SpaceX Starship Reaches Space in 3rd Test Flight (Supercut) 

I got goosebumps

100 tons to orbit impressive

picture quality was good cause it was connected to starlink during reentry. allowing it to stream data much faster than on-site

On board cameras were connected to starlink the whole flight

Probably some of the most beautiful footage that I’ve ever seen of earth from space

⁠@@ToneOFTheGods How does it feel to have room temperature IQ?

@@ToneOFTheGodsbro is so delusional the illuminati says he's not real

Or make it the same way as the dragon capsule.

@@heythave Dragon's heat shield is ablative which means the material ablates during reentry, making it non-reusable. Starship's heat tiles are designed to be reusable for many flights.

@@robberbarron7602 Then how do they keep reusing dragon? Put on new tiles every time?

@@heythave Dragon team removes the heatshield and replaces it with a new one. They also refurbish the capsule; this process takes them at least a couple of weeks. Dragon does not use heatshield tiles; their heatshield is one big piece.

@@robberbarron7602 They could do a one piece thing for Starship too, like a heat shield condom of sort.

How about moon flat? Haha 😂😂😂

I can see the turtle below Facts

Booster bounced off a dome!

“It’s a fisheye lens” 🤡

It’s so believable i can’t believe it!

😂

Who knew right?

It was.. in the beginning

Must be flat

Not at all

Not 100% sure about this...but they might only post on X now 😅

Because they’re only doing it on X to try and get people on it 😒

They will upload a video, but they don't livestream anymore.

Its was about to land to the ocean, but the boosters use to slow it down didnt ignite, so it crashed onto the water.

@@Maky-vo7qs The booster actually self-destructed ~400m above the water. I relight probably went wrong causing the self-destruction. The summary has been posted on SpaceX's website.

They aborted the relight due to starship's rotation

Broke apart

It blew up around 400m from the surface. FTS may have been set off but it’s still unknown to us.

It's perspective. Relative distance to an arc (the curve of Earth), size of object in comparison to the planet, and viewing angle. Imagine bacteria on a pool ball. From the perspective of the bacteria, given that it can see like we do (it can't but for the sake of this analogy, it can), it would see something similar to the video at some distance from the pool ball and at some angle. A trajectory that is near tangent or tangent to the curve of the planet would allow you to see such a curvature

Snitch on them.

You seemed to be the only person that cared.

Both crashed in the ocean..

@@humbertomonteiro6742 They didn't crash into the Ocean. The booster self-destruct ~400m above the water and Starship broke up during reentry.

@@humbertomonteiro6742 nope only the superheavy the starship burned up

I don’t think they where tiles

Ice

​@@KMASIF-mi9yjIt was probably solid oxygen. The ship was dumping oxygen in space right after engine cutoff.

Doesn't even matter too much considering the vehicle's attitude at that time. It appeared to me that around MECO, possibly combined with the oxygen dump they were doing during the coast phase, the ship began rotating and it wasn't able to stabilize. When it started hitting the denser atmosphere it seemed to reverse the spin direction and then even began to yaw, but you can tell by looking at the plasma that it was facing the wrong way. It seems that, towards the later stages, it was hitting the atmosphere with only one half of the shield. Even if they lost a bunch of tiles, I think it's not a surprise, as most of them should hit the atmosphere at around a 90 degree angle, while the ones that are closer to the edge of the shield being more securely attached maybe, as they're supposed to be parallel-ish to the entry direction. However, it seems that was completely the opposite way, as the tiles in the middle of the shield were parallel to the entry. I think it was a great test and knowing SpaceX they gathered a lot of data that they will use to ensure that the next ship will re-enter in a more controlled manner, and thus better putting the shield to the test, according to its design.

@@raizenpk I agree with you. Also, a couple tiles were missing, probably fell off during flight. Regarding the ship's orientation during reentry, I believe it self-corrected itself once it started hitting the atmosphere allowing the flaps to manipulate aerodynamic forces. Thats why the flaps kept on actuating, creating aerodynamic drag on only one side to counter act the rotation and actively correct orientation.

