Тёмный

Starliner Is Not Coming Back....Having Serious Problem Again! 

Space Trends
Подписаться 40 тыс.
Просмотров 188 тыс.
50% 1

Starship's Realistic model on Amazon: amzn.to/45vOJ0U
Boeing never seems to get it right. For years, they have been developing the Starliner spacecraft, a project that was supposed to be operational years ago. But they faced constant delays and hurdles, so much so that everyone got frustrated with them and started to believe that the spacecraft would never become fully usable. However, in 2024, they appeared very dedicated to making up for their constant delays by launching a successful crewed mission to the International Space Station. Yet again, they faced many problems. They planned to launch the crew multiple times, but issues kept cropping up, forcing them to abort the missions. Most recently, they were dealing with a helium leak. After a few days, they decided the issue was not serious, and they were able to launch the astronauts to the International Space Station despite the problem.
But now, that same problem seems to have returned to haunt them, and we are going to talk about it in this video. Before delving into the details, please make sure to subscribe to our channel for future updates about this spacecraft and many more.
Boeing's Starliner spacecraft has faced many delays and challenges since its inception. The project, which was expected to restore America’s ability to launch astronauts into space from U.S. soil, began with high hopes and a significant investment from NASA. In 2014, NASA awarded Boeing a $4.2 billion contract to develop the Starliner as part of its Commercial Crew Program. The goal was to have a reliable spacecraft ready by 2017.
The need for a new spacecraft became pressing after the retirement of the Space Shuttle program in 2011. The Space Shuttle had been the backbone of America's human spaceflight capability for three decades, but it faced significant safety concerns. The Challenger disaster in 1986 and the Columbia disaster in 2003, where both shuttles were lost along with their crews.
With the Shuttle program retired, the U.S. faced the uncomfortable reality of relying on Russian Soyuz spacecraft to transport astronauts to the International Space Station. This dependency was not only costly but also politically sensitive. It became clear that America needed to develop its own capability to launch astronauts into space again.
In response, NASA initiated the Commercial Crew Program, an ambitious effort to foster public-private partnerships to develop new spacecraft. Alongside Boeing's Starliner, SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft was also developed as part of this initiative.
SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft has been remarkably successful. The Dragon successfully completed its first crewed mission, Demo-2, in May 2020. This historic flight marked the first time astronauts launched from U.S. soil since the end of the Space Shuttle program.
It has become the most reliable spacecraft for ferrying astronauts to and from the international space station, completing multiple crewed missions without significant issues.
The success of SpaceX, especially, has made people question Boeing's failure to deliver a similar spacecraft, despite receiving almost double the amount of money from NASA.
However, the mission was cut short due to multiple software issues that prevented the spacecraft from reaching the International Space Station. One of the primary issues was a timer anomaly. The spacecraft's mission elapsed timer was incorrectly initialized due to a software error, causing an 11-hour discrepancy. This error prevented the thrusters from firing at the right time to reach the planned orbit, leading the spacecraft to consume more fuel than expected, which ruled out the planned docking with the space station.
Additionally, during the mission, a valve mapping error was discovered. This issue affected the thrusters in the vehicle's service module, which are responsible for performing a disposal burn after separating from the crew module before reentry. Had this error not been corrected in time, it could have caused a collision between the service module and the crew module, potentially damaging the capsule's heat shield.
Keywords:-
Spacex rocket launch videos,Spacex falcon 9 launch video,spacex super heavyrocket,Super Heavy booster,Super Heavy booster engine fire,spacex fire test,super heavy engine fire,super heavy launch 2022,super heavy sapacex,SpaceX rocket launch,spacex starship,spacex super heavy,spacex,spacex amazing launch,SpaceX vs NASA

Опубликовано:

 

15 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 703   
@JimDog794
@JimDog794 9 дней назад
Send SpaceX Dragon to recover the crew and send Boeing the bill for it.
@Watcher3223
@Watcher3223 9 дней назад
Or, Space-X could send Dragon on the house, a rather classy way of exhibiting superiority over Boeing in that field of aerospace...
@ianforeman4377
@ianforeman4377 9 дней назад
Ether way it’s looking more and more likely
@jeremiahputnam3893
@jeremiahputnam3893 9 дней назад
Why is Starliner even an option? With the success of Falcon and the crap Boeing is shoveling through the doors, this is insanity.
@musk-eteer9898
@musk-eteer9898 9 дней назад
@@Watcher3223 business is business, no free ride.
@Watcher3223
@Watcher3223 9 дней назад
@@musk-eteer9898 It's not necessarily a free ride if it's still being done at Boeing's expense ... whether you give them a bill or a hell of a dose of humility, especially if it emphasizes the point that Boeing is so shit that they can't even bring their own crew back home. Just saying.
@sargonofakad
@sargonofakad 9 дней назад
This is a prime example of how bureaucrats can lead a project into disaster due to their incompetence.
@JW-jl8iq
@JW-jl8iq 9 дней назад
Bureaucrats? explain? Stop the rhetoric
@robertkerr4199
@robertkerr4199 9 дней назад
no. this is diversity, equity, and inclusion eroding all facets of society.
@antonbruce1241
@antonbruce1241 9 дней назад
@@JW-jl8iq "Bureaucrats" does not just apply just to the government, you know. It applies to huge private companies as well. And when a company or a government moves to protect its bureaucrats and its egos more than it does their products....this is what happens.
@owenlaprath4135
@owenlaprath4135 9 дней назад
These are NOT bureaucrats, who ruined the show. It's the damned capitalist profiteer managers of Boeing, and their greased NASA hands! There is a huge difference, but US-Americans for some reason do not know the difference! A real government bureaucrat would have never allowed this thing to take off or even get funding!
@catsupchutney
@catsupchutney 9 дней назад
Aggressive cost cutting resulted in a demotivated workforce and loss of institutional knowledge. Who would have expected that?
