@Bomtombadi1 Yeah, I'm a convert. Considering beyond just one concept of truth was part of my journey. If any thing comes along to truly disprove God, I'll let you know.

Lol. Nearly everything disproves god. Seriously if you EVER find a single shred of actual evidence FOR god let anyone at all know. Oh wait, that's right there ISN't any and never will be because it's made up BS.

Why did God make Cancer cells???

You cant disprove leprechauns, unicorns, Santa Claus, The tooth fairy, big foot, and Superman so I assume you believe in these also. @@ichigomiku8586

My god you’re not that smart, are you?

I've noticed that certain people lack the brains to know when they are being lied to.

@@timhallas4275 pretty much.

@@timhallas4275 Thanks for sharing Tim ☺️. I do appreciate you sir.

​@timhallas4275 yes but there is a difference intelligence and wisdom. The fo. Ol says in his heart, There is no God.

The effect of two evolutionary linked species on each other is actually very much in line with evolution. As in they evolved alongside each other.

Has someone who understands computer control of lathes I am amazed how they do not have little tape measures. Boy are you ignorant.

it's all in the dna ... which is a kind of tape after all.

@@mountkeen8701 Only a fool would ignore the nature and needs of his farm animals. Science doesn't always ask the right questions, let alone come up with consistent answers. Observing my bees has taught me so much more than embittered scoffers like you ever have. I bring admiration and love to my hives! You bring condescension and smallness to this discussion, and you're off balance for the enjoyment you get from trolling gentle Christians. By opening your mouth, you confirm that you're a fool. How do you make the world any better by quashing goodness? What would happen if you found something encouraging to say instead? You might find the love you so desperately need.

@@captdawn Why is it good to spread lies about science just to make you feel better about yourselves?

@@kattykitters5310 Knowing that people like you are crying in the corner, is half the fun! How is your mask holding up? Are you still wearing it? Science told us that it was necessary to wear it while at the same time telling us it didnt have the benefits that science originally told us. crazy how science cant make up its mind!

​@@mountkeen8701 ​​ how can a random mindless molecules be dropping comments on RU-vid? Na we don't discuss with descendants of ape. We talk to real humans 😅

@@mountkeen8701 How can a mindless random molecules reply me? Are you not contradicting yourself? Atheist!

Oh- that's where the bikini baes have their channel, out of Australia. Wicked Weasel hotties.

Algorithms may seem simple when you have the luxury of libraries of high-level functions to build from. It's sort of like "standing on the shoulders of giants". Consider this - you can't measure a "target" until you do the image processing to identify one or more candidate shapes within the scene that may or may not be the intended target. Try doing that in low-level machine code and find out how very non-trivial it actually is.

So are you implying that evolution could have created the algorithm? If so, then you are attributing intelligence to a naturalistic process - sounds like deification to me.

Algorithms exist in minds. Attributing algorithms to nature is an admission that there is a mind behind nature. Eugene Wigner commented on the “unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences”, Albert Einstein stated that the most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible. If there was no intelligent design in the universe, why would it be intelligible to our minds? For that matter, if the universe was, without reason, why would we even have reason?

@@denvan3143Well said!

Your god-fella doesn't exist, outside of mythology.

It's a 50/50 proposition. God is or is not. My belief is that we will know for sure when our physical bodies expire. I do know, with certainty, that you cannot prove the non existence of God. Not only that, but given your denial of God's existence you can only, at best, hope that God does not exist, and that Jesus was not God incarnate, and that this same Jesus did not die for your sins. If this is truth and you deny it, then you will spend eternity in Hell. It's a 50/50 proposition. You possess the God given sovereignty within yourself to decide. @@richardharris8538

I agree. Fallacious arguments are irrational. In the instance of the aforementioned presentation, your rejection of Calvin Smith's analysis and conclusions do not render said conclusions fallacious. Your conclusion is mere opinion. @@mountkeen8701

Instead of ears to hear, why don't we try minds that think?

Yes. Minds that think are definitely a pre condition for hearing ears@@Temulon

Excellent!

Praise Santa Claus!

Unless you enjoyed an increased number of annual species flowers - and I very much doubt it - the bees had zero effect. They could only ever increase pollination which the flowers would then take the normal time to produce seeds - this usually takes an entire season and thus happens once a year.

How so?

@@Bomtombadi1Did you watch the video?

@@ISmellYoureFeet yes! He’s wrong.

@@Bomtombadi1please tell me how

Yes, Darwin said "au, au, au that hurts a lot"

You mean you never heard of the moon bee landings or their diamond mines?

Lol - piss off.

Beautiful sentiment, I have always been amazed that a seed held in the palm of a hand can become a giant awe inspiring oak tree, all that information packed into the seeds code and it knows when the conditions are ideal to begin its journey, knowing to put roots down into the Earth and everything else up towards the life giving sun. God truly is amazing.

