Starfield vs Fallout 4 - Details and Physics Comparison 

great work!

@@evgenyyurichev Thank you friend 👍

fallout 4 is better and never change .Starfield look like 5$ games

This makes me almost curious about Starfield vs Fallout 3.

clearly starfield has Less of everything. shame

I suspect that Bethesda didn’t add that because water isn’t as present in fallout 4, which takes place on the coast. I admittedly haven’t played star field so take this with a grain of salt. Not trying to justify it in any way, frankly the fact this happened at all is ridiculous, but it at least explains why it happened

Actually it’s like that because you can’t go underwater. It wouldn’t make sense for your character to go under from the fall but not able to on his/her own so they cut it completely that was if you’re in 1st person you don’t see that

Its for stealth reasons

I used a power on Neon and on one of the disciples and they floated off the map and fell into the water, so I had to jump down there to kill ‘em but that’s when I noticed the water issue 🥲

I'm pretty sure you single handedly caused the "most replayed" section on this video.

Lmfao no it doesn’t even come close to Starfield’s physics

@@koolthing2135theyre pretty much neck n neck, edge to fo4 honestly…😂🥱

​@@koolthing2135rider

​You're right, Fallout 4 actually better in a lot of respects. ​@@koolthing2135

@@koolthing2135did you even watch the video?

This right here, no one seems to get it. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills, cause barely anyone brings this up.

Because Gamebryo. Gamebryo never changes

What are you referring to?

@@Kyle-nm1kh underwater swimming, dismemberment of enemies (guts, gore, and blood), nudity, branching story elements based off choices, seamless non load screen travel/exploration, those are just a few I could think of off the top of my head.

@@woodchuck83Laziness. Game developers are not the same anymore and everyone should be skeptical about buying games from day 1.

Nah it doesnt look good in comparison to other modern games. Starfield is barely an improvement over F4 thats why

It's the artstyle. Even Oblivion looks good today imo (except the faces). Their games have always been artstyle over graphics.

It does, even you can install unofficial HD retextures pack@@1vaultdweller

Starfield is Fallout with nextgen texture pack.

@@1vaultdwellernice cope buddy 🤡

everyone misses this i expected it to be in the game due to the PEGI 18 rating.

Luckily mods are a thing

@@STRYKER1467 There's a couple missions with people turned into skeletons but that's about it. Even if it was just the jetpack explosion blowing them to bits, that would be great.

Something must have hapenned because on the trailers you could even see gore in what looked like an Argos extractors accident with the cutter, Also when they show one of the shotguns there was gore, i don't know why they didn't ask Todd this the other day

to me, gore in fallout is an artistic choice, unlike in skyrim and starfield, fallout is pretty much set in a lawless, brutal world, its either you or him, killing and murdering, canabalism, anything that is evil have no consequences. Thus having gore is a good choice and common. meanwhile Skyrim, Starfield, they are not a lawless world, You have civillization, different culture, you are just exploring rather than trying to survive. So not having gore does kinda make sense. but im certain after a while, you will get shit ton of mods, gore mod, complete planet that is fallout, hell maybe even nirn will be modded in

I find planets to be inconsistent. I once visited a moon that ACTUALLY looked like photo realistic with the distant sun and long shadows. I was in awh. But then I went showy planet and looks like special edition skyrim lol. This happens all over the game, some planets and environments look breathtaking and some look like Skyrim or Fallout or even worse. Regardless as a whole I’m still pretty impressed with what they were able to accomplish with starfield.

Next gen ??? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

4k texture doesn’t mean "Next Gen" lol

@@sozkev9762 idk bro the game looks pretty “next gen” a lot of the time on Xbox series x. My only real complaints are the flickering and Aliasing along with 30fps. The actual environments looks really gorgeous .

​@@ashtondillard6906lol no,it doesn't

yeah but who cares 😂 aint no way a person would spend hours shooting the water.

​​@@geraldwiedemann2126todd somehow compared it to rdr2 lmao

@@geraldwiedemann2126 it's embarrassing to even look at the water, let alone to shoot at or swim through it. Not that I think water looks particularly good in any Bethesda game, but in this game it seems like a direct downgrade from fo4 (and even Skyrim had better splashing imo). It's about attention to detail and having an interactive environment, not whether the player spends hours doing it.... Like I don't spend hours shooting at walls either, but I still like to see a bullet hole appear when I do shoot a wall. It's fine if your standards don't require that attention to detail to enjoy the game; but that lack of detail stacks up to be an unimpressive release. It's attention to detail that creates immersive world spaces, and this game is missing a lot of attention to detail that prior BGS games had.

really is

​@@geraldwiedemann2126That's not the point. Man, you gamers are idiots smh

But they did make a great game on the "old" engine and all people do is shit on it for being "bugthesda" and say that they should just use UE5 instesd

Issue is more with the designers rather than the engine imo. (look at new Vegas or mods)

It is not great dude, is good in maximum capacity @@harrasika

It's the same engine

Fallout 4 is a very small game. Starfield is Like 1000X bigger than every Games From Bethesda combined. Of course they needed other priorities

Yeah, maybe the helmet is the cause of the haziness in Starfield, but it seems that even without a helmet, Fallout 4 looks better in many aspects.

