Today is the third anniversary of Sir Richard Attenborough's death. I wanted to make a small tribute to him. So I did, and this is it. Follow me on twitter: / sicktriceratopz
Rest In Peace. Throughout my whole childhood I have watched Jurassic park hundreds of times. Beside Alan grant John Hammond was my favourite character. Something I admired about him was how he talked, he spoke in a way that made me feel safe and warm. Always brought comfort and chills. I didn’t know he died until recently, and it was a very sad news to me. Rest In Peace and spare no expense.
Rest in peace Richard Attenborough, our eternal John Hammond! we all surely miss you! Thanks for coming to this world and making it better for everyone just by being yourself! Richard Attenborough - ★ (1923) † (2014)
In the movie we love John Hammond he has a hearth and he stay alive. In the book we learn to hate him and he dies. Both versions are good but Richard Attenborough would never be the book version and it's perfect like that.
7DragonEyes7 I could not agree more and Jurassic park is my favorite book along with 1984 and no actor could have been better then richard Attenborough
@@theeternal1766 I don't know, is JP movie so good because it's the "perfect" length? If It was longer, which part would be longer? I agree that I want more, but I fear that having the movie even longer could play against it, more than for it.
@@theeternal1766 Yeah I know what you mean :) I agree having a longer version could be nice, not like Star Wars where you can find the "normal" version but have multiple version like LOTR, with the extended versions.
I was kind of expecting this to be part-compilation of him saying "spared no expense", part-compilation of all the parts where it's kind of obvious that he's lying. This was better.
I feel like the scene with the ice cream and Hammond's "Spared no expense" is the moment where he realizes how much he dedicated to the park, and that it must fall
Please hear me out: I’m actually glad that Attenborough did not reprise his role a third time for the Jurassic Park franchise, because that ending interview scene from “The Lost World” was a perfect curtain for his character. If he had lived to be a part of “Jurassic World”, his character could’ve had only one storyline: dying in the Park he helped to create. While that was suitable for John Hammond in the book, it definitely was not suitable for the movie Hammond.
I would've been fine if we've got a sort of prequel film with Richard Attenborough tho. Learning how he came up with the idea of Jurassic Park, how the first dinosaur was brought back from extinction, how he met Wu, Muldoon, Arnold and Nedry, how InGen's rivalry with BioSyn began, how Hammond got Isla Nublar and Isla Sorna. Ect.
Steven Spielberg saw Richard Attenborough as John Hammond from the start? He must have just been familiar with Hammond from the script. In the book, he’s more like Orson Welles playing a dark version of Walt Disney. Attenborough got the charm of Hammond right, but Hammond in the book goes into denial much farther than Hammond in the movie ever does.
In the book, John Hammond and Ian Malcolm are pretty much the arch nemesis of each other. In the second movie, Hammond does something that he would’ve never done in the book: admit that Malcolm was right about “Life finds a way.” I love the movies, and I love the books. I don’t mean to seem critical. But Hammond is definitely different in both cannons.
Good, better best .... simple But as you say . How much better , that's the hard part. Review the list of credits and maybe watch Gandhi or the great escape 10 rillington place ....