We’ve never had a enemy that could reverse engineer code NEVER WILL

B10 looked like it was just low on fuel, I don’t think fuel slosh but maybe. S28 failed to due a roll

No recovery of either section was planned

SpaceX is a private company #1 and #2 it's a test vehicle not a finished product just yet, so it doesn't make sense to add a flag.

costs extra and plus you can't really paint on stainless steel like that. they will though for the NASA contract

So you are stating you want to burn an American flag??!!

@@GrommoA different way of putting it. 😂

Why in a test?

1: They aren’t 3 Billion Dollars, maybe like a couple million if not under 2: The 2nd stage failed due to a roll it couldn’t stop

@@Booster-13Ielon used 3,5b tax payed dollers for this show dude

@@zeocool84 Not really

@@zeocool84?

@@gamers-xh3uc U.S. space agency NASA awarded Musk's company about $2 billion in contract volume out of its total approved budget of $24 billion. as in nasa money or tax money

tell it to the people personally saw it flew yesterday.. Hey guys, a flat earther here

@@Maky-vo7qs Ok, I'll talk to people who saw aliens too 🤣

@@TheVaelastraszgo watch the next one in April, it’s not that hard

They’re burning their own money. Not taxpayers’. Also, this ship was either going to be used to test or be scrapped as part of a development process. It’s a prototype of iterative development. They keep failing to achieve the perfect end goal, if you want to be cup half-empty like that, but each time they’ve managed to achieve more and more. The falcon 9 rocket is the most efficient, safe and successful rocket currently in use and is partially reusable. It failed a lot before that and look at it now - it’s the only reason that the west isn’t having to beg Russia for access to the ISS. This rocket made it easily to orbit. And is the largest and most powerful rocket ever launched, by a fair margin. All other rockets get disposed of after this. The fact that it didn’t soft land (they never planned to recover it btw, just try a sort of soft crash into the ocean) is an extra bonus. The only comparable rocket is the SLS which costs 2B and can only launch every other year and is fully booked for a decade. In this flight it showed that it can do what that can do, for a MAGNITUDE lower cost, and with 2-3x the potential payload capacity if expendable. That’s amazing.

@@shestewa6581 achieving slightly more and slightly more while still chasing but falling short of the achievements of the 1960’s is not a glass half full situation. If nasa failed at the rate space x has been doing they’d have been shut down long ago. Elon appreciates your worship though.

@@BusterDarcylearn how differently these companies operate. Otherwise you look like an idiot

Look for the following keywords; Space X Agile Approach Methods The result will be many reports and videos explaining the design methodology adopted by Space X (as explained by Shestwa). That's why it's successful for Space X, including the most recent test of Starship. I hope that helps :-)

Sorry, I have a personal rule not to fight with someone who is blind, deaf, or both, such as yourself. But I'm glad you can still call for help!

Best to actually turn your appliance ON. It generally helps

Ok, this is kinda funny.

@@greensky01 i love you! thank you!

@@Grommo nice dude!

Get well soon.

Wow you could not be more wrong have fun on earth when the sun expands and swallows you up the rest of us who actually understand will be on mars watching and laughing at you 😂

You're so smart! Man, we must all look so little to you.

Their money, their problem. They could literally make a 5 billion $ bonfire, and it would still be none of your business. I find it very funny that you say there's 'very little achieved in the success column', when they achieved what every single successfully launched rocket in history has (apart from Falcon 9..). No one else designs even first stages to return back to Earth, let alone a second stage travelling at 27000 kmph. These guys launched the biggest, most powerful rocket ever created, achieved orbit with (again), the biggest human-made object ever, and apparently that's a 'bust' to you. Tell me ONE rocket that lands it's second stage from orbital velocity please.

Only as fake as your post.

It's not a view most people are use to, plus the light from the sun in space is pure white, so it gives us an unnatural almost artificial look to things.

I guess I shouldn't believe my eyes then. Would it be too much to have a public area in safe distance with multiple press people and cameras?!? All looks fake!!!

They do?

Fake? I take it you haven’t actually been in space before, right?