Тёмный

SpaceX’s New Raptor V3 Is Changing Starship's Design 

TheSpaceBucket
Подписаться 42 тыс.
Просмотров 45 тыс.
50% 1

Some of the most important parts of any launch vehicle are its engines. Both its efficiency and power among other factors can have a massive influence on a rocket’s payload capability, production time, and even reuse properties. For a while now we have been receiving the occasional update on the next generation of Raptor engines powering Starship.
Earlier today however Musk shared some significant information on both upcoming production and the removal of heat shields and fire suppression in Super Heavy thanks to engine upgrades. Here I will go more in-depth into why Raptor 3 is such a big deal, some of the various improvements, the engine’s timeline, and more.
For more space-related content check out - thespacebucket.com/
Credit:
SpaceX - / spacex
Chapters:
0:00 - Intro
0:32 - Booster Weight Savings
3:45 - Improving Raptor

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

30 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 101   
@alexlabs4858
@alexlabs4858 6 дней назад
Man that raptor 3 engine is attractive. Can’t wait to see them fire.
@kevinrose8568
@kevinrose8568 6 дней назад
Short, sweet, and to the point. I like your presentation style.
@samrusoff
@samrusoff 6 дней назад
Seriously. It really stands out how direct and efficient he gets information across in the video without all the unnecessary fluff and video length padding that other channels do to game the algorithm. Keep up the great videos
@737smartin
@737smartin 6 дней назад
Reminds me of my Air Force training. Tell the what you’re going to say, say it, then tell them what you said.
@vueport99
@vueport99 5 дней назад
Now if he can find a better AI voice, it'll be perfect
@SebastianWellsTL
@SebastianWellsTL 6 дней назад
Raptor V3 will be a huge improvement from V2! Really looking forward to seeing them in use on a Starship!
@Chumbucket2
@Chumbucket2 4 дня назад
The raptor three model looks unsettlingly simple
@marksinclair701
@marksinclair701 6 дней назад
I believe the 10 tons of “heat shield” is more the result of needing prevent a single engine RUD from taking out its neighbors, and potentially so on and so on. Raptor 3 is supposed to survive RUD without firing pieces of shrapnel everywhere. That seems like a hard thing to validate to me, give all the different and violent ways a rocket engine can explode. It’s not such a big deal until they try to human rate Starship. SpaceX are proposing no launch escape system, so the booster and ship (and therefore the Raptors) must be incredibly reliable.
@acasualviewer5861
@acasualviewer5861 4 дня назад
I'm wondering how they'll get away with the no launch escape system. To me it sounds like the no need for a water deluge system that they originally came up with. I think they'll have to back track it. But we'll see how it goes. SpaceX never fails to surprise and do amazing things.
@eddjordan2399
@eddjordan2399 6 дней назад
love your end of vid round up every time. great channel
@antoninbesse795
@antoninbesse795 5 дней назад
Presumably the cows at 5:07 are there to produce Starship methane?
@dissaid
@dissaid 6 дней назад
Thanks Man!
@AliHSyed
@AliHSyed 6 дней назад
We will have to wait and see how it progress and the impact it has on the space industry. Thank you very much for posting.
@andrewdillon7837
@andrewdillon7837 6 дней назад
He was told at the start not to use methane , It's all new tech ,,just go with the usual,,, H2 leaks , helium runs up walls, ,,3rd version is powerful,and quick an easy to build ,,, The stainless steel use proved itself too..
@MyKharli
@MyKharli 6 дней назад
Except its not reached apollo 4 level yet .
@simonhampton1304
@simonhampton1304 5 дней назад
I am just impatiently waiting for starship 5 launch,OMG that last one was amazing. Im hoping to see a hard landing very soon eapecially of that booster rocket. We are seeing history in the making with this starship. Im 44 now and i could see a human going to mars before i leave this world.
@ricardoabh3242
@ricardoabh3242 5 дней назад
V2 is impressive
@Saivarun11
@Saivarun11 5 дней назад
Those cows running for their lives 05:08
@ka-uy8yh
@ka-uy8yh 6 дней назад
great video quality as always, some constructive criticism from me though would be maybe looking into reducing that white noise every time you talk, its not really annoying but i found it a little distracting sometimes, have a nice day :) Edit: I've gone and listened to it on my phone and the noise isn't audible, i guess you can only hear it on pc
@oberonpanopticon
@oberonpanopticon 6 дней назад
What white noise?
@Scaliad
@Scaliad 6 дней назад
​@@oberonpanopticonI think it's in his voice...