And will likely run better

​@@ChrisLittonnah it's actually the opposite just player it on my Xbox fallout 4 crashes every 39 mins or everytimes when big kaboom happen other the other hand starfield only the frame drops but comes back fast

I love fallout 4 but I do think starfield is better, the game will be next level In a year

@@ChrisLitton yeah try explore downtown boston. XD

I think Starfield development started ages ago, even before Fallout 4, that may explain why it's so shitty, and worse than Fallout 4. Elders Scrolls 6 on the other hand, would be newer. I wouldn't expect a huge improvement anyway, considering they are using the same engine.

Most sensible people were worried about Fallout 4 before it came out. You are VERY late to the party

Elder scrolls 6 is going to be dumpster fire by the looks of how starfield is. The creative engine 2.0 is massively outdated and unoptimized.

I was concerned with the Elder Scrolls series after seeing how Skyrim turned out. Graphically, each one has improved. But each title that comes out loses more and more of the soul of the series.

If you want to play a good RPG wait for Gothic remake, it will be ready in late 2024. It would much better then tes 6

but it didnt. walking in open worlds is so fun but its because its a land area not a whole planet or solar system.😂 I bet it would be boring to travel for hours.

Lol here comes the nostalgia biased videos/comments. First fallout 4 was trash now its the best game ever.

​@@nicholasgronewold3217first bethesda before I made good games and starfield is at the level of Fallout 76 console war

Fallout New Vegas is best.

I think bethesda add those 1000 worlds in because their trying to set this game up to be the next minecraft. The thing is that only works if your game engine isn't janky.

The water come from Oblivion

i swear to god the game had a massive improvement. also one of the nicest comunities.

@@Just-A-Clown111 The game is improved now, but that doesn't change the fact that Bethesda released an absolute turd for nothing but a cash grab. If they really cared they would have delayed the game until it was properly finished, but they choose to scam their customers. Still don't understand why anyone would fanboy for Bethesda at this point, you'd have to have rocks in your head.

@@Just-A-Clown111 That's like saying I got hit to the head by the waiter in a restaurant with a baseball bat but he brought me nice meal afterwards.

You KNOW that very day SOMEONE will say "Fallout 76 Was Much Better" THAT! That right there is when we all know the gaming industry has fallen The only Strong title game that makes waves is DOOM right now. Imagine Fallout 5 with THAT type of gore!? It would almost be unmatched 😂

​@@joedollarbiden9823Patch Update lol 😆 Fresh fries are DLC

If it makes you feel better, Starfield's prehistoric engine runs like ass even on the best GPU and CPU combo on the market today.

@@Fucklesticks thats why we shouldnt care or run for the new GPU. There are SO MUCH better running and looking games out there

And i played F4 on GTX 750 2GB (non ti) and i worked pretty good ! Not on lowest for sure

@@Fucklesticks They created Creation Engine 2. It's not running on a prehistoric engine

@@williams00 Looks worse than Fo4 😂

Yeah. I've been noticing a trend of reduced environmental interactivity in games for years now. It's not just Bethesda, it's most of the industry, but particularly in the AAA space. In Fallout 3 (and by extension New Vegas) NPC's react to having a gun pointed at them or one being fired near them. Even in Skyrim NPCs will react to you having a weapon drawn or spell ready, and guards will confront you verbally if you cast spells in a town. So like you say, we know they _can_ do this stuff. They're just cutting corners.

Especially since it’s the same engine too, and modders have used the FO4 creation kit to mod starfield so it hasn’t changed much if at all, which means even if they didn’t want to spend time remaking it they could just paste it in from their old games

Nah, that tells me that most gamers are just too focused on graphics. The gameplay is the important factor, not some water details that you'll only look at once for a few seconds and then go back to doing side quests or whatever. It's appreciated, but not a damn necessity. When something like Starfield is an insanely massive game, some things (like water details) are expected to be less prioritized cuz they hardly matter which brings a massive issue in this industry. Game devs prioritize graphics & details over gameplay so they can generate more sales.

