Тёмный

Square root of 64 divided by 1/2 times 2 = ? Many don’t get this BASIC Math! 

Подписаться
Просмотров 61 тыс.
% 628

How to solve a math problem with square roots, fractions and multiplication and division - order of operations (PEMDAS). Learn more math at TCMathAcademy.com/.
TabletClass Math Academy - TCMathAcademy.com/
Help with Middle and High School Math
Test Prep for High School Math, College Math, Teacher Certification Math and More!
Popular Math Courses:
Math Foundations
tabletclass-academy.teachable.com/p/foundations-math-course
Math Skills Rebuilder Course:
tabletclass-academy.teachable.com/p/math-skills-rebuilder-course
Pre-Algebra
tabletclass-academy.teachable.com/p/tabletclass-math-pre-algebra1
Algebra
tabletclass-academy.teachable.com/p/tabletclass-math-algebra1
Geometry
tabletclass-academy.teachable.com/p/tabletclass-math-geometry1
Algebra 2
tabletclass-academy.teachable.com/p/tabletclass-math-algebra-21
Pre-Calculus
tabletclass-academy.teachable.com/p/tabletclass-math-pre-calculus
Math Notes: tcmathshop.com/
If you’re looking for a math course for any of the following, check out my full Course Catalog at: TCMathAcademy.com/courses/
• MIDDLE & HIGH SCHOOL MATH
• HOMESCHOOL MATH
• COLLEGE MATH
• TEST PREP MATH
• TEACHER CERTIFICATION TEST MATH

Опубликовано:

 

25 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 314   
@jeremyhorne8383
@jeremyhorne8383 5 дней назад
Okay… first, the obelus used after the sqrt64 doesn’t mean “divided by” but means “grand divided by” So, we rewrite the problem with parentheses as (Sqrt64) / (1/2x2) Next, the slash between the 1 and 2 means “divided by” and does NOT denote a fraction. So, we simplify on both sides of the obelus. Sqrt64 = 8 1/2x2 = 0.5•2 = 1 Finally, we perform grand division last by rule. 8 / 1 = 8 Of you had used the simple slash for division (the original symbol, btw) you would have Sqrt64 / 1 / 2 x 2 That would be 8/1/2x2 Left to right that’s 8/1/2•2 8/2•2 4•2 8 To get the steps and result you showed, you would need to not only use simple division (slash) after sqrt64 but you would also need to write one half as a fraction instead of using simple division (slash) or put it in parentheses to begin with of that’s what you meant and you don’t have the ability to write it as a fraction.
@MusicNewb
@MusicNewb 5 дней назад
Communication is important in math. Any expression should be conveyed without ambiguity.
@kjellg6532
@kjellg6532 6 дней назад
Forget about PEMDAS, it is not always crystal clear. Use parentesis so expressions are not ambiguous. The purpose is not to make traps, but to wright your expression in such a way that they are not misinterpreted by the reader.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
PEMDAS is not the issue here. The issue here is that there is absolutely no excuse for mixing ÷ and / in the same expression.
@Gideon_Judges6
@Gideon_Judges6 6 дней назад
The fractional notation here leaves a bit to be desired. Why not use the unicode ½, or at least use parentheses (1/2)? Using the full size font just makes the / look like a division symbol on a computer system where it it might not be convenient to render ÷. Instead you have an implied parentheses and ambiguity since this "fraction operator" is not in PEMDAS/BODMAS (and frankly this isn't even a pure fraction operator which would be a horizontal line with a numerator above it and denominator below it).
@splat_rick3369
@splat_rick3369 6 дней назад
As a teacher, I would never fool my students like this. As a mathematician, I will always consider fractions to be divisions (because they are). I would accept both answers (assuming that the reasoning is correct).
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 6 дней назад
​@@splat_rick3369As a teacher and mathematician, I would hope you are never mixing two different division symbols in the first place. That is the fundamental and inexcusable error in the notation here.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 6 дней назад
It doesn't just leave a bit to be desired. It's straight up incorrect. The correct way to write this, using inline notation, is √64 / (1/2) × 2
@lant7123
@lant7123 6 дней назад
Big reason I always write fractions with the horizontal bar, not the slash. However, I think the spacing made this problem very clear, on top of using the division sign.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
​@@lant7123The problem with that is, spacing is not a symbol in mathematical notation and the standard inline operator for division is / not ÷. Those of us who already understand mathematical notation know all this. We can see how he's trying to write something that evaluates to 32. We can see that he's actually written something that evaluates to 8 (unless you treat ÷ here as something other than simply a division operator). But what if there are people who view his videos and don't realise he's using his own personal dialect? What if people come away thinking that this is how mathematics is written? They are just going to have to unlearn a load of crap in future. There's no excuse for someone who purports to be a teacher to do such a disservice to his students.
@HugoRH444
@HugoRH444 6 дней назад
Very easy. I don't understand people's confusion. Square root of 64 is 8 8 divided by 1/2 is like multiply it by 2, so 8x2 is 16 Then 16 times 2 equals 32.
@panlomito
@panlomito 6 дней назад
Exactly what I did, but I prefer to de-escalate this situation in the Ukraine in stead of the very sick war mongering that is promoted by Western nations.
