No video :(

Soviet BTRs Still Being Used in the Ukraine War

Подписаться 4,8 млн

Просмотров 1,1 млн

50% 1

You can help affected Ukrainian families in need through an organization called Tab For A Cause - where every tab you open raises money for humanitarian aid.
Tab for Ukraine: tab.gladly.io/...
In the Russo-Ukrainian War, thousands of BTRs have been deployed and destroyed. Having already been often sighted within conflicts even as far as Afghanistan, Cuba, Egypt, and Iran during the Cold War, here we describe their various technical designs, how they have been continuously tinkered with, and their intended purposes. Beginning with the BTR-60 not long after World War II, and exploring their unusual amphibious capabilities, we conclude with the latest formidable BTR-82A and their impacts on the battle-zones.
2nd Channel: / @simplehistorylive
Become a Simple History member: www.youtube.co...
Support us on Patreon: / simplehistory
Copyright: DO NOT translate and re-upload our content on RU-vid or other social media.
SIMPLE HISTORY MERCHANDISE
Get the Simple History books on Amazon:
www.amazon.com...
T-Shirts
teespring.com/...
Simple history gives you the facts, simple!
See the book collection here:
Amazon USA
www.amazon.com/...
Amazon UK
www.amazon.co.u...
/ simple-history-5494376...
/ simplehistoryyt
Credit:
Created by Daniel Turner (B.A. (Hons) in History, University College London)
Narrator:
Chris Kane
vocalforge.com/

Опубликовано:

28 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 1 тыс.

@rifroll1117 Год назад

The quality of the images in the animations have been significantly improving here. Keep it up y’all

@abraham2217 Год назад

Which is excellent. And the images are more dynamic and more detailed. 😊

@nursestoyland Год назад

@@abraham2217 agreed

@oljimeagle Год назад

there was a point where they were showing a turet gunner rotating around and I thought the same thing.

@randomname7321 Год назад

Yea it feels like watching infographics show all over again, they also have improved a lot

@wats0flower801 Год назад

The quality did improve but if you compare the animation well from my perspective it loose it own performance

@anytimeanywhere7859 Год назад

Thinking of where the escape hatch was placed and imagining people trying to get out of it while in motion always amused me.

@ingetout Год назад

There have been lots of cases where troops were run over trying to egress. The side door is a dumb design because it also creates weakness in the armour and the only reason for this is because it is cheaper and easier to maintain the engine if it is in the rear.

@Adierit Год назад

@@ingetout I wonder why they didn't try a boxer configuration engine in these and put it in the floor at the rear; that would provide the rear engine placement while also letting them make the crew compartment over top of it and having a rear exit door, although I guess it would be a little taller but I think that would be worth the maintenance/protection issues of placing the engine compartment in the front of the vehicle.

@PugilistCactus Год назад

@@ingetout It really doesn't make any more weakness than there already is. The whole side is vulnerable to .50cal and up regardless of the door. Troop carriers are to protect you from small arms fire (mostly) not the stuff that makes you pop.

@user-nc8if6fn2y Год назад

Эвакуации при движении техники быть не может ты по воюй ваши фильмы дерьмо я на настоящей войне был

@JaelaOrdo Год назад

As the old Soviet saying goes “If it ain’t broke shut up and use it comrade.”

@gtm5336 Год назад

Well, if it broke, they will repair it and use it again or even modify ig

@user-op8fg3ny3j Год назад

Don't most nations do that though when in wartime?

@The_Corporal Год назад

Comrade this BTR engine is on fire!

@meatpuppet5036 Год назад

And if it is broke *blam. no more questions komrades

@sam8404 Год назад

@@user-op8fg3ny3j yeah, "if it ain't broke don't use it" doesn't get you very far lol.

@AnonEMus-cp2mn Год назад

Despite how well known the BTR and other Soviet weapons are, the BTR-60/70/80's main armament: the KPVT heavy machine gun (KPV in its standard configuration) seems to get ignored. HMGs like the M2, DshK, and KORD are venerated for their 50 BMG/12.7x108 firepower, but the KPV fires the 14.5x114mm cartridge (the same used in the WWII PTRD and PTRS-41 anti-tank rifles) at 600rpm with 40rd belts (KPVT has unique 50rd belts). For the BTR this is serious firepower that outclasses the defensive capabilities of its own frontal armor, and could theoretically make short work of similarly matched IFVs, concrete structures, and anything in its effective engagement range. The KPV is probably outdated compared to modern 20-30mm auto cannons, but must have been formidable in the mid 20th century. Note: Edited to correct technical mistakes.

