I don't know why so many people concern themselves with estrogen and testosterone levels. They should be really concerned about how out of whack everyone is with the four humours in this century. I had myself tested by my local Apothecary and he said my choleric levels were way below what they should be. Bloodletting and blistering saved my life.
“Well?! You won’t bleed him, you won’t cup him, you won’t divine his humors; for all you charlatans know, this poor man is both phlegmatic and bilious!”
Hot tip, to paraphrase Dara O'brien, if someone calls themselves a "nutritionist" take whatever advice they give you with the biggest grain of salt... There's a reason why they use the title "Nutritionist" instead of the legally protected title "Dietician" because a dietician not only has to earn their title, they can't be self-proclaimed, but also dieticians actually have to present credible evidence and sources to support their claims. It's like the difference between a "Fiduciary" and "Financial Advisor" or a "Dentist" and a "Toothiologist".
@@pessimisticvideographer5039 I ask my local Scientologists, and they usually also help me out with my thetans while I'm there. It's like a little mid morning tune-up!
Professor: Sandra, you better have a good excuse as to why you haven't even started your final year project with only a week left before the deadline. Sandra: I did finish it. My dog ate it. Professor: .... Sandra: I'm just telling the truth that's too hot to handle!!!
the homoeroticism of being so collectively afraid of women that you can't touch anything that says estrogen regardless of it's chemical makeup (makeup! D:) or observed behavior in men
it was an obvious joke. It's making fun of men who are so deep in their """"manliness""" that they refuse to even eat something that has plant estrogen in it.@@mythicalmeanderings
@@mythicalmeanderings aside from loose cultural connotations, what genuine biological proof is there that femininity and masculinity are the natural order for females and males (respectively)?
@Disney is the Devil Ohno, Im a big ALPHA that believes in BETAS because the BETAS ate a bean that I don't like. I'm so MANLY that I'm scared of 1 (one) bean that hasn't been proven to affect testosterone levels. I. Am. Afraid. Of. A. BEAN. This bean is terrorizing my life, keeping my family captive. Please send help. The bean has a gun.
@Disney is the Devil Please, could you use something like "beta cuck snowflake" in your next post ? I need this to complete my "right wing braindead guy bingo".
I’m a woman and the past 5 years I’ve been working at a sushi restaurant. I eat tons of tofu, I literally drink soy sauce like it’s water and I bathe in miso soup. A year ago I grew a third breast and as of today I’m the proud owner of 2 vaginas.
This is great news for the male to female transgender community! No more need for hormones or surgery, just drown yourself in a tide of soy and vaginas will appear!
This is a five year old video but there is an important topic to be added to this discussion. The original idea that Soy feminizes men comes from White Supremacist beliefs in the 1800's that claimed men from East Asia were more "Feminine" than white men. The view of East Asian men led men in academic institutions to link it to the soy that was a large part of the diet in those cultures, similar to how they used the shape of skulls to "prove" that Black Men were less intelligent than White Men.
I paused at exactly 10:00 and the commentor legitimately wrote "I'm fairly sure also the only heterosexual out of all of them is the asian dude which explains why he has the highest level testosterone." Eugene (The asian guy in question) is gay, he has a husband, and everyone else in the group is straight with wives. This cracked me up
I'm a trans girl and when I heard soy feminized people, I went slightly bonkers and ate like 5 kilos of soy beans and drank about 1 carton of soy Milk. Conclusion: real real REAL bad tummy ache and didn't leave the bathroom for about 8 hours
This is extra funny to me because I’m Chinese and these people never even think about the fact that there are cultures that base their entire diet on soy products.
No no, they think about it a lot. But hear me out for a second, they are racists. They don't care about that because they already think Asian people are worst in some way and therefore see it as a consequence of soy. It's not that they don't think, it's that they are bad at thinking because the knowledge of the world they base their worldviews around is stupid to begin with
You are literally irrational. Like, literally, in every sense of the word, you are objectively not rational. Literally one of the parts of my job is to teach teenagers proof that you're irrational. Maybe step out of this one, root 2.
i can never take “alpha” guys/accounts seriously because as a person who writes and consumes fan fiction, the only thing the words “alpha” and “beta” bring to mind is omegaverse fanfic
So called heterosexual "alpha males" when they smell the pheromones of a beta in heat: Side note I hope you got a kick out of this comment because writing it took at least three years off my life
Me too, but my mind just remember video game stuff Alpha/Beta? I think of a game in early development, Sigma? The (once scary, but then laughable) villain from MegaMan X, Omega? The hilarious robot from Sonic Heroes... And so on, these names are just funny codes to me
When I was in middle school and learning about the importance of citing your sources, I always groaned because it meant more work. But shit like this shows how important it is.
you don't have to MLA cite your youtube videos, that's why. if i had to do that shit i probably wouldn't source my videos because not even god can put me through that pain. only my college professors can. when they aren't busy brainwashing me, of course. good avatar btw, great album
This entire sentence is so stupid. It implies that there are disputable facts but a fact cannot be disputable aside from disputes about alternatives to reality (at least as long as we all inhabit the same reality) since the possibility of such an alternative would mean it's not a fact (or at least that we don't know yet).