@filonin2
@filonin2 6 дней назад
@@Scaliad I think it's in his head.
@Scaliad
@Scaliad 6 дней назад
​@filonin2 I enjoy the presentation, but go back and listen... this guy isn't wrong. There is a wispiness to the presenters voice.
@ArethaDawn
@ArethaDawn День назад
💫 happy birthday 0:30
@julianfp1952
@julianfp1952 5 дней назад
As I see it - and maybe seeing what I want to see rather than reality - even more recent Raptor 2s have been incredibly reliable. We can't know all the details but discounting IFT-1 I'd say it's entirely possible that out of 117 engines (3 flights with 33+6 Raptors each) there might well have been only a single failure that is down to the engine - the one that shut down almost immediately after OLM booster ignition on IFT-4. It's entirely possible that all the other failures (and maybe even that first IFT-4 failure) were down to issues further upstream (fuel slosh, clogged filters or other issues that weren't actually in the engine itself). Obviously all those non-engine issues are critical to identify and fix but the more of the failures that we have seen in the IFTs that were upstream issues rather than engine issues does bode very well for where SpaceX is already at re engine reliability.
@acasualviewer5861
@acasualviewer5861 4 дня назад
Just to put it into perspective, Raptor 3 at $250,000 will cost LESS than many small jet and turbo prop engines!
@marks7502
@marks7502 5 дней назад
thnx
@saumyacow4435
@saumyacow4435 3 дня назад
Call me a sceptic, but removing safeties like shielding between engines sounds reckless. Also, the continued engine failures don't instill confidence. Maybe continue to push the engine to extremes for the sake of a few percent performance is not the way forawrd?
@julianfp1952
@julianfp1952 5 дней назад
So does that 10+ ton weight saving from removing the current fire suppression behind the heat shields involve the removal of those huge CO2 tanks housed in 2 of the very long chines on the booster? If yes then not only is that a good weight saving but I would think that it will also be a very useful cost and time optimisation when building a booster. Those huge CO2 cylinders are I believe manufactured elsewhere and trucked to Boca so that's probably a relatively costly component and then when you see them being fitted to a booster in a Megabay it looks like a pretty serious lift (2 lifts actually - one for each cylinder) that probably needs a lot of prep (making space, establishing bigger-that-usual health and safety exclusion zones because of the swept space taken to lift the cylinder from horizontal to vertical etc). It's probably a Megabay operation akin to installing a methane downcomer so getting rid of those CO2 cylinders entirely would be nice for the production process too.
@scottymoondogjakubin4766
@scottymoondogjakubin4766 5 дней назад
Im still curious to what and when will be the first payload ! So many things happening so quickly ! Most likely a load simulator or a bunch of starlink satillites !
@TopGear543
@TopGear543 6 дней назад
When is the 35 engine booster coming?
@bluesteel8376
@bluesteel8376 6 дней назад
Long time. That is version 3 of the booster. They are still making version 1s.
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 2 дня назад
They’re adding 2 extra raptors to super heavy in V2
@k.c.sunshine1934
@k.c.sunshine1934 6 дней назад
I love how Elon's company does engineering!
@oberonpanopticon
@oberonpanopticon 6 дней назад
Elon’s the idea guy and business man, but the engineers who work for him are the ones doing the real magic
@k.c.sunshine1934
@k.c.sunshine1934 6 дней назад
@@oberonpanopticon Are you denying that Elon created the highest-level design process? THE 5 STEPS. (1) Make the requirements less dumb. (2) Delete the part or process. (3) Simplify or optimise the design. (4) Accelerate cycle time. (5) Automate. It seems to me that the SpaceX engineers continue to execute according to the 5 steps to a high degree of accuracy and success. As a retired engineer, I assure you that Elon is different than the "typical business CEO" at other companies. It's absolutely true that SpaceX deserve a lot of credit for the great work that they are doing, however, I am sure that the engineers that don't live up to the 5 steps are gone.
@konfunable
@konfunable 5 дней назад
I love how Elon's fanboys will always love him no matter all the facts.
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 2 дня назад
@@konfunableuhh what
@konfunable
@konfunable 2 дня назад
@@XRS2200 Moon in 2022 and Mars in 2024!
@lordgarion514
@lordgarion514 6 дней назад
"We've got more Raptors than we know what to do with". What a coincidence, Boeing has more Starliners than they know what to do with. 🤣
@gnarly706
@gnarly706 6 дней назад
I think the catch tower should be a tall platform with a hole in the middle.