@randywalker2554
@randywalker2554 9 дней назад
At least the door didn't fly off
@chrisborey1734
@chrisborey1734 9 дней назад
That’s a good point
@johnwyoder
@johnwyoder 9 дней назад
Not yet.
@JimHurd-tv4fp
@JimHurd-tv4fp 9 дней назад
Yet...
@davebigdog
@davebigdog 9 дней назад
Yet
@jslo819
@jslo819 9 дней назад
My thoughts exactly. Who knows if may have, just don't want to let that out.
@LuciFeric137
@LuciFeric137 9 дней назад
When NASA feels pressured and doesnt want to be humiliated folks get killed.
@maxwellcrazycat9204
@maxwellcrazycat9204 9 дней назад
Challenger.
@j3i2i2yl7
@j3i2i2yl7 9 дней назад
Agreed. Also when NASA is more focused on loyalty to their legacy suppliers than to quality. The Space Shuttle should have been extensively redesigned years befor Chalkenger, but that would have risked their prime contractors contracts. The unmanned NASA programs have been very successful, but the manned programs are too political.
@keithscott1926
@keithscott1926 9 дней назад
Boeing and NASA should not worry about their egos. They need to focus on the safety of the Astronauts. 😡
@sqr2024
@sqr2024 9 дней назад
Oh oh remember the two space shuttle disasters which could have been avoided if NASA thought about safety first.
@Scooterdude01
@Scooterdude01 9 дней назад
NASA lost 17 astronauts, that we know about. That's pretty awful.
@Girdwoodian
@Girdwoodian 9 дней назад
And it's Boeing, so who knows....the door might fall off
@yevgeny79
@yevgeny79 9 дней назад
​@@Girdwoodianif it's Boeing, I ain't Going!
@dennisstoddard2008
@dennisstoddard2008 9 дней назад
And Spacex has had sooo many disasters, so we must stick with Boeing. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@NoahSpurrier
@NoahSpurrier 9 дней назад
It took them longer to build this than it took to design and launch the Space Shuttle.
@thomasackerman5399
@thomasackerman5399 9 дней назад
They didn't take that long. Two Starliners were built from 2014 to 2019. It's just taken this long to fly a crew on them. The Space Shuttle program started with studies as early as 1968 and officially began in 1972. So about up to 13 years between conception and 1st flight while Starliner began in the early 2010s and first flew in 2019 with 1st crew flight in 2024. So roughly about the same time.
@danielarnold9466
@danielarnold9466 9 дней назад
Boeing keeps screwing up and NASA keeps going back. And why launch when you know there is a problem? Doesn't sound like they have much respect for the astronauts.
@user-jj1cp2yh9o
@user-jj1cp2yh9o 9 дней назад
Can't loose face to china that is the real reason .
@stevesummers1354
@stevesummers1354 9 дней назад
Or our tax dollars
@yedidyah-jedshlomoh1533
@yedidyah-jedshlomoh1533 8 дней назад
There are always problems.
@matthewnottelling4395
@matthewnottelling4395 7 дней назад
Politicians, the Bureaucratic Ruling Class and their cut into those Billions of Dollars; living Fat off the working man/woman.
@cbonz7734
@cbonz7734 9 дней назад
It's simple. SpaceX is run by engineers and Boeing is run by bean counters.
@Dennis0824
@Dennis0824 9 дней назад
Correction, Boeing is run by DEI hire bureaucrats.
@Rational_thinker_212
@Rational_thinker_212 6 дней назад
With a combined 44 years working in this industry as active duty military, private contractor, and civil servant; I agree with your statement 100%. I determined early on that the better run more effective organizations selected the best technical personnel with leadership/management abilities and motivation rather than career managers they hoped could learn the engineering part. I believe the whole culture of calling good engineers and scientists nerds and geeks, and lauding falsely they were socially challenged is a myth propounded by those secondary university students that were not academically capable of doing math and science and became marketing, advertising, majors and spent the rest of their somewhat useless lives (convincing others to buy things they don't want or need) making themselves feel better about themselves by berating those that they could never become. These are the ones running things now. What about those that wanted a four year party before having to grow up for which the marketing/advertising thing was a little too much work? They are really liking that student loan forgiveness thing.
@kmech3rd
@kmech3rd 9 дней назад
The neologism "Crewed" and how much it sounds like "Crude" describes Starliner perfectly. This thing is a "shack of sit".
@markcoutts7750
@markcoutts7750 9 дней назад
👁️🤔🫵🏼 meant "Boeing's Flying 🚀🗑️💩😊!!!? I mean, piece of SHIT !!!💩 Too bad for the Astronaut/Actors 👀
@schawo2
@schawo2 9 дней назад
S+
@scoutmaster33
@scoutmaster33 9 дней назад
Never underestimate the power of an experienced defense contractor to double the budget, deliver late, and with poor performance…..Boeing has a lock on incompetence right now but a “diverse” workforce. Coincidence?
@marcmcreynolds2827
@marcmcreynolds2827 8 дней назад
Wrong on both counts. Ever done aerospace engineering? Worked in a group developing aerospace hardware? If you aren't qualified to do it, you aren't qualified to talk about it.
@user-mx6or6oo4w
@user-mx6or6oo4w 9 дней назад
I guess this is why Boeing and NASA picked the two oldest astronauts in the agency to go up in that death trap.
@robertwest2879
@robertwest2879 9 дней назад
Yea, they had to go for a sembelence of experience over DEI
@janices5389
@janices5389 9 дней назад
@@robertwest2879 The only thing DEI does is help HR departments recognize prejudices within the hiring system and on various questionnaires. It in no way stops meritorious hiring; on the contrary it strengthens it by ensuring that ALL candidates for a position are considered fairly. It's not the same as Affirmative Actions in Universities. Don't confuse the two.