@vanja2565 Год назад

1 14.5x118 not 117 2 You don't compare a heavy machinegun to a cannon

@timmycrockett3348 Год назад

any good soviet technologies get ignored by the west

@lucasartore161a Год назад

@@vanja2565 14.5mm has energy comparable to 20mm cannons per Wikipedia

@LegendStormcrow Год назад

Never heard of the KORD. Russky machineguns are far better known than the Kord.

@sikuter Год назад

@@LegendStormcrow Kord is a modernization of the NSV Utyos cal. 12.7x108. This is a common weapon, but there is nothing special about it, it is close to the M2 in terms of capabilities. But the Vladimirov machine gun is a completely different matter, the bullet has an energy 32000 J, a rate of fire 550, and a mass only 53 kg. This allows you to punch btr anywhere at any angle from a distance of 2000 meters. The Ukrainian military even installed it on the Humvee.

@americanoutcast9716 Год назад

I've always liked the BTR, such a cool looking design. APCS are much more interesting than standard tanks to me

@SCPKing1835 Год назад

preach brother 🙌

@mote_vengador2832 Год назад

It's one of the most sexy vehicles I have ever seen that and the t-72 It's my opinion

@Dmitriy__Kiselev Год назад

А то что у него двигатель на 260 сил и 760 крутящего ты знал? :D

@Combine_elite168 Год назад

@@Dmitriy__Kiselev oh didn't know that

@Colorfullll 4 месяца назад

Cool@@Dmitriy__Kiselev

@gadget445 Год назад

@7:26 "BTR-82A" is stated, but model pictured is a BTR-3E1, a Ukrainian design loosely based off of the BTR-80 but with significant differences in construction such as a higher hull roof. Yes, both 30mm autocannon armed BTR-80 variants, but easily distinguished at a glance.

@Recru1tas Год назад

Not only that, but forgot to mention BTR-80A. Claimed Ukrainians have only older models, while BTR-4 is much more supperior design to BTR-82A is forgotten.

@oleglegenchuk6615 Год назад

@@Recru1tas yeah, I really wanted to see Ukrainian BTR-4 in this video.

@bavovna201 Год назад

@@oleglegenchuk6615 БТР 4 це концептуально інша розробка, яка не спирається на совєтський досвід на відміну від українського БТР 3 й рф-ського БТР 82А.

@skatewood5864 Год назад

@@bavovna201 только вот где эти бтр 4

@lomasik Год назад

@@skatewood5864 куча видео в ютубе и телеграм каналах где БТР4 на передовой и очень хорошо делает свою работу

@mikkoheirila702 Год назад

The BTR-60 was also used by the finnish defense forces, it is most known here because there was a nasty accident in 1991 were one btr sunk while doing an ambhibious assault training exercise, and 7 conscripts drowned.

@Chuked Год назад

Imagine dying that way, how tragic

@yaboyed5779 Год назад

Burning /drowning in a metal compartment have to be one of the most horrible ways to go.

@mikkoheirila702 Год назад

The video mentions the small hatches on top that were difficult and slow, and everyone in this case was wearing full battle gear, so there was just no way of getting out fast enough.

@tuplat5107 Год назад

@@mikkoheirila702 yeah, only people who were on top of the vehicle survived, it went down so fast that there was no way anyone inside could have survived. Truly a tragic insident but caused by operator error

@JJ-su7re Год назад

@@yaboyed5779 In his podcast Jocko Willink told that during the Chechen war some russian soldiers refused to exit their BTRs and died inside.

@f-man3274 Год назад

90% of all equipment used in the Ukrainian war is Soviet: from AKs to artillery by both Ukrainians and Russians.

@user-qb9el8cd5i Год назад

Что конкретно у русских из СССР

@Nikolaievich9837 Год назад

@@user-qb9el8cd5i t-90 is from the soviet union? Ukraine has more soviet, and most haven't been upgraded. Russia has upgraded most of its Soviet equipment as well as developing more advanced APCs and tanks

@tavish4699 Год назад

@@Nikolaievich9837 the russians used like 10 t90s in total I wouldnt even consider them They were just there to be tested in actual combat to gather data

@tavish4699 Год назад

@@Nikolaievich9837 also the russians have upgraded their infrantry with the ratnikprograms in the 2000s But all heavy stuff is still soviet era basicly

@azurite_ore9647 Год назад

90%???? lies

@WolfPriest_Leon Год назад

The animator confused russian and ukrainian markings on 5:58 (UAF soldier with blue stripes are supported by BTR that has Prorussian tactical markings V) , 8:05 (RUAF infantry supported by BTR82 with ukrainian pixel camo), 8:06 (UAF soldiers supported by BTR with russian tactical marking V) I am curious what references he was using that he mixed it up so badly :D

@scudb5509 Год назад

“Military expert wannabe” reference. Seems to be used way too much unfortunately nowadays…

@Old.Stalker Год назад

Well noted.

