Starlink Mission 

Ikr. Just another day xD

Ikr

Maybe for you, but for me they are still exciting to see, and the main reason I watch these launches.

@@cjay2 dude, I've been in the SpaceX world since 2008 or 2009.

Soon it would be like parking a car into a garage

Private industry can do what government can not.

There will be a time when it’ll be just a few hours, even minutes apart. In fact, they were aiming for these two missions to be only 8 hours apart, before delays made it 22.5 hours

Used to be “unbelievable”

Still never gets old watching the first stage land back on Earth. Something NASA said couldn't be done is now done routinely almost every week. Looking forward to the future boost to my Internet link!

Agreed .. I love it

Interesting that they chose an internal Starlink launch to debut this new booster, suggesting few (if any) outside customers still have qualms about a flight-proven one. More often these Starlink missions get used more to prove out the envelope on reuse, as with recent 12th and 13th flights

@@jordanhazen7761 I would guess that now the safest first stage is one used once or twice. You can say it has been successfully tested 😀

It sure looked beautiful particularly landing on a well-seasoned Just Read the Instructions in a still, blue ocean.

@@jordanhazen7761 It is "flight-proven" so now SpaceX should start charging more for such boosters :D

@@desunistallerinc I'm sure they won't.

And no signal dropout this time! Anyone know for sure if they're now using Starlink itself for their video feed from the barge?

@@jordanhazen7761 Not sure but that live footage was from the 1st stage’s perspective. I wonder if they can use starlink for that camera too?

@@tomanderson8251 Starlink performance from moving vehicles is improving, and I guess a phased-array antenna could fit in the interstage, but they probably wouldn't want to incur the mass penalty of carrying that all the way up. I think both S1 & S2 transmit from small omni antennas on S-band (there are FCC filings showing exact frequencies), which can be relayed via the launch site at first, but likely switches to either the barge or a nearby support ship once over the horizon, and on to a satellite from there. (For S2 you can hear the callouts of ground-station handovers). Watching the landing again, there was still a slight breakup on touchdown (either from disturbance to the barge's position if the uplink is there, or maybe water vapr in the exhaust plume infringing on line-of-sight), but much shorter of one than previously

Not to mention the inherent unpredictability of winds and (to lesser degree) sea state in those final seconds, and the fact that a rocket stage moving engine-bells first through the air isn't exactly aerodynamically stable! Such impressive work, whoever developed and fine-tuned their control algorithms

This is the real miracle!!

I live in a city and I bought Starlink. It works as well as the cable we had before.

The moon is a plasma. No one can land on it.

Highly doubtful

@@farkasjulia stop huffing hair spray

@@anatomicallycorrectmuppets8180 stop getting the clot shots and drinking the fluoride

Too cool!

How can I use it ?

Starlink has been awesome. I'm way far north and I have better internet now than I ever have.

Same here! Starlink has been life changing for my family and I.

@@unotechrih8040 is it stable now? I remember i used it at my friend's house(a year ago) and it was frequently disconnecting. I trust elon, he makes his products better in a very short amount of time

@@madomk3438 more satellites means less drops as the constellation is more complete.

you are the ones to thank for this technology. if not for the subscribers, the company would have troubles

Well with only 6 landing failures (2 being FH cores) in 5 years it's gotten quite trivial for them.

Well they have the chat turned off again

@@stoffers6419 I had my volume low and at 21:22 it sounded like only one person was there clapping. 😂

@@TechWithBrett (Great news about the space-time bubble engine (warp drive) so we ask experimental physicists and engineers to use multiple experiments in order to create flight engines to travel at the speed of light between planets and regions on planet Earth) "This brings us to the new study, which scientists in the Advanced Propulsion Laboratory (APL) at Applied Physics just published in the peer-reviewed journal Classical and Quantum Gravity. In the report, the APL team unveils the world’s first model for a physical warp drive-one that doesn’t require negative energy. 👇👇👇 The study is understandably pretty thick (read the whole thing here), but here’s the gist of the model: Where the existing paradigm uses negative energy-exotic matter that doesn’t exist and can’t be generated within our current understanding of the universe-this new concept uses floating bubbles of spacetime rather than floating ships in spacetime so we ask experimental physicists and engineers to use multiple experiments in order to create flight engines to travel at the speed of light between planets and regions on planet Earth (Please send these requests to physicists and engineers in the aviation engine industry and mechanical engineering)

i want to watch a launch, wheres best place to watch? also how do you know when they are going to launch?