= argument from incredulity. Fallacy.

@@sjl197 Equals Argument from Intellectual Design which is Apparent to any rational human who uses a computer.

Hi It isnt ‘ Willing allegiance’ but HUMBLE REPENTANT SUBMISSION TO GOD’S SOVEREIGNTY! So it is SINFUL PRIDE THAT PREVENTS SUBMISSION TO GOD’S SUPREMACY that prevents the gnostic scientists from even acknowledging Him! The wrath of God remains on those who are not covered by the blood of Jesus our Saviour. THERE IS NO CHOICE! Shalom to us only in Christ Yeshua returning soon to reign over His Creation from Jerusalem forever.

@@toosiyabrandt8676 Willing Allegiance can only come from humble submission to Christ as the payment for our sins. I should have added that, you are correct.

So the longer you live the more you wallow in ignorance.

@@Firedrake1313 you strike me as the sort who exemplify ignorance the most; your sort think computers are magic boxes and that coding is simply a wave of Harry Potter‘s wand. Darwin didn’t know about DNA but we do; deoxyribonucleic acid is the code in all living things. There is no code without a coder. But if you are computer illiterate that will fall on deaf ears. The complexity of DNA, that the inner workings of the smallest unit of life, which Darwin called protoplasm, undifferentiated jelly, is actually a highly complex infrastructure rivaling that of a modern industrialized city. Yet you would tell me this happened by accident. That’s magical thinking. it denies cause and effect, sees the creation, but ignores the creator. The universe had a beginning, what was it? Your answer: “it just happened”: magic. Define tuning of the universe, the laws of physics, being deliberately set as they are for life to be possible, what was the cause of it? Your answer: “it just happened”, magic. In the biological instructions in DNA? Your answer: “it just happened.” Magical, thinking. Don’t wag your finger at others and accused them of wallowing in ignorance when you expose your own.

Turn on the volume of your device

I can assure you no atheists were harmed in the viewing of this. After repeated exposure, we've evolved immunity to God of the gaps arguments 😉

@@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844 thank God...atheism of the gaps is atheists nightmare... Many great atheists changed their minds after 1950 .... DNA, fine tuning of the universe and blood in dinosaurs remains changed everything.....no God of the gaps in those and other evidence.....😎

​@@jonasmlgaard-asmussen9844nope, the video clearly proves you atheists wrong.

It is harming to atheists. The video clearly proves atheists wrong.

@@kevinburke1325 All the video says is "I don't understand, therefore the Bible must be true. " Thee is obviosuly zero connection between those two statements

We checked, and God was nowhere to be found. Unsubstantiated claim was dismissed, and we went on with our lives.

@@FrikInCasualModeYou might have “Checked” but your conclusion is moot, since you did not test the “theory.” See, I can sound smart too😌

@@gwengwen4535 What "theory"? "God exist and you should believe in him like I do." Is a claim. Your claim. You have to prove it. I don't believe your claim is true, because I didn't see any compelling evidence to the contrary. Never met God, never seen him, never heard from him. All I've met, seen and heard are people coming to me, saying "Believe in our God. He's totally real!" Nope.

@@FrikInCasualMode That is a not my claim. Show me where I made that claim? I didn’t. And if your premise for not believing something because you “Haven’t seen it/them” is an extremely weak premise because there are millions of things we humans cannot see, that we inherently do, believe. To answer your question in a logical, scientific way, I would speak to the fact that we can see without a doubt, that humans have collectively since the beginning of our existence, always looked to a higher power for our source of existence and our purpose. This is a phenomenon that is inherent, innate, and instinctual in most humans. It is something that can be quantified and measured and proven very easily. This is the starting point for a logical, rational investigation to the quest for searching for God. The next step would be to verify the most accurate, verifiable, and compelling evidence surrounding this phenomenon, at least from a scientific, psychological, and philosophical standpoint, which is exactly what I have done. Are used to be agnostic/atheist, leaning in that I was more convinced of metaphysics than anything. But I am also very analytical, and when I found enlightenment, lacking and fulfillment, waning, I asked myself if perhaps immersing myself in the product, instead of the source of the product, was making me miss the mark entirely. Since I have worked in psychology and various therapies for many years, it was not hard for me to set aside my bias and my world view, to perhaps evolve a little more. So that is exactly what I did, and I begin to investigate the Bible, and what I found was undeniable, unequivocal, literary evidence, that even top atheist scholars could not disprove. I found that the Bible is literally the most historically, authenticated book of its magnitude ever written, with thousands of primary sources that are so close in comparison and context, spanning thousands of years, languages and miles, it was nothing short of supernatural, especially considering that it was relayed by oral tradition for the most part, for thousands of years. The only thing that atheist scholars generally disagree on when debating the Bible, are the supernatural aspects, and so they throw out the massive historical wealth of this piece of ancient, eastern antiquity, simply because they cannot explain the Supernatural accounts with in the text. Even though these accounts have thousands of primary witnesses, which is unheard of and has never been seen at that magnitude before, in the history of the world. Don’t be like those atheist scholars. They have seen the truth, and they reject it simply because they do not understand how things can happen supernaturally. Yet they are the ones who cannot actually explain how they believe we came into existence, without a Supernatural cause. It makes no sense. The Bible? Makes perfect sense. If actually read it with unbiased eyes and an open mind. And the “theory” as I call it? It is in John 3:16-17, Acts 16:30-31, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, Romans 10:9-10, Ephesians 2:8-9.