@voshod1ua Год назад

That's not a btr-82a, but in fact ukrainian btr-3. That's why it has pixel camo

@WolfPriest_Leon Год назад

@@voshod1ua yeah, but i mean in context of the video

@WolfPriest_Leon Год назад

@@scudb5509 lol just imagine, the animator would make PZ 4 with german cross supporting US riflemen :D

@andrey9065 Год назад

BTR-82A looks different, but here I saw the Ukrainian BTR-3 (Yes, they are similar in terms of having a base of a modified BTR-80 and a 30mm cannon instead of a machine gun, but still they look different)

@scandited2763 Год назад

My brother in christ, they have different firing modules which are impossible to confuse

@sam8404 Год назад

@@scandited2763 weird response.

@Grek1574 Год назад

BTR-4 "Bucephalus"

@someguy872 Год назад

@@sam8404 no

@scandited2763 Год назад

@@sam8404 Combat modules

@luisemoralesfalcon4716 Год назад

I remember these vehicles from Call of Duty MW 2 on Xbox 360, man do these things pack a punch. Edit: then in the first MW the BMP's were a terror.

@SwagKiryu Год назад

There's also a btr on the mission "Wolverines"

@luisemoralesfalcon4716 Год назад

@@SwagKiryu that is on the new MW games or on the originals from MW1-MW3?

@stxrenegade Год назад

@@luisemoralesfalcon4716 original trilogy

@luisemoralesfalcon4716 Год назад

@@stxrenegade which of the three games? I apologize it is that such a long time has passed.

@stxrenegade Год назад

@@luisemoralesfalcon4716 2nd

@lancedeboer8220 Год назад

Fun fact: ukraine also built a successor model to the btr its called the btr 4 but its not like the traditional btr its more alike western counterparts like the us stryker. Thanks for the video is so awesome to learn about the history of armored vehicles thanks!

@jacksteel228 Год назад

was just about to mention that when i saw your post lol

@user-hf6gm9fl4z Год назад

Also Ukraine has BTR3 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BTR-3

@giodima4024 Год назад

это 2 разных пути. в Украине пошли по глубокой модернизации БТР 80. в России сделали лёгкую модернизацию БТР 82а. Это дёшево и это позволило построить их много. Но начали работать над БТР "Бумеранг" которая похожа на западные БТР Пиранья и Патрия

@peterregorsek1504 Год назад

@@user-hf6gm9fl4z Ukrainian looks very under-engineered, even comparing them to brezhnev-era soviet models. And only the poorest countries were buying Ukrainian post-soviet derivatives of military equipment.

@user-hf6gm9fl4z Год назад

@@peterregorsek1504 as a fact during 2014-2015 fights with Russia-proxies BTR-3 was clearly superior over soviet style BTR and BMP.

@Xeonzs Год назад

Great video as always, glad the channel exists and occasionally feeds us another enjoyable video, here's a small donation to display my gratitude.

@Simplehistory Год назад

Thanks for that!

@noctusfury6918 Год назад

Your animations just get better and better! I'm loving this so much. I've been a watcher of your channel for years. Thank you so much for your hard work! Both in animation and in historical info. Keep up the great work!

@mrVandecko Год назад

Also Ukraine has BTR-3(2001y) and BTR-4 "Bucephalus"(2011y)

@gamewithvirsus8332 Год назад

Поэтому гоняете на бмп 1 ?)

@aboba7343 Год назад

@@gamewithvirsus8332 БМП и БТР - разные машины, и да россия тоже

@gravnervad1294 Год назад

@@gamewithvirsus8332 вже на 82 ганяєм)

@Wolfspaine7N6 Год назад

You should have mentioned the BTR-4 which is actually domestically produced by Ukraine.

@user-zt3gf7gs2s Год назад

And BTR-3.

@kiber7333 Год назад

It doesn't relate to soviet APCs. It has fully new chassis. Only BTR-3 does

@tylerclayton6081 Год назад

BTR 4 is probably the best BTR made in history. It has a lot of western technologies in it

@user-bg7bj6zv4d Год назад

@@tylerclayton6081 85% of ukrainian parts, and doing according to NATO standards does not mean taking their technology lol

@Allriteyeah12 Год назад

Hands down one of the most badas* and coolest armoured vehicle especially the BTR80 and 90 series man

@Melchizidek777 Год назад

Man I love this channel. The animations are so well done, and the information is entertaining to learn. Thank You for continuing to make these, my Son and I really enjoy them.

