🤔It all goes down to the operator's skills/abilities and how concetrated/focuses they are on the proceedings. The husqvarna operator doesn't seem to be as focused as the stihl operator coz, at times he lags behind doing some other things instead of moving forward. Therefore, we can not conclude that husqvarna is less powerful, as the input from the two operators is not the same. Both machines are on par, and hoth are great 👍
both machine were badass machines, but Husqvarna head slower than Stihl head, because Husqvarna feed almost 2 inches of lines in each bump, so the line longer and the operator need to cut it down by shove it to the rock or hard surfaces 1:36 . Stihl head only feeds 1 inch line in each bump.
Ahí a las dos maquinas les quitaron la guarda, qué es donde también se corta automáticamente el hilo en cada golpe, yo tengo la husqvarna 555rxt y mis respetos, la stihl es mucho más cara en todo y me gusta más el desempeño de la sueca, el tanque de gasolina te rinde poco más de una hora trabajando duro! 💪🏼
@@jorgenjarl yeah i agree, overall i like husqvarna, i only respond to the trimmer head, although husqy trimmer head have longer lifespan because it have bearing, but line usage are higher than stihl. husqy trimmer head will feed 1.5 inches every bump. while stihl head feed only 1 inch.
@@roccobarca4558 Nice, that's a lot. I have 4,500 m² and usually I cannot cut more than 300 m² with one fuel tank per 45 minutes. I have a lot of fruit trees and weaker machine FS 260. I have seen one guy do 250 m² per 7,5 minutes with Husqvarna 555 RXT, but Stihl FS 560 seems even better.
