Тёмный

Special Q&A with Fazale “Fuz” Rana, Hugh Ross, and Jeff Zweerink 

Reasons to Believe
Подписаться 53 тыс.
Просмотров 2,6 тыс.
50% 1

Join Fazale “Fuz” Rana, Hugh Ross, and Jeff Zweerink for a conversation celebrating the 100th episode of Stars, Cells, and God. They answer questions submitted by our dedicated viewers and dive deeper into topics where science and faith intersect.
For 100 episodes, this podcast has served as a space for deep conversation with leaders in the science-faith arena to explore how the latest scientific discoveries provide evidence for God’s existence, the reliability of Scripture, and the credibility of the Christian worldview. We’re honored to have our viewers participate in this episode by posing great questions to our three scholars.
We look forward to the next 100 episodes with you!
_____________________________
TIMESTAMPS -
7:32 - Question from @EmaManfred on AI image generators replacing artists
You can listen to the full episode on this topic HERE:
• What Does It Mean to B...
22:16 - Question from @whyaskwhybuddry on plants on Earth before the Sun, insects, and birds
You can listen to the full episode on this topic HERE:
• God and Information Th...
28:58 - Question from @SamytheGreek on humans having Neanderthal DNA
You can listen to the full episode on this topic HERE:
• Neanderthal Engravings...
41:14 - Question from @johnbaker2755 on animals learning tactical capabilities
You can listen to the full episode on this topic HERE:
• Chimp Tactical Behavio...
50:15 - Question from @pierreabbat6157 on vitamins in lab-grown meat
You can listen to the full episode on this topic HERE:
• Lab Meat and Photosynt...

_____________________________
PLAYLIST - Star, Cells, & God
_____________________________
HOST: Fazale “Fuz” Rana
GUEST: Hugh Ross and Jeff Zweerink
_____________________________
CONNECT WITH US
▶️ Help us reveal God through #science by supporting Reasons to Believe at: support.reason...
▶️ Follow RTB_Official for more #apologetics content!
Facebook: / rtbofficial
Twitter: / rtb_official
Instagram: / rtb_official
Website: www.reasons.org

Опубликовано:

 