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 6 дней назад
It depends on how you decide to treat the symbol "/", a forward slash. A forward slash is UNIVERSALLY treated as "divide by" and not "treat as fraction". If we interpret that forward slash properly, the answer is 100% 8.
@Kualinar
@Kualinar 5 дней назад
@@marscience7819 When you have ÷1/2, that «/» is absolutely to be treated as a fraction. The actual proper interpretation gives 100% C
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
​@@KualinarYou have that exactly backwards. The / symbol is the one you cannot change the meaning of. / is part of the basic definition of mattress notation. It is the division operator. The ÷ symbol is not formally defined, so that's the only flexibility in interpretating this question. The only way to get an answer other than 8 here is to treat ÷ as something other than a simple division operator. Ultimately, the notation is just silly. Mixing two different division symbols in the same expression is inexcusable. The correct way to write what he's trying to write, using inline notation, is √64 / (1/2) × 2
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 5 дней назад
@@Kualinar Show me the rule in PEMDAS that says that. You aren't going to find it.....
@whoff59
@whoff59 3 дня назад
Tricky question. It is explained only in the text form of the question "divided by 1/2" which is clearly equivalent to "*2". But in the formular you find "÷1/2" where "/" is just a sign for division (without brackets). So according to PEMDAS it is first "divide by 1" then "divide by 2". And this is sth. totally different from the first case.
@MrEvanston
@MrEvanston 6 дней назад
Mr. RU-vid Math Man: Congrats, you are the first teacher who taught me about the "Order Of Operations." How could I have missed this concept?
@MsChemicalEngineer
@MsChemicalEngineer 5 дней назад
I don't know how you missed it I learned it in 6th grade.
@heatherbartusch5239
@heatherbartusch5239 6 дней назад
Yes. PEDMS. In my head and by calculator. Thank you for all your videos. They are indeed helpful. Bless you.
@nathanw4018
@nathanw4018 5 дней назад
Only a teacher or exam writer would structure a fraction and ÷ symbol in an equation. First you run the risk that you have written it wrong and two you risk the reader interprets your intention incorrectly. Order of operations should be kept simple. People should not be guessing what is in the denominator and what is in the numerator. In my line of work, I would fire someone if I saw a calculation setup like this one. It could be so much clearer when written algebraically - no need for order of operations except for the square root.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 3 дня назад
Don't tar all teachers and examiners with the same brush. Only an idiot would use ÷ and / in the same expression like this. No halfway competent teacher or examiner would ever write anything like this. It's complete gibberish. It's not proper mathematical notation at all.
@notme444
@notme444 5 дней назад
The '/' character is not included anywhere in PEMDAS. This explanation only works if some additional rule makes a fraction written like '1/2' a number which in this case is equal to one half. There seems to be an unwritten assumption that separating the fraction from the rest of the expression with spaces front and back means it should be read that way. Maybe such a conventions exist in the minds of some people, but I've never heard of it, and the result is very confusing. This should be taught as something to be aware of, but is actually a mistake. If your aim is to explain to someone how to do this calculation using a typical calculator, don't tell them to divide by one half. Presumably, you know what the meaning of the expression is, so just tell them to multiply by 2. If it's some more fancy calculation, just tell them what keys they need to press. When writing on paper, fractions can be more clearly written with a horizontal line drawn under all of the numerator and over all of the denominator. The universally recognized convention that this implies parenthesis around the fraction allows PEMDAS to be applied, eliminating any ambiguity. When entering an expression into some document, explicitly use parenthesis - in this case '(1/2)' - if no other method is available. Teachers of written style, always prefer clarity, and not making the reader strain to understand the meaning of a sentence. Clarity is all the more important when writing on a mathematical subject. Another comment here notes that that the unicode ½ could be used in text. The writer would have to get the ½ from the list of symbols in whatever document editor they are using, but the result would be compact, and could be visually more appealing. Like the '/' character, these special characters are also not included in the PEDMAS rule, but the meaning would be perfectly clear in my opinion. When writing on paper, the fraction could be written in a similar way, and that would be just fine too. When writing an arithmetic expression in a computer program, usually the PEMDAS rule applies. Generally however, '÷' cannot be used, and instead, '/' is used to indicate division. This means that the '/' in the fraction will be handled left to right, the same as the other divisions and multiplications in the expression. To stop this happening, the fraction must be in parenthesis. If you let your students think it is ok to write expressions like the example in the video, they could be mightily confused when they later have a go at programming.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 4 дня назад
The notation in the question is certainly very poor, but why do you keep going on about the / symbol being non-standard and not part of PEMDAS? In mathematical notation the inline operator for division is the / character. It is completely standard (there is literally an international standard for this - it is ISO 80000-2 and it defines / as division) and therefore it is part of the MD step in PEMDAS. The non-standard character here is the ÷. Using inline notation, the correct way to write this expression to give the answer 32 is √64 / (1/2) × 2
@blainealmeida
@blainealmeida 6 дней назад
I GOT CC 32 BY USING MY 71 YR EXPERIENCED BRAIN CELLS! THANKS😅
@maxhenderson1890
@maxhenderson1890 21 час назад
I'd argue that there are six possible solutions: ±2, ±8, ±32 (depending on how the ambiguously written problem is interpreted). This problem is written extremely ambiguously. Let me walk you through my logic and reasoning: 1. We all agree that √64 is 8 2. The √64 is also -8, so another solution for each interpretation is possible. 3. The use of both ÷ and / symbols is simply careless. These symbols mean the same thing, so you should stick to one division symbol. 4. Lack of parentheses/brackets surrounding 1/2 causes issues because you dont know whether its supoosed to be ((8÷1)/2)*2 or 8÷(1/2)*2 5. More issues arise since you dont know whether the problem is (8÷1)/(2*2), same with 8÷((1/2)*2) and 8÷(1÷(2*2)).