@nexpro6118 Год назад

The "right" way that you are wanting schools to teach kids....isn't teaching kids to learn how to do their own research and to learn things by them teaching themselves with research which also encourages more reading. Your "right" way is the most lazy way to learn things which won't stick/retain the information in their small marble brains lol

@charlessalyer208 Год назад

@@nexpro6118 kinda agree and don’t agree

@nexpro6118 Год назад

@@charlessalyer208 I'll take it. Lol

@TTFNG063 Год назад

@@nexpro6118 I ain’t reading allat 🤦🏽‍♂️😂

@nexpro6118 Год назад

@@TTFNG063 lol reading is hard for some ha

@Just_Some_Guy_with_a_Mustache Год назад

Clearly they've been itching to use those weapons since the Cold War and didn't want them to go to waste...

@donkthedankee8595 Год назад

Disappointed the BTR 50 was not mentioned at all. Arguably it was what started the BMP (BMP 1 is a bit of a mix between the BTR 50 and PT76 as it operates as both an APC and has ability to engage armoured units)

@Swagmaster07 Год назад

Thats called a ''IFV''

@shawnofdanaukota3843 Год назад

How about this one 'Why do US armed forces wear Jeans in the Vietnam War' for your next video.

@doggydude2668 Год назад

Lmao-

@randomexcessmemories4452 Год назад

Great video! Two things to mention though. 1. The BTR-50 was also a thing. The only BTR to use tracks, it was based on the PT-76 light tank and saw lots of use both with the USSR and export countries, some of which still use it in modified versions as IFVs or other roles. 2. Ukraine has developed several of their own Wheeled BTR vehicles, though in limited numbers. These include the BTR-7 (an upgrade package to the BTR-70), BTR-3 (all new and highly successful), BTR-4 (similar to BTR-3), BTR-94 (BTR-80 with a new weapon station, export only), and the Otaman (BTR-based, but massively upgraded and overhauled, 6x6 or 8x8).

@maks2895 Год назад

BTR-4 analogue of BTR -3? 😂 compare them even the design is completely different cars

@randomexcessmemories4452 Год назад

@@maks2895 Oh I don't mean that they are similar in terms of design or role, i just mean that they are both Ukrainian products.

@Soggy_Cake Год назад

Animation quality improved so much, absolutely stunning

@rismarck Год назад

You must have two different editors or more because I swear this video is 100% better than your previous video feels more like simple history video instead of a rushed high school project

@Andrewbaysura1 Год назад

Gotta admit though, the BTR has something that no other APC has... It's definitely a cool vehicle. Would be crazy if tanks were fazed out altogether and APCs and IFVs would be the main armored vehicle.

@user-pk2oo3vj5x Год назад

5:57 letter V on Ukrainian BTR?

@igorudovychenko3446 Год назад

During the Post-Soviet era Ukraine developed its own line of BTRs including BTR-3 & BTR-4 "Bucephalus".

@glebnokelainen4001 Год назад

Причём забавно что автор говоря о БТР-82 показал на видео БТР-3, и к тому же сказал что украинцы используют лишь старые версии БТР

@glebnokelainen4001 Год назад

Так ещё и на 5:57 на стороне украинцев показал БТР с опознавательным знаком V

@generalgames2810 Год назад

@@glebnokelainen4001

@glebnokelainen4001 Год назад

@@generalgames2810 ?

@xjax8519 Год назад

Это смешно конечно что они не понимают что БТР 4 это не советская техника ! Просто высокомерие бы уменьшить и понять, что Украина продает и делает оружие и ракеты, прежде чем бредовые видосы делать (((

@Hamsteak Год назад

Love that you guys nailed the SKS design in the video

@Dmitriy__Kiselev Год назад

BTR 80 - Legends

@HyperLethalNova Год назад

Love seeing that notification from Simple History

@scalehobby7465 Год назад

Very cool and interesting! but there is a slight inaccuracy, you showed a picture with a Ukrainian BTR-3E in the story about the Russian BTR-82. Despite the external similarity, they are very different

@user-ke6ur7bm7l Год назад

Смешно очень ваше замечание на фоне того что тут показаны старые советские танки ис, времён второй мировой. И современные солдаты на них.

@pawe6473 Год назад

5:10 I know it's hard to animate, but back in soviet world left handers were forced to use right hand mainly

@toobroke9236 Год назад

I remember when I was in Poland, there was a museum, they had something similar to a btr, but it was called a “skot (enter model)” just sitting in the drivers seat, was so cramped , banged my head on the roof, would do it again

@kiwiprouddavids724 Год назад

Turns out the rocket that hit Poland killing two people recently was launched by Ukraine... In my opinion as a false flag attack trying to drag Poland into the war on their side seeing as the Ukrainian president is still trying to lie and say it was Russian

@werfault4076 Год назад

Bruh moments: 5:57 Ukrainian BTR have 'V' markings. Ukrainian army used white stripes in the East from 2014 to 2022. 6:47 No comments... Just... Yeah... 7:27 Talks about Russian BTR-82, shows Ukrainian BTR-3. 8:06 Another 'V' marked Ukrainian BTR. Good drawing tho.