@oberonpanopticon
@oberonpanopticon 6 дней назад
ah yes, let’s make threading the needle even harder
@ricardoabh3242
@ricardoabh3242 5 дней назад
Up to test flight 5, these are v1, no?
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 4 дня назад
Flight 8 will be the first V2 flight
@fionajack9160
@fionajack9160 5 дней назад
These sites are something, either soulless AI bot voiceover with mangled words and grammar, or maybe real guy reading too fast, and monotne
@jiiji_jp
@jiiji_jp 5 дней назад
人類を月に!に向けてのアップデートを優先して欲しい!!!現状のアップデートの方向性に疑問...
@Thoran666
@Thoran666 6 дней назад
The Raptor V3 is going places. Can't wait to see some videos of it. But at the same time it pains me to see how much fuel is required for each start. It doesn't help our efforts to reduce greenhouse gases and I can't afford a ticket on a rocket.
@thomasreese2816
@thomasreese2816 6 дней назад
The fuel (methane + oxygen) can be obtained via processes powered by solar panels or wind turbines. This is more renewable than existing fuels
@oberonpanopticon
@oberonpanopticon 6 дней назад
I’ll start being concerned when rockets are flying through the stratosphere as frequently as planes are
@johnstephenson5158
@johnstephenson5158 6 дней назад
My understanding is that Raptor uses methane that would otherwise have been burned off into the atmosphere anyway or just released into the atmosphere. Raptor is carbon-neutral, and one could even argue that it benefits they environment by burning methane that could of otherwise been simply released in the atmosphere (way worse for the environment than some CO2)
@filonin2
@filonin2 6 дней назад
​@@johnstephenson5158 Your understanding is wrong. Methane is not a waste product and is in fact a valuable fuel. What do you think gas stoves use? It is vented to the atmosphere during fossil fuel refining because it's easier than storing it but it doesn't need to be and still is. Raptor is not carbon neutral as that methane comes from fossil fuel. A carbon neutral rocket wouldn't be putting new carbon from the ground into the atmosphere and they sure af are not offsetting the carbon with anything else.
@TwitterAR3
@TwitterAR3 6 дней назад
lmfao
@robertorzech8922
@robertorzech8922 4 дня назад
Great topic but I can't handle your reading .You dont separate your words making it hard to understand ! Learn how to read !
@weissmorris8822
@weissmorris8822 6 дней назад
Again, excellent video much appreciated with the worst narrative (presumably AI) ever. Can’t you please do something about that?
@darkkennny1
@darkkennny1 5 дней назад
🤣 that is he himself
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 4 дня назад
Not AI lol
@wyattnoise
@wyattnoise 6 дней назад
Casual reminder that Starship V.1 was supposed to carry 100 tons to orbit but has only ever flown empty and the entire program has already expended more rocket engines than the entire shuttle program did over decades of flight, even factoring in their two vehicle losses.
@TheEvilmooseofdoom
@TheEvilmooseofdoom 6 дней назад
No. Thats not how it works.
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454 5 дней назад
It has flown empty but with less fuel, so it clearly has capacity. I think the main reason they haven't flown payload yet is a combo of: - not entirely reliable yet, many changes each flight, wouldn't risk payload - being paid for development milestones for Artemis - focus on long term reusability, which dominates the returns of a few deployments during testing The latter two come into play when there's any conflict between deploying a payload and demonstrating reuse. There's the obvious tradeoff of limited engineering time, but there are probably many in-the-weeds reasons. That said, I feel if I were in charge I'd be trying to deploy starling satelites by now.
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454 5 дней назад
Loss of engines doesn't really matter compared to cost. It's too early to say if the starship development program will be capital efficient, but I think it's fair to guess that they will deliver far more than the space shuttle at far less cost. They're currently sitting a like 10-20x less than shuttle's cost.
@tedarcher9120
@tedarcher9120 5 дней назад
The cost of engines for the whole starship programm is still less than 1 (one) RS-25. The number of engines is irrelevant
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 4 дня назад
Obviously it’s expended more engines, starship has 39 total and the shuttle had 7. Not to mention the shuttle reused all of its engines: the SRBs parachuted down, and the OMS and SSMEs came back with the shuttle to be removed and reused. Not a good comparison. The raptors are also far cheaper than any shuttle engine. Also, plans have changed: V1 used to be meant to deliver 100+ tons to LEO, but is now delegated to be a prototype for the first operational version: V2, due to them finding improvements and deciding to improve the design before launching with payload.
