@@SeanHenrichsT-Stoff and Z-Stoff? I’d use C-Stoff instead of Z-Stoff, more oomph for the mass, but being hypergolic makes that a rather … explosive mixture. But, indeed, HTP is much more ecological safe than many other rocket propulsion fuels. Although it has a taste for eating up any organic material, like humans. Unfortunately, it has not the greatest ISP, especially w/o something to burn.
I guess they have launched a first stage successfully using steam. Then it uses fuels for the later stages. With that said. They are trying to build a bigger rocket, right? It is literally 420 engines strapped in like a hexagonal shape! Fatter than it is tall at first. The makers do have proof of their work, but their dream rocket looks straight out of a KSP game made by someone like me. Scott Manley has talked about them. It is worth a watch on just ridiculous the concept is.
He actually did talk about them. It is real. The water rockets are for lower stages, and they got them to work as intended mostly except they were tethered. Lower stages are steam with the higher ones being chemical. These mother fuckers are wild though. They want to now build a huge one with 420 rockets basically strapped. It is wider than it is taller, and looks just ridiculous. They be trippin dawg. So the kids say. I think they are just nuts, and were stupid to ask investment showing that. Looks like something I would make in KSP. Anyway I think there might be some niche uses. Weapons come to mind. Why? Because storing/handling water is a lot easier than many other fuels. Water doesn't expire, and way less cost of maintenence. Anyway I think it is a cool demonstrator. I swear Scott Manley said it would carry a 20kg payload to space. That is pathetic if true.
You do know most rocket fuel reacts into water right? The most efficient is liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen, combusts to form H2O and a couple other H2 and O2 variants in smaller quantities
It will be capable of carrying a payload of 5 Weebles well downrange on a near orbital trajectory via the proximal parhelion to terminal velocity. Unfortunately eBay is currently sold out of Weebles.
My question is not not how powerful is it (superheated steam, when properly harnessed, is just like plasma when it comes to terms of energy releasef and power capabilities), but HOW do you make it? Boiling off that much water and storing the respective fuel (superheated water under IMMENSE PRESSURE) would take INSANE amounts of energy (fuel)! WHERE AND HOW do you generate that much clean energy on a rocket? Or HOW do you contain the superheated water long enough before you "flash" it to steam in the nozzle? This whole process just doesn't make sense to me. It seems impossible!
I would venture to say that the final stage, which is not stated to be steam, is more conventional and does 95% of the work. Steam does not get it to 137 miles and 17700 mph... not even close.
Which, not who. It is not a person flying off. I have no confidence in this presentation. It is severely flawed and should be removed and all involved, re-educated.
@yetanotherdude3955 the laws of physics apply . You couldn't carry enough water to create enough steam or carry enough batteries to create it . This is a troll post of fake technology in case you noticed 🤣
Agreed like it's hidrogen peroxide in this case if I'm not mistaken, but steam engine can also be said about liquid fuel hidrogen and oxigen which exists for like over 50 years? Btw way less enviromentally dangerous than a peroxide 'bomb' in case of a failure
There was a guy in California who killed himself because he accidentally deployed the parachute during the takeoff of his homemade steam-powered rocket.
A lot of rockets use hydrogen as fuel. It burns with oxygen to make water. Can’t get much cleaner than that. Peroxide propellant is a step backwards, and definitely not environmentally friendly or safe. Now, there are other propellants that aren’t as clean burning as hydrogen, but still seems better than this.
Better than Rocket is here Easy lift off Easy land on with antigravity Spaceship No Fire No Explosion No Flame Just Spin and Lift off Powered by Baterry Work base on Gravity just spinning by using Battery can fly in bad weather, plunge in the ocean even in outer space Can lift more than 100 Ton Earth which weight predict 600 trillion ton does not fall at the Sun because of centrifugal in orbitting, on the contrary it does not be thrown far go out the orbit line of hold by gravity at the Sun as orbit center. Gravity and centrifugal is equal called Equillibrium, thats why until now Earth which we was inhabited always rotate and circulate the Sun. Now we justly take example : how if the gravity used and centrifugal is negated? The Earth will float far leave the Sun. So that centrifugal can be used to fly far away if gravity eliminated. Finally how to eliminate gravity? It’s way rotate part of aircraft by horizontal. When that rotation faster centrifugal force getting greater and the gravity getting smaller, finally it lose the gravity and the aircraft start flying. Of course people would surprise: how the aircraft can keep rotate without fulcrums? Thats why we named that aircraft Shuttling System that is aircraft likes two disc adjoining attached in the midle as fulcrums: A. The Top part, we name Positive rotate to right, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. B. The Buttom part, we name Negative rotating to left, and the edges is getting thicker and havier. C. Middle Part , we name Neutral, air crew placed and also machine and everythings turning Negative and Positive at the same time. The aircraft can liftup added with explosion from the engine. However that aircraft construction later, let the engineer doit it, and we are sure the aircraft will bulletproof and also waterproof. . . In modern civilization where human being generally using flying saucer as vehicle, will a lot of change in lives either in materialism and in psychological. In materialism area will apply the change in life like. People no longger need roadway and rel road which spend large of energy, money, places, things and time, object place and time. People would utilize that area for habitat or for other need:
It's probably hydrogen peroxide decomposition. It's nothing new and craft like the X15 used combustion of ammonia with oxygen to release nitrogen and water vapor which is equally environmentally safe. For solid rockets, using ammonium nitrate as an oxidiser also releases no toxic fumes.
Unreliable isn't an issue most solid fueled rockets have. They can't be throttled or shut off arbitrarily. That's the only issue when using them on human rated rockets. That's why they're used as boosters only on human rated rockets.
Alright let me ask this question. what is the molecular composition of water? H20 am i right? The Space Shuttle uses hydrogen as it's fuel and oxygen as it's oxidizers. When both of these ignited inside a rocket engine it produces thrust. And guess what? Hydrogen H and oxygen O2 when combusted create water. ROCKET ENGINE EXHAUST IS QUITE LITERALLY JUST WATER, IT CAN'T BE MORE ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY THAN THAT. THIS SHIT IS JUST A SCAM MEANT TO ATTRACT INVESTORS
I think this is using HTP / T-stoff. Not remotely safe or nontoxic and certainly not battery powered. Basically in WWII the Germans decided to use this to make flying pilot-liquification machines know as the Me-163.
We have all the stuff around us we need to create magnificent things . All we need the oil companies in you know kerosene rockets like Elon Musk has to stop . I doubt that's going to happen anytime soon .
Why not just use hydrogen and oxygen it's exhaust is water and so it's just as eco friendly and a proven technology Secondly i wouldn't call soild feul dangerous or unreliable again look at the space shuttle its solid fuel engines never failed in flight to my knowledge and most missiles use soild fuel so its a very proven technology that by necessity is reliable
Iv seen this one, no people, it's not hydrogen peroxide. It's battery power, high output heating elements, turning just water to steam. Iv seen their stuff on RU-vid and it does work, and produce thrust. Tho I very much doubt It would be able to carry the required volume of water or battery power to run for very long
Physics. Energy has to come from somewhere. So much like an E vehicle, the pollution is simply remoted offsite. The energy required is considerable and my spitball says the only thing getting hoisted is the investors wallets.
I don't believe cientists, i believe people with brains, it's written one must love the Lord your God with all the hart, your soul and your whole brain 😊