@Grek1574 Год назад

and he forgets BTR-4 "Bucephalus"!

@salamov963 Год назад

Ukrainian vehicle having an V marking is the most cursed thing 😂

@Realninja7214 Год назад

Is the V marking like the Russian Z

@salamov963 Год назад

@@Realninja7214 V and Z are used by russians, symbolises where the vehicles coming from

@TheKitMurkit Год назад

Was looking for this comment

@Leo-yr5jb Год назад

БТР-50? Ukraine has developed an upgrade of the BTR-50 in 2019. 1 Replaced engine 240 to 400 horses and gearbox 2 A combat module with a 30mm cannon and an anti-tank missile system are installed. (From the BTR-4, this is already the modern, newest armored personnel carrier) 3 Slightly improve ballistic protection by installing screens in front of the caterpillar Yes, the tracked BTR-50 is the only one of the entire line of armored personnel carriers that is not on wheels. Any armor is better than its absence, and if this armor also knows how to swim, then it opens up great prospects. The modification was developed for the export of the upgrade service, but several pieces on which these modifications were worked out are used in UA + taken out of conservation and upgrade. PS Muscovites also have a modernized version БТ-3Ф same БТР-50, but upgrade and new name.

@USSAnimeNCC- Год назад

I remember being scared of this thing in the old mw2 those things can totally kill you like nothing

@sgtdebones Год назад

That's how I fell in love with the BTR-80A/82A design. GAZ-59034 with a BPPU turret equipped with a 2A72 30mikemike and a Kalashnikov PKT

@LeningradetZ Год назад

The BTR-40 was inspired by the M3 Scout Car, which was supplied to the USSR under Lend-lease and was very much loved by the soviet militares.

@linkieloos Год назад

The animation improves drastically with every video.

@synevir1603 Год назад

8:04 not true because Ukraine has BTRs of its own production such as BTR-3 and BTR-4

@vojnanaoruzanja9901 Год назад

Americans still use M113 so i don't see any problem

@discombubulate2256 Год назад

love or hate the btr series it does what it says on the tin. it transports troops and supplies fire support.

@cocyungdey1307 Год назад

I love these videos. They bring me a lot of enjoyment watching them. I play warthunder and my primary country to play is russia. So after seeing this I am thinking to myself and asking. when is gaijin gonna add in these btr's to be used in game.

@ger128 4 месяца назад

Iconic armored vehicle. I remember climbing on top of these as a kid during the May 9th celebrations back in the USSR. They were quite cramped inside, even for a 7 year old

@eltenda Год назад

Great overview of a classic family of veichles

@Daelan1234 Год назад

Why not show Ukraininan modifications BTR-3 and BTR-4 ?

@mdolfjitler9833 Год назад

Forgetting about the BTR-3,BTR-4 and BTR-94 I see. I guess you would not consider the BTR-4 a actual BTR since it’s design is radically different and the BTR-94 is pretty much a modified BTR-80 but still they should be included since the BTR-82 is a modification as well🤓.

@Leo-yr5jb Год назад

"Soviet" BTR-3,BTR-4 it not sovet, 94 it upgarde 80

@mdolfjitler9833 Год назад

@@Leo-yr5jb yep right about that,I forgot about the “Soviet” in the title. But still should include those to some degree since he mentions the Russian modification of the BTR-80(the BTR-82A). But nevertheless you’re still correct.

@FatFroggers Год назад

The BTR is a cool vehicle and the video is great 👍

@jesseseva2219 Год назад

Would have been nice if there was atleast a mention of the Ukrainian BTR which has a rear hatch and more.

@antguy3195 Год назад

The truth is that soviet weaponry is pretty much all that the Ukrainian armed forces really have. Whether it be BTRs, attack helicopters, tanks, rifles or shoulder-launched missiles.

@JonOroMusic Год назад

Yeah I don't think you know what you're talking about.

@antguy3195 Год назад

@@JonOroMusic As I understand they are still using weapons from the 80s. To shoot down modern russian helicopters. But uh, don't believe me if you don't want.

@robofat Год назад

@@antguy3195 russians tanks are 90% of modernized soviet t-72. And even t-62 on Kherson

@antguy3195 Год назад

I have re-checked and still the most advanced tank in the Ukrainian Army is the T-84, a Ukrainian variant of the soviet T-80 MBT.

@JonOroMusic Год назад

@@antguy3195 you're a unicorn. Lol interesting to know.

