He has large hands! We don’t often comment about the physical gifts of some people. Nobody would doubt that Usain Bolt would run faster than a 5’9 person with shorter leg to torso ratio. The same here: the easiness of playing is just otherworldly: see Yuja’s performances for examples, and you will see that this stamina and power at this speed is simply not there; fortes are a little softer and not as effectively drawn. Pianos are more inaudible, etc. Nobody would question this reality with Rachmaninov…
As pianist, I heard a lot of classical pieces throughout my life, but this arrangement always amazes me of how well this piece resembles original orchestral Firebird.
I am a piano transcription/arrangement artist, it's what I love to do more than practically anything. I say with confidence, this is the greatest transcription I have ever heard. It has nothing to do with "reducing" or stripping a song down for piano, it's a matter of translating the exact energy and basically all the notes. Superb work by Agosti, what a genius to be able to transcribe without the aid of software. The score for this by the way, is insane. I have it sitting on my piano right now. There are often 3 staves dancing around each other, incredibly hard to read. My favorite is the Finale. I love how Piementossi plays the 7/4 quarter notes rubato. Every other performance, the pianists are strict with the timing of those notes. His interpretation is far more passionate, and relatable in my opinion
agosti only transcripted 3 dances from the firebird. but there's a guy that transcripted the whole thing to piano, the sheet is in imslp edit: the guy who transcripted the whole thing is stravinsky himself
I used to think this comment was about it being a cover of an orchestra. Then I learned it's about the piece requiring you to look at the notes like they are the instruments they are representing. Replicating the timbres with dynamics. Wow.
It just doesn't get any better than this. It is one of those moments where you don't even want to attempt to play this piece because his performance is already perfectly sufficent.
@@militaryandemergencyservic3286 The sheet music can be found online, certainly for purchase if you're willing to pay, I see Scribd has it, it's 25 pages and you can do a free 30-day free trial to download and print it, but I imagine it's a beast to play, far beyond my abilities. Good luck to you though, if you give it a go.
I'm having hardcore chills right now. I'm 1 minute in and I already know how this guy is going to rock the ending so perfectly. Completely here for this.
Danse Infernale du roi Kastchel and Finale were really intense, and that second half of Danse Infernale was so incredible, it blew me away! It was understandable how he then needed a breather with Berceuse, and to play slow and easy for a few minutes before the magnificent Finale
@@jasonhuang6023, oh yes, it's still difficult. But it's not as fast which makes it a degree easier. I guess I meant that it was a breather for him. I could never play Danse Infernale.
Who is this? What a technique melded by musicality...no fancying of shoulders or useless facial expressions...makes it easy to listen to what he is creating within heart and his hands.Awesome, impressed and so so enjoying.
I've never heard of this guy before but Holy Sweet Baby Jesus... Man, this guy's good. And here I thought Petrushka was a nightmare. Don't get me wrong, La semaine grasse is still monstrously difficult. This just add another title to my 'Impossible Musics' list.
I mean....just the intro....what an intro! This is how you start a piece.. Then there is the Berceuse, what a different world the Berceuse takes you to.
Amazing performance. I have looked at the score. It seems physically impossible. It is wonderful to actually see a real performance. Thank you for sharing this video in RU-vid. Francesco is super talented.
Met Francesco tonight. He plans to transcribe an extra 2-ish minutes that were left out by Agosti and play it sometime in the near-future. I'm looking forward to seeing another performance.
In some ways this is even better than the orchestra version, as I've yet to hear any orchestra whose articulation was this sharp and whose tempo felt this exhilarating. Even the pros tend to not quite get it right. It's understandable, of course, Stravinsky's rhythms are stupidly hard sometimes, and a pianist who has practiced this for hundreds of hours knows the piece inside and out and can take liberties whereas an orchestra which has one day to rehearse together before the performance can't do that. Still, this my new reference for how the Infernal Dance *should* sound.
This comment reminds me: even Stravinsky wasn’t quite sure how the Firebird *should* sound. There is the magnificent 1910 original (and the 1911 suite, identical to the ballet), then came the 1919 suite, which was IMO already a sort of castrated version done at the dawn of his neoclassical period. You could say that by downsizing the orchestra, Stravinsky wanted to make it more “performable” (not everyone has 3 harps), but that doesn’t excuse it from all its half-baked, jerry-built orchestration choices, which I could go on about for months how much of a downgrade they are. Then came the cherry on top, the truly execrable, botched 1945 version - which thank God, almost nobody plays - and what I assume only saw the light of day so that Igor could cash in on his royalties in the USA.