​@@FrikInCasualModeCreation is proof of the creator just like the computer is proof of the computer engineer

@@mountkeen8701 To foolish words, deaf ears.

@@mountkeen8701 Hmmm.. majestic bubonic plague, malaria, polio and braineating bacteria. 😳

Sally Struthers will take care of it.@@mountkeen8701

@@mountkeen8701 Have you ever considered the possibility of the boy's blindness bringing even more glory to God?

@@mountkeen8701 It really has nothing to do with the worm perse, but rather what the child does as a result of the blindness that can bring glory to God. God has a remarkable way of bringing good from something we see as tragic.

@@mountkeen8701 How about this. God used the worm to bring more glory to Himself. Is glorifying God a bad thing?

It's a store. I like it, too.

Absolutely zero fallacies we’re challenged in this video. They actually commit a fallacy themselves. Namely the personal incredulity fallacy. They don’t understand evolution and just claim it’s false. AIG uses this fallacy constantly.

Let's say this video chopped holes in evolution (which it didn't - it just highlighted his ignorance, but let's GRANT that it did). So what? Disproving evolution doesn't prove God. Muslims can make these same arguments, so does it prove THEIR book is true? Would a Hindu be proven correct by poking holes in evolution?

Don't rely on the mess that is Genesis. god couldn't even find Adam at one point, which is not a good sign when god is supposed to be all-knowing,

@@Mystik_Mind Yet here you are - a LIVING human being, intelligent enough to be contributing on a channel! Now, please tell me again - where did you come from?

@@kevinrtres I don't have the answer to where anything came from, nobody does. People have their belief, but just because I am not sure of the origin of everything, I don't automatically think, 'ahhh yes, it must be God' even with that belief, you're just believing your god is the creator of it all, when it just as easily could be any of the thousands that have their own creation myth. It still doesn't change the fact that your god had no idea where Adam was, and he had no idea that both Adam & Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil. That alone dismantles god as being all knowing. Believe what you wish. I'm simply stating one of the flaws in Genesis as an example of how much of a mess it is.

"slight" variations don't make a species.

_We should see thousands of species with slight variations roaming the earth, or at least in the fossil record_ And that is exactly what we do see. There ARE thousand sof species and there is variation within those species. Before you ask, all living things are transitional forms. You are the transitional form between your parents and your children. You don;t look exactly like them, your kids won;t look exactly like you.

@Richard No, we don't see them. We should see thousands of HAPLOTYPES. In other words we should see many different kinds of Giraffe groups. Some with short necks, some with longer legs, some with black spots, etc. Same with every species. It does not make sense that only ONE haplotype should be singularly successful while ALL others go extinct. The other problem with evolution is that it is not sophisticated enough to create such complex organisms. The early flagellum (tail) of microorganisms worked like a modern car motor and it would have required such specificity in each of its design components, no "evolution" could have led to such a home run of sophistication. There are books written on this topic, but mainstream science refuses to acknowledge these massive holes.

Look up the concept of "irreducible complexity". It means that base components of complex molecular systems had no evolutionary predecessor. They seemed to come out of thin air.

@@fightingfortruth9806 "irreducible Complexity" is ignorant nonsense.

@@mountkeen8701 when you believe there isn’t any use trying to prove it to someone who doesn’t. But this person is happy to try and present his beliefs. That takes courage today with all the blind hate online. May your life be blessed in an undeniable way. You are loved by the creator whether you believe he exists or not.

@@mountkeen8701 you are correct about “personal delusions”: ACS scientists are aware of fine-tuning of the universe admit, they are uncomfortable with the fact, and choose to retreat into the emotional safe space. That is the Multiverse, concerning which there is no evidence, and which scientist will admit, is an un scientific idea. The Multiverse is the atheists personal delusion., A refuge from the harsh realities of physics.

You're kidding?

There are lots of videos on RU-vid about beekeepers, fascinating things, like beekeepers, who find swarms of bees, capture the queen, and put her in a beekeepers box. The swarm catches the scent that the queen gives off, and they all obediently walk through the little hole into the box with the prepared comb, and take up housekeeping. It’s amazing stuff to watch.