@robertwest2879
@robertwest2879 9 дней назад
@@janices5389 The whole system went wrong when hiring changed from a personnel dept to Human Resources....nonsense of a bunch of females involved in the hiring process about areas of expertise they know squat about.
@richardboutin8522
@richardboutin8522 9 дней назад
Yes😂
@yedidyah-jedshlomoh1533
@yedidyah-jedshlomoh1533 8 дней назад
@@janices5389 lol
@johnwhoo6194
@johnwhoo6194 9 дней назад
Nobody was fired?! 7 years delay, billions of dollar over-run, still unsafe to use.
@maxwellcrazycat9204
@maxwellcrazycat9204 9 дней назад
The bigwigs probably had their bonuses increased.
@pocarea512010
@pocarea512010 9 дней назад
Money Laundering is their focus. They realized they can tell us things cost more than they actually cost. The money then DISAPPEARS and they ask for MORE money. When We, The People, start to ask questions they stage a terrorist attack and start a (money laundering) war.
@77142957
@77142957 9 дней назад
A big function of NASA is jobs for Congressional districts. That's why NASA is so expensive. SpaceX has no such ball & chain.
@albertross2322
@albertross2322 9 дней назад
I'm surprised the two astronauts even made it there!
@advertisercommerce6990
@advertisercommerce6990 9 дней назад
and will most likely need SpaceX to bring them home safely.
@johnwyoder
@johnwyoder 9 дней назад
I'll be surprised if they make it back safely.
@chrisantoniou4366
@chrisantoniou4366 9 дней назад
Boeing didn't make the rocket...
@Wes4Trump
@Wes4Trump 9 дней назад
Did it come equipped with jumper cables 😂
@chrisantoniou4366
@chrisantoniou4366 9 дней назад
@@Wes4Trump Yep... but they jumped ship just before launch... 😁
@BlancGivre
@BlancGivre 9 дней назад
The arrogance of Boeing claiming that Bombardier had been unfairly funded by government money for developing the CSeries is astonishing to say the least.
@mikevella2544
@mikevella2544 9 дней назад
They are just jealous they can build a plane that flys
@spanky7160
@spanky7160 9 дней назад
Good job Boeing for adding another module to the ISS. Crew now have a extra little seating area. Probably better that it is stuck to the ISS rather than attempting a re-entry.
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
It's really not good for anything more than a closet. It doesn't even have a rudimentary toilet.
@JamesSwafford-hf9bo
@JamesSwafford-hf9bo 9 дней назад
Boeing should not get any more government contracts for spacecraft.
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
@@JamesSwafford-hf9bo But that would anger the Boeing employees and they wouldn't vote for the people who cut their funds. At this point the sole goal of the whole game is to keep Boeing employees happy, so they keep re-electing the same clowns who gave them the money in the first place.
@coldwarveteran4239
@coldwarveteran4239 9 дней назад
Another example of supporting the too big to fail companies. They just suck up valuable resources.
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
@@coldwarveteran4239 Let's be clear about this and direct our indignation where it belongs. "Too big to fail" is a designation invented by the government (not the company) as an excuse for sending them taxpayer money that they don't deserve. Boeing didn't invent the "too big to fail" scam, they're just good at playing it.
@Scooterdude01
@Scooterdude01 9 дней назад
Musk and SpaceX will rescue them
@MrGchiasson
@MrGchiasson 9 дней назад
NASA should charge Boeing for extended stay on the ISS..like a hotel bill.
@MissilemanIII
@MissilemanIII 9 дней назад
That would be hilarious 🤣
@Scooterdude01
@Scooterdude01 9 дней назад
@@MrGchiasson Bill Nelson needs to surrender the NASA keys to Musk and just walk away
@speckledone8899
@speckledone8899 9 дней назад
Yeah, Boeing won't steal technology to make their stuff work.
@PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars
@PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars 9 дней назад
@speckledone: Boeing can't make an electric fan work these days even with instructions!
@youdodat2
@youdodat2 9 дней назад
Where is the part about them not coming back?
@thefrustratedtheologian6238
@thefrustratedtheologian6238 9 дней назад
Multiple helium leaks
@GroomsmanBuilder
@GroomsmanBuilder 9 дней назад
They were supposed to return on the 14th. Now they say the 22nd. Leaks still not fixed. Doesnt look good for them.
@Jarek13
@Jarek13 9 дней назад
Thanks
@bluedog9935
@bluedog9935 9 дней назад
I think they’re talking about the Starliner itself. I could see the crew coming back on a Crew Dragon at some point. But they may be living on the ISS until they get a chance to come home safely.
@chuckdenure5780
@chuckdenure5780 9 дней назад
He CLICKBAITed everyone. He is not a technical person. He should run for office.
@jayarbe60
@jayarbe60 9 дней назад
You need look no further than the differences between how SpaceX is structured and how Boeing is structured. SpaceX, like Musk’s other companies, has a flat organisation where cooperation between teams and departments is encouraged and failures are seen as opportunities to improve. Boeing, by contrast, is a huge organisation where managers are more concerned about their own little fiefdoms and positions than anything else. Problems are always somebody else’s fault and should be covered up if possible, in case they can be traced back to an individual. It’s the only explanation I can think of for SpaceX’s ongoing success and Boeing’s abject failure. Both have government money but it’s clear that SpaceX spends it wisely while Boeing fritters it away then asks for more…
@SDuapveer11
@SDuapveer11 8 дней назад
Well said
@iandavies4853
@iandavies4853 8 дней назад
But also SpaceX has NASA / spy services as minor customer, not sole. Re-usable Falcon 9 driven by need for ginormous Starlink internet satellite constellation. And in turn mission to Mars - for city of 1 million settlers. Way bigger dreams. Lots of people could dedicate whole lives to realising those dreams. Boeing is kids lemonade stand in comparison.
