Scorsese made his passion project “silence” 2016 and could have ended it there…. But no he gave us a three and half hour gangster epic “the Irishman” with the three best mafia actors ever and his collabs….. and that would’ve been fine to end it there but no NOW he gives us this other 3 and half hour epic but this time set in a time place that he NEVER did before and that he NEVER delved into before like damn Scorsese… every film he feels the need to top himself and funny thing is he DOSENT HAVE TO. The man could rest on his achievements but no he STILL has stories to tell. Directors like him make me look at others and go “what’s ur excuse “?
@@otavioclassics and major studios are probably regretting that cause also I think they mentioned a three and half hour deniro Scorsese Pesci Pacino movie wouldn’t bring in audiences or whatever and although flower moon didn’t break any box office records or anything it did pretty well still in top 5, if people were interested in Scorsese 3 half hour Osage Native American film.. a lot of them prob would’ve saw Irishman too in theatres
@@Johnconno Nah... Spielberg has his fair share of bad movies, but that's the same man who also made Jaws, Schindler's List and Saving Private Ryan...that's enough to catapult him into the 🐐 list 🤷
@@rishabhprasad5417 that's without including ET, Jurassic Park, the Indy trilogy and Close Encounters. Even the ones a tier below like Munich, minority report and bridge of spies were extremely well made.
There are SPOILERS just so you know- I had to bail because I haven’t seen it yet so be careful if you haven’t seen it either. Excited to come back once I have.
I was initially a little bit worried about the length of this film, but i need not have worried, it is fantastic and the nearly 3 and a 1/2 hours flew by!
That’s my one main criticism about Steven. He needs to collaborate with past actors more frequently. Martin Scorsese, Robert De Niro, and Leonardo DiCaprio know the benefits of collaboration.
True, but I see that as part of Spielberg's prolificness and curiosity. He bounces around between so many wildly different tones and genres from picture to picture, sometimes even in the same year. I see his varied casting as a part of that.
felt bad for ernest , i don't think he was 100 % well, either from the war (though the was a cook) or just some mental health , i wanna know more about his background before saying he was this spineless guy even if the may be true its quite easy to say ... he felt like an good guy , pure but with something bodering him from within. along with external situations , did anyone even him knew he wasn't 100 % well and stable ? he lost as much as anyone in the movie , my guess and opinion :)
@@gpapa31 RU-vid took my comment off…But basically I was saying that yeah, Kubrick is on a whole different level than them, I just have been fanboys of S & S since I was a young child.
@@AlexThe1Menace it’s based on his love of cinema and it relates to him as a child. Fabelmans isn’t an exact representation of Spielbergs childhood either. It’s just aspects placed into a fictional scape. Also that’s why I said he “kinda” did it with Hugo
@@Ooth9999 ik I'm just pulling your leg lol. Although Fablemans, despite some changes, is very explicitly meant to reflect his life and upbringing. Hugo meanwhile is based on a book and is more about Marty's love of film rather than being about his own life.
Art it’s not sports. No such thing as better or worse at that level of craftsmanship anyway. They are both incredible in their own right. And above all great friends.
Stan the man hasn't existed in a couple of dozen years. Unless he faked his death to live even more reclusively. Which is kind a Kubrickian sorta thing to do actually.
This needs to happen: Angelina Jordan in Paris Steven Spielberg Angelina Jordan is a young singer who has amazed the world with her voice and style. She has performed in many countries and events, but one of her dreams was to sing in Paris, the city of love and art. That dream came true when she was invited by Steven Spielberg, the famous director, to be part of his new movie project. Spielberg was impressed by Angelina's talent and wanted her to sing the main theme song of his film, a romantic comedy set in Paris. Angelina was thrilled and accepted the offer, and soon she found herself in the beautiful French capital, recording the song and exploring the city with Spielberg. They had a great time together, and Angelina felt inspired by the culture and history of Paris. She also learned a lot from Spielberg, who shared his wisdom and experience with her. Angelina said that this was one of the best experiences of her life, and that she was grateful to Spielberg for giving her this opportunity.
It's devastating how Steven Spielberg cut Shia LaBeouf out of his life. I always believed that Shia could have helped Steven win six more Oscars if they kept their collaboration strong like Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro. Offering constructive criticism about Indiana Jones is an unacceptable reason to fire someone. The only obstacle that stands in the way of success for Steven is his inability to listen to the advice from the people around him. Steven recently lost 7 Oscars to Everything Everywhere All At Once. I'm glad that I'll never use my Bachelor's Degree in Film to become a movie director.
@@atlas3565 Because he made the quintessential movie about the horrors of genocide and has incredible influence in the US to shift the toxic policy it currently has towards Israel.
Marty should’ve made this a miniseries, as is there’s not enough time spent with the main players on their own in order to really get an idea of what’s going on in their head. If we had another hour or so in this runtime and the whole thing was split up into 4 episodes I think it would’ve had a bigger impact at the end. It’s still a fine movie but I do think there was too much to try and squeeze into a feature length film. So much of the screen time is dedicated to the actual plot and also showcasing the Osage culture and that’s all handled well, but I wish I actually saw more of DiCaprio’s thought process during all of this and the rationalizations he must be giving to himself about everything.
Christopher Nolan has easily overtaken these guys. In fact Spielberg was always a sentimental hack that appealed to the average dumb American movie goer. Even his serious movies are filled with cringe 😂
I really enjoy Nolan’s movies but there’s no way he’s better then Scorsese or more successful then Spielberg. Today he is a top 3 director but Scorsese and Spielberg are all time greats.
@@karansoni909 Quantity does correlate to quality. Spielberg has made many many trash movies whereas Nolan hasn't made one. Schindler's List was cringe, Spielberg was a typical stupid American taking something like the Holocaust and telling a feel good one man saving a few Jews story out of it lmao. That's his worst movie. Spielberg was the biggest director in the world at that point and he could've had the power to make a proper Holocaust movie but he didn't. Scorsese is good but not on Nolan's level, that's a fact.
@@karansoni909 Yeah, it's his biggest cringe movie. It's a bigger atrocity than his mediocre blockbuster movies. Go watch the short clip of Terry Gilliam's views on Spielberg and Schindlers List which explains my feelings on that movie and what's wrong with it.
@@elonif4125 Nolan just turned a 3 hour talky biopic into a near billion dollar movie. That's something Spielberg and Scorsese in their prime never came close to doing. Those two guys like most directors are just journeymen directors who just pick up a book or screenplay with no input. Nolan is an actual storyteller and it shows considering he went to a world class university studying English. He's numerous classes above Scorsese and Spielberg it's not even close lol.