@Ayyuna_chan Год назад

my fav military vehicle of all! 🧡

@DARK-sq9hi Год назад

Спасибо сладкий

@meccnr3536 Год назад

The quality has increased significantly!

@BaktasMIntrasWala Год назад

I think the BTR in itself is not the problem but rather how they employed this tool of war. Like all tools of war it is but cog in the overall warmachine. APCs are essentially war taxi's where a unit can transport infantry timely where it's needed. It's not meant to absorb high explosive damge hence it's needed to be protected by heavy armor and air cover and as of today drone attacks. It is also assumed that the army using the same will keep it fueled thoughout the campaign. Take for example, the Japanese Imperial Army which primarily used bicycles in their campaign of Malaya and advanced with relative ease because they had air cover and this secured their flanks from horizontal and vertical envelopment. The problem with current iteration of the Russian army is their lack of air cover and combined arms support for the movement of these very vulnerable but necessary equipment. It's as if they've forgotten how to fight a conventional war by spending to much time in greyzone warfare. The Ukrainians on the other went back to basics and used this things once they knew that the path was relatively secured.

@prezmrmthegreatiinnovative3235 Год назад

id like to see more faction vids from interwar and cold war

@azarot_542 Год назад

У российского БТР82А 7:41 нарисован украинский камуфляж. в таком виде он больше похож на украинский БТР-3. украинская армия имеет бтр-ы не только устаревшего советского образца, есть и свои глубокие модернизации БТР-3(на базе БТР-80) и БТР-4 "Буцефал"

@user-sr4sz6tv9v Год назад

на видео бтр 3 украинский, это о том как вестерны вникают в суть вещей на постсовке..

@MrTomatoGuy Год назад

feels good to see my smol country (estonia) being mentioned in one of these

@theartificerchannel2110 Год назад

Great vid, but as a heads up The BTR-3E and BTR-4 are the ones Ukriane built between 2014/17-2022 fielding a 'Shkval' 30mm cannon and granade launcher, complete with ATGM Barrier and the BTR- 80A is the russian modern version with the heavy 30mm cannon. Awesome animations tho interesting facts I will be using for sure! :D

@SonicCartoon Год назад

Another Cool Video 😎😎😎

@user-no5mo7ls7n Год назад

You had forgot about Ukrainian BTR-3/4 it's very modernized versions of BTR-70/80

@user-zt3gf7gs2s Год назад

Четверка не являється модификацией совкового БТР.

@user-no5mo7ls7n Год назад

@@user-zt3gf7gs2s так, дякую, наразі вже про це знаю, на той момент не знав)

@EmpowerHour101 Год назад

Nice military history channel it is very easy to understand with animation

@adancampuzano7490 Год назад

The similarities between armored carrier and armored car is between the troop capacity and when kind of gun is mounted could be for anti-personal or anti-tank such as a machine gun or either a artillery/tank cannon on other nations to compete or tackle the russian BMP Models

@robinramos2740 6 месяцев назад

i really like the explanation of this vehicle and knowing the difference from the BTR-60 up to BTR 82 -A ....... i really like this vehicle amazing and awesome......

@endlessroadie3131 Год назад

Plenty of newer btr's have been added to the Ukrainian arsenal since the beginning of the war with the help of the Russians who abandoned them :)

@user-px8bl6gp2t Год назад

Не бросили, а передали дружественной Украине. Кто же знал, что они превратятся в русофобов и нацистов. Хорошо хоть этим идиотам ядерное оружие не оставили.

@Ramelousy Год назад

Plenty of which are now damaged and unrepairable because there is no maintenance crews available, or were underutilised and got completely obliterated by Russian infantry, Just like the new line of centurion's that just arrived, 3 are already reported to have been destroyed in the span of 5 days by UA media.

@joshsegg2814 Год назад

The track sound when they're showing a wheeled vehicle ! And that dope sun reflection on the parade

@P455w0rds Год назад

"Those who support war will never support peace" -

@berkkarsi Год назад

8:01 the only part of the video that mentions Ukraine

@commodorce6431 Год назад

6:01 shows Ukraine soldiers (Ukrainian soldiers uses blue or yellow arm bands for identification) however the BTR in the background is sporting a Russian V symbol. Another inaccuracy is that u mention how Ukraine still uses BTR-70,although partly true Ukraine has built and fielded its domestically built BTR-3 and BTR-4 with the BTR-4 although being larger has capacity for 8 embarked troops and 3 crew members with the ability to carry a 30MM auto cannon (and in some cases a prototype 40mm) which is far superior to BTR-82s 30MM due to BTR-4 main gun having I believe gen 2 if not gen 1thermals and NVG sights.