@jayarbe60
@jayarbe60 8 дней назад
@@iandavies4853 I wouldn’t say Boeing is a lemonade stand but it makes nearly all its money from aviation, not space. As you say, SpaceX is a lot more focused on the job of launching rockets.
@dipaknadkarni62
@dipaknadkarni62 9 дней назад
Maybe Boeing can first fix their problems on their airplanes. Leave space to others. This reminds me of Apollo where my dad (Ph.D. In electrical engineering) sort of said that 1% of the engineers did 99% of the work and 99% of the engineers could not complete the other 1%. Our system with many private, money hungry companies leads to our failure. On the other hand Elon Musk seems to run a tight ship. Let’s go with the best. No more $1K toilet seats, etc. These are lives that we are putting on the line. No one on the ground can even imagine that the astronauts trust their competence.
@MASMIWA
@MASMIWA 9 дней назад
Does Boeing have a systemic cultural problem or management problem? Boeing 737 MAX problems and now the Starliner. Let's hope the Starliner issues don't end in tragedy.
@gordonbergslien30
@gordonbergslien30 9 дней назад
Let's not forget about Goeing's other problem children: the T-7 and the KC-46.
@jeffpeyton3702
@jeffpeyton3702 9 дней назад
"Does Boeing have a systemic cultural problem or management problem?" Yes.
@parajerry
@parajerry 9 дней назад
@@jeffpeyton3702 Government Defense Contractor mindset. Excessive money for half-baked systems that will require 10x more money to eventually get working well enough to claim success. Meanwhile, SpaceX shows what an actual innovative company, without the excessive management layers and reliance on huge never-ending contracts for sub-par hardware, can do. The government pays defense contractors huge amounts of welfare payments knowing the projects will never deliver. Just part of the corruption at all levels of government.
@ad70preterist
@ad70preterist 9 дней назад
Yes they’re woke and DEI heavy, therefore quality is crap.
@thomasboese3793
@thomasboese3793 9 дней назад
All of Boeing's problems started AFTER the last merger. The well-respected name BOEING was kept, and the failing McDonnell Douglas management filled all the leadership positions. I believe I see the problem...
@dkuhlman2282
@dkuhlman2282 9 дней назад
When “bean counters” and MBAs take over a corporation that depends on the safety of its customers the bottom line and shareholder value takes precedence.
@user-km6rh3cv7t
@user-km6rh3cv7t 9 дней назад
It really is time for Boeing to pause and return to the days they were a premier engineering company. Putting people in vehicles designed by MBA's really doesn't make much sense. Hopefully they'll figure all these things out before they fail right out of flight products and move into say, home appliances.
@rickystarduster
@rickystarduster 9 дней назад
oh yes the boeing sound system the one that stops working 5 minutes after you plug it in and blows up after that, or the boeing air purifyer wash the filter and the system dies on you or the boeing vaccum cleaner people say it sucks but it really blows and doesn't suck anything up.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@thomasboese3793
@thomasboese3793 9 дней назад
All of Boeing's problems started AFTER the last merger. The well-respected name BOEING was kept, and the failing McDonnell Douglas management filled all the leadership positions. It is little wonder why Boeing has had such a string of bad luck with everything it has tried to create since the merger. Time for a divorce. Only problem... there is no one left to do the real job of engineering.
@w.knudsen5570
@w.knudsen5570 9 дней назад
People ask me why i quit flying on Boeing aircraft 30 years ago. I miss the days of DC10, L1011 and MD11.
@walterkazban1819
@walterkazban1819 4 дня назад
They were made by McDonnell Douglas....company..along with F4 pham* f101 voodoo no waste of money there...at the time Boeing aired McDonell Douglas they were getting a booster to land on pads.. Then after that never to be heard of again
@joshwebb1493
@joshwebb1493 9 дней назад
I once thought Elon was wrong for only hiring the best of the best and not training people but now I totally understand why Boeing is failing.
@marcmcreynolds2827
@marcmcreynolds2827 8 дней назад
That's SpaceX mythology. "The best" have lots of options, so working crazy hours for a volatile CEO can be far down their wish list. I mentioned SpaceX as a possibility to a job-hunting CalTech grad who lived in the LA area, and they wouldn't even consider it.
@Gh0stDrag0n1
@Gh0stDrag0n1 8 дней назад
Afraid to work...
@marcmcreynolds2827
@marcmcreynolds2827 8 дней назад
@@Gh0stDrag0n1 I didn't say recent grad. Anyway, they ended up staying with their existing employer despite the regular overseas travel that the job had morphed in to (the price of competence, though personally I had a talent for finding some eager beaver to go in my place). SpaceX has obviously done a lot of good things. But they make significant unforced errors as well (e.g. the on-pad second stage explosion), resulting in people with better skills being brought in to clean up the mistakes. Nothing that makes it to RU-vid, however, so in practical terms I suppose it's not part of most people's reality.
@walterheinen5298
@walterheinen5298 9 дней назад
If we put all these missions on the moon, more then 50 years ago, why are we having trouble just getting a moon rocker to work? Interesting.
@ynchin6925
@ynchin6925 9 дней назад
Good question!
@gelf1907
@gelf1907 9 дней назад
American industry and our education system had not been destroyed back then. I am surprised we can even build a rocket anymore.
@pocarea512010
@pocarea512010 9 дней назад
Money Laundering is their focus. They realized they can tell us things cost more than they actually cost. The money then DISAPPEARS and they ask for MORE money. When We, The People, start to ask questions they stage a terrorist attack and start a (money laundering) war.
@guytech7310
@guytech7310 9 дней назад
In the case of Artemis: its a frank'n rocket. Parts from different obsolete vehicles, From Space shutttle engines , to the cancelled Ares rocket. Also NASA is largely a jobs program & congress fight over which states get NASA money.
@GreatUncleBuck
@GreatUncleBuck 9 дней назад
@@guytech7310 Very true. This is going to cause many costly problems down the road.