@@ginkgothestink-o6949 True, it would instead say something like "In all the studies done on the jaundice caused by watching Shrek, we found no conclusive evidence to prove that there is a correlation or that watching Shrek can cause jaundice." Which is basically science for "there are literally no recorded cases of this being true. So we're 99.99999999999% sure that this just doesn't happen."
I had always figured one of the reasons people assumed soy to be feminizing because of the toxic masculine hatred towards vegetarians, but I suppose that is just one of them
if all of these guys are so scared of estrogen why do all of them consume dairy, something we all consume on a regular basis that contains actual animal estrogen and has an actual affect on our hormones???
Man this bodybuilder would hate to see what we've done to corn, tomatoes, bananas, grapes, and _idly flips though the pages of an agricultural history book..._
Not just every single plant but also every single animal product you have ever eaten has already been genetically modified over the course of thousands of years.
I think "soy boys" would be an endearing term for farm boys in my conservative state of Indiana, considering half the state is covered in soy bean fields.
I'd watch that reality show. "I'm Ricky Pete" *cuts to him wrangling a gator* "That's my brother Big Jim" *cuts to him driving a combine harvester* "And his son, Jimmy" *cuts to them celebrating* "And we're the soyboys" *plays heavy metal banjo theme*
Have you noticed? Silly meaningless SHORT replies always get lots of likes? They've got to be short for slow moving minds. Are you sure that your name is Witt? Ah..2 letters T. That makes it OK.
25:46 also notable thay when reading kosko's article he states that Eugene (the Asian guy) is "probably the only heterosexual" when he's exactly the one that came out as gay last year. They just had to make yet another conclusion based on stereptypes that obviously turned out to be wrong.
I would also like to point out that "nutritionist" isn't a job title or profession. The actual profession you're looking for is "dietitian." People who refer to themselves as "nutritionists" do so because they legally can't describe themselves as dietitians because they don't actually have degrees in anything (at least, not anything related to diet science), and would, therefore, be committing fraud if they did and could be sued or even imprisoned. So, if you see someone calling themselves a "nutritionist," that person is a con artist, and now, you'll know better.
I think it depends where you're from. Here in Australia, one of my best friends has done a uni degree and is a nutritionist. It was a 3 year degree as well so not some random 3 month course.
@@f_yu Many people who are Nutritionists will have degrees, but the original poster is correct that the title of 'Nutritionist' isn't protected by law*. So you don't need a qualification to use the title, 'Dietician' in contrast is protected by law. So not all Nutritionists are quacks, but also not all Nutritionists have any qualifications to back up their claims. *Apart from in Canada, where it is protected, but not to the same degree.
I eat a criminally low amount of veg, I'd think my diet has zero soy based products and I've got to tell you, my man tits are still unfortunately voluptuous
I'm from a country where soy isn't really used in cooking or foods. It's virtually inexistent in our cuisine. Yet I still have supple man boobs and ample leftist views. Curious.
"Nutritionist" is not a protected occupation and anyone can claim to be a Nutritionist! The scientifically recognized profession in the field of nutrition that actually requires a degree is called "Dietitian". Please always be skeptical of self-proclaimed "Nutritionists" "If Dietician _is like_ Dentist then Nutritionist _is like_ Toothyologist," -Dara O'Briain
Thank you! I'm studying to be a registered dietitian right now (I've been in college for 4 years and I'm applying to interships so hopefully in a year I can be a dietician). There is actually a push to change the title from Regestered Dietitian to Registered Dietitian Nutritionist so we can seize the title from people who don't know what they're talking about (though many have mixed feelings about it)
Can we all also agree that shrieking about soy is the adult version of “girls are gross and have cooties”? The whole concept that anything feminine is bad is peak misogyny.
Bad take. If it were true, that soy did increase estrogen, there would be plenty of reasons for men to avoid it. Just like how there are reasons many women would not want to take testosterone supplements.