@TheKitMurkit Год назад

The same mistake at 8:02. Also you show BTR 82A with Ukrainian pixel camouflage at 7:30

@duykhoabui9967 Год назад

7:30 That is a btr-3 (not btr-82a) which is a Ukrainian modernization of btr-80 with Ukrainian made remote weapon station.

@bohdankulchytskyy158 Год назад

You have forgoten that ukrainians has its own models and that one which you presented as btr-82a is actualy ukrainian btr-3e and ukrainians developed also btr-4. In Ukraine-Russia war there are a lot of videos showing deployed btrs not only old btr-80. Btr-82a looks a little bit different :)

@user-bg7bj6zv4d Год назад

BTR-4 totally new vehicle, it has nothing to do with soviet examples

@ameliaschedrinskaya9118 Год назад

Всем насрать

@RyanCoomer Год назад

I homeless & created beef suit to keep me warm in the Chicago. I dug outside in garbage to find expired beef products. I then stitch a yarn exoskeleton around my body to hang meats to cover me entirely.....

@Nostr00 Год назад

9:10 No there is no such option. If you decide to instal ERA on any ifv or apc you basicly turn it into a wheeled/tracked bomb. Armour of such vehicles isnt designed to survive explosion like this. Russian troops in Ukraine are doing it because they think it might help them, but in fact they just make infsntry work more dangerous.

@JM64 Год назад

The armor could probably take it, the issue is having it in close proximity to dismounted troops

@Nostr00 Год назад

@@JM64 No it wouldnt. It's 10mm steel plate. It wont survive such explosion. Further more, these apcs weren't designed nor tested with ERA. Extra weight puts additional load and makes parts wear faster, it reduces mobility, and wrongly placed, one explosion can lead to chain reaction of every piece instaled on the vehicle. As I said, its basicly a bomb on the wheels.

@wyatthicks-johnson2449 Год назад

Let’s talk about the idea of „Soviet vehicles still being used“ Reminder, the us has used the Abrams since it’s first adoption, some of the hulls and turrets of today are original to the 80‘s with upgrades and engine changes. The Russians have been using the same vehicles in some cases since ww2. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it

@diligentone-six2688 Год назад

The BTR's Design isn't easy for troops to dismount without the risk of being shot at in the flanks and in the rear unlike the M1128 Strykers and the M2 Bradleys that had rear panels for troops to safely dismantle under the cover of armor.

@user-rr7gu5or8d Год назад

Если солдат при высадке можно обстрелять со всех сторон, то у меня плохая новость для командира бтр, он заблудился, и находится не там где должен.

@ZURTAN_L Год назад

First, the M2 Bradley is an BMP(or IFV), which is a completely different vehicle, and second, if the driver mechanic came under enemy fire and went under grenade launchers without the cover of other infantry units, then either the APC commander is a fool, or the driver mechanic is drunk, or maybe both.

@ZURTAN_L Год назад

And yes, if the "Striker" gets under fire and loses the ability to move, then most likely it can be written in the cargo 200, as well as the crew with infantry in it, or the aforementioned APC will catch several missiles from RPG 7 or other handheld grenade launchers, or raise the white flag

@JM64 Год назад

You... you do know you can steer vehicles right?

@il400 Год назад

BMP next?

@danajorgensen1358 Год назад

Back March or early April, there was aerial drone footage of a Ukranian ambush of a Russian convoy during that whole "stalled invasion" when a Russian convoy was stuck on a road headed for Kiev. One of the vehicles the Russians were using happened to be a turretless, roofless BTR-60P. I guess even then, they were desperate for men and vehicles to be calling those up from whatever was left in the border guards.

@aboba228bb Год назад

бро, возможно, ты спутал с БТР-80 без крыши, но даже если это БТР-60П,то тем не менее, ведь это не просто бтр, а КШМ (командно штабные машины), которых, к сожалению или к счастью немного

@user-bw6kr7ny8e Год назад

Despite many drawbacks, BTR is a solid APC platform. It may look outdated, but still very effective with decent protection, high mobility and capable 14.5mm and 30mm guns.

@Yurek1 Год назад

Disappointed you didn't cover the Ukrainian BTR-4, which is a radically different vehicle, despite sharing the same chassis.

@kiwiprouddavids724 Год назад

Turns out the rocket that hit Poland killing two people recently was a Ukrainian rocket . In my opinion as a false flag attack trying to drag Poland into the war on their side

@Yurek1 Год назад

@@kiwiprouddavids724 I see in no way how this is related to the Ukrainian BTR-4?

@kiwiprouddavids724 Год назад

@@Yurek1 well it's really simple,both are Ukrainian equipments for war....but I get how someone who is small minded couldn't see i

@napoleonibonaparte7198 Год назад

Eventually, the APC became IFV.