@robertdonez3420
@robertdonez3420 9 дней назад
Now retired I was an aircraft mechanic for 30 years Lockheed by far was a better aircraft
@maxwellcrazycat9204
@maxwellcrazycat9204 9 дней назад
I always loved the L1011 Tristar. I worked at Atlanta Hartsfield and they were a thing of beauty.
@gravelydon7072
@gravelydon7072 9 дней назад
@@maxwellcrazycat9204 Having flown in one, I'd agree.
@RedPixel2023
@RedPixel2023 9 дней назад
Starliners reliability, durability, cost-effectives, rapid deployment and redeployment, stability and safety and reusability are all X checked fails. The FAA is so nitpicky when it comes to private space industries but for government NASA and its partners they pass with failure standard! How did Starliner got to the ISS with FAA approval of this magnitude when the craft can barely stay afloat This is just a bit closer to the fatal Apollo mission in terms of unreliability and safety!
@richmargin6082
@richmargin6082 9 дней назад
Space X is already years ahead on building a spacecraft to get to the moon and back. Sending supplies and people to the space station is routine
@gravelydon7072
@gravelydon7072 9 дней назад
Heck, its almost to the point where SpaceX could send a Starship up to bring back both crew and capsule.
@Meatball2022
@Meatball2022 8 дней назад
@@gravelydon7072lol. Starship isn’t even pressurized. And can’t reenter. And has only landed once. And it can’t seem to get to orbit. And it costs 100x what falcon costs. I guess you’ve drank all that kool aid…
@TheReal_JG
@TheReal_JG 3 дня назад
​@Meatball2022 if you look at the mission parameters on Google and almost literally every minute from the SpaceX narrators on the live feed, the mission was never to achieve orbit, but to achieve a high enough speed upon reentering the atmosphere (IFT 4 achieved about 29,000 kph at 170 km above sea level, which is enough speed for peak reentering temperatures on the heat shield) to gauge survivability of the heat shield and to simulate a 'virtual tower' landing for both booster and vehicle. As of now, Starship is still in prototype phase and will continue to conduct these kinds of tests until Nasa certifies SpaceX to send astronauts. Keep in mind SpaceX has done this kind of prototype testing on the Falcon 9 and booster landings. Falcon 9 took 4 attempts to succeed and the booster landing took about 6.
@Meatball2022
@Meatball2022 3 дня назад
@@TheReal_JG falcon 9 booster failing didn’t cost a billion at a time
@Meatball2022
@Meatball2022 3 дня назад
@@TheReal_JG you’ve been sold a non existent bill of goods. Enjoy the kool aid. Starship is so bad it can’t even reach moon without refueling. That’s a planned failure.
@bio-techlarry9602
@bio-techlarry9602 9 дней назад
My experience with very close tolerance (thin) gasket leaks, just tightening the bolts after the gasket has been installed for some length of time only causes more leaks by deforming the gasket. Need to replace gasket. If "O" rings are used exceeding bolt torque specs won't help and could warp the whole assembly. If compression fittings, good luck.
@johnwyoder
@johnwyoder 9 дней назад
My thoughts exactly! They tightened the bolts, and thought that would fix it??? 🙄
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
Sounds like they asked the kid at Home Depot what to do. The correct method is to reassemble the joint and tighten the bolts to the specified torque. If it still leaks, take the joint apart and reassemble it again...and again...and again. Trying to fix a leak by tightening the bolts on a joint of this type is 100% the wrong thing to do.
@JimHurd-tv4fp
@JimHurd-tv4fp 9 дней назад
Wow someone with intellect. A breath of air in this land of low IQ zombies.👍👍👍
@broccanmacronain457
@broccanmacronain457 9 дней назад
I was on Submarines for 20 years and our QC people would never have allowed that. We would have had to pull the whole thing apart inspect it and get another seal installed and then tested again.
@bio-techlarry9602
@bio-techlarry9602 9 дней назад
@@broccanmacronain457 I agree. With more 4 more leaks being found and thrusters failing when maneuvering for docking, I suspect microfractures in the manifold or connecting plumbing after the trip. With the main Helium valve closed I suspect the Starliner is safe enough for now. But with that kind of pressure, no way would I repressurize the system back to working pressure with Starliner attached to the ISS.
@rfletch62
@rfletch62 9 дней назад
We used to have wings, now we're back to "Spam in a can". I hope the Dreamchaser can show them how it's done, and we get a manned version of that.
@guytech7310
@guytech7310 9 дней назад
Unlikely, The shuttle was basically a flying brick.
@antonnym214
@antonnym214 9 дней назад
It was a valve. Hello, McFly! It's ALWAYS a valve!
@advertisercommerce6990
@advertisercommerce6990 9 дней назад
Boeings issue is they cut key quality control personal as the spaceship fell behind schedule. Plus the massive overhead of Boeings corporate ways heavily on the program. While SpaceX does not have these same issues. Boeing was a great airplane manufacturer but now is only mediocre especially when quality is considered and with its massive corporate overhead, it must charge premium dollars for a late and not so great product. Their days as providing launch vehicles for NASA and other space agencies is coming to a close. Competition is eating their lunches and management refuses to take the steps necessary to meet the demands of the market.
@ltdees2362
@ltdees2362 9 дней назад
All "once good" things must come to an end...
@thomasboese3793
@thomasboese3793 9 дней назад
All of Boeing's problems started AFTER the last merger. The well-respected name BOEING was kept, and the failing McDonnell Douglas management filled all the leadership positions. A blind person can see the problems...
@cecillanter3207
@cecillanter3207 9 дней назад
so, are the astronauts asking for their life insurance policies increased ??
@fauxque5057
@fauxque5057 9 дней назад
I think I would decline a ride home. I'd wait for Uber X to come get me.
@apollo0510
@apollo0510 9 дней назад
This is a common trend in industry : Projects are driven by managers that have zero technical insight. Technicians and engineers that actually have the knowledge are treated like "expendables".