Just so ya know, Bumble bees are not honey bees and they are NOT little, they are HUGE.

@@johnhanek167 doesn't matter to me I stay away from all of them to begin with because I don't want to be stung by a bee or a wasp or a spider or anything else that bites or stings LOL

Bees die when they sting that is a clever idea.@@master2uall88

Nobody denies natural and artificial selection. The question is: how far does that go in creating all new body plans and very complex, interactive systems?

@@rdrift1879 Observation of nature suggest very, very far, as all known organisms seem to have been developed this way; based on *observable similarities between species, Taxonomy, comparative gen sequence analysis, fossil records* (which visually illustrate each step of the physical transition in detail) and very questionable anatomical "choices" like the route of the *recurrent laryngeal nerve* (which unnecessarily loops under the aorta) and the *vas deferens* (which tours the sperm over the bladder), both observed on humans and most mammals.

YDo yu believe the fossil record contains "each step" of physical transition? For example, do you believe the fossil record shows the gradual development of each body type in the Cambrian explosion? Or do many suddenly appear? @@quantumangel

@@rdrift1879 It contains important steps on important transitions on some of the studied specimens. Currently There's ~ 8 million species of live animals that represent

@@quantumangel That was a pretty quick jump from "visually illustrate each step of the physical transition in detail" to "hypothesis."

It's also founded on the idea that those mutations are not deleterious, but complexity is gained by them

COULDN'T not have happened? Don't you mean COULD not have happened?

@@firecloud77 lol.. Yes thank you!

The fuq are you talking about? Everything you have said is wrong.

@@Bomtombadi1how?

@@joelockhart6986 Of course it could happen. Because all organisms evolve to fit with their local environment, there will always be such connections

Stupid things impress stupid people

"Microevolution is the change in allele frequencies that occurs over time within a population. This change is due to four different processes: mutation, selection, gene flow and genetic drift" the problem is the source of hte inherent programming or original information being passed down from an original source. We observe this code and design elements in nature we can explain some of the changes over time as you say with those mechanisms but ultimately it doesnt answer the question and theism provides an answer for this problem of assuming DNA made itself over time as a philosophy when that doesnt seem to be the case as far as we can tell

Micro evolution exist, but let’s not move the goal. Post: variation and species, i.e. micro evolution“ is observed in nature, and in fact, is what breeders of domestic animals have exploited for centuries before Darwin wrote his book on evolution. But micro evolution does not accrue to macro evolution. it is not observed in nature, and there is no evidence of it in the fossil record. That would, as Darwin described, require transitional forms in the thousands or tens of thousands or perhaps millions. That is not observed in the fossils. Theistic answer meets the observable data. Life forms appear suddenly in the fossil record with no ancestral force that would validate evolution. Genetic science does not validate evolution. No mechanism is shown where, in new biological instructions could be encoded without a source. It’s been found that the human genome is decaying at a rate between one percent and 2% per generation, and that buy some estimates, the human race will be extinct in 6000 years. Again, this evidence is in accordance with the theistic solution: life forms, and the fossil record not only appear suddenly, but also become extinct, to the extent that over 90% of all the life that existed are now extinct. The Cestic model, and the physical evidence comport, one with another, evolution is in defiance of the physical evidence, scientific research, and the second law of thermodynamics. And curtail the inevitable response: the sun is an open system, the earth is an open system, the solar system is an open system, galaxy are open system, but the universe itself is a closed system: energy levels within the system are reducing as energy becomes evenly, distributed, and complex systems Decay into chaos. The evolutionary model doesn’t work on any level.

No, you fuq wit. That’s not evolution at all. Flowers came long before bees.

Were you brought up by chimps?

Thank you Buford on letting everyone know you have absolutely no idea what evolution is. Bravo!

Yes. All of those things have been explained by evolutionary theory

@@Bomtombadi1 You are correct flowers came before bees: on the 3rd day God created grass and flowering plants. On the 5th and 6th day God created insects and other creatures not of the sea. Flowers came two days before the bees, not millions of years before. Being created 2 day's apart is pretty much at the same time --time enough for the flowers to be pollinated. Get it into your head right now: God created all things in 6 days, not over millions of years. The sooner you get this into your head, the sooner you will sound like someone with intelligence.

You need to get out more Clive. god has never blessed anyone, ever.

@@rf7477 I hope you come to realize the reality of God. God Bless 🙏

Well after what is happening in Gaza, it might be an omnibenevolent God who is taking time off. @@cliveandersonjr.8758

⁠@@rf7477 that is a god you choose not to believe; I also do not believe in that god; it is a false god you created for your argument. I believe in the true God, not your false god.