This man lives through music, becomes music in his playing and is music. I am overwhelmed at this performance. Truly an inspirational musician. Bravo Francesco!!!!
We can hear its gorgeous, intense sound but at the same time can see his delicate technique as a Virtuoso. Moreover, his original glissandi sound effectively. There will never be another it.
This is the performance of God quality of a God quality piece of music. It's like witnessing the top of Everest and you get to fly away instead of having to climb down.
Grandissimo Francesco Piemontesi...hai dato all'Uccello di Fuoco la predominanza Ritmica che merita, fuori da ogni mediazione melodica o sinfonica. Emerge la Danza Primitiva da cui origina la Vita stessa. E con essa la Musica. Bravissimo, Maestro. Biologia musicale.... Marco Rotondi
Who is this marvelous performer? It is perfect, tempo, accuracy et.al. This has to be one of the most difficult pieces to perform. Orchestra is still my favorite--guess I've always heard it that way. The video photographer needs some piano lessons, why cut away from the keyboard on the best parts?
Bart Watts I have seen the score many times. Here are some pieces that are considerably more difficult: Alkan Le Preux, Alkan solo concerto, Liszt 1838 Paganini etudes, Liszt’s 2nd version of the transcendental etudes (not the 1851 version performed today), Liszt’ La Clochette fantasy, Liszt/Beethoven 9, Godowsky’s Passacaglia, Godowsky’s piano sonata, the majority of the Mereaux etudes, etc. you get my point
@@jackcurley1591 1) You have mentioned so few pieced that the claim "one of the most difficult" remains undisputed and your entire comment is pointless. 2) Le Preux is an excercise in very fast octaves, nothing more. 3) Alkan's solo concerto is 5 times as long as this piece and is mostly difficult because of its length. Not comparable. 4) Both the 1838 paganini etudes and transcendental etudes aren't "more difficult" than the revised versions-they're just written much worse and are awkward and uncomfortable to play. This is why Liszt fixed them and nobody plays them anymore. Bart was talking about pieces in the repertoire; these arent. Obviously, any idiot can write a piece that consists of repeated chords or octaves at unplayable speeds, 12ths spreads or just physiologically impossible intervals without any effort whatsoever. This is absolutely meaningless, however. If there's no musical merit to it and nobody performs it, it's irrelevant. Incidentally, this applies to the Meraux etudes as well, of which only 3 or 4 are that difficult at any rate, and only if you choose to play them fast, which again, is irrelevant as there's absolutely no musical merit to playing them fast (or slow). You might as well argue that the chopin etudes are harder stil, provided you play them at double speed. Not repertoire. Not relevant. 5) Godowsky passacaglia could arguably have some variations that are as or more technically difficult than this one, but again, it's a much longer piece and not comparable at all. 6) Godowsky's sonata is technically easier than the variations, even longer, and its difficulty is so utterly different from this piece that it wouldn't even be comparable if it wasn't 5 times as long. 7) The Beethoven/Liszt transcription is literally over an hour longer than this piece. The most technically difficult parts are in the fourth movement, which only exists transcribed for two pianos.
Well probably not exactly. There's always someone better than you. And lots harder pieces than this that other pianists play as well or better than he played this piece.
When Erik said he was the most talented of this generation, that was his opinion. You didn't need to comment on his opinion and try to validate it with your own opinion. Thanks but no thanks.
+Erik Vertriest Daniil Trifonov, Denis Matsuev, Evgeny Kissin, Yuja Wang...just to name a few that immediately come to mind. I'm sure there's quite a few more as well.
Dude on the cam controller likely did this live. Post editing means you can look at it all at once and go "hmm, maybe this" unfortunately we're stuck with the guy who did things as best he could at the moment. Also, if something happened to that camera (it moved away, or it was shook or dropped) the controller would switch to a different camera. So there could be a reason for it.
Stravinsky was one of the great orchestrators, and the orchestral version of this is of course as beautiful as can be. But a piano transcription like this shows how much of the beauty does depend just on the actual notes. He was also famous for the distinctive spacing of the notes in the chords, which also changes the character of the harmony. But that shows up more in later works than this. (Think of the unmistakable E Minor chord that opens Symphony of Psalms -- different from any other E Minor chord you have ever heard, and instantly recognizable.)