@allanbrand
@allanbrand 9 дней назад
The need to send SpaceX up to bring the astronauts back home.
@user-xr6tu3gw4r
@user-xr6tu3gw4r 9 дней назад
an observation, Boeing is Unionized while Space X is not AND compared to Boeing the enthusiasm of Space X employees is glaringly obvious.
@tanzanos
@tanzanos 9 дней назад
It has nothing to do with the union. However, it definitely has to do with the Wall Street beaurocrats running Boeing instead of engineers.
@sqengineer
@sqengineer 9 дней назад
There was nothing wrong with the space shuttle. Engineering said don't launch it in this low temperature environment... Bureaucrats said go anyway and it blew up just like engineering said it would. The tiles knocked off during launch could have been repaired while still in orbit, but the bureaucracy failed to do that. National aeronautics and Space administration should not be involved in spacecraft anymore. You don't see the Federal aviation administration running an airline do you??
@joshtaylor6911
@joshtaylor6911 9 дней назад
Its ironic Im watching this today here in Sydney, Australia as Apollo 13 was on TV last night........and Gene Kranz words are now more relevant than ever...... "What have we got on the spacecraft thats good......."😢
@toddw6716
@toddw6716 9 дней назад
How long before Boeing goes out of business
@wm7312
@wm7312 9 дней назад
Doubt it. Congress will bail them out
@44R0Ndin
@44R0Ndin 9 дней назад
Never, in typical "capitalism gone wild" fashion, they're "too big/important/entrenched" to fail. I think there's a great solution that we're stepping over when we encounter these "too big to fail" things: Nationalization. That's right, if Boeing can't run Boeing right, it gets taken over by the government (and no, the CEO's/management who caused this problem wouldn't get their golden parachutes, in fact they'd likely be imprisoned and/or their accounts and assets that the US can exert control over would be frozen, for failure to complete government contracts (such as CST-100 Starliner) to satisfaction). Of course this won't happen because the corporations have sufficient control over the government to be largely immune to things like "consequences of their actions" and that's why living in the US sucks so much right now.
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
"Too big to fail", unfortunately.
@jamesm.5455
@jamesm.5455 9 дней назад
How long before the US government goes out of business
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
@@jamesm.5455 We can only hope.
@danabishop5506
@danabishop5506 9 дней назад
Perhaps change the name of it from Starlinet to " grave liner " seems more appropriate.
@user-ok1eu4tn7l
@user-ok1eu4tn7l 9 дней назад
NASA will be Ringing SpaceX’s phones very soon………
@stabilo3170
@stabilo3170 9 дней назад
Boeing is discussing a new contract with NASA. The astronauts are flown to the ISS, but not returned to earth. They call it the "Half-Liner". A joke? Hmmm... not really.
@g2h0
@g2h0 9 дней назад
imagine if its just there forever now
@Brandonsux2024
@Brandonsux2024 9 дней назад
It's DEI Boeing!!! What did you expect??? I will never fly Boeing again.
@quixote5844
@quixote5844 9 дней назад
Blaming DEI is racist.
@davidj4662
@davidj4662 8 дней назад
@@quixote5844 even if it's true.
@napalmholocaust9093
@napalmholocaust9093 9 дней назад
Their executives should be taking the test flights, not valuable astronauts.
@jamesschenk
@jamesschenk 9 дней назад
When it absolutely has to fail its boeing
@petersiegrist7844
@petersiegrist7844 8 дней назад
So what can we expect. They built the Tacoma Narrows Bridge and it blew down. Then they built the floating bridge on Lake Washington and it floated away.
@richardboutin8522
@richardboutin8522 9 дней назад
That what happen when accountants take control friends
@wm7312
@wm7312 9 дней назад
Sounds like we have been seeing the result of D E I lately on Boeing products
@robertwest2879
@robertwest2879 9 дней назад
@@wm7312 And NASA
@carlingraham114
@carlingraham114 9 дней назад
Just wait until marketers gain the upper hand!
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
And when technical decisions are made by non-technical minds.
@richardboutin8522
@richardboutin8522 9 дней назад
Well you know they suck your blood remember Anderson accountants the vampire died that day
@cyrillawless
@cyrillawless 9 дней назад
Prime example of government compared to private. Space X is years ahead for a fraction of the price.
@valeriedahl
@valeriedahl 9 дней назад
Boeing got what.......... twice the funding as SpaceX to send two people into space while Dragon takes four. Sounds like the typical government "bargain."
@cyrillawless
@cyrillawless 9 дней назад
@@valeriedahl yes typical government contracts the world over. Wonder what politicians profited.
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
@@valeriedahl And Dragon was actually designed with 7 seats.
@thomasboese3793
@thomasboese3793 9 дней назад
@@ghost307 AND the Dragon comes in two versions, cargo and crew. Remember Inspration-4? It didn't dock at the ISS so the Dragon was fitted with a BIG viewing port under the nose hatch for the crew to enjoy the view.
@quixote5844
@quixote5844 9 дней назад
@@valeriedahlits called govt corruption.
@jamesanderson7831
@jamesanderson7831 9 дней назад
Starliner/Boeing can now brag about how they almost got it right !
@Dennis0824
@Dennis0824 9 дней назад
At least the door didn't fall off.
@WricNick
@WricNick 9 дней назад
Rumor is they made double sure that the door didn't blow off.
@brianferus9292
@brianferus9292 9 дней назад
Should have fixed it with some JB weld or duct tape.
@gravelydon7072
@gravelydon7072 9 дней назад
You left out the bailing wire, just like Boeing appears to have done.
@SDuapveer11
@SDuapveer11 8 дней назад
I think they might have run out of duct tape. Didn't you notice how much they used on the cone of the capsule?