18 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 46   
@kriskriskris32
@kriskriskris32 3 месяца назад
I asked chat gpt what was the most interesting thing it had learned today and it told me about a scientific discovery of an organism and it said i could read more about it on the internet. So i tried to read more about this organism and could not find any information about it. When i told chat gpt i couldn't find any additional information on the organism, it apologized. My question is : where did it get the information? Did it just make something up or did it receive misinformation to pass on to the unsuspecting?
@SPQR2755
@SPQR2755 3 месяца назад
Well done and congratulations in 100 episodes! However, I am not ever eating bugs. Nope. Not going to happen.
@jaxcortez5100
@jaxcortez5100 3 месяца назад
I've been serializing a speculative fiction novel that is written as a cautionary tale about AI and gene manipulation. I was just curious about what your thoughts were about one thing: some of the most creative people have endured personal traumas and/or have they come from rough backgrounds. If AI begins to make life more comfortable for humans, you don't think that we are going to create such a perfect environment that may impede our ability to tap into that creativity, or perhaps we'd be so riddled with pleasure that we may lose our vision and desire to create things?
@nil1473
@nil1473 3 месяца назад
Will you guys, please please adress this question, as to , why god did not create a optimum-quality banana,apple , oranges , strawberrys etc ... Why humans are required to intervene & "artificially" make (gentically modify) banana to make it edible(suitable) for humans Eg. Bananas are a cross between the Musa acuminata and Musa balbisiana bananas, neither of which are edible alone. The latter has too many seeds despite its sweetness. In contrast, the others are seedless but less sweet and more challenging to eat due to their toughness. The hybrid banana we eat today is seedless primarily and sweet
@nil1473
@nil1473 3 месяца назад
Respected Jeff sir , fuzz sir , hugh sir .. please try adressing above problem 🙏 thank you..
@StarTails
@StarTails 3 месяца назад
RTB "we don't delete comments from posters who disagree with us" while deleting the comments that call them out on this.
@RileyLoyd-pd3tt
@RileyLoyd-pd3tt 3 месяца назад
how does genesis 1:30 work with an old earth model where animals are eating meat for millions of years?
@StarTails
@StarTails 3 месяца назад
As I understand it, there view is that the death that came upon the world via sin was spiritual death not mere physical death. They have their reasons for thinking this and they are quite fleshed out and sound. I would explain them to you in detail but I have to ask are you even going to listen or is your mind already made up.
@MutsPub
@MutsPub 3 месяца назад
My reply's to comments are not being posted.
@rochellekesselring4865
@rochellekesselring4865 3 месяца назад
How do we know that the Bible has skipped so many generations? There has to be a lot missing to make up for the fact that Adam and Eve were created during the last ice age
@ji8044
@ji8044 3 месяца назад
They were not. The first homo sapiens are from all over Africa conservatively dated at least 200,000 years ago. They competed with other hominids for perhaps 140,000 years before permanently leaving Africa to expand all over Eurasia somewhere around 60,000 years ago and becoming the last hominid standing (figuratively and literally)
@rochellekesselring4865
@rochellekesselring4865 3 месяца назад
@@ji8044 so the expansion would line up with the tower of Babel and the next story is Abraham which we know is about 4000 years ago. That leaves a gap of around 45000 years that young earth creationists just have no accounting of at all. That is part of the reason they just completely ignore scientific evidence of humans existing tens of thousands of years ago and leads them to reject a majority of empirical data.
@rochellekesselring4865
@rochellekesselring4865 3 месяца назад
@@ji8044 right and that lines up with the Tower of Babel in the Bible. But the next event in the Bible is Abraham which we know is somewhere around 4,000 years ago. That leaves a gap of around 56,000 years or more that young earth creationists cannot account for. That leads them to reject the evidence of human beings being alive tens of thousands of years ago. Because of that they reject other empirical data.
@ji8044
@ji8044 3 месяца назад
@@rochellekesselring4865 There was no Tower of Babel. It's an allegory. However you and I agree about young earth creationists.
@MutsPub
@MutsPub 3 месяца назад
@@ji8044 The fossil record clearly indicates that ALL bipedal primates went extinct before they evolved. You are presenting nonsense, not facts.
@ji8044
@ji8044 3 месяца назад
Sorry, according to Genesis there was water before the Sun and of course that is strictly impossible. The days of creation have nothing at all to do with the astrophysics of the universe. Attempting to make them do so requires coming up with twisted and convoluted explanations like one part was written from space looking down and the other part from the earth looking up. Still, as usual, I enjoyed the video.
@daklord
@daklord 3 месяца назад
you didn't listen at all. The first thing you have to do, in any scientific endeavor, is establish a frame of reference. What is the frame of reference in the creation text? The Spirit of God was hovering over the waters. This means that we are on the surface of the Earth, not in space. When it says "Let there be light" in 1:3, it's talking about light penetrating through the atmosphere for the first time in Earth's history. Everything makes sense if you know you are on Earth, and not in space. Nowhere in the creation text in Genesis 1:1-31 does it change frame of reference from earth looking up to space looking down, so I don't know what you are talking about.
@rochellekesselring4865
@rochellekesselring4865 3 месяца назад
The sun was created in verse 1 (" heavens and the earth" because there's no Hebrew word for universe) and referenced in verse 16. There's no verb tense in Hebrew and verse 16 would have been better translated "and so God HAD ALREADY made..."
@ji8044
@ji8044 3 месяца назад
@@daklord No sorry, a human wrote that text, not God in space. You only want to say it that way because nothing in Genesis actually coincides with what we know about the universe.
@ji8044
@ji8044 3 месяца назад
@@rochellekesselring4865 And yet no Tanakh or OT has your interpretation so therefore we must rule it out.
@daklord
@daklord 3 месяца назад
@@ji8044 I dont understand what you are arguing. Of course a human wrote that text. We are discussing the merit and logic of the content of the creation text of Genesis 1. Verse 2 shows you where the frame of reference is.
@MutsPub
@MutsPub 3 месяца назад
Now my responses are being deleted. What gives?
@ji8044
@ji8044 3 месяца назад
I can see them
@StarTails
@StarTails 3 месяца назад
RTB is known for censoring and deleting comments that they don't agree with. They have a history of this. Still though judging on the comment section that is still here, you have been rather rude so I can't say I'm surprised they pulled down some of your stuff
@fuzrana894
@fuzrana894 3 месяца назад
@@StarTails We don't delete comments from posters who disagree with us. Just look at the comments for this video, if you think I am being deceitful. We will remove offensive comments.
@StarTails
@StarTails 3 месяца назад
@@fuzrana894 Setting aside the fact that my above comment got deleted, I think that comments one deems as offensive is rather subjective. You know I used to be associated with RTB, even being a volunteer for RTB. However, during the COVID pandemic I remember how comments critical of establishment dogma were not only censored but how you people would dunk on such critics. Hack even on your official email forums you tolerated people treating other's like garbage because they were critical of science. And of course years later we learn that some, though not all, of those criticisms were valid. Nevertheless, from my perspective you people threw out your convictions of being critical of mainstream science, like evolution, and simple told people to passively accept and do what the government told them, and then you allowed your fellow apologists to treat dissenters like trash. So I think I can be forgiven for not only parting ways with your organization but for thinking you people are unprincipled and censor those you disagree with.
@StarTails
@StarTails 3 месяца назад
@@fuzrana894 Your deleting all the responses I am making to you even though I am trying to bear my heart to you, so let me be clear since I know this comment will also be deleted but at least you will read it. You and your organization have made an enemy of me today and I will let people know what your true colors are and I will make it a priority to dissuade people from your organization.
@shvilibe1767
@shvilibe1767 3 месяца назад
I have a question regarding this video at 38:36 what is the stuff he is talking about? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XTvJCM4xI-Q.html
Далее
Q&A With Former Atheist, Dr. Hugh Ross
1:04:32
Просмотров 40 тыс.
Relating To The Trinity ~Hugh Ross
1:25:55
Просмотров 20 тыс.
Emeritus Lecture with Dr. Hugh Ross, April 12, 2019
2:06:35
Keep the Sabbath | Hugh Ross
35:10
Просмотров 108 тыс.
28:19 RTB 101: Were Adam and Eve the First Humans?
9:25