This is the video that got me out of the pipeline. I had seen youtubers i respected and believed say that soy was evil and feminising and accepted it as true, thinking myself as a sceptic for doing so just because the 'SJW's said otherwise. Seeing something id taken for granted be so obviously shown to be false and built on lies made me start to wonder whether there were any credible arguments against the other things I believed to be obviously true (99% of which were most definitely not). Thank you Harry for saving me from delving deeper into the pipeline and stopping me from stewing in my own impotent rage for any longer than i already had done
Oh god. Endocrinology is one of the most complex fields of medicine that exist. People have pointed out BMI scores are often a bit sketchy? BMI scores are goddamn stone tablets from God Mountain in relation to the complexity of hormones and their interactions within individual people. Oi.
Eight to twelve years of education and residence to legally help people understand and regulate their unique endocrine systems and health vs. a chart without citations on some alt-right blogs written by some gynophobic dudes? 🤔 What makes you more qualified to talk about estrogen?
I'm transgender, and it's common knowledge in the community (because of HRT self-medication) that estrogen alone won't do SQUAT regarding feminization if you don't take testosterone blockers. Otherwise, testosterone in your body will simply overwhelm any effect estrogens you take might've had.
Exactly. Looking at the average test level is like looking at the average height of a man and thinking your body is fucked up because your genetics made you an inch shorter.
Same on the trans issue: I was gobbling 2 mg of estrogen and a weak dose of spiro (have went to the doctor and gotten a higher dosage) a day for months AND have been on a vegan diet for at least two years whilst still having a dark, coarse beard growing in a matter of an one-and-a-half week with little effects. Will take these claims with a grain of salt or 1-up my game as a ~soy boi~
It's crazy that people think they're more in danger of hormonal imbalance from drinking soy milk than drinking a pregnant mother cows' milk that's meant for her baby, which has ACTUAL mammalian estrogen. Beer has more phytoestrogens than soy, but as we know, phytoestrogens don't affect us like that, but if we're to claim it does, then beer is the least manly thing you could drink.
"omg hhomberguy its a joke take a joke soyboy is all joke" hhomberguy literally shows people in this video who take it seriously and is very obviously making this a response towards people who do actually think its real. And jokes do normalize sentiments, anything said enough times becomes the truth to people who cant dig deeper and that's dangerous.
At the same time satan, (lol), I think that it’s worth making fun of the fact that people actually think this way. As long as you’re clear about what you think in reality, I feel you should be free to chastise however you like.
Imagine if soy actually mimicked estrogen, we could control our menstrual cycle by drinking soymilk and eating tofu at the right times. We could use soy as a contraceptive LOL. But seriously don't you think women would have noticed if soy actually did this...
@@shotgun6X I was joking, I was doing a parody of the alt-right idiots who believe such crap, but I will delete my comment in case anyone else thinks I was serious.
I remember being 17 and being subscribed to Sargon of Akkad and Paul Joseph Watson and Milo Yiannopoulos and Gavin McInnes. I am so goddamn glad I jumped off that train when I did.
Confusing phytoestrogens with estrogen just because they are shaped the same is like confusing a floppy disc with a slice of cheese. Sure, they will both fit in a disc drive, but they ain't doing the same thing once they're in there.
The way Paul's videos are always shot with him uncomfortably close to the wall, and with the camera ever so slightly tilted down at him, it makes it feel like he's a tiny geography teacher lecturing at a tall person who has him cornered against a map.
Turns out unless you actually hold a standard that forces people to do so, most people are fine letting their given authority figures think for them (regardless of political bent). Also yeah, most people suck at research. Kinda why peer review is so important.
@@OnEiNsAnEmOtHeRfUcKa yeah, for instance the poeple here in the comments not pointing out this dudes has less testosterone than the 5th percentile. Or that pytostrogens actually mimic estrogen (it's literally even on wikipedia). They just give personal atacks to "the evil righwingers" and repeat what they heard in the video doing NO RESEARCH. Most people dont aave the brain for critical thinking (specially amongst the official media narrative ie leftism). I would say 1 in 100 at most.
@@Amber-nz3sj Yeah you can, but his point is that psuedo scientific groups that encourage their member to do their own research, often suck at gaining legitimate research.
