Тёмный

Specific Gravity for the MCAT | Fluids | MCAT 

MedCat ✔️
Подписаться 7 тыс.
Просмотров 7 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 7   
@futuredoc7303
@futuredoc7303 3 года назад
It would be awesome if you can do some lessons on lab techniques we need to know for the MCAT. Love your videos!
@Emily-zk4sh
@Emily-zk4sh 3 года назад
More high yield Physics/Math please!
@7dnein944
@7dnein944 3 года назад
The framework of myosin and kinesin motion during the flexing of a muscle has proven to be erroneous. The Phosphorus emission does not create the propelling motion and this has been proven on 2015. Thus, the whole theory falls apart and no current theories exist to compensate for the shortcoming. Do I have to learn something that I know to be false? Will AAMC test us on things that are in a scientific grey area?
@medcatmcat
@medcatmcat 3 года назад
That's a good question and something I actually discussed with my professor when taking Cell Biology. The short answer is: no. The long answer as it pertains to your question is that you'll need to understand 2 major things: 1) Calcium binds to troponin, shifting tropomyosin over to free up the myosin binding site on actin, allowing myosin to attach to actin. 2) ATP is required for myosin to detach from actin (the way I remember this is that when someone dies, "rigor mortis" ,which means stiffness of death in Latin, sets in due to no ATP being available and thus myosin does not detach from actin). These two points account for nearly all of the AAMC practice questions on muscle contraction (I would say all of them, but I'm sure there's an exception or two). As a general rule for your "scientific grey area" question: if you can only find it in research articles and not in any general source, test prep or textbook for a class, it won't be on the MCAT. There always could be an exception, so if you find one let me know so I can make a video on it.
@codyko7178
@codyko7178 3 года назад
How should we deal with specific gravity in buoyancy problems?
@medcatmcat
@medcatmcat 3 года назад
Good question! Unfortunately, it depends on the question. The AAMC problems I've seen-and there aren't that many on specific gravity-keep everything else in specific gravity, so you for those you could just leave it as if it were a direct measure of gravity. For anything that requires you to compare specific gravity to a density written out in units, you would probably need to convert the specific gravity density to the appropriate units.
@jarrettleto
@jarrettleto 3 года назад
One application of it is the percent submerged. ie if a ball has a specific gravity of 0.5 and its placed on water, then half of it will be submerged and half will be above the waterline.
Далее
Trigonometry for the MCAT-Approximating Values | MCAT
4:38
MCAT Physics Ch. 4: Fluids
20:01
Просмотров 47 тыс.
Specific Gravity for Fluids | Buoyant Forces
6:42
Просмотров 29 тыс.
Hydrostatics - Buoyancy | MCAT Physics Prep
12:40
Просмотров 12 тыс.
Radioactive Decay Explained in 7 Minutes | MCAT
6:41
MCAT Physics Equations Tips & Tricks
22:51
Просмотров 38 тыс.
What is an Electron?
10:51
Просмотров 231 тыс.