@roberthance2412
@roberthance2412 9 дней назад
After all these years Nasa should have been the first to get back into the game I mean come on we went to the moon and now it takes years just to get back into space ? something seems a bit fishy IMO....
@pocarea512010
@pocarea512010 9 дней назад
They've killed people before. The deaths will be used to make speeches and "inspire" us to support future space "efforts" to honor the memory of our fallen. They don't really care. Profits are HUGE. Money Laundering is their focus. They realized they can tell us things cost more than they actually cost. The money then DISAPPEARS and they ask for MORE money. When We, The People, start to ask questions they stage a terrorist attack and start a (money laundering) war.
@bill5982
@bill5982 9 дней назад
This is the very definition of space junk. I wouldn't trust Boeing to make a safe tricycle.
@RALTBOB1
@RALTBOB1 9 дней назад
With the known insecurity of this vessel, my concern which was never really mentioned is the loss of the two astronauts. We cannot afford to lose any astronauts. It’ll set back the space program for an unknown period of time. And the fact that there is no real set time for these astronauts and the Starliner returning back home safely is unsettling.
@pocarea512010
@pocarea512010 9 дней назад
They've killed people before. The deaths will be used to make speeches and "inspire" us to support future space "efforts" to honor the memory of our fallen. They don't really care. Profits are HUGE. Money Laundering is their focus. They realized they can tell us things cost more than they actually cost. The money then DISAPPEARS and they ask for MORE money. When We, The People, start to ask questions they stage a terrorist attack and start a (money laundering) war.
@jeromehugh9624
@jeromehugh9624 9 дней назад
So they now have to deal with the leak in space rather than on earth. Kicking the can down the road
@AcmePotatoPackingPocatello
@AcmePotatoPackingPocatello 7 дней назад
Clear, concise , no nonsense delivery makes your stories EXCELLENT. Good job !
@rickaser2383
@rickaser2383 9 дней назад
At least this is one Boeing that hasn't lost a door.........yet.
@baronbattles4681
@baronbattles4681 8 дней назад
I’m really curious, has Boeing’s PC choice of employees rather than quality of abilities had an impact on their success?
@kaijen2688
@kaijen2688 9 дней назад
The issue is they lost 50 years of experience. Not to mention they outsourced so much of their reliable manufacturing.
@thomasjacques5286
@thomasjacques5286 9 дней назад
Maybe they can convert it into a new toilet for the ISS. The US should fund and fly SpaceX and move on.
@jamesn3513
@jamesn3513 9 дней назад
Yes, I knew about the problems but hey, let’s launch anyway with people onboard. NASA what the heck?
@gregking7926
@gregking7926 9 дней назад
Sounds like a very serious Q&A issue at Boeing that needs to be fixed in the worst way. Heads should roll over this.
@quixote5844
@quixote5844 9 дней назад
Heads roll? Heads should be jailed.
@richardpearcy6149
@richardpearcy6149 9 дней назад
Makes you wish for the best and brightest from the 60's and 70's don't it!
@danlowe8684
@danlowe8684 9 дней назад
It's one thing to run into problems after leaving the port. It's another thing to shove off with known problems you failed to repair while in port (Key Bridge).
@eman7892
@eman7892 9 дней назад
Guessing they will be calling Elon and as for a lift from SpaceX.. Dragon to the rescue?
@joshwebb1493
@joshwebb1493 9 дней назад
I so called it. I was worried that space astronauts would be coming back on it, after hearing about the leak. I was so worried for them. They should have SpaceX go over it to make the corrections because Boeing is failing.
@johncrumpley8702
@johncrumpley8702 9 дней назад
Hey Boeing!!! If it is broke and you know it... Don't fly it. Oh wait!!! Remember MCAS???
@thefrustratedtheologian6238
@thefrustratedtheologian6238 9 дней назад
Does Boeing offer on-site repair? :)
@advertisercommerce6990
@advertisercommerce6990 9 дней назад
LOL! I don't think so. It will only increase the number of personnel needing a ride back home on SpaceX!
@wm7312
@wm7312 9 дней назад
Lifetime warranty. Just bring the space craft to our shop and our very knowledgeable service advisor will take care.
@brandenwaltz9879
@brandenwaltz9879 9 дней назад
No car shield
@Wes4Trump
@Wes4Trump 9 дней назад
AAA😂
@thomasboese3793
@thomasboese3793 9 дней назад
@@Wes4Trump No it's: ASV: American Space Vehicles. It's at the ISS and AAA doesn't go there.
@brucec2635
@brucec2635 9 дней назад
The two passengers must have gotten massive hazardous duty pay.
@myvideosetc.8271
@myvideosetc.8271 9 дней назад
nah, I think Boeing just told them that the "witness convincing team" may make a visit to their families if they decline.
@pocarea512010
@pocarea512010 9 дней назад
​@@myvideosetc.8271They've killed people before. The deaths will be used to make speeches and "inspire" us to support future space "efforts" to honor the memory of our fallen. They don't really care. Profits are HUGE. Money Laundering is their focus. They realized they can tell us things cost more than they actually cost. The money then DISAPPEARS and they ask for MORE money. When We, The People, start to ask questions they stage a terrorist attack and start a (money laundering) war.
@edwardcarothers5011
@edwardcarothers5011 9 дней назад
NASA is not the NASA of the 60s and 70s.
@Shelley-ch8fs
@Shelley-ch8fs 8 дней назад
Those astronauts will be returning in “crew dragon” then, 😂
@grumpyoldsodinacellar3518
@grumpyoldsodinacellar3518 9 дней назад
Boeing = Bits Of Engine In Neighbours Garden 😂😂😂
@chrisrossi5176
@chrisrossi5176 9 дней назад
Does anything work on the thing?
@thomasboese3793
@thomasboese3793 9 дней назад
Do not know, the crew had diapers on for the trip.