I must say, I used to think soy caused raised estrogen and lowered testosterone in males. hbomberguy, thank you for educating me. I have been relieved from my ignorance a little bit more. I'm a trans dude, and I was honestly pretty scared of eating too much soy. The last thing I want is more of a hormone that I instinctively feel shouldn't be in my body
Dude we’re in the exact same boat. I’m also a trans guy, and for the longest time I used to avoid certain foods and binge others because I thought they’d raise my T or something, and I avoided soy products. Rock on dude, eat some celebratory tofu
@@EddieJrDigiarts "in my opinion" dude read into body dysmorphia among trans folk, as well as studies regarding their brains and brain behavior as correlating w/ their gender. science backs the fact that being trans is nothing new and not just some high level body self esteem issues. also, dude saying u support trans folk while invalidating their existence just doesn't work. it's back handed and makes it seem like u view them more as simply confused teens rather than knowledgable individuals who have struggled w/ the matter of their gender presentation for much or the entirety of their lives
@@EddieJrDigiarts "I don't fear you nor hate you. I respect your rights." "I don't understand you and I don't respect you. Your existence is INCORRECT. Fuck you".
A 12oz can of beer has 13 times more phytoestrogen amounts than one serving of soy lol. Not that phytoestrogens have anything to do with anything. I just find it funny that people freak out about soy but not beer.
Because they're not the ones who came up with the idea, they're just regurgitating back something they read online or saw in a video somewhere, they heard it and without doing any research of their own they then spread it as fact, often embellishing with their own additions and next thing you know all your neighbors are fucking lunatics.
Ryan White don't think you're making a proper comparison to soy. Maybe if the shit in beer was isolated, concentrated, and deemed a health food to be eaten throughout the day. Here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9KDMqqCR3sg.html
@@llawliet5211not even the past tho rlly, more like an alternate reality where their ideologies are the norm. Too many of their beliefs contradict the practices of the times they want to “go back to” for it to be a feasible solution.
@@undercookedtoast1479 this has always been the conservative agenda the past was way fucking worse for everyone interms of social mobility and just general workers rights and treatment but the conservatives will fucking AO3 their way into “the past is great”
In one of the screenshots you share in this video, of manosphere... men... reacting to the Try Guys data, at 10:00, Kosko says: "I'm fairly sure also the only heterosexual out of all of them is the Asian dude which explains why he is the only one with a normal (though low) range." I draw this to your attention now because that Asian dude VERY PUBLICLY came out as gay about two months ago.
@tinylilmatt it's a huge deal in Korea, where his parents are from, and in Texas, where he grew up, and on the internet, where the trolls live and where he publishes his work so... I think coming out was probably a huge deal for him.
tinylilmatt Yes bc as we all know only people that support a channel will visit &/or comment on it and no one in the whole world ever gets killed over being gay anymore...except in the places where it's still illegal & can get you killed...not to mention all the nut jobs in the world... My point being, in this instance/on this topic I appreciate that you think no one cares anymore, makes it seem as tho you don't care...but that doesn't change the fact that you're incorrect, it's still a much bigger deal than it should be for many people in many places
Is it bad that prscutto or however you spell it is more of a comfort food for me that fucking chocolate, i think I'll push out my first kidney stone at age 20 or so
God, I wish soy would make me girly, when I first heard about soy being feminizing I was so excited! but then I learned more truth on the matter. Facts really don't care about my feelings :
Yeah it suck. Really the best and most reliable way I found to get a feminizing effect as a wannabe femboy is just cutting red meat (or really all meat) from your diet. It reduces T and you kinda get the same effect
@@yrdeft9774 There's a beautiful irony about the comment above this one being: Every time. A: "X is true" B: "X is not true, and here is why." A: "Hahaha I was just joking I wasn't being serious stop making me look dumb"
All comes back to "a real man does what he wants" Which is a sentiment that still doesnt sit quite right with me, but whatever. Obsessing over whos the "real" and "true" man is just such sad and unhealthy behavior. Yall are fine the way you are, the perspective of other people does not define you.
Insofar as the notion of alphas and betas holds any validity at all, you're right - needing to define your masculinity based on erroneous observations of a wild animal and the belittlement of others... is pretty fucking beta.
Beer makes me sick, but I noticed that the more beer my macho friends drink, the more open they become to making out with another guy. Some machos require more beer than others but sooner or later the inhibitions vanish. I thought it was alcohol but I guess it`s the estrogen.
0:24 - It's true. I am a leftist because of soy. I was just sitting around, minding my own business, loving capitalism and enjoying the free market in a café when a soy truck became overturned and all the milk flooded in and turned me to socialism!
@@melvint-p9500 there's noting i hate more than having to manage an entire way of thinking just too many things to manage i can barely manage myself let alone billions of people
Lack of adequate father figures caused by breakdowns in the convention of marriage that led to the rise of single motherhood. This, combined with female empowerment and bad educational theory that treats young boys as defective girls and suppresses any kind of masculinity or masculine culture as "toxic"
@@Arrakiz666 you're strawmanning my beliefs to shit m8, and your for some reason guessing i didn't say anything. this is the exact mentality of the left i hate, you asume a whole bunch of bulshit its redicules. i miss read you earlier point because i was high as fuck but i what i meant to say is that i don't associate with the right either i'm actually fairly left of center and i dont know why your assuming and saying were "buddies".