@innerworld4388 Год назад

Русская бронетехника самая лучшая😁

@pupsik_99 Год назад

На металлолом вообще имба

@user-yz1vp5ft7t Год назад

Чел клянчить деньги для всу это позор для такой могучей страны и зачем вам Украина вы просто используете её

@cord2512 Год назад

Что ты за куйню несёшь? Тысячи русских задонатили на ВСУ они рады... наверное))

@dr3adon Год назад

@@cord2512 под дозой были явно. Трезвый до такого в жизни не додумается

@cord2512 Год назад

@@dr3adon нет, трезвые, просто им помогли это сделать)

@dr3adon Год назад

@@cord2512 ахаххахахах

@damianvovna6468 Год назад

Actually Ukraine has a better version of the BTR variants including BTR-4 and BTR-3

@user-jx4xp8ky6y Год назад

Слава России 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺

@pupsik_99 Год назад

В составе Китайской народной республики

@nekron4676 Год назад

@@pupsik_99 а любителям поскакать и этого не светит.им светит полное исчезновение и расеивание как евреи до создания израиля

@FSB_RUS Год назад

@@nekron4676 Ты про свинарник?

@FSB_RUS Год назад

@@pupsik_99 укрошистам На земле не место вам место в аду как раз для вас там ничего не изменится все также как у вас сейчас

@kskmohanty5559 Год назад

"ramirez! Use that RPG to Destroy those BTRs"

@livingroomtheatre174 Год назад

Tumi kemiti acha?

@kskmohanty5559 Год назад

@@livingroomtheatre174 bhala acchi, tame bhi odia 🤣?

@livingroomtheatre174 Год назад

@@kskmohanty5559 na, Bengali

@Comm323-q8u Год назад

USSR it s cool

@ZaMonolith1986 Год назад

millions starving to death is cool to you?

@Comm323-q8u Год назад

@@ZaMonolith1986 Was hunger invented in the USSR? I think they fought him. Of course, there was a famine in the USSR, but is this the only thing that was there?

@JaelaOrdo Год назад

Communism is never cool

@ZaMonolith1986 Год назад

@@Comm323-q8u yeah they let millions of their own people starve not only because of famine but because of how communism works. How is this not obvious to you? Are you dumb?

@doggydude2668 Год назад

@@Comm323-q8u yeah they had pretty cool tanks and guns like the PPSH41

@killer3000ad Год назад

The Ukrainians actually designed their own modernized BTR, the BTR-4.

@mainegroyper904 Год назад

@activatekruger446 Год назад

Soviet era weapons being used today?? You BTR believe it!!

@leviathan8465 Год назад

UKRAINE💪🇺🇦

@scpfoundation8597 Год назад

Oh man, simple history finally did a history of these beautiful vehicles.

@jobwork604 Год назад

Hope Ukraine will lose the war at the end.

@jobwork604 Год назад

@Кацапетка Зеленский киска

@Ramelousy Год назад

They are already losing my friend, reminder that the war has brutally lowered the land in price for over 88% of total land

@jobwork604 Год назад

@@RamelousyChan unfortunately no one knows the truth here. There is a very strong pro-Ukrainian propaganda in the Eastern Europe. We only hear, read about one Ukrainian victory after another.

@Ramelousy Год назад

@@jobwork604 Yeah, even Wikipedia is full of it.

@ieronimbosh5233 Год назад

Cool video. Thanks for making it

@Blanka-24 Год назад

Ukraine win war 🇺🇸🤝🇺🇦

@vovans4954 Год назад

@haron4ik739 Год назад

@@vovans4954 yes)

@Blanka-24 Год назад

@@vovans4954 why?

@GangBang007 Год назад

@@Blanka-24 then we'll all be swimming in nuclear ash. only you will be in ours, and we will be in yours.

@Cyrclebodee Год назад

Having the engine in the back makes sense, keep the vulnerable stuff towards the back while pushing forward towards an enemy right?

@minigunnathaniel Год назад

Teachers need to start showing kids simple history and any other History Channel

@historyfunnfacts9204 Год назад

this quality is amazing

@brandonhampton5945 Год назад

I have literally watched every single video from this channel an always looking for new ones to come out lol its so interesting but the voice an cartoon style is best 👌

@harrypalmer728 Год назад

Faced the BTR-60s in Grenada, we easily defeated them with LAWs.

@sgtdebones Год назад

There are so many animation discrepancies in the facts and animation in this video, like a BTR-80 with V markings fighting for the UA side and a UA BTR-3 fighting on the RU side. Also calling a BTR-3 a BTR-82A is ignorant. This video needs to be reuploaded with major corrections, specifically in the animation.