Spiderverse: Movie Good, Comics Bad 

I mean, at the very least, he died within his own game, and following Wreck-it-Ralph logic, he can come back to life since he didn't die OUTSIDE his game.

i think he actually lived though

He came back in Infinite, so it’s probably not canon

@@jerryborjontbh *A fate even worse than death*

True 15:33

That's too bad.

​@@yellowstarproductions6743 Leave now!

​@@yellowstarproductions6743 Leave now!

The voice actor for peter in amazing friends dan gilvezan was so sad after hearing about the death of his version of spider-man

It's pretty cheap as well because you know they can backpedal on those deaths just by going "It wasn't the ACTUAL version of those characters, but a version that was similar". Let's the, have their cake and eat it too.

@@yourfatboy5359greetings

We have had like 3 different Spider-Verse stories, Spider-Geddon, various minor Spider-Verse crossovers (ones in which only 1 or 2 spider-people team up), all the Venomverse stories, GwenVerse, Spider-Verse films (With another Spider-Verse film to come), Spider-Verse crossover in the Ultimate Spider-Man cartoon, Spider-Verse crossover in the Spider-Man unlimited mobile game, Spider-Verse crossover in Spider-Man 2 game. ANNDDD just a few days ago, they have announced yet ANOTHER Spider-Verse comic, I am getting SOOOOO sick of this, it's not interesting anymore whatsoever, it is just a cash cow that is slowly drying up

DAMN

Wasn't shathra an original villain?

More like he did it to spite fans more than share love of the icon with them.

@@kyrohowe3156 Oh for fuck's sake, grow up.

​@@Ash-Winchesterno she was introduced in JMS run

"WIDTH" 🤣🤣

W I D T H

Thank. You. It’s literally that simple.

Yeah. While on one hand I see why people want faithful adaptations of things they love. I think it's misguided though. People don't realize that not everything translates from one medium to another. Sometimes that's to a story's determent but sometimes it's to its favor. Personally I don't like when creators in one medium (often authors) will tell creators in other media how to do their job. You see that a lot. Some artist will be upset their vision was "ruined" because it got turned into a movie. Their vision wasn't ruined. It's still in the book. Their vision wasn't the movie. If it was they would have made a movie, not a comic book.

Usually it is, especially for comics, bc then they try to retroactively change the comics. And if the best comic stories were adapted with some consideration for the source material, movie fans would enjoy that every bit as much as the stuff that doesn't care one bit about the source material. So why threaten to damage what comic fans love when you can make something that both movie and comic fans would enjoy? Not to mention Spiderverse is very much the exception, not the norm. Typically the movie adaptations of superhero comics are not as good, the characters are less intricate and they struggle to tell low stakes stories effectively (a reasonable amount of low stakes stories are essential for an interconnected universe). If comic adaptations were like book adaptations, there wouldn't be much ti complain about.Yes, movies about books get people irritated by difference, but they still feel like adaptations. Comic adaptations are way more extreme. They mostly just put the names of characters and plot lines on things that bear little to no resemblance and just come up with some random new and unrelated story

@@rickrivers2021 "bc then they try to retroactively change the comics" How the fuck does having the story for a comic book movie change the comics? That has literally never happened. "So why threaten to damage what comic fans love when you can make something that both movie and comic fans would enjoy?" They're not damaging anything. Wtf are you talking about? "They mostly just put the names of characters and plot lines on things that bear little to no resemblance and just come up with some random new and unrelated story" Congratulations. You just described every comic book storyline ever. If you honestly have a problem with movies being based on comics differing from the source material, I can't wait to see your reaction that the source material can differ from itself.

@ColeGray-il6tm when something happens in a cbm, the comics very often will change things to try and match the movies. 'Brand synergy' is an extremely common complaint among comic fans. And yes, this causes there to be inconsistency in how things are written in comics. And yes this bothers many, many readers. What makes DC and especially Marvel comics special is their unique approach to continuity. You follow a characters life through decades and decades of story, watching it evolve and unfold over time. There have always been writers who come in and write things with little concern for continuity or the character's history. Those are bad writers. Fans of the characters generally don't like such runs. It's just a reality that that will happen from time to time But since the CBM movies really took off, runs like this have become more and more frequent, and worse, caused not necessarily by an occasional lazy or misinformed writer but often directly pushed by editorial to morph things to be more like the movies. The erroneous logic is then movie fans will pick up the comics and like them more. Longtime loyal readers apparently matter less than the hypothetical new readers Marvel and DC fail to market to anyways. Comic book movies should treat the source material with similar respect to book movies. Tweaks are fine, heck it doesn't even need to directly adapt a particular story. But capturing the characters right and recognizing the core themes that make them work is important. Comics shouldn't be playing catchup with the movies, disregarding decades of lore to reform to the needless changes that movies flippantly make. Instead, the writers of films (and shows) should be expected to really dig into and understand the source material. They have power of these characters future. So they have a responsibility to do right by those characters

@@rickrivers2021 I'm not reading that wall of self entitled ignorant bullshit.

Shattered Dimensions as well.

@@milesmorales-intothespider9861 Thanks, I must’ve forgot about it. Duo to my lack of playing the game, only saw its cutscenes.

Game of Thrones vive

That make no sense!

Totem and spider-man are so stupid idea

I love them all! I said miles is probably my main Spider-Man here but I just meant currently in the books. Peters book isn’t that great right now and Miles is my favorite book out. I love most spider characters. Ben Reilly Kaine Miguel Spider Punk Spider Gwen Silk I just love them all a lot haha

One of he said

Another victim of the woke Hollywood brainwashing. Miles or any other token "representation" Spidertroons shouldn't ever stand next to icons like Peter Parker.

My belief is that since Peter and Miguel were Spider-Man before Miles they had to be character assassinated to make Miles out to be more valid as Spider-Man. ESPECIALLY Miguel who was the first actual successor to Peter in the Marvel Universe, and his fanbase's existence is proof that people are OK with people other than Peter not being Spider-Man.

:)

@@2Rhe_43 ???

@@jaguarplayzz8578 :)

Yeah no

RIGHT!???!?! The idea of adaptaing that comic on paper was horrible, like you just saw the headlines and were like "Are they in their right minds rn?" Here we are years later and the Spider-Verse is at the forefront of pop culture, crazy times, lol

It’s because they went “nah, imma do my own thing” and made it good Also, them bringing Miles back to his original origin so he works better. Nobody can argue movie Miles isn’t SpiderMan, cause the original is dead and basically asked him to pick up the torch. He is just 1610s Spidey.

I had no idea of any of that. Admittedly I didn't read comics much then but was familiar with the animated show so I never really thought about it. It's interesting too because I like most these changes.