Honestly one of the funniest parts of this myth is that more estrogen DOESN’T decrease testosterone. The testosterone would overpower the estrogen. That’s literally the reason trans women taking hormones need to take a T blocker
@@seigeengine, that's also sort of true, plenty of people could have abnormal hormone levels that are normal for them. If you have a nominally high estrogen level but aren't experiencing any effects from it, you're fine.
@@lunarlegion5518 fuck is this, people having an intellectual discussion on a topic and being respectful to eachother when the other points out their mistake? RU-vid blasphemy I tell ya
@Disney is the Devil So basically the point you're getting at is that men with low testosterone are bad because you think they're like women and you don't like women?
@@AmazingStoryDewd Tell me, esteemed troll, what precisely was untrue in this video? Point out to me, specifically, what was untrue or inaccurate in this video.
@@harpoonlobotomy I'm talking about the ones I DO know about. Most men these days are very low T/effeminate regardless of sexual orientation, not just the Buzzfeed Guys.
Well, there used to be a guide floating around for stuff to eat and drink if you're unable to get actual proper hormones, back in the early '00s. They were supposed to help a bit, as in be better than nothing. They weren't supposed to be as effective as actual hormones. Allegedly eating cooked animal ovaries were also supposed to help, which makes sense if cooking doesn't damage the hormones. I was interested because I had been bullied for being "too manly" for a girl. I never got around to trying the stuff on account of being too poor, and having been shamed by my parents too much to consider birth control hormones an option even though I wouldn't be taking them for having any sex.
@@thj_5046 if that was true hrt wouldn't work for trans masculine people. Since that is literally just taking extra testosterone as an injection or a gel.
@@brook_angel man idk dude but i believe it doesnt just work with food. i did a shit ton of research on that like 2 years ago i donz remember it well no more. might be very possibly wrong tho. no hard feelings bro
I've read several people defending Paul basically saying; "Well, this stuff isn't his specialty, but when he talks about SJWs and immigrants he makes loads of good points!" The fact that PJW is okay with blatantly manipulating the sources he uses so it fits in with his narrative is surely a bad sign for the rest of his content, regardless of the topic.
Yeah. It's fine to be wrong about stuff that's not your specialty. But you can't use that defense while simultaneously claiming to be presenting the truth.
Kolbe Howard Some of the criticisms towards SJWs are valid, but I find these anti-SJW channels and their followers have become just as easily wound up by things as the people they criticise. The new Star Wars films being "SJW propaganda" seems to be a particularly popular topic of choice at the moment for them.
The thing is, none of these areas are his speciality, because he's never actually studied them in any sort of depth beyond the conspirasphere and blogs. None of these anti-fems and most of the far-right youtubers and the skeptics have any understanding of what they're talking about because most of them haven't studied the topics at all, read any of the relevant material, and those that have studied a hard science, which is all well and good, but that doesn't make you any sort of authority on social sciences or philisophical concepts etc. I still cringe at Armoured Skeptic's "post-modernism" video, and all the other sheep bleeting "cultural Marxist" and "Frankfurt School" who don't know who Adorno is and haven't read any of their work, and then, like PJW, go on to make critiques of modern culture in a similar vein to how the Frankfurt School, particularly Adorno (I think), critiqued it, only they blame those very "Cultural Marxists" for what is actually the fault of neoliberal (I wonder if TL;DR has learned the meaning of this yet) capitalism.
And the fact PJW's work on immigration makes him a borderline-Nazi. The guy is a dye in the wool racist. And I'm someone that gets into arguments with the sjws on my side all the time. PJW is just a racist repugnant piece of shit.
You have changed my mind about this subject and made me reflect more on the whole matter. But most of all, you've reminded me to make my own researchs instead of waiting for someone's video to tell me what to think about X or Y. I thank you for this. Have a good day.
I'm NEVER going to willingly put SOY in my body! 😤 Not because of the whole soy-boy thing. That's dumb and pseudo science... I'm just allergic to soy. ┐('～`;)┌
I feel like you started to get close to this without saying it... but considering that soy is a staple food in Asia feels like a dog whistle for anti Asian racism. They're telling you this one food makes you a lesser man, which would imply that men from Asia.... connect the dots. And some people are actually just repeating this not knowing the hate they're spreading.