@wyattnoise
@wyattnoise 6 дней назад
Casual reminder that SpaceX the longest-running private space flight company and still hasn't launched a single payload outside of LEO.
@reyviqueira3159
@reyviqueira3159 6 дней назад
Did you forget about a falcon heavy launching a tesla roadster all the way out to Mars orbit? Go Google it.
@TheEvilmooseofdoom
@TheEvilmooseofdoom 6 дней назад
@@reyviqueira3159 haters tend to ore than a little dishonest.
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454 6 дней назад
Nope. From wikipedia: Launches to higher-orbits have included DSCOVR to Sun-Earth Lagrange point L1, TESS to a lunar flyby, a Tesla Roadster demonstration payload to a heliocentric orbit extending past the orbit of Mars, DART to the asteroid Didymos, Euclid to Sun-Earth Lagrange point L2, and Psyche to the asteroid 16 Psyche.
@zatheriz
@zatheriz 5 дней назад
As all already pointed out you are wrong and I don't think that's any sort of goalpost. They are the industry leader, like it or not. The push for reusability can be directly attributed to the success of the Falcon 9 rocket.
@blurpsiez
@blurpsiez 5 дней назад
No You forgot Blue Origin dude, they run longer than SpaceX and not even single orbital launch yet
@wyattnoise
@wyattnoise 6 дней назад
Starship is funny. Just like the Cybertruck, it feels like a vehicle Musk actually did have a lot of input in, which is why it is absolute dog shit.
@TheEvilmooseofdoom
@TheEvilmooseofdoom 6 дней назад
That makes no sense.
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454
@blakemcalevey-scurr1454 6 дней назад
Is it dog shit though? It's already clearly capable of deploying massive payloads, and it's closer to full reuse than any rocket in history except arguably the Falcon 9.
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 4 дня назад
This guy actually commented three times on one video just to shit on musk lmao. Actually pathetic
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 2 дня назад
Bro actually commented three times on one video thinking people would care about his opinion lmao
@hypercomms2001
@hypercomms2001 6 дней назад
33 engines and now we find out from Enron Musk that the thing can only lift into orbit 40-50 tons instead of of the original 100 tons that he originally claimed … what an absolute fuck up!
@thomasreese2816
@thomasreese2816 6 дней назад
As compared to the
@oberonpanopticon
@oberonpanopticon 6 дней назад
He’s doing the opposite of the Scotty approach, he’s promising way too much so that even if reality falls short of expectations it’s still better than the competition
@filonin2
@filonin2 6 дней назад
It's not done yet kiddo. If you'd huff a little less gasoline maybe you could understand that.
@hypercomms2001
@hypercomms2001 6 дней назад
@@filonin2 Ha Ha HA...! This is especially for you!! PS: How is the uncrewed Lunar Landing coming along, that was supposed to have occurred in Q1 2024????? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m23tGqmmiA8.htmlsi=SzuY5xKpf-9E2wsr
@TheEvilmooseofdoom
@TheEvilmooseofdoom 6 дней назад
These are test articles, you clearly don't actually understand whats going on or why.
@kc10man
@kc10man 6 дней назад
That's not the new Raptor design💩
@user-ut5iv7qt6u
@user-ut5iv7qt6u 6 дней назад
Raptor engine runs on liquid methane aka liquified farts.
@konfunable
@konfunable 5 дней назад
Just face it. It is Space Shuttle 2.0. And it is going to have the same fate. Exactly same idea just different form.
@TheNheg66
@TheNheg66 5 дней назад
Miles off target
@konfunable
@konfunable 5 дней назад
@@TheNheg66 We will see.
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 4 дня назад
I dont see any wings
@XRS2200
@XRS2200 4 дня назад
I dont see any wings on that thing lmao
@konfunable
@konfunable 4 дня назад
@@XRS2200 The level of intellectual depth of Musk cult.
Далее
I Built 100 Homes And Gave Them Away!
09:36
Просмотров 45 млн
First Look Inside SpaceX's Starfactory w/ Elon Musk
1:04:18
How SpaceX Reinvented The Launch Pad!
17:42
Просмотров 180 тыс.
Why is starship so late
23:08
Просмотров 23 тыс.
FULL FLIGHT! SpaceX Starship Flight 4
11:51
Просмотров 822 тыс.
This Is Why You Can’t Go To Antarctica
29:30
Просмотров 2,3 млн
The SpaceX Starship BLOCK 2 Is Coming!
11:40
Просмотров 114 тыс.
Кто производит iPhone?
0:59
Просмотров 428 тыс.