I wish a had a nickle for every time someone comments "never gets old".

Routine...

@@chadwickwood9843 never gets old :D

@@chadwickwood9843 "I have 2 nickles. Wich isn't a lot but its wierd that it happened twice right"

@@alexblack4470 (Great news about the space-time bubble engine (warp drive) so we ask experimental physicists and engineers to use multiple experiments in order to create flight engines to travel at the speed of light between planets and regions on planet Earth) "This brings us to the new study, which scientists in the Advanced Propulsion Laboratory (APL) at Applied Physics just published in the peer-reviewed journal Classical and Quantum Gravity. In the report, the APL team unveils the world’s first model for a physical warp drive-one that doesn’t require negative energy. 👇👇👇 The study is understandably pretty thick (read the whole thing here), but here’s the gist of the model: Where the existing paradigm uses negative energy-exotic matter that doesn’t exist and can’t be generated within our current understanding of the universe-this new concept uses floating bubbles of spacetime rather than floating ships in spacetime so we ask experimental physicists and engineers to use multiple experiments in order to create flight engines to travel at the speed of light between planets and regions on planet Earth (Please send these requests to physicists and engineers in the aviation engine industry and mechanical engineering)

We hope for more experiments in order to test the power of the engine and take advantage of errors and failed experiments because failure is the way to success and progress in the development of the light speed engine (EM Drive) Light Speed ​​Engine (EM Drive)

Light Speed ​​Engine (EM Drive)

We ask technicians and engineers to design and develop flight engines that operate at the speed of light in the field of aviation, and this is in order to teleport in the regions of the planet Earth and reach planets similar to Earth, such as (TOI-1231 b) Planet and (Gliese 486b)Planet and (TOI 700d) Planet Therefore, the design of engines and tests of flight engines at the speed of light must be expedited in order to turn science fiction into reality You should take advantage of this lost time in order to travel at the speed of light in space and enjoy these wonderful beautiful planets like (TOI-1231 b) Planet and (Gliese 486b)Planet and (TOI 700d) Planet (Please send the names of the planets and these requests also to the experimental physicists and engineers in the Department of Mechanical Engineering)

Hmmm.... Right

Notice too just how much of that velocity gets scrubbed off by atmospheric friction, when the engines aren't firing.

You won't get any response here. Kindly send a direct mail to Elon Musk using his official email address. Email: elon@spacexusa.info

They said it would be the 120th in the intro but then said 111th after the landing! At the beginning of their previous launch they said it would be their 112th! I think they've had so many crossings out and changes to the script that they've lost accurate track! :-p :-)

@@MartinSlucutt 120th total first stage landings, which includes 113 Falcon 9 landings. Other 7 are Falcon Heavy booster landings. Thats the count right now.

I never said he had no brain. I said he was an infantile douchebag. And I used to be huge fan. Now I am just still fanatical about space.

Does anyone know if others can link up to the internet they're creating?

Yup, look up typical flight profiles of ballistic missiles, which is what S1 is at that point- their "boost phase" can be surprisingly short. I'm glad SpaceX shows both S1 and S2 telemetry now. Full instantaeous orbital elements (apogee, perigee which starts off very negative, right ascension etc.) would be even better. ULA used to broadcast those, but stopped after they got in trouble from revealing too much on a classified DoD launch

This is because it is moving very fast when it shuts its engines down, and thus takes time to slow down and start moving in the other direction.

physics: kinetic energy, the energy of mass in motion

I always watch that too. I have seen it go up to 136km before returning.

@@eastafrica1020 The Falcon Heavy Center Core ascents are cool to watch!