@@Tabish_Nooristani MSG is not harmful. Yeah, look into it: surprise: racism and xenophobia and bad 'science' also factored into the panic. I bet some of the people claiming to not be able to eat Chinese food also eat bags of Doritos... surprise: MSG is used in tons of seasonings. Glutamic acid is also naturally occuring in significant quantities in many meat and animal products (ie eggs and dairy).
By the way, for someone with some chemistry knowledge, saying the phytooestrogens and oestrogen "look similar" is like saying my black cat looks like my black pillow. They're both black, fluffy and round, but that's about it.
Well, according to Wikipedia "The similarities, at molecular level, of an estrogen and a phytoestrogen allow them to mildly mimic and sometimes act as an antagonist of estrogen."
It always makes me think of chirality and our chemistry teacher giving the example of thalidomide scandal, on how having the same molecular formula does not mean it would have the same effects, let alone molecules that are "kinda similar", when mirror image molecules can cause different results.
you have to mix soy milk and regular cow milk. because soy milk is not mamalian. we are mamals not plants and soy is plant based. so yeah. youll get more estrogen if you mix the two. but drink coffee after because the cow milk might add to your height
4 года назад
@@tap5263 lucky you to only have to eat soy based foods to start your transition :-D unless you're a leftist of course, it only works on right wingers, which is why they are afraid of it :-/
I don't understand so I am trying to look for some hidden meaning. Is it the first letter of each line? YEBIYB???? Does it have something to do with the fact that this comment has 123 likes? Am I supposed to look at the first letter of the first line, the second letter of the second line and then the third repeating? YNDIOA..... hmmm now if we rearrange these letters maybe there is a secret message. I Do Yan... Ohhh ok I get it now. I don't know who "Yan" is, but its a coded message about how you're fuck her. I gotcha bro. Nice. EDIT: oh shit, I just realized it could be "I do nay" Are you saying you are a Brony?
This video has almost 10,000 dislikes...and its just a debunking of all the bullshit they’ve spewed. Literally you’re just pointing out that PJW is misreading the studies, is not looking at enough studies, and the sources cited can be not credible. It’s a very well done response and should be respected but instead its pummeled with dislikes because you’re disagreeing with PJW.
There's this moronic argument going around here that pointing out that an insult is nonsensical, is a childish waste of time. Despite the fact that I don't understand Zombie's point, what exactly is wrong with that? Do you prefer kids to be offended rather than confuzed when people insult them?
ZombieZoo1000 Except the fact that multiple people featured in this video literally tried to prove it isn’t just an insult with dumb studies ... this isn’t just an insult to them and you know it.
I know this is an old video but I also do want to point out that there is no requirement of education or certification to call yourself a nutritionist in the United States. This contracts to a dietician, which is a specific set of education and qualifications. Literally anyone can say they are a nutritionist so that’s always a red flag if that’s the strongest “qualification” that someone has.
'Soy is genetically modified.' Wait until this guy hears about what we did to corn. Wait until this guy hears about what we did to rice. Wait until this guy hears about what we did to any fruit ever. Wait until this guy- ANYTHING THAT HAS EVER BEEN FARMED EVER IS GENETICALLY MODIFIED.
Wait until he hears about potatoes. “Since the invention of agriculture we have been selectively breeding plants to overcome their evolved defenses. Berry bushes were bred for reduced spininess and the berries for reduced toxin concentrations. The history of potato domestication, as described in Johns’s book, is especially instructive. Most wild species of potato are highly toxic, as you might expect, given that they are an otherwise unprotected, concentrated source of nourishment. Potatoes are from the same plant family as deadly nightshade and contain harmful amounts of the highly toxic chemicals solanidine and tomatidine. Up to 15 percent of their protein is designed to block enzymes that digest proteins. Still, a few wild species can be eaten in limited quantity, and edibility can be increased by freezing, leaching out the toxins, and cooking. We enjoy thoroughly edible potatoes today thanks mainly to many centuries of selective breeding by native farmers in the Andes. Concerns about pesticides have recently spurred programs to breed plants that are naturally resistant to insects. This protection is provided, of course, by increased levels of natural toxins. A new variety of disease-resistant potato was recently introduced that did not need pesticide protection, but it had to be withdrawn from the market when it was found to make people ill. Sure enough, the symptoms were caused by the same natural toxins the Andean farmers had spent centuries breeding out. An evolutionary view suggests that new breeds of disease-resistant plants should be treated as cautiously as artificial pesticides are.” - Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine
Nobody mention what's been done to the most widely farmed animal protein that exists (chicken). Musclebros luuuurve their low-fat protein, wouldn't want to make anyone feel weird about eating it...
