Stepping Barefoot on the Moon | Because Science Footnotes 

3rd like I'm here before this comment got famous.

I see you everywhere... are you Kami

Moon foot note would B♭

Why does everything you post get TC Jellal? Using celestial body magic for this? Or are you casting Meteor every video??

Why has Kyle not like this yet. This comment deserves Kyle-love.

*Sues Mr. Incredible for damages

Keyboard Man Joshua I've been trying to get my idea of making an episode about the velocipods that syndrome makes for his goons for about a year or 2

...and the original Gwen Stacy timeline.

When is youtube science-con?

@@noxid86 It was called EduCon and it happened last Wednesday in LA -- kH

He is my LEGAL father -- kH

Yes! The ULTIMATE Sith fuel!!!

Also you know lethal levels of radiation.

@@monauralsnail0669 Makes sense

What's making it get everywhere though? Not like it's blowing around.

"It's rough, it's coarse, it's irritating, and it gets EVERYWHERE" Whaddaya know, Anakin was right all along

Also, would the moon dirt cool off enough during night? Even if temperatures drop to negative a lot, the vaccuum of space would not let the dirt cool off very efficiently, no? But the sunlight would heat the sand quickly enough. So how does that work?

It is if I remember correctly. Most of the surface is also like a powder and sticks to everything. I think it was also discussed that the moon dust was hazardous to the suits and equipment as well.

@@SweGunner71 everything in the universe (as far as I know) radiates heat through infrared radiation

@@generalgrevious815 Sounds a lot like silica to me. Under a microscope, silica dust looks like razor blades. Any moving parts or micro crevasses would start to degrade pretty quickly.

@@Ltifone2014 For sure, but does it lose heat through infrared radiation during the moon night as quickly as it gains heat from the sun during the moon day? I mean, it's been mentioned so many times here that even if the space is REEEAAAALLLYYY cold, if you end up in space without a protective suit, cold is not what will kill you (by the way, how long would it take a human body to actually freeze solid in space - it would happen eventually, no?)

Ahahahhahahahahaha!

As another Zerg attack heads for your base...

POWER OVERWHELMING!!!

Time to break out Kerbal Space Program....XD

lol need more tesbian gas!!!

Yeah...but holding his head still wouldn't prevent the liquification of his brain against the inside of his skull.

@@SgtSupaman quicksilver doesn't move that fast.

@@nyetloki , it's not about the speed; it's the acceleration. Quicksilver taking off is definitely more G's than a human body can handle. He goes from standing still to moving faster than bullets almost instantly. 0 meters per second to almost 400 meters per second in less than half a second can result in over 100 G's (the max a human could survive is about 9).

@@SgtSupaman 0 to 400 ms in 0.5s is 81 gs. The human body can survive transversal (front/back) gs of up to 45 assuming the neck is protected. And differences between short and sustained gs. But quicksilver isn't going faster than mach 1 (no Sonic boom), he accelerates in a way to protect people from the extreme g forces (he takes precautions in both movies) and/or his mutant power actually provides like an aura of protection. Not as much as the flash or sometimes Superman but still. Note that he doesn't get hurt from colliding with things at his super human speeds or Sonic booms when going beyond Mach 1 in any comic or movie.

@@nyetloki , you're seriously trying to use the lack of sonic boom in a movie to prove something... We see him go from standing still to moving so fast that bullets are nearly standing still in comparison. This is WAY faster than 400 mps. I was intentionally underestimating and it still comes out to be not survivable. The lack of a sonic boom is not proof that the movie's physics are good, but an indication that they're actually worse. I also said "LESS than half a second". Yes, 0-400 in .5 is 82 Gs, but 0-400 in .4 is 102 Gs. However, even with the numbers you provided, you are confirming it isn't survivable (note how your 81 Gs is nearly twice your proposed survivable 45). His mutant power providing protection could absolutely be the case, but it has nothing to do with what I'm saying. In regards to comics, powers don't need to be analyzed based on real physics. They work because they work. My original reply was just pointing out that praising the physics of the movie is meaningless when there is something wrong with everything that is right.

Didn't expect to see Johnny Dangerously's title song in the comments section.

@@formerlyknownasunipony3488 you're welcome. 😁 Weird Al is the bomb.

In one of the Iron Man movies, I think it was 2, he caught a plane full of people (barrel of monkeys style) without injuring them by coming at them in the direction of their fall and gradually decelerating them until he was able to drop them in the ocean at a very low velocity.

We know what he did. 🌝

Mustafa Khan super chill like “ok”

*OPM's guitar riff intro plays*

agreed

@@jeffrey7923 I think you missed that my quote was a reference to "Gilligan's Island"... ;)

@@DocFarmer I didnt I've seen the entire show

Just like money can't buy love, but it can rent it by the half hour.

Caio Vieira No, you'd approach the speed of light asymptotically. The more energy you pour in the closer you get to the speed of light, just adding an additional 9 to 99.9999% the speed of light.

@@CarFreeSegnitz Would'nt that mean the acceleration is decreasing, thus "gravity effect" is going to become zero one day?

Traveling at these speeds results in time dilation. The universe sees you adding on those decimal places more and more slowly, but you experience them continuing to pile on at the same acceleration. What happens as the passage of time approaches 0? It's best not to think about these things.

You'd reach 0.1c (10% the speed of light) in about 5 weeks

such is their failed understanding of science

@thunderbird002 yes but I put "why not turn the moon into an ark instead a la Space 1999 style?"

@thunderbird002 about 2 years of travel, one timeloop and weird monsters and aliens but the Moon found a planet and the moon base inhabitants a new earth like planet to settle.

maybe if you turned every rocket on to 100% rather than ramp it up slowly then you'd cause problems but why would you do that? would you get in your car and start it by putting it in highest gear and flooring the accelerator untill you blew it up? gotta stop that black and white thinking and explore the grey area in between, because science!

@@ikitclaw7146 doesn't matter. The force you would need to exert on the Earth would exceed the strength of the material. You can't push 500lbs of styrofoam with your finger as an example.

@@williamwinder5011 If i slowly push against it to start with i can reach a high acceleration over time without breaking it, more than if i just jabbed really hard with 1 finger so it tore a hole, the point is you can slowly accelerate the planet over 100s of years rather than be in such a rush, the sun naturaly going giant isnt a fast process, that far in the future we would see it coming with plenty of time to creep out of the way, i havnt read/seen this story/movie but they seem to have some sort of urgency, in that case why take earth, cannibalize it, make generation ships and head out for a new home. they can push a world with giant thrusters, spaceships are much easier to push.

@@ikitclaw7146 the material can not support the 500psi it would take to move it regardless of how slowly you pushed. Another example would be setting a 10lbs weight on a cake.

I changed my username from Steven Pedersen