@mikewright9210
@mikewright9210 2 дня назад
Did you notice the invisible asterisk at the end of PEMDAS ? Yes, it refers to the unwritten rules containing the exceptions to PEMDAS such as solidus over virgule, size (as written) of the entity, inclusion or exclusion of extra spaces, and other forms of fontographic artifice to include the presence of invisible braces, brackets, and parentheses. Mathematics is a language of precision that leaves absolutely ZERO room for personal interpretation of equations according to an arbitrary set of rules, regardless of whether they are provided by a teacher, professor, preacher, or snake oil salesman. Using the absolute order as stipulated by the unmodified rules of PEMDAS the answer is 8, Teacher gets an F.
@terryjohinke8065
@terryjohinke8065 6 дней назад
Did it in my head BUT I was a math teacher , like you, for 38 years.
@user-hy9gy9we3e
@user-hy9gy9we3e 6 дней назад
Thank you for your programs. I always need refresher classes. Will you ever go up to Caculus or higher? Thank you. Keep doing what you do. Your manor of teaching is quite clear. Teaching some basic information and examples first will make learning easier for students. I think your "classes" are a great foundation leading to into their first class of algebra.
@tomtke7351
@tomtke7351 6 дней назад
Last lesson WAS calculus
@bigdog3628
@bigdog3628 6 дней назад
rewrite to √64 * 4 [ flip the 1/2 you get 2 and since the other number is also multiply by 2 we can combine and say times 4] √64 = 8. 8 * 4 = 32 super simple no need for calculator or scrap paper.
@frankdeboer1347
@frankdeboer1347 День назад
What is the word you used for the E in PEMDAS? I heard you say it several times but still didn't hear what the word was.
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 6 дней назад
Actually, I learn more than mathematics, when I visit here. One thing for sure. Mr John is an exceptional teacher, not only with great knowledge and experience in math, but also with a whole lot of patience 🙏🏽
@neildickinson6493
@neildickinson6493 День назад
The basic version of the order of operations as in the video is simple enough for a primary school child to use to check they are calculating in the correct order when they are learning the order of operations. From the video it appears that it is too complicated for a maths teacher in the USA to use correctly. The basic version of the order of operations has limitations. If you are dealing with an expression that contains more than three numbers it might not give you the correct answer. The basic version is not used but it does explain the version that is used. The correct answer to 10÷2×5 is 1 The correct answer to ___ √64 ÷1/2×2 is 32 The person in the video appears to have got the correct answer more by luck than an understanding of basic maths. ___ √64 ÷1/2×2 8÷1/2×2 8÷1/4 8÷0.25 32
@alex-qe8qn
@alex-qe8qn 5 дней назад
The method taught to me in Scotland over 65 years ago gives the answer 32; but I think that different countries etc. may have different methods of applying operators - clearly, we need to have universal agreement on operators - and a more liberal use of brackets/parentheses would be sensible.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 4 дня назад
There is universal agreement, at least amongst people who actually understand mathematical notation. It's even defined in an intentional standard. / is the division operator and ÷ should not be used. Using ÷ at all is dubious enough, but using ÷ and / in the same expression is absolutely inexcusable. The correct way to write this, using inline notation, is √64 / (1/2) × 2
@alex-qe8qn
@alex-qe8qn 3 дня назад
@@gavindeane3670 Thank you!
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 6 дней назад
Yes, in order to do well in Math, we shouldn’t be in a rush to get the answer, especially when we are not in a competition or doing a timed exam. Also, it is always nice to be in good spirits for our mental as well as physical health. After all, it is not the end of the world! It is just a simple Math problem.
@LionkingCMSL
@LionkingCMSL 6 дней назад
Whenever I run across a fraction in math I always convert it to its decimal equivalent and go from there. For this problem, I automatically converted 1/2 to .5 and worked from there, knowing when dividing by a positive amount less than one you have to multiply its reciprocal.
@mauriziograndi1750
@mauriziograndi1750 6 дней назад
You are 💯 right because the 1/2 should instead have been (1/2) this changing the division result from 4 to 16.
@mlaiuppa
@mlaiuppa 5 дней назад
That is an excellent way to check answers. The problem being people that can’t do this likely have problems with decimals too.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 4 дня назад
When you divide by ANYTHING you are multiplying by its reciprocal. That's the definition of division. Dividing by 2? That's multiplying by 0.5. Dividing by -100? That's multiplying by -0.01. Dividing by ⅓? That's multiplying by 3. It doesn't just work for positive numbers less than one. It works for ALL numbers, by definition. (Except dividing by zero, which isn't possible precisely because 0 has no reciprocal)
@mauriziograndi1750
@mauriziograndi1750 3 дня назад
@@gavindeane3670 Hi Gavin thanks for the comment.