@JohnElizondo
@JohnElizondo 9 дней назад
Yes! The DEI hiring practices work very well it seems...lol
@stephenlozano2816
@stephenlozano2816 9 дней назад
It takes some balls to fly in that Boeing Starliner. I’d be afraid the hatch would fly off during takeoff.
@chrisborey1734
@chrisborey1734 9 дней назад
If this keeps up the ISS will have a huge Rocket garage with broken down Rockets
@ghost307
@ghost307 9 дней назад
They should just hang a big sign on the ISS that reads "Sanford and Son".
@sebell69
@sebell69 9 дней назад
boing QC has left the factory and has not come back in over 20 yrs
@charlestorruella8591
@charlestorruella8591 9 дней назад
IT TOOK SPACEX A QUARTER OF THE TIME BOEING TOOK TO SCREW UP STARLINER
@robertollier3085
@robertollier3085 9 дней назад
Boeing is facing the same fate as Pan Am. It will suddenly no longer exist.
@seandonnellan1785
@seandonnellan1785 9 дней назад
It will take them six months to fix the problems before they can come back down.
@warp00009
@warp00009 9 дней назад
For everyone's safety, they should immediately move the Starliner away from the ISS (as it may literally be a ticking time bomb), then try an automatic reentry without any crew on board. Boeing should pay Space-X to send a Dragon up to retrieve the test pilot crew. NASA should write-off the whole Starliner program and invest in other alternatives. No one needs another fatal disaster in space!
@googleaccountuser3116
@googleaccountuser3116 9 дней назад
Why go to space when you can't even use the right bolt to secure an airplane window or door. Looks like mismanagement on the workfloor. 😕
@jamieK111
@jamieK111 7 дней назад
When I worked for NASA we had an all hands because the Constellation program (later became SLS) had $1B unspent and all centers had to find ways to burn it before the end of the year. The amount of $ NASA spent before turning LEO over to commercial space is mind boggling. X-34, X-37, X-38, SLI Constellation... all money pits with 0 launches.
@Nothinglefttosay
@Nothinglefttosay 5 дней назад
They should be sued for sending it up there knowing it wasn’t ready.
@davidjonah7402
@davidjonah7402 9 дней назад
And Starliner had to go rent a rocket to get their capsuled into space SpaceX developed the rocket developed a capsule and send it up years before Starliner ever got into space
@SillySausage-mq3so
@SillySausage-mq3so 3 дня назад
Why can't Boeing's engineers be as precise and efficient as their hitmen?
@dginia
@dginia 9 дней назад
As a video producer I thought robot voices would be a boon for narrations. Now, as a video consumer, I detest them. Why should I put credence to a narration when I know the human sounding voice is really from a machine? “I’ll see you in the next one,” he says at the end of this. Yeah, sure.
@wm7312
@wm7312 9 дней назад
I am sure the well-being of everyone involved in the space program is the most important factor. But it is shocking the amount of money not only spent but wasted. But who cares, is only paper. Surely the money wasted is not their concern
@chrisborey1734
@chrisborey1734 9 дней назад
Just as I mentioned earlier. Call space X to pick up the astronauts and bring them back to Earth. Or consider having a long term hotel room in space????????
@antonnym214
@antonnym214 9 дней назад
I definitely agree it was a crude mission.
@jrtstrategicapital560
@jrtstrategicapital560 9 дней назад
We want a REFUND OF OUR TAX MONEY FROM BOEING! Give it SPACE X!
@thavatutor
@thavatutor 9 дней назад
The starliner is the helium blower. I am worried for its safety.
@Pancho-villa666
@Pancho-villa666 9 дней назад
Boeing needs to increase their C E O's AND V P.'s more BONUS money for doing absolutely nothing .
@myfavoritemartian1
@myfavoritemartian1 9 дней назад
Look on the bright side.....The ISS now has a dandy storage closet! (Or they can fill Starliner with their garbage and when full, let it re-enter and burn up!) Now who rescues the Hubble? Or pushes the ISS up to a stable orbit?
@gtfg3800
@gtfg3800 9 дней назад
NASA has such an incredible history, why did they sub out construction to Boeing ? It certainly doesn't sound like it was cost effective. And especially given the current track record of Boeings most current passenger jets, maybe it's time to call Elon Musk & let him run with it.
@donjohnson3701
@donjohnson3701 9 дней назад
Looks like a no-brainer; SpaceX has it down! You don’t have to be a “rocket scientist” to figure out that Musk and SpaceX have figured out how to do it better and cheaper! I still can’t get over seeing the Falcon rockets return and land!
@rlic9206
@rlic9206 9 дней назад
The peoples money should have gone to a proven winner. Space X. Not to a buddy buddy system between congressman and Boeing.
@chrisanderson6204
@chrisanderson6204 8 дней назад
8:56 / 8:56 Starliner Is Not Coming Back where in this video is that mentioned?
@deltonlomatai2309
@deltonlomatai2309 9 дней назад
If it is not safe don't do it. Bring the starliner home unmanned and bring the astronaut home on starship. Boeing does not want the embarrassment of having the astronaut take an uber ride from space-x. NASA does not need the political embarrassment of losing astronauts to contractor pressure.
@madusmaxamus8670
@madusmaxamus8670 9 дней назад
Feeding ULA more money to get their space craft operational is throwing good money after bad down a bottomless pit. SpaceX has done it and more in less time and at a much less cost. Do we really want to wait longer and feed more money to ULA???
Далее
The Boeing Starliner Has A New Problem!
11:57
Просмотров 314 тыс.
This Is Why You Can’t Go To Antarctica
29:30
Просмотров 1,9 млн
Olive can see you 😱
01:00
Просмотров 6 млн
Low Altitude Alert! WN4069 KOKC 19 June 2024
11:28
Просмотров 202 тыс.
NASA Isn't Telling Us Something About The Moon
15:14
Просмотров 316 тыс.
SpaceX To Rescue  The Astronouts of Boeing's Starliner!
8:55