Bullshit. The only important thing is the content people are playing your game for. Starfield has that content, if you’re complaining that the water doesn’t splash in the way you want it to then why the fuck did you buy the game? To play it or to do random shit like this for no reason? The detail went into the lore, the stories and the settlements, the important places, why bother wasting development efforts on things that people will barely see. The funny thing is Fallout 4 barely had enough content compared to other BGS games, because they changed their focus, Starfield has way more stuff to do, way more interesting side quests, but no you’d have preferred them to take focus from there and instead make the water splash more….. Absolutely ridiculous…

@@VolaticWolf LOL, starfield's cost 700m dollars, and they haven't make a realistic water. AAAAAND

@@sarychevmaxim907 the cost of how much a game takes to develop doesn't mean it will have the most realistic water. Sometimes graphics aren't the most important thing in the games industry? Not all developers perhaps are focused on making the best graphics? Have a think about that

@@zKingsKiller Well that's how you feel and not how I feel. Personally, I buy the game for the gameplay. I personally don't think that water quality ruins my experience. Sure a better water quality would be appreciated, but I'm also fine without it. Stunning and next generation graphics are not just simply important to me. Used to be, but not anymore

Not only took longer but cost more. Fallout 4 cost 150 million to make and was developed in 7 years.

I guess they try to improve graphics at the cost of reducing existing features (performance issues), I don't understand why most gamers seem to prefer better graphics and lighting over a fun and rich gameplay... However lately games dont even have top notch graphics or polished gameplay features.

@@lmeza1983 I agree and I believe this is partially the fault of their engine as well. Fun and rich is subjective but Bethesda games in true nature do not allow you to shoulder swap for whatever reason or provide a FOV slider. Basic functions that a massive company like Bethesda shouldn't struggle with, yet do somehow. This is objectively bad and lazy especially for a major company like Bethesda. Plenty of games were released this year (2023) that provide A1 graphics and optimization to their already addictive gameplay and are no where near the size of Bethesda studios. Gunfire games (Remnant II) Larian Studios (Baldurs Gate 3) Mundfish (Atomic Heart). just to name a few AAA studios need to stop getting slack for the slop they are throwing out when the under dogs are out here not only outperforming but undercharging. A trend we should be supporting instead of this copy + paste method from bigger studios or worse, "early access".

Enjoy the AAAA experience

The game is good if you do not spend 70 dollars like me for early access

@GameLight unfortunately I bought the premium edition and I played too much to get a refund

@@JayTsTech I understand you perfectly, I have a Game Pass for a year, but I had to buy it to shoot a video.

@GameLight undate: I told steam that this game should be called loading screen simulator and they gave me all $105 back

@@JayTsTech 🤣 Happy for you friend, there are people who played 30 hours and were able to return the money. I'll take a look too 😉

STFU with the excuses for them making an incomplete game!

@@heavydynamics8128 he literally said "that's not their get out of jail free card" and he complained about how janky Skyrim was. I don't think this guys defending anything lmao calm your tits

@@heavydynamics8128 learn to read.

@@jamesmeldrum4563 Reading is too scary. He saw lots of words and got angry.

@@sweet.chickens damn you really roasted this angry guy xD

LOL you gotta be kidding

There def an improvement

Not to mention the sounds. SFX team went crazy

Agree, the gunplay is definately a big improvement to the fo4 mess

@@sonderbain I think the gunplay in FO4 was decent, just the gun animations were kinda ugly and boring. And most of the guns were downright hideous.

mods will fix that

yes i want gore back !!

@@cangikawowshouldn’t need mods to make a game decent

@@athejbaka7084 indeed, but tis is bethesda they make games for the modders to fix

@@cangikawow “this game is great bro just download this pack of 280 mods first”

Same

You think they will!? God I hope so.. it'll make F4 leagues better

too bad the firing animation is repeated without variations. looks so dumb

You should buy your self a pair of glasses

The green bar is on the second rank of demolition expert

its a mod

You can do that in Fallout 4 too

​@@DREIKVENONWskyrim and oblivion too

Its called optimization. Which they fail to do.

who's laughing now

I extensively played Starfield and theres no f**kin way its a 7/10, easily 9/10 at the minimum you loser! Lol but seriously, 7/10 is nothing to get upset about. That's a pretty decent score coming from someone that's got over 200 hours in it.

I know your comments is old but! That’s crazy 😭 7/10 is still good

ill probably just pirate it....

​@@vadim6656same here. I don't need to spend money. 😂

@@chronolynx360 see you on the high seas captain!