@robertdeland3390
@robertdeland3390 5 дней назад
You said that 1/2 should be treated as if it is parenthesized. Why? How would I know that? Pemdos doesn't say that.
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 5 дней назад
That's absolutely right. If it to be treated as if it has parentheses, then he should put parentheses around it!! It is inexcusable to leave it ambiguous.
@flummer7
@flummer7 5 дней назад
@@marscience7819 One could argue it is not ambigious but plain wrong notation if you intend 1/2 to be the fraction one half. When written inline 1/2 is not a fraction but simple division thus making the result 8.
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 4 дня назад
@@flummer7 Yes. Exactly. Now try to get the guy making the video understand this
@hectorrafaelbonilla5604
@hectorrafaelbonilla5604 6 дней назад
Thanks!
@iananttila
@iananttila 6 дней назад
I just noted this, you are correct with one major flaw; all square roots have both a positive and negative answer as sqrt64 will be 8 and-8 (I know that WITHOUT a calculator) which leads the final answer to be 32 and -32
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
No, the √ symbol is more precisely defined than that. Yes, 64 has two square roots, but the expression √64 refers to exactly one of those square roots (the positive one). To refer to both square roots you would have to write ±√64. More importantly, the expression doesn't evaluate to 32 at all. It evaluates to 8 (unless you think the ÷ symbol is something other than a simple division operator).
@ludwigr.reindl4146
@ludwigr.reindl4146 6 дней назад
I converted the "1/2" into a decimal and it worked out too.
@marthatamez8698
@marthatamez8698 5 дней назад
1/2 conversion to a number is 0.5
@slm3945
@slm3945 5 дней назад
@@marthatamez8698 Why do you think this should be done first?
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 5 дней назад
According to PEMDAS, that should NOT be done first. It has no parenthesis, and it is not an exponent. You know, the PE in PEMDAS.
@ludwigr.reindl4146
@ludwigr.reindl4146 5 дней назад
@@marscience7819 My error was all too apparent.
@slm3945
@slm3945 4 дня назад
There is no S for Space in PEMDAS. Just ask ChatGPT!
@Ayelmar
@Ayelmar 6 дней назад
Solved in my head at the thumbnail, and using the problem as stated in the title, my answer is c) 32. That's assuming we treat 1/2 as the fraction, evaluating to 0.5. If we treat it as to separate operands, 1 and 2, and using order of operations, the answer would be a) 8. In the first case, SQRT(64) / (1/2) * 2 = 8 / (1/2) * 2 = 16 * 2 = 32. In the second case, SQRT)64) / 1 / 2 * 2 = 8 / 2 * 2 = 4 * 2 = 8.
@francisdelpuech6415
@francisdelpuech6415 6 дней назад
Dividing by a fraction is multiplying by the inverted fraction in this case is multiplying by 2 after getting the square root. A fraction is 2 separate numbers but still has to be treated as a whole
@Ayelmar
@Ayelmar 6 дней назад
@@francisdelpuech6415 exactly. Just as I demonstrated when I showed how I worked out my main answer of 32. However, I also showed how it could be a bit ambiguous as written, especially for those with a computer programming background.
@faireplaymedia7622
@faireplaymedia7622 4 дня назад
PEMDAS Left to right Left to right multiplication and division which ever comes first… In this case going left to right division comes first. The square root of 64 =8 8/ .5 = 16x2=32
@Kualinar
@Kualinar 5 дней назад
It's C, 32 Square root of 64 is 8. Dividing by one half is the same as multiplying by 2, so, 16. Then, multiply be 2 = 32. A few second in my head. I sometimes use PERDMAS instead of PEMDAS. Parentheses, (exponent and radical), (division and multiplication), (addition and subtraction)
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 5 дней назад
As a grandmother, I can’t help sharing the following, which I have learned through living life. My intentions are pure and not to upset anyone. So, please bear with me 🙏🏽 If one stayed above the Earth, and observed from the surrounding universe, our recent activities and behaviors pertaining to this math problem, it must have looked like a devastation from a man-made avalanche. They were not friendly criticisms🥲 Was it really worth? Life is too short! Everything is temporary. We all are going to leave here in no time! Whether we prove our point or not, life on Earth will never be the way we want it to be. Nobody is perfect on this imperfect world. Nobody can make this world perfect how much we try. Life on Earth is only a series of lessons that make us better humans. So, let’s lose our silly pride and move on to our limited future, with compassionate thoughts towards our fellow beings, never leaving room for such shameful events to happen again! Let’s save our vital energies for wholesome activities! “Anger is like grasping a hot coal to strike another; you are the one who is burned first”.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 4 дня назад
Some of us are aware that mathematics has a reputation for being difficult and tricky and unenjoyable, yet it doesn't need to be this way. Some of us are aware that people almost take pride in saying they weren't good at mathematics at school, yet it doesn't need to be this way. And we know just how much those sad situations are the result of what is frankly appalling teaching like this. This guy and other sloppy, incompetent "teachers" like him do, collectively, a lot of completely avoidable harm to their students. So forgive our contempt and disgust. It comes from a fine and honourable place and it is entirely merited. This is not about expecting perfection. It is about not tolerating those who fail to reach even the basic minimum standard. We display an attitude you should welcome and applaud, otherwise you have very messed up priorities indeed.
