Subsonic Expansion Gel Block test! 300blk with the Lehigh Defense 194gr Max Expansion Bullet!! 

Thanks!!

@@rob409BOI I agree completely, but I think Hornady’s got way to much money invested in lead core copper jacketed bullets. Even with the 8.6 Blackout (.338cal) Hornady is way behind. The CX is the only bullet they make that can survive a supersonic loading in the 1/3 twist barrel. The lead cores just spin apart, right out of the barrel. Proved it last weekend with a small test set with SP and SST!! 😂.

The 190 sub x is a very accurate bullet and if you notice it only expands at the 1/3 area I believe if the designed a 2.0 version make it crumple down to the halfway point or more would be huge expansion

I have some REX for the .458socom. I’ll be testing those later too. 😉

@@GalloPazzesco Awesome!! Thanks!!

@@bobborlog1677 👍🏻, same here. All great choices. 😉

@@briancsmith11 with the chrono data at the end you could build a ballistics chart and see what the velocities would be at any given distance. That, and manufacturers data on expansion at different velocities would give you a real good idea. I wouldn’t expect much performance difference at 100-150yrds as the velocity loss wouldn’t be too great yet. I’m talking with Barnes Bullets now on expansion velocities for the supersonic 8.6 loads and converting them in my ballistics chart. At some point I’m wanting to load some of them “down” to corresponding velocities for 200, 300, 400 yrds etc. It’s pretty time consuming so I have to pick and choose which rabbit holes I end up diving into 😂😂😉

@@bobborlog1677 The short answer is monitization. Lol. Long answer, RU-vid is not very suppressor friendly. I have a Hybrid 46M but if I use it during videos it needs to be off-screen when I take the shot or they’ll gig the video and reduce its ability to run adds.