Yep, it's (not) just the engine, look what modders did with Skyrim, mods transformed into totally different game. Bethesda is just lazy. Even in Skyrim and Oblivion NPCs had daily routines (something that even Gothic2 had, not to mention games like KCD): go to work ->go eat -> go sleep etc etc while in Starfield most named NPCs just stand in one place 24/7 with 1 or 2 idler animation (sweeping the floor with a 'space' broom). It's not stagnation, it's regression.

Dedication? Yeah, the devs of RDR2/GTA Vlost lots of sleep and the crunch impacted their personal lives immensely. Rockstar also had like 1500 people working on their new games too. Bethesda is substantially smaller, and you almost never hear about their working conditions being poor. The engine situation is definitely the problem, but if you switch to unreal, the performance likely takes a massive hit. Bethesda's engines are incredibly unique in how they handle their worlds.

I played the main story. Screwed around for abit did some side missions, got bored and then deleted it lol😂 Meanwhile all the fallouts, and skyrim I played for weeks when they came out, without getting bored. And I still go back to them

I don’t like that Dickpick system.

I still don't fully understand how you actually guarantee success. I start by trying to clear the rings with the most slots first and that seems to work most of the time.

@@daco9464 dick-pics are overrated

I always read it like dick pic 😂😂😂

​@@TeddingtinYou can align the picks with the inner circles before unlocking the outer ones. This way you can easily solve the mini game in your head and when you know it's right, actually pick the locks

If you somehow find fetch quests entertaining then Fallout 4 is a great game yeah.

@@Badookum Well, in general, I meant that in comparison with Starfield, Fallout 4 is not such a bad game, although there are enough good quests in F4.

Me too!

@@alpagliari :)

Not buying it until it's 20€. Morrowind I got 2 CD offer with a GPU at the time, Oblivion had a perfectly working DVD copy without cracks, only bought it later at 3 €, same for all the games, the most expensive was Fallout 76 and ESO 10€ both the worst games they made.

Its a nice game but everyones knows totk is the goty

@@mfegs_nope Baldur Gate 3 is

@@Bedbug451 bro baldurs gateisnt better thant totk (probably is but i dont like classic medieval fantasy)

@@mfegs_ classic medieval fantasy and post apocalypse are clearly the best game genres, no counterargument

Fallout 4 did beat Witcher 3 at DICE and BAFTA game of the year, Starfield can win some this year since it's not like there is only one GOTY award.

RDR2 was a masterpiece. FO4 is a good game, but was outdated the day it released just like Starfield

@@shammons556 To me

@@Zargex Did you even play FO3 or FO:NV? or for that matter Oblivion or Skyrim? Bethesda games just keep getting worse, not better

sure, but I hope my armor penetrating rounds would at least crack a display case... /s

They haven't been actually developing it for 25 years. They just wanted to make it for that long. It's a marketing thing

@@hoodironyyy I mostly figured.

In Starfield it also seems like everything is made of plastic... And there are quite a few times where the light is very poorly managed and the effects are absent, it gives even more of this impression of superficiality and it's not credible

​@@nawack2774I feel the plastic argument in Starfield only applies to New Atlantis. Futuristic clean cities in gaming always manage to look like plastic.

thats not true fallout 4 looks great, and also consider we are comparing 2015 vs 2023, theres an 8 YEAR GAP

@@Just-A-Clown111 and fallout 4 looks like a 2008 game

You can mod the textures and lighting for Fallout 4 and it looks similar to Starfield. Not *quite* as good but it's damn close, which says a lot.

Definitely, a couple more videos will be released related to Starfield 😌

Not to mention the fallout 4s game is modded so this is not a fair comparison at all.

Probably not but morons are going to keep buying this trash

I'm starting to think he doesn't play games. He's just the talking head.

It just works.

Gta San Andreas doesn't have entire systems to explore and multiple planets

empty planets@@impairedtrout6917

​@@impairedtrout6917That's a poor excuse 😅

​@@impairedtrout6917too bad it's just a bunch of small square procedurally generated landscapes with all repetitive content

You just don’t like the game so you don’t feel anything towards it , simpso

​@@broughton1835No no really, I agree with him. There are games that I don't like but I can recognize that they have an identity, a personality, and I can see how other people might like them. Like a BG3 for example, it's not at all my style of game and if I played it I would certainly be bored, but the game has its personality and I can see the qualities. Starfield on the contrary is a type of game that should please me, but that's not the case, and honestly I've seen very few other games have any soul like it, it's ultra bland and generic everywhere, in addition to being terribly not immersive

let me guess you dont like fallout 3/ NV or 4?@@nawack2774

Completely disagree. After playing the game, you just sound ridiculous imo.

Fallout 4 >>>>>> midfield

Живём в эпоху лени и бездарности, предзаказать за 70$ не забудь.