@kcl9116
@kcl9116 6 дней назад
What would be the result if instead of 1/2 you had 0.5? Similarly, what would be the result if you had 64^1/2 divided by 0.5^1 multiplied by 2^1? How would PEMDAS deal with those integers.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
Exponents are calculated in the E step of PEMDAS.
@maxinemcafee4893
@maxinemcafee4893 6 дней назад
C) 32
@roundtwo3321
@roundtwo3321 6 дней назад
No one ever got the right answer rushing through a math question. Dividing by one half = Multiplying by 2
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 5 дней назад
Not if the division is preceded by other division or multiplication. That's the whole point of PEMDAS, setting a rule so that people don't just decide for themselves what to do first in an expression.
@roundtwo3321
@roundtwo3321 5 дней назад
@@marscience7819 No relation.
@PREGO1966
@PREGO1966 5 дней назад
@@roundtwo3321 you are correct. People read dividing BY 1/2 the same way they read dividing IN half. Not the same folks, they are opposite
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 3 дня назад
​@@PREGO1966Some people might be making that error but that is not what @marscience7819 is saying. You have missed their point completely. The point they are making - quite correctly - is that this notation does not tell us to divide anything by one half. This notation tells us to divide √64 by 1, then divide the result of that by 2, then finally to multiply the result of all that by 2. As written, the expression evaluates to 8, not 32. In the video he is treating the 1/2 as if it was enclosed in parentheses. He is evaluating the expression he meant to write, not the expression he actually wrote.
@fayolivier2416
@fayolivier2416 3 дня назад
I understand how you got the answer but there are no parentheses so it can be confusing
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 6 дней назад
Thank you, Sir! I see that I got confused with the square root sign. I should have just solved left to right.
@francisdelpuech6415
@francisdelpuech6415 6 дней назад
I hesitate too! But a square root as he very well explained it is a fractional exponential and though comes before division and multiplication. Great job!
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 6 дней назад
⁠Thank you soo much. That makes sense neatly! Yes. Square root of 64 is 64^1/2. So, it is an “exponent”, which represents “E” in PEMDAS. After that comes multiplication and division or division and multiplication left to right. 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
@devonwilson5776
@devonwilson5776 6 дней назад
Greetings. 32, absolutely.
@Subcritical96
@Subcritical96 6 дней назад
We will agree to disagree. The answer is 8! For the answer to be 32, the 1/2 must be in parenthesis.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
Absolutely right. But the guy doesn't care. He's done exactly this before and I expect he'll do it again. He's inventing his own personal dialect and aiming it at an audience that will include many people who don't know any better. People who will watch this video and think this is an acceptable way to write.
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 5 дней назад
Yes, or write the 1/2 with a horizontal line instead of a forward slash. The forward slash is ALWAYS to be interpreted as "divide by".
@russelllomando8460
@russelllomando8460 6 дней назад
Got it 32. Easy pemdas thanks for the fun
@bobcarn
@bobcarn 5 дней назад
I initially came up with 32. Square root of 64 is 8, divided by 1/2 is 16, times 2 is 32. But then I thought that there may be a trick and instead of 1/2 (.5), it's 8 divided by 1 then divided by 2, which is 4. So it depends on if you read "1/2" as being one-half, or if you read it as "one divided by 2", in which case you have to perform everything left to right.... divide by 1 then divide by 2. But I'm sticking with 32. Using a division symbol and then switching to a different division symbol would make it a bad way of expressing the formula. ... YAY!
@slm3945
@slm3945 2 дня назад
What difference does it make which division symbol is used? They both require you to divide working left to right. PS: To resolve a fraction, you divide the numerator by the denominator.
@abilioandrade9727
@abilioandrade9727 6 дней назад
8x2x2=32
@danafarrar3583
@danafarrar3583 6 дней назад
32
@innocentodenigbo7284
@innocentodenigbo7284 6 дней назад
Interesting.
@SherriRice48
@SherriRice48 6 дней назад
I say 8 Oops! I did square tooth of 64 is 8 Then divided by 1/2 = 4 × 2 = 8 Though the 1/2 step got me confused ... I forgot the rule of switching Inverting the 1/2 to 2/1= All thanks to my mum n dud selling me out as baby to use me as biblical experiment making my life complicated much like math being complicated due to human error and mistakes of not knowing the order of procreation where mum n dud are suppose to be equipped established ready prepared to sustain maintain themselves n child or children with all that ls needed n required first n foremost before conception. Many dont know money n work is required In the beginning of situation to care provide for child/ children to avoid prevent many things from going wrong. Not to mention, the need for having brains and how to use and apply to life living but that's a whole nother story and video .. Much love n blessings to all and remember to have it together before pro creating another human being is what mathematics comes down to
@photographedemode
@photographedemode 6 дней назад
8 divided by .5 X 2 = 32, thank you
@jonathangoss396
@jonathangoss396 3 дня назад
We always used BODMAS. Nice and simple 😊
@jimmcdiarmid7308
@jimmcdiarmid7308 6 дней назад
Whats the point?
