@@bestmusic9879 you can check my twitter, I've always had the same one, it's me. (Twitter.com/hypnotistKate) I have been pretty dysphoric and not wanting to use my voice recently, I'm sorry I know these are worse quality videos for it but it's hard to want to make videos using voice when it makes me extremely depressed. I go literal days in my outside the internet life without saying a single word sometimes I really need to do voice training, really badly so that this can stop. It's just so hard to start and I've tried before and I just don't know exactly how to do it on my own so I might get lessons which is money I don't have
I don't know if you thought this through. Reading requires alertness. The whole point of hypnosis is to _strip_ the subject of alertness. Which means that, although many viewers played along with your instructions, they had to be awake and alert in order to read them; playing along is all they're doing. And in case RU-vid edits my response to your reply below: Characterizing _explaining_ as _"mansplaining"_ is ignorant and sexist. Being ignorant and sexist doesn't put you on the moral or intellectual high ground -- it keeps you off it. Addendum for the purpose of prevention of 'memory-holing': Nobody achieves trance through text hypnosis, for the reason already explained. Now, you may have chosen to cosplay as "Hit-Girl" from the movie Kick-Ass, and you may choose to pretend to take umbrage at having basic cognitive mechanics pointed out to you, but that doesn't actually _change_ basic cognitive mechanics. What you call 'trance' is _not_ trance; it's _hyperfocus._ They're not the same thing, and the fact that someone has to tell you that comes down to the fact that you don't already know it. The fact that the one telling you there's a difference happens to be male doesn't make it 'mansplaining'. It's just _ex_ splaining. I'm also going to append this to my original comment so that you can't memory hole it like you seem to have done with previous comments.
wow did i just get hypnosis mansplained to me lol i assure you you are extremely incorrect about text hypnosis not working, and also tbh it sounds like you're just incorrect about what hypnosis, fundamentally, is. highly recommend doing some actual reading on the subject
@@HypnoPrincessKate Wow, did I just have basic logic broadsplained? (See how sexist and fucking stupid that is? Probably not.) You also didn't actually present a rational comeback. Reading requires focus. Hypnosis requires _defocus._ You can't focus and defocus somebody simultaneously. Now you go ahead and throw out another anti-male sexist derpshot. Go ahead.
@@JohnCastleSmokeless do you know not know what mansplaining is? "explaining" something to a woman, in a way that is not just incorrect but condescending as hell, is quite LITERALLY what mansplaining is. I don't need to be on a "moral or intellectual high ground", I know you don't know what you're talking about & so does every other person in the world who achieves trance through text hypnosis.
@@HypnoPrincessKate Yes, I know what it is. It's when a man explains something that, if she'd thought about it, a woman would have figured out for herself already but which, based on results, she hasn't. I don't know what it's called when a man has to do the same thing with another man. I don't think anti-male sexist bigots have come up with a buzzword for that yet.
@@HypnoPrincessKate Nobody achieves trance through text hypnosis, for the reason already explained. Now, you may have chosen to cosplay as "Hit-Girl" from the movie Kick-Ass, and you may choose to pretend to take umbrage at having basic cognitive mechanics pointed out to you, but that doesn't actually _change_ basic cognitive mechanics. What you call 'trance' is _not_ trance; it's _hyperfocus._ They're not the same thing, and the fact that someone has to tell you that comes down to the fact that you don't already know it. The fact that the one telling you there's a difference happens to be male doesn't make it 'mansplaining'. It's just _ex_ splaining. I'm also going to append this to my original comment so that you can't memory hole it like you seem to have done with previous comments.