There are a hilarious amount of people in the comments trying to roast hbomb by calling him a soy boy, as if they aren't commenting on a 30 minute video thoroughly debunking the soy boy myth.
Because their entire belief system revolves around the twin ideas of Objective Truth and Permanent Competition. They believe that there is exactly one correct way to live, and the only way to find that correct way is to constantly compare yourself to everyone else, in every way you can think of, and whomever comes out on top must be the Most Correct. Everything that cannot be reduced to a numerical score is irrelevant. Anyone who tries to claim that certain things are incomparable or that the rating system is flawed is dismissed as a Cope. It's completely irrational, but rationality is not the point. The point is to keep people engaged in a cycle of inadequacy and superiority, so men can point to these numbers as evidence for how much better they are than everyone else, while enforcing a submissive attitude towards men who can claim a higher score than them on whatever arbitrary standard they care about that week. "You're better than all those limp-wristed plebs and normies, but you'll never be good *enough* unless you do what I tell you and live the way I want to to live."
@@Ornithopter470 Which is something you're only going to care about once or maybe twice in your life. So long as fertility is some non-zero number, I don't really see the problem. We have so much medical technology dedicated to having kids that there's really no reason to be so worried about something like sperm count.
Drinking soy ≠ feminized men was officially confirmed way before the Infowars nutjob made his video. You'll probably stop breathing the moment any news comes out that air makes people inflate to death.
Fan of skeptic community content watching your vids for the first time. Keep up the good work, we need people like you. The left needs people like you. Please continue shaming bad ideas!
Keep watching, he's got some good ass shit about video games too! It's also nice to see someone who just puts real effort into the 'video' side of 'videos on the internet'
Which skeptics are you into, and which major ideas in that community do you agree/disagree with? I'm always curious about this stuff, none of this is rhetorical.
Check out the Michael Brooks Show on the Majority Report, he's an articulate, intelligent dude who blends humour, wit, insight, knowledge and, perhaps most importantly, nuance as well as makes left wing ideas accessable, understandable and explains concepts that trigger the anti-SJWs in a way that I think a fan of the "Skeptics" would like and understand, and hopefully you'll join the cuckoldry!
And you are a credit to the skeptic community. Too many tend to be ironically unthinking, who just go with their first assumption on things and never let people challenge their views. I'm glad that people like you exist. Even if we might disagree on some things, it's good that we can do so with mutual respect.
So you were mentally ill as a child, and your abhorrent mother didn't realize? Sad. Good thing is that there's still good people who produce rope for you, so you can add to the statistic.
*Anybody* using "soyboy" to insult anybody is a *chimp* (cue agitated chimp sounds) And what defines a chimp? They're territorial, mean-spirited and primitive. Nazis derived their social Darwinism from chimps. What defines a rational human? Well, quite clearly the ability to function *above* the basic needs of a chimp. "Soyboy" is a chimp-level "rebuttal". It's not found in academia or any level of mature and educated debate. I'll tell you another truth. Trying to out-chimp other chimps is never going to lead to any progress of humanity.
My father is very conservative, so is my brother in law and they FARM soy beans. Both are not what someone would call feminine; they are a guy's guy. They eat soy. It doesn't change a thing about them.
@@JoeyCentral Fermented soy products may contain a lesser amount of phytoestrogens, but due to the process of fermentation these are more bioavailable and thus should have an even greater hormonal impact than the ones in unfermented soy.
proud of being delusional I see, you will destroy your body and feel like garbage all the time as that is not how your body is wired, you will be very unhealthy and die much sooner than everyone else (well with the way people are these days, prob relatively soon like them as you have the same unhealthy behaviors, habits and mentalities) and have a worse quality of life, and after that you will possibly get punished in the afterlife, depending on gods judgement of your sins, you are doing self harm, you are hurting yourself and defending that which is your enemy. sadly you can't help lots of people like this, they just don't listen, but their miserable lives are punishment enough, although sad, the 50% rate of unlife shows that enough already, it's unnatural, unhealthy and morally wrong, I say this not of hatred, but wanting others and society to be better.
It's been a while since I first saw this video but the first guy he clips looks like a soy boy cuck look at his eyes he loves soy effeminate fairy boy Edit: bro for real had to go into bodybuilding because he was so fuckin ashamed of his own face every day he looked in the mirror
Innuendo Studio's series called The Alt-Right Playbook actually has an interesting analysis of this kind of mindset, I believe the episode is called The Card Says Moops. Decide people are serious if you want to make fun of them, decide they're joking if you want to make fun of someone else. If you haven't seen it I recommend it, the title of the series may be misleading but its's a good leftist analysis of alt-right techniques.
Minor update: A: "X is true" B: "X is not true, and here is why." A: "Hahaha I was just joking I wasn't being serious stop making me look dumb. Anyway, X is true"
I know this video is **SIX YEARS OLD** at this point, but, I can dream, right? I remember seeing Paul's Soyboy video as a new upload when I was a teenager. I was just beginning to realize that there was a big world out there and it was made easier to fall into the world of Alternative Fact by my parents, who raised me to believe in all KINDS of different forms of nonsense. I specifically remember, as I was beginning to get off of the wild ride back when... well, when this video was uploaded, actually... I watched a PJW video where he mentioned that China's social credit score system was on a track to take over the world, and I remember feeling just... so hopeless. That hopelessness was only matched a few months ago when I FINALLY realized that there's simply no way I can get my parents to see sense, to accept who I am, and to connect on a shared view of how the world fundamentally is... If you *are* reading this, by some miracle, I just want you to know, mate. You're helping.
I used to self harm and have a huge problem dealing with anxiety, but now I lift heavy shit because it makes me feel better. All of these clowns are trying to come up with excuses to convince themselves that their low standards are acceptable because everyone else is either a low testosterone beta or is on juice, meanwhile they never make any steps to improve themselves. I hate seeing these people prey on young men’s insecurities, selling them some wonder solution to a problem they’ve made up.
wouldn't you say that Info war's Brain Force Plus is doing the same thing? They use extremely low quality ingredients and sell for an outrageous price to people insecure about their mental alertness. I think it's good that your trying to improve your body, but perhapses find a few more opinions, look around at what evidence is out there. Be a self-advocate, and you can improve your mind too.
On what planet did I advocate for some goddamn brain juice? I’m p sure I was giving an anecdote into why I find using any sorts of products like that unhelpful. Am I missing something?
Its called growing up, also testosterone levels change over time. I went through the same changes, started working out after college but spent the better half of my life as some insecure, fat & weak. Low standards = being a doormat, and yes being physically weak is a low standard because being physically fit and strong requires hard work and dedication. Its easy to sit in a chair all day, grow fat and/or weak. The clowns with low standards would be the people telling you that its ok....Do you really think being morbidly obese and 400 pounds is having a high standard?
I was doing other things while listening to it in background & just happened to glance up while he was 'trying' to cut thru the cuffs - followed by a wtf?! moment lol
Is that what's meant to be happening? God, I feel so silly now. For months now, I've been trying to decode what's meant to be happening in the background... and it was kidnapping. '='
Drunk Superman actually surprisingly not(or unsurprisingly really), women are more likely to vote progressively on average and their reason for that is because of women and estrogen, it kinda has to be that way to keep the narrative standing up, it has to be women's manifest destiny to vote progressively or there could be ya know, an actual reason. This is also why the mra manosphere types don't think women should get to vote, since they're just "inherently irrational and wrong almost always, because women" That's paraphrasing but you could pretty easily find them saying pretty much exactly that, but why would you subject yourself to that. And if the women agree with them they still don't get to vote, they're just being correctly submissive.
Actually, everyone is aware of the fact that soy or the estrogens aren't the reason for why people are or become liberal. This notion is just a strawman and this guy loves to use them in order to make sense of his strange theories
Yeah, I... I don't see why people believe estrogens _directly_ result in more women identifying as liberal. It's far more likely that more women are liberal or register under liberal parties simply because liberal parties and liberal ideology is generally more supportive to them. None of this is to say that these _are_ the reasons why women typically ID as liberal, it would be hypocritical for me to argue that; it's just what I think is a more _likely_ or more _prominent_ factor related to the correlation.
Worm Driver. Not really. They just did not carry it to Hilary. When 52% of men vote Trump and 54% of women vote Clinton, but Trump wins because of the Electoral Collage. Blaming it on the women is simply unfair.
I mean, it's honestly kind of a fallacy anyways. Of _course_ some women are going to vote republican, no one here is saying that all women fall on the left, so honestly it should be kind of obvious that if all of the women who voted republican voted democrat instead, Hillary would win. At the very least, it seems reasonable to someone who hasn't looked up any statistics as of now. Looking up statistics now, it looks to me like most of the women who did vote for Trump were white; uneducated white women were the only demographic among women to vote in majority for him. (College-educated white women were very much on the fence, but tilted just a little bit towards Hillary) Overall, it honestly seems like a bit of a cop-out to give such a simple claim as "women carried the election", as there are so many other factors to that. (my source is in the next comment)