@mlaiuppa
@mlaiuppa 5 дней назад
32. It’s order of operations and how to multiply and Divide with fractions. This is sixth grade math.
@berylkimpton8560
@berylkimpton8560 6 дней назад
Using PEDMAS this is correct 💯.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
Unless you think that the ÷ symbol is something other than a division operator, then PEMDAS gives you the answer 8 here.
@KW-gb9cd
@KW-gb9cd 6 дней назад
Before watching the video: √64 ÷ 1/2 × 2 = 8 × 2 × 2 = 8 × 4 = 32. No need to muck it up with Pemdas.
@kjellg6532
@kjellg6532 6 дней назад
Congrat! You used order of operation to reach this answer!
@jhenshaw102
@jhenshaw102 6 дней назад
You're still using PEMDAS, order of operations. Gotta muck it up a little because if you started with (1/2) x 2 = 1, you would have (√64) ÷1 = 8.
@josephlaura7387
@josephlaura7387 6 дней назад
c) 32
@MrMousley
@MrMousley 6 дней назад
Square root of 64 divided by 1/2 times 2 8 divided by 1/2 times 2 16 times 2 32
@topkatz58
@topkatz58 6 дней назад
8 × 2 × 2 = 32
@acrobatslimer8878
@acrobatslimer8878 2 дня назад
My answer is a) 8
@rgrinnell
@rgrinnell 6 дней назад
C
@FrankD71864
@FrankD71864 5 дней назад
I plugged into my calculator and got 16. I typed in the square root of 64 divided .5 times 2 equals 16
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 4 дня назад
Are you sure? Exactly what did you enter into your calculator?
@bw9538
@bw9538 6 дней назад
He should make the problem more direct because the way he wrote it makes the method he used to solve really convoluted and not actually solvable the way he is saying is the correct way
@berylkimpton8560
@berylkimpton8560 6 дней назад
I mean the nice maths man👍☺️
@lovettwimberlysr.8355
@lovettwimberlysr.8355 5 дней назад
4
@connorpattinson93
@connorpattinson93 5 дней назад
8.
@donwatson8555
@donwatson8555 6 дней назад
8
@PrebenMunter
@PrebenMunter 5 дней назад
So if I have a car and my distance pr sec is 28 m (~ 100 km/h). I know it can accelerate to this speed in 5 sec. Calculate acceleration! 28÷1 gives speed 28÷1/4 must then give acceleration. According to you acceleration is 112 m/s² - ridiculous! Much larger than acc due to gravity. Correct answer is of course 7 m/s².
@Ca_milo_G
@Ca_milo_G 6 дней назад
c
@mahamunibalakrishnan8263
@mahamunibalakrishnan8263 6 дней назад
C. 32
@samswift4921
@samswift4921 6 дней назад
16
@DayanandPandey-ns5qc
@DayanandPandey-ns5qc 6 дней назад
C-32
@nixxonnor
@nixxonnor 6 дней назад
When you add ambiguity and different kinds of division/fraction you have designed a mess on purpose.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
I think it is on purpose. Last time he did exactly the same error in one of his videos, it generated far, far more comments than he normally gets. I suspect he's doing this deliberately to generate engagement on his RU-vid channel, and he knows full well, and doesn't care, that it's at the expense of his students.
@SodalisUK
@SodalisUK 6 дней назад
As written the formula is confusing as to whether 1/2 represents the number 0.5 or the partial formula 1 divided by 2. If you assume that / is the same as ÷ then the answer is 8 - if you assume that the 1/2 represents a number then the answer is 32.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
If you think that ÷ is a division operator then / absolutely is the same as ÷. Because / certainly is a division operator. That's part of the basic definition of the language of mathematical notation.
@SodalisUK
@SodalisUK 5 дней назад
@@gavindeane3670 "1/2" (three separate characters) is different to using either "½" (single character) or the number 1 directly over a bar over the number 2 (which I can't type but you know what I mean. In this specific case, the video says "sqrt(64) ÷ 1 / 2 x 2" which SHOULD be read as "divided by one, then divided by 2 then multiplied by 2". If they wanted to indicate ½ then they should have used the single unicode character or shown it as 1 vertically over a bar vertically over a 2 - but they didn't.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
​@@SodalisUK I completely agree. I was really just suggesting that this bit should be the other way around: "if you assume that / is the same as ÷" / is a defined symbol in mathematical notation so there's no scope for considering it to have any different meaning. It means division. The only symbol here that you can potentially play around with the meaning of to get an answer other than 8 is the ÷ symbol, which is not a formally defined symbol.
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 5 дней назад
Yep, you are absolutely correct.
@leoclayboss7215
@leoclayboss7215 5 дней назад
A - 8
@merrigalebeddoes1921
@merrigalebeddoes1921 5 дней назад
C; 25
@perssoh11
@perssoh11 6 дней назад
NEVER ever use different symbols for division. If you used / only the anwer is 8.
@sawdust2556
@sawdust2556 6 дней назад
Yay!❤
@johnnyragadoo2414
@johnnyragadoo2414 6 дней назад
32, but this is why parenthesis not required by PEMDAS law are not a bad idea. 1/2*2 is ambiguous. Is it 1 / 2*2, or is it 1/2 * 2? If the typesetting used a horizontal bar for the division, the ambiguity would disappear. If an equation is passed around, sometimes typeset in Latex, sometimes scrawled on the back of an envelope, meaning may not survive.
@antilogism
@antilogism 6 дней назад
Using the slash, which often indicates division in programming, to fake a bar can make it rough. I see "sqrt(64) / 1 / 2 * 2" and "sqrt(64) ÷ 1 / 2 * 2" as very different too.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
​@@antilogismThe / symbol doesn't just often indicate division in programming. The / symbol IS the division operator in mathematical notation. ÷ is not a proper mathematical symbol at all. The only way that √64 ÷ 1 / 2 × 2 and √64 / 1 / 2 × 2 are not the same is if you treat the ÷ symbol as something other than a simple division operator.
@antilogism
@antilogism 5 дней назад
@@gavindeane3670 Thanks. I ususly just use ÷ (\div) in the rare instance I don't set up as a fraction. Rare meaning once or twice ever? Using LaTeX is pretty rare for me anyway. I was just skimming AMS style guide and I didn't see either one. The TUG manual uses \div in their examples.
@marscience7819
@marscience7819 5 дней назад
1/2*2 is not ambiguous because of PEMDAS. It's why PEMDAS exists. It will evaluate to 1. 1 / 2*2 and 1/2 * 2 is identical to 1/2*2 because a "space" is not an accepted operator in math. Sure, in your own mind you can give it meaning, but other folks would not necessarily see it the way you do. That's why we have to be very precise in what we accept as operators, and a space just isn't an accepted mathematical operator.
@johnnyragadoo2414
@johnnyragadoo2414 5 дней назад
@@marscience7819 Sigh. Someone typesets a horizontal line. Above the line is a 1. Below the line is 2*2. Someone else decides that's a beautiful thing and includes it in a letter to his Dear Aunt Sally. Without Mathjax, It should be typed as 1/(2*2) - but is it not interesting that pemdas would require parentheses in the one situation and not the other? If you want to prosecute pemdas crimes, by all means withhold parentheses. If you don't want the bridge to collapse under you, shake loose an occasional "unneeded" parenthesis or two. Your buggy compiler with thank you! 🙂
@lamper2
@lamper2 6 дней назад
32? before watching YAY!
@mollyjonesreacts
@mollyjonesreacts 5 дней назад
This is not hard. Parentheses, Exponential, then all divisions & multiplications from left to right. Finish with all additions & subtractions from left to right. Many people don’t get how division with a fraction gives you a larger number than you initially had & for anyone stuck here, I recommend a practical example FIRST.
@flummer7
@flummer7 5 дней назад
Not hard but just wrong, as the notation is written answer is 8. Problem is wrong notation. When written as 1/2 you do not divide by a half, in this expression as wrtiten we would first divide by 1 and next divide by 2. In inline notation 1/2 always means 1 divided by 2. If it is intended to mean divided by the fraction one half, we must either write (1/2) or use correct fraction notation.
@nickfraser4599
@nickfraser4599 5 дней назад
This is someone fixated on semantics. Like the proper way to say something. In short a formula means something! What it means is not clear. Use the python REPL and you would get the answer but even if you get it "right" the question remains: what does it represent. Formulas represent something. Furthermore, whoever arrived at the formula may yet have written it out incorrectly. You don't need PEMDAS unless you are trying to learn by rote. And I seriously advise against that approach if you wish to understand.
@justanotherguy469
@justanotherguy469 День назад
Enough PEMDAS, give us something else. The answer is A.8. Edit: More PEMDAS please. I got it wrong.
@dianelewis7469
@dianelewis7469 6 дней назад
😀😃 i got it right 32
@RS-Amsterdam
@RS-Amsterdam 6 дней назад
Do you want a balloon
@kenmatheson5794
@kenmatheson5794 5 дней назад
in my head...32?
@jithe3rd
@jithe3rd 3 дня назад
32?
@panlomito
@panlomito 6 дней назад
V64 = 8 8 / ½ = 8 x 2 = 16 16 x 2 = 32 so answer A 🤪
@user-gv4cx7vz8t
@user-gv4cx7vz8t 6 дней назад
@@panlomito ...so answer C! Don't drop the ball so late in the game lol.
@panlomito
@panlomito 6 дней назад
@@user-gv4cx7vz8t I hate these multiple choice answers so I like to sabotage them.
@user-gv4cx7vz8t
@user-gv4cx7vz8t 6 дней назад
@@panlomito You win a silly prize, then.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
​​@@user-gv4cx7vz8tExcept answer a (and d) is actually correct.
@kristendelaney5196
@kristendelaney5196 4 дня назад
Yeah, leave it to the internet, but these are some of the dumbest questions in math. Indeed, you need to be careful with syntax when coding, for instance, but being intentionally ambiguous (for instance using both a division sign and a slash for a fraction) is begging mis-interpretation and a 'gotcha' answer. Leave mere semantics and conventions to those who need the precision to code, to Algebra I students, and all the rest who who can't do math.
@ken71671
@ken71671 6 дней назад
could have been explained in 3 minutes.
@kevingeier3385
@kevingeier3385 6 дней назад
C is 32
@greenmanofkent
@greenmanofkent 6 дней назад
I do not agree with your answer. You are NOT dividing by 1/2. The 1/2 is not in parentheses. the "/" is the same as division, so it has the same precedence as the division sign. The sqrt(64) is done first, we all agree with that. So we have: 8 divided by 1 = 8. 8 divided by 2 = 4. Then 4 multiplied by 2 = 8. IMO the answer is a).
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 6 дней назад
@@greenmanofkent Square root of 16 = 8 8 divided by 1/2 means, 8 x 2 = 16 (You have to multiply 8 by the reciprocal of 1/2, which is 2) Then, multiply 16 by 2. The answer is 32. (I think you were a little bit confused at the step of dividing by the fraction 1/2. When we divide by a fraction, we have to multiply by the reciprocal of the fraction. Hope you got it now. 😇)
@Sukrutwastaken
@Sukrutwastaken 6 дней назад
Bro I'm 13 and I got 32
@johantj
@johantj 6 дней назад
No one in their right mind divides anything by 1. It’s completely useless. This is why PEMDAS sucks. And multiplying something with a half is also very rare when you can simply divide by 2.
@therapidone
@therapidone 6 дней назад
Suppose the 1/2 were written as 0.5? The answer is 32 (8 divided by 0.5 = 16; 16 X 2 = 32)
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 6 дней назад
@@therapidone ​​⁠ Yes! If the 1/2 is written as 0.5, it also works 👏🏽 Isn’t that great? Sometimes, there is more than one correct way to do problems!
@ulyssesgrant1781
@ulyssesgrant1781 6 дней назад
A
@leetucker9938
@leetucker9938 6 дней назад
I dont have a calculator
@lant7123
@lant7123 6 дней назад
Yes, you do. *pats their head*
@user-jj3hi3gh4u
@user-jj3hi3gh4u 6 дней назад
C easy
@niranjanchakraborty1139
@niranjanchakraborty1139 6 дней назад
Ans=32. √64÷1/2×2=8×2/1×2=32.
@GirGir183
@GirGir183 6 дней назад
It all depends on how you interpret an expression or equation. If u want 2 use pemdas, then you get one result. Otherwise, you might get another one.
@jvebarnes
@jvebarnes 4 дня назад
1/2 x 2 = 1 square root of 64 is 8 8 divided by 1 = 8
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 4 дня назад
You've solved it as if there were parentheses around the (1/2×2).
@jvebarnes
@jvebarnes 3 дня назад
@@gavindeane3670 No I solved it using the rule for multiplication first the way I was taught in school.
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 3 дня назад
​@@jvebarnesIf you were doing that then surely you would have done 2×2 = 4 first, then the divisions, and got a final answer of 2.
@louabney
@louabney 5 дней назад
Folks, it's a waste of time from a troll. The answer depends on the precedence of the operators. Is this an infix, prefix, or postfix notation? It's ambiguous. Don't give the troll your time
@fredmertz1791
@fredmertz1791 2 дня назад
No. It's not ambiguous.. It is clearly 32. Maybe you should pay attention..
@seesee61
@seesee61 6 дней назад
Learn a lot from you... but please pick up the pace, and try not to digress so much... This video is twice as long as it needed to be...
@SarahThor-ht4qy
@SarahThor-ht4qy 6 дней назад
Dear TabletMath Table: God would like you to know that I would like to correct my answer I did yesterday on the slope problem video of yours, because I made a mistake and wrote my answer was a four. The correct answer is two, because that is the ratio of the vertical point over the horizontal point! The x axis is a given two; I solved for the y axis by plugging in the two and raised it to the power of two, and I got a four for y! In addition, God would like you to know that I got eight for my answer to this problem on your video, because the square root of sixty four is eight. I divided eight by one half and I got a four. Then, I multiplied the dividend by two and I got eight for the product! In the name of Jesus Christ, Amen! Sincerely, God and Sarah Thor-ht4qy
@donwood9358
@donwood9358 6 дней назад
It seems like you pull quotations for the different things out of your rear. I’ve done this problem in my head come out with 8. I need to understand why you put the half in brackets
@IvarHyngstrom
@IvarHyngstrom 5 дней назад
Please change careers. The answer is A and D. You wrote the equation in a sloppy manner. If you wanted the answer to be 32 then it was your responsibility to put parentheses around the (1/2). Please correct this video as you are misleading your “students”
@normanmunns4743
@normanmunns4743 6 дней назад
I 100,% disagree. No brackets so 8 ÷ 2 x one half. Answer = 8 Always multiply and divide before add and subtract if no brackets
@gavindeane3670
@gavindeane3670 5 дней назад
Are you interviewing this as 8 / 2 × 0.5 How are you doing that???
@osgubben
@osgubben 6 дней назад
I hate these problems! They are not necessary at all. Just use parentheses😊
@chrisdissanayake6979
@chrisdissanayake6979 6 дней назад
@@osgubben However, the world doesn’t run to please everyone. So, we just have to be contented and work with what is served to us.
@hagaygodovanik4334
@hagaygodovanik4334 6 дней назад
Just put [()]
@luzlambert296
@luzlambert296 6 дней назад
8 is the answer
@user-gi3vx7wr6q
@user-gi3vx7wr6q 6 дней назад
Half of 64 is 32 half of 32 is 16, 16 x 2 = c32
@lant7123
@lant7123 6 дней назад
You got the right answer, but that's not actually what's being done, here